You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
(7) |
3
(11) |
4
(3) |
5
(6) |
|
6
(14) |
7
(25) |
8
(14) |
9
(21) |
10
(16) |
11
(3) |
12
(12) |
|
13
|
14
(5) |
15
(11) |
16
(4) |
17
(18) |
18
(15) |
19
|
|
20
(1) |
21
(14) |
22
(7) |
23
(14) |
24
(9) |
25
(14) |
26
(5) |
|
27
(12) |
28
(1) |
29
(5) |
30
|
|
|
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2011-11-11 14:19:26
|
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Philippe Waroquiers <phi...@sk...> wrote: > If I understand well, the idea would be that the CFS should handle specially > a process made of multiple threads, all burning CPUs, but only one thread > at a time burning CPU. The CFS would have to avoid switching them from > cpu, as this interacts badly with cpu frequency scaling. There is already a "cpu.shares" variable that allows to configure the relative scheduling priority of a group of processes. It's probably not that hard to add a cgroup variable that tells the scheduler to schedule all threads of a cgroup on the same CPU. $ uname -r 3.1.0-rc10+ $ mount -t cgroup none /sys/fs/cgroup $ mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/valgrind $ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/valgrind/cpu.shares 1024 Bart. |
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2011-11-11 14:13:22
|
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Rich Coe <rc...@wi...> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:31:55 +0000 (GMT) > sv...@va... wrote: >> Author: bart >> Date: 2011-11-09 17:31:54 +0000 (Wed, 09 Nov 2011) >> New Revision: 12263 >> Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar.c >> +#include <linux/mman.h> // MREMAP_FIXED > > Shouldn't this be #include <sys/mman.h> ??? > > linux/mman.h is the kernel's header file ... As far as I can see on RHEL 4 the definition of MREMAP_FIXED is missing in the glibc header files and is only present in the kernel header files. So either <linux/mman.h> has to be included or an explicit definition of MREMAP_FIXED has to be provided. Bart. |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2011-11-11 04:09:27
|
Author: florian Date: 2011-11-11 04:04:12 +0000 (Fri, 11 Nov 2011) New Revision: 12267 Log: Document test results. Modified: trunk/auxprogs/gsl16test trunk/auxprogs/gsl19test Modified: trunk/auxprogs/gsl16test =================================================================== --- trunk/auxprogs/gsl16test 2011-11-09 23:42:41 UTC (rev 12266) +++ trunk/auxprogs/gsl16test 2011-11-11 04:04:12 UTC (rev 12267) @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ # name of Valgrind # args for Valgrind +# Results: 3.7.0 --tool=none +# x86 1 failure Ubuntu 10.10 +# FAIL: qawo(f456) elist (7.25063790881233303e-15 observed vs 7.25922435194575979e-15 expected) +# same failure was also present in 3.6.1 +# s390x 0 failures on z900 running RHEL4 if [ $# != 5 ] then Modified: trunk/auxprogs/gsl19test =================================================================== --- trunk/auxprogs/gsl19test 2011-11-09 23:42:41 UTC (rev 12266) +++ trunk/auxprogs/gsl19test 2011-11-11 04:04:12 UTC (rev 12267) @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ # name of Valgrind # args for Valgrind +# Results: 3.7.0 --tool=none +# x86 1 failure Ubuntu 10.10 +# FAIL: qawo(f456) elist (7.25063790881233303e-15 observed vs 7.25922435194575979e-15 expected) +# same failure was also present in 3.6.1 +# s390x 0 failures on z196 running SLES11 if [ $# != 5 ] then |