|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2006-06-08 02:39:26
|
As ever, thanks to all who worked on it. I thought 3.1.X was a pretty good series, but 3.2.0 definitely is a worthy successor. The repo is now un-frozen, as Tom already noticed, hack on, therefore :) J |
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2006-06-08 03:47:30
|
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Julian Seward wrote: > As ever, thanks to all who worked on it. I thought 3.1.X was a pretty > good series, but 3.2.0 definitely is a worthy successor. It'll be interesting to see if the performance improvements are noticed. I certainly hope so, since so many people mentioned performance in last year's survey. Nick |