|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2006-03-28 00:05:24
|
Author: njn Date: 2006-03-28 01:05:16 +0100 (Tue, 28 Mar 2006) New Revision: 5794 Log: tweak Modified: trunk/NEWS Modified: trunk/NEWS =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- trunk/NEWS 2006-03-27 12:23:44 UTC (rev 5793) +++ trunk/NEWS 2006-03-28 00:05:16 UTC (rev 5794) @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ In detail: =20 - Performance is much improved: programs typically run 1.20--1.40 times - faster under Memcheck, with an average of about 1.30 for the programs = we - tested it on. The improvements for Nulgrind are similar. We haven't - measured Cachegrind and Massif, they should be also be faster, but wit= h a - smaller improvement. We are interested to hear what speed-ups users g= et. + faster under Memcheck (much more for some unusual programs) with an + average of about 1.30 for the programs we tested it on. The improveme= nts + for Nulgrind are similar. We haven't measured Cachegrind and Massif, = they + should be also be faster, but with smaller improvements. We are + interested to hear what speed-ups users get. =20 - Memcheck uses much less memory. The amount of shadow memory used -- w= hich accounts for a large percentage of all of Memcheck's memory overhead -= - |