You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(9) |
|
2
(24) |
3
(22) |
4
(16) |
5
(32) |
6
(19) |
7
(22) |
8
(30) |
|
9
(21) |
10
(21) |
11
(20) |
12
(13) |
13
(24) |
14
(23) |
15
(13) |
|
16
(11) |
17
(6) |
18
(12) |
19
(17) |
20
(26) |
21
(25) |
22
(37) |
|
23
(32) |
24
(21) |
25
(30) |
26
(22) |
27
(24) |
28
(19) |
29
(9) |
|
30
(5) |
31
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Florian K. <br...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 22:41:53
|
On 10/10/2011 05:18 PM, Julian Seward wrote: > > Also, it seems like filter_memcheck didn't make it into the tarball. Likely. There is plenty more that needs fixing, I used Bart scripts from drd/Testing.txt #4 and #5 and they pointed out quite a few issues. > The tarball GDB regtests now fail like this > I never got that far because building the docs failed (known issue). A make dist-no-docs target would be great. It would enable everybody to build the tarball and run regtest with it. Florian |
|
From: Florian K. <br...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 22:30:23
|
On 10/10/2011 04:58 PM, Julian Seward wrote:
> On Saturday, October 08, 2011, Florian Krohm wrote:
>
> There are two different issues (not just for SSSE3, but for testing any
> instruction set extension):
>
> (1) can the assembler handle these instructions? If not, we can't build
> the relevant test cases. This is what the configure test checks for.
>
> (2) does the CPU support the instructions? If not, then we don't try
> to run the test cases. This is what x86_amd64_features tests.
>
Right, I understand. But we shouldn't be attempting to execute a test
that was not built. This is an issue of the make machinery, independent
of how it was determined whether the test can be built or whether the
hardware can execute it.
There are a few approaches
(1) Write the test in a way that it is independent of the tool chain
version (using .byte, .word etc instead of mnemonics). This is
what we've done for s390. But it's probably not feasible to recode
all existing testcases.
(2) Fix the make machinery to not execute the test if the executable
does not exist
(3) Have an implicit prereq that tests the existence of what is
specified in the prog: line
I haven't looked at how make regtest works but would guess that #3 might
be the simplest way to fix it.
> So maybe you have an old toolchain?
Not really:
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.20.51-system.20100908
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.4.4-14ubuntu5) 4.4.5
Florian
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 21:18:43
|
On Monday, October 10, 2011, Julian Seward wrote: > mcsignopass now hangs repeatably for me on Ubuntu 10.04.3 64-bit. It > was OK a few days ago. Philippe, any idea what changed? Also, it seems like filter_memcheck didn't make it into the tarball. The tarball GDB regtests now fail like this ./../memcheck/tests/filter_stderr: 25: ./../memcheck/tests/../../memcheck/tests/filter_memcheck: not found But anyway, let's first get to a stable situation w/ the regtests in the checkout tree. J |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 21:07:36
|
mcsignopass now hangs repeatably for me on Ubuntu 10.04.3 64-bit. It was OK a few days ago. Philippe, any idea what changed? J |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 21:02:28
|
On Sunday, October 09, 2011, Florian Krohm wrote: > On 10/08/2011 06:22 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > > So, I wrote a script which checks that all *.exp or *.vgtest or *.gdb > > (and similar) are present in the Makefile.am. > > > > Now, I just need to not forget the run the script :). > > > > Maybe this check could be part of make regtest ? > > (then nobody can forget anymore) > > I for one would welcome the integration of your script in make regtest. Yes, me too. Or into make dist. Philippe, can you show the script? J |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 20:59:37
|
On Saturday, October 08, 2011, Florian Krohm wrote:
> On my x86 netbook the tests
>
> none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3
> none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3_misaligned
>
> are failing because configure and x86_amd64_features do not agree about
> the presence of SSSE3. configure thinks it is not supported,
> x86_amd64_features returns 0 thereby indicating support. I think that
> x86_amd64_features is right. See /proc/cpuinfo below.
>
> During "make regtest" the make process attempts to execute e.g
> insn_ssse3 which does not exist.
> Curious... Is this the way it is supposed to work? I mean if it has
> been determined (during configury) that the test cannot run and
> therefore the executable has not been built, why trying to invoke it?
There are two different issues (not just for SSSE3, but for testing any
instruction set extension):
(1) can the assembler handle these instructions? If not, we can't build
the relevant test cases. This is what the configure test checks for.
(2) does the CPU support the instructions? If not, then we don't try
to run the test cases. This is what x86_amd64_features tests.
(1) is basically a property of how-old-is-your-distro-toolchain, and
(2) is obviously a property of the hardware.
So maybe you have an old toolchain? But SSSE3 is pretty old, so I am
surprised the configure check failed.
J
|
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-10-10 20:28:48
|
valgrind revision: 12132 VEX revision: 2215 GCC version: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.11.1 (20100118), by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.32.45-0.3-default s390x Vendor version: Welcome to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 (s390x) - Kernel %r (%t). Nightly build on sless390 ( SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 gcc 4.3.4 on z196 (s390x) ) Started at 2011-10-10 21:45:01 CEST Ended at 2011-10-10 22:28:40 CEST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 499 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-10-10 20:06:49
|
valgrind revision: 12132 VEX revision: 2215 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.5.3 20110121 (Red Hat 4.5.3-3) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.12.1, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.38-06555.ga44f99c.48.x.20110321-s390xgit s390x Vendor version: unknown Nightly build on fedora390 ( Fedora 13/14/15 mix with gcc 3.5.3 on z196 (s390x) ) Started at 2011-10-10 21:45:01 CEST Ended at 2011-10-10 22:06:58 CEST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 498 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2011-10-10 14:59:23
|
Philippe Waroquiers wrote: >> The regression tests on POWER7/SLES 11 SP1 (using Oct 6, 2011 SVN) actually compare quite favorably to Valgrind 3.6.1 on a POWER5 >> (POWER7 support did not yet exist in 3.6.1 timeframe). For reference, here are the results: > > The attached diff files also contains differences for mcbreak, but mcbreak is not in the below list ??? >> gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallRU (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) > These 3 failures+the mcbreak seems linked to problems to do an inferior function call. > (see below). > >> gdbserver_tests/mcsignopass (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcsignopass (stdoutB) >> gdbserver_tests/mcsigpass (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcsigpass (stdoutB) > The above tests are based on none/tests/faultstatus which also fails. > I think that if faultstatus is fixed, these should also work. I opened https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283709 to address the faultstatus problem. This fix also allows mcsignopass and mcsigpass to pass on my ppc64/SLES 11 SP system. -Maynard [snip] |
|
From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2011-10-10 13:16:08
|
Philippe Waroquiers wrote: >> The regression tests on POWER7/SLES 11 SP1 (using Oct 6, 2011 SVN) actually compare quite favorably to Valgrind 3.6.1 on a POWER5 >> (POWER7 support did not yet exist in 3.6.1 timeframe). For reference, here are the results: > > The attached diff files also contains differences for mcbreak, but mcbreak is not in the below list ??? Right . . . copy/paste error. >> gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallRU (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) > These 3 failures+the mcbreak seems linked to problems to do an inferior function call. > (see below). > >> gdbserver_tests/mcsignopass (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcsignopass (stdoutB) >> gdbserver_tests/mcsigpass (stderr) >> gdbserver_tests/mcsigpass (stdoutB) > The above tests are based on none/tests/faultstatus which also fails. > I think that if faultstatus is fixed, these should also work. OK, I'll look at faultstatus. > >> gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) >> gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) > These two are failing as the filter script does not properly remove or transform > the power7 specific line: > from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6 > and > 0x........ in .__GI_kill () from /lib64/power7/libc.so.6 > The (already horrible) gdbserver_tests/filter_gdb should be further enhanced to filter or transform these. Should I open a bug report and attach a patch for this? > ... >> Unfortunately, POWER5/SLES 10 SP3 (current SVN) compared much worse to Valgrind 3.6.1 -- lots of callgrind and helgrind failures. >> Whereas results from an April 15 snapshot of SVN was almost identical to the 3.6.1 results (with just two extra callgrind >> testcases failing). >> Also, some gdbserver tests usually hang the regtest on this processor; thus, I have to remove the gdbserver/*vgtest files in order >> to get >> 'make regtest' to complete. I have seen occasional hangs of gdbserver tests on POWER7, too, but not often. > > Hanging tests are often caused by inferior function calls not working properly. A possible technique to investigate this > is to compare the behaviour of the "standard" gdbserver with the valgrind gdbserver > (see gdbserver_tests/README_DEVELOPERS). I'll try to find some time to look at this later in the week. Thanks for the help! -Maynard > > Philippe > |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-10-10 08:37:09
|
On 10/10/11 07:25, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Any chance you can have a look at the runtime failure of err_disable4 on > bristol and change the stack size into something that does not cause a > failure ? Well it's not clear there is any such value... Basically it is failing at about thread 449 with EAGAIN and the actual stack size does seem to affect that much. Even massive increases in the requested stack only reduce that failure point by one or two. Given that the requested stack size is already close to the minimum there isn't any real scope for decreasing it further. My suspicion is that it is some sort of internal glibc limit anyway as the hardware (and kernel) is exactly the same (x86_64 with 24Gb of memory) as for the other, later, Fedora versions that are working. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: <br...@ac...> - 2011-10-10 08:22:25
|
valgrind revision: 12131
VEX revision: 2214
GCC version: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4, by Roland McGrath et al.
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.9-42.EL s390x
Vendor version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
Nightly build on z900 ( s390x build on z900 )
Started at 2011-10-10 01:42:22 EDT
Ended at 2011-10-10 04:28:56 EDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 465 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:05:24.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:26:06.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:05:25.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:26:30.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-10 03:05:25.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:26:30.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:42.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:06:44.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:42.000000000 -0400
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:07:13.000000000 -0400
@@ -20,5 +20,47 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1096 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:41.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:07:36.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:41.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-10 04:08:42.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:55.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:36:10.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:55.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:40:43.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2011-10-10 03:04:54.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:40:43.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 03:04:55.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:48:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2011-10-10 03:04:54.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:48:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:43:18.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:01:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:43:18.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:02:10.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2011-10-10 01:43:18.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 03:02:10.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:34.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:42:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:33.000000000 -0400
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:43:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -20,5 +20,26 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1048 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:33.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:43:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:33.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:44:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:47.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:13:55.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:47.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:18:28.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2011-10-10 01:42:47.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:18:28.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 01:42:47.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:25:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2011-10-10 01:42:46.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-10-10 02:25:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2011-10-10 08:13:38
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2011-10-10 09:08:53 +0100 (Mon, 10 Oct 2011)
New Revision: 2215
Log:
Move a few more stragglers into the new decoding framework:
SGDT SIDT SHLDv imm8,Gv,Ev ENTER
Modified:
branches/AVX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c
Modified: branches/AVX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c
===================================================================
--- branches/AVX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c 2011-10-09 18:13:41 UTC (rev 2214)
+++ branches/AVX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c 2011-10-10 08:08:53 UTC (rev 2215)
@@ -17189,6 +17189,37 @@
}
return delta;
+ case 0xC8: /* ENTER */
+ /* Same comments re operand size as for LEAVE below apply.
+ Also, only handles the case "enter $imm16, $0"; other cases
+ for the second operand (nesting depth) are not handled. */
+ if (sz != 4)
+ goto decode_failure;
+ d64 = getUDisp16(delta);
+ delta += 2;
+ vassert(d64 >= 0 && d64 <= 0xFFFF);
+ if (getUChar(delta) != 0)
+ goto decode_failure;
+ delta++;
+ /* Intel docs seem to suggest:
+ push rbp
+ temp = rsp
+ rbp = temp
+ rsp = rsp - imm16
+ */
+ t1 = newTemp(Ity_I64);
+ assign(t1, getIReg64(R_RBP));
+ t2 = newTemp(Ity_I64);
+ assign(t2, binop(Iop_Sub64, getIReg64(R_RSP), mkU64(8)));
+ putIReg64(R_RSP, mkexpr(t2));
+ storeLE(mkexpr(t2), mkexpr(t1));
+ putIReg64(R_RBP, mkexpr(t2));
+ if (d64 > 0) {
+ putIReg64(R_RSP, binop(Iop_Sub64, mkexpr(t2), mkU64(d64)));
+ }
+ DIP("enter $%u, $0\n", (UInt)d64);
+ return delta;
+
case 0xC9: /* LEAVE */
/* In 64-bit mode this defaults to a 64-bit operand size. There
is no way to encode a 32-bit variant. Hence sz==4 but we do
@@ -17554,6 +17585,40 @@
delta++;
switch (opc) { /* first switch */
+ case 0x01: /* 0F 01 /0 -- SGDT */
+ /* 0F 01 /1 -- SIDT */
+ {
+ /* This is really revolting, but ... since each processor
+ (core) only has one IDT and one GDT, just let the guest
+ see it (pass-through semantics). I can't see any way to
+ construct a faked-up value, so don't bother to try. */
+ modrm = getUChar(delta);
+ addr = disAMode ( &alen, vbi, pfx, delta, dis_buf, 0 );
+ delta += alen;
+ if (epartIsReg(modrm)) goto decode_failure;
+ if (gregLO3ofRM(modrm) != 0 && gregLO3ofRM(modrm) != 1)
+ goto decode_failure;
+ switch (gregLO3ofRM(modrm)) {
+ case 0: DIP("sgdt %s\n", dis_buf); break;
+ case 1: DIP("sidt %s\n", dis_buf); break;
+ default: vassert(0); /*NOTREACHED*/
+ }
+
+ IRDirty* d = unsafeIRDirty_0_N (
+ 0/*regparms*/,
+ "amd64g_dirtyhelper_SxDT",
+ &amd64g_dirtyhelper_SxDT,
+ mkIRExprVec_2( mkexpr(addr),
+ mkU64(gregLO3ofRM(modrm)) )
+ );
+ /* declare we're writing memory */
+ d->mFx = Ifx_Write;
+ d->mAddr = mkexpr(addr);
+ d->mSize = 6;
+ stmt( IRStmt_Dirty(d) );
+ return delta;
+ }
+
case 0x05: /* SYSCALL */
guest_RIP_next_mustcheck = True;
guest_RIP_next_assumed = guest_RIP_bbstart + delta;
@@ -17778,6 +17843,16 @@
delta = dis_bt_G_E ( vbi, pfx, sz, delta, BtOpNone );
return delta;
+ case 0xA4: /* SHLDv imm8,Gv,Ev */
+ modrm = getUChar(delta);
+ d64 = delta + lengthAMode(pfx, delta);
+ vex_sprintf(dis_buf, "$%d", (Int)getUChar(d64));
+ delta = dis_SHLRD_Gv_Ev (
+ vbi, pfx, delta, modrm, sz,
+ mkU8(getUChar(d64)), True, /* literal */
+ dis_buf, True /* left */ );
+ return delta;
+
case 0xA5: /* SHLDv %cl,Gv,Ev */
modrm = getUChar(delta);
delta = dis_SHLRD_Gv_Ev (
@@ -18728,37 +18803,6 @@
DIP("ret %lld\n", d64);
break;
- case 0xC8: /* ENTER */
- /* Same comments re operand size as for LEAVE below apply.
- Also, only handles the case "enter $imm16, $0"; other cases
- for the second operand (nesting depth) are not handled. */
- if (sz != 4)
- goto decode_failure;
- d64 = getUDisp16(delta);
- delta += 2;
- vassert(d64 >= 0 && d64 <= 0xFFFF);
- if (getUChar(delta) != 0)
- goto decode_failure;
- delta++;
- /* Intel docs seem to suggest:
- push rbp
- temp = rsp
- rbp = temp
- rsp = rsp - imm16
- */
- t1 = newTemp(Ity_I64);
- assign(t1, getIReg64(R_RBP));
- t2 = newTemp(Ity_I64);
- assign(t2, binop(Iop_Sub64, getIReg64(R_RSP), mkU64(8)));
- putIReg64(R_RSP, mkexpr(t2));
- storeLE(mkexpr(t2), mkexpr(t1));
- putIReg64(R_RBP, mkexpr(t2));
- if (d64 > 0) {
- putIReg64(R_RSP, binop(Iop_Sub64, mkexpr(t2), mkU64(d64)));
- }
- DIP("enter $%u, $0\n", (UInt)d64);
- break;
-
/* ------------------------ CWD/CDQ -------------------- */
/* ------------------------ FPU ops -------------------- */
@@ -18973,16 +19017,6 @@
/* =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- SHLD/SHRD -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= */
- case 0xA4: /* SHLDv imm8,Gv,Ev */
- modrm = getUChar(delta);
- d64 = delta + lengthAMode(pfx, delta);
- vex_sprintf(dis_buf, "$%d", (Int)getUChar(d64));
- delta = dis_SHLRD_Gv_Ev (
- vbi, pfx, delta, modrm, sz,
- mkU8(getUChar(d64)), True, /* literal */
- dis_buf, True /* left */ );
- break;
-
/* =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- SYSCALL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= */
/* =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- XADD -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= */
@@ -18996,40 +19030,7 @@
}
/* =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- SGDT and SIDT =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= */
- case 0x01: /* 0F 01 /0 -- SGDT */
- /* 0F 01 /1 -- SIDT */
- {
- /* This is really revolting, but ... since each processor
- (core) only has one IDT and one GDT, just let the guest
- see it (pass-through semantics). I can't see any way to
- construct a faked-up value, so don't bother to try. */
- modrm = getUChar(delta);
- addr = disAMode ( &alen, vbi, pfx, delta, dis_buf, 0 );
- delta += alen;
- if (epartIsReg(modrm)) goto decode_failure;
- if (gregLO3ofRM(modrm) != 0 && gregLO3ofRM(modrm) != 1)
- goto decode_failure;
- switch (gregLO3ofRM(modrm)) {
- case 0: DIP("sgdt %s\n", dis_buf); break;
- case 1: DIP("sidt %s\n", dis_buf); break;
- default: vassert(0); /*NOTREACHED*/
- }
- IRDirty* d = unsafeIRDirty_0_N (
- 0/*regparms*/,
- "amd64g_dirtyhelper_SxDT",
- &amd64g_dirtyhelper_SxDT,
- mkIRExprVec_2( mkexpr(addr),
- mkU64(gregLO3ofRM(modrm)) )
- );
- /* declare we're writing memory */
- d->mFx = Ifx_Write;
- d->mAddr = mkexpr(addr);
- d->mSize = 6;
- stmt( IRStmt_Dirty(d) );
- break;
- }
-
/* =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- unimp2 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= */
default:
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2011-10-10 06:14:57
|
Author: bart
Date: 2011-10-10 07:10:11 +0100 (Mon, 10 Oct 2011)
New Revision: 12132
Log:
Update expected output - the ppc output changed due to r12038.
Modified:
trunk/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc
Modified: trunk/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc
===================================================================
--- trunk/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2011-10-09 23:28:47 UTC (rev 12131)
+++ trunk/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2011-10-10 06:10:11 UTC (rev 12132)
@@ -3,11 +3,78 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
- Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
+rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+Thread 1:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+Thread 2:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
|
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2011-10-10 05:48:40
|
valgrind revision: 12131
VEX revision: 2214
GCC version: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291]
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.9 (20081117), by Roland McGrath et al.
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc
Vendor version: Welcome to openSUSE 11.1 - Kernel %r (%t).
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2011-10-09 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2011-10-10 00:48:27 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 477 tests, 12 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 3 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcvabits (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/big-alloc (post)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin-amd64
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin-amd64 2011-10-10 00:08:09.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:48:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,13 +3,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
Thread 3:
Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
@@ -18,11 +11,15 @@
cond 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
@@ -30,6 +27,19 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+
+Thread 1:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
@@ -40,7 +50,7 @@
Thread 3:
Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
cond 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
@@ -66,11 +76,5 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-Assertion failed: (!r), function main, file tc23_bogus_condwait.c, line 86.
-
-Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
- at 0x........: __kill (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: __assert_rtn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:86)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin-x86 2011-10-10 00:08:09.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:48:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,13 +3,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
Thread 3:
Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
@@ -18,11 +11,15 @@
cond 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
@@ -30,6 +27,19 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+
+Thread 1:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
@@ -40,7 +50,7 @@
Thread 3:
Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
cond 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
@@ -67,4 +77,4 @@
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2011-10-10 00:08:09.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:48:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,11 +3,78 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
+
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
+rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
+
+Thread 1:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+Thread 3:
+Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+cond 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+Thread 1:
+The impossible happened: mutex is locked simultaneously by two threads: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+
+Thread 2:
+Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
- Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2011-10-10 00:08:09.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:48:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -20,19 +20,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
@@ -43,7 +30,7 @@
Thread 3:
Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
cond 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
@@ -63,7 +50,7 @@
Thread 3:
Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
+ by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
cond 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
@@ -90,4 +77,4 @@
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 12 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:49.000000000 -0500
+++ mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.out 2011-10-10 00:24:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -21,35 +21,33 @@
0x........ in do_burn () at sleepers.c:39
39 for (i = 0; i < burn; i++) loopnr++;
[Switching to thread 1 (Thread ....)]
-#0 0x........ in do_burn () at sleepers.c:39
+#0 0x........ in do_burn ()
+ ...
39 for (i = 0; i < burn; i++) loopnr++;
$1 = void
[Switching to thread 2 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
-Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
+Remote failure reply: E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
set pc, calling from gdb a function in the debugged process, ...)
can only be accepted if the thread is VgTs_Runnable or VgTs_Yielding state
Thread status is VgTs_WaitSys
-'
[Switching to thread 3 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
-Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
+Remote failure reply: E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
set pc, calling from gdb a function in the debugged process, ...)
can only be accepted if the thread is VgTs_Runnable or VgTs_Yielding state
Thread status is VgTs_WaitSys
-'
[Switching to thread 4 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
-Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
+Remote failure reply: E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
set pc, calling from gdb a function in the debugged process, ...)
can only be accepted if the thread is VgTs_Runnable or VgTs_Yielding state
Thread status is VgTs_WaitSys
-'
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:49.000000000 -0500
+++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2011-10-10 00:24:39.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,55 +1,32 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 defined
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-00000000 00000000 0000
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff00ff00 ff00ff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff000000 0000ff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff00ffff ffffff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 2 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 2 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff00
-Address 0x........ len 2 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 2 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 2 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 2 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-____
-Address 0x........ len 2 has 2 bytes unaddressable
-Address 0x........ len 6 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 6 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ffffff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 10 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-0000____ 00000000 0000
-Address 0x........ len 10 has 2 bytes unaddressable
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:46.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:37:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
-declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
@@ -46,8 +43,5 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
-declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
-
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:46.000000000 -0500
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:38:48.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:46.000000000 -0500
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:39:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -215,14 +215,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +227,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:46.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,6 +26,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_wait failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -53,4 +61,4 @@
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/big-alloc.post.diff
=================================================
--- big-alloc.post.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:55.000000000 -0500
+++ big-alloc.post.out 2011-10-10 00:33:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -36,19 +36,19 @@
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 10,489,832 10,489,832 10,485,760 4,072 0
- 2 20,979,664 20,979,664 20,971,520 8,144 0
- 3 31,469,496 31,469,496 31,457,280 12,216 0
- 4 41,959,328 41,959,328 41,943,040 16,288 0
- 5 52,449,160 52,449,160 52,428,800 20,360 0
- 6 62,938,992 62,938,992 62,914,560 24,432 0
- 7 73,428,824 73,428,824 73,400,320 28,504 0
- 8 83,918,656 83,918,656 83,886,080 32,576 0
- 9 94,408,488 94,408,488 94,371,840 36,648 0
+ 1 10,489,816 10,489,816 10,485,760 4,056 0
+ 2 20,979,632 20,979,632 20,971,520 8,112 0
+ 3 31,469,448 31,469,448 31,457,280 12,168 0
+ 4 41,959,264 41,959,264 41,943,040 16,224 0
+ 5 52,449,080 52,449,080 52,428,800 20,280 0
+ 6 62,938,896 62,938,896 62,914,560 24,336 0
+ 7 73,428,712 73,428,712 73,400,320 28,392 0
+ 8 83,918,528 83,918,528 83,886,080 32,448 0
+ 9 94,408,344 94,408,344 94,371,840 36,504 0
99.96% (94,371,840B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
->99.96% (94,371,840B) 0x........: main (big-alloc.c:12)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 10 104,898,320 104,898,320 104,857,600 40,720 0
+ 10 104,898,160 104,898,160 104,857,600 40,560 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/big-alloc.post.diff-64bit
=================================================
--- big-alloc.post.exp-64bit 2011-10-10 00:07:55.000000000 -0500
+++ big-alloc.post.out 2011-10-10 00:33:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -36,19 +36,19 @@
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 10,489,800 10,489,800 10,485,760 4,040 0
- 2 20,979,600 20,979,600 20,971,520 8,080 0
- 3 31,469,400 31,469,400 31,457,280 12,120 0
- 4 41,959,200 41,959,200 41,943,040 16,160 0
- 5 52,449,000 52,449,000 52,428,800 20,200 0
- 6 62,938,800 62,938,800 62,914,560 24,240 0
- 7 73,428,600 73,428,600 73,400,320 28,280 0
- 8 83,918,400 83,918,400 83,886,080 32,320 0
- 9 94,408,200 94,408,200 94,371,840 36,360 0
+ 1 10,489,816 10,489,816 10,485,760 4,056 0
+ 2 20,979,632 20,979,632 20,971,520 8,112 0
+ 3 31,469,448 31,469,448 31,457,280 12,168 0
+ 4 41,959,264 41,959,264 41,943,040 16,224 0
+ 5 52,449,080 52,449,080 52,428,800 20,280 0
+ 6 62,938,896 62,938,896 62,914,560 24,336 0
+ 7 73,428,712 73,428,712 73,400,320 28,392 0
+ 8 83,918,528 83,918,528 83,886,080 32,448 0
+ 9 94,408,344 94,408,344 94,371,840 36,504 0
99.96% (94,371,840B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
->99.96% (94,371,840B) 0x........: main (big-alloc.c:12)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 10 104,898,000 104,898,000 104,857,600 40,400 0
+ 10 104,898,160 104,898,160 104,857,600 40,560 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:55.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2011-10-10 00:33:45.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:55.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2011-10-10 00:33:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:52.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:28:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:54.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:31:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
...
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-kfail
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-kfail 2011-10-10 00:07:54.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:31:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:07:54.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:32:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2011-10-10 00:07:54.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:32:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:35:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,27 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1984)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5739)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1984)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5739)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -707,8 +707,8 @@
fres 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
fres fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- frsqrte 0010000000000001 => 5fdf000000000000
- frsqrte 00100094e0000359 => 5fdf000000000000
+ frsqrte 0010000000000001 => 5fdf800000000000
+ frsqrte 00100094e0000359 => 5fdf800000000000
frsqrte 3fe0000000000001 => 3ff6000000000000
frsqrte 3fe00094e0000359 => 3ff6000000000000
frsqrte 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
@@ -794,638 +794,4 @@
fneg 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fneg 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fneg 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fneg 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fneg 8010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fneg 80100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fneg bfe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fneg bfe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fneg 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fneg 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fneg 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fneg fff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fneg 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fneg fff7ffffffffffff => 7ff7ffffffffffff
- fneg 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fneg fff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
-
- fabs 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fabs 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fabs 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fabs 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fabs 8010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fabs 80100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fabs bfe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fabs bfe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fabs 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fabs 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fabs 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fabs fff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7ff7ffffffffffff
- fabs fff7ffffffffffff => 7ff7ffffffffffff
- fabs 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fabs fff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
-
- fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- fres. 0010000000000001 => 7ff0000000000000
- fres. 00100094e0000359 => 7ff0000000000000
- fres. 3fe0000000000001 => 4000000000000000
- fres. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3ffff00000000000
- fres. 8010000000000001 => fff0000000000000
- fres. 80100094e0000359 => fff0000000000000
- fres. bfe0000000000001 => c000000000000000
- fres. bfe00094e0000359 => bffff00000000000
- fres. 0000000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fres. 8000000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fres. 7ff0000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fres. fff0000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fres. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7ffff00000000000
- fres. fff7ffffffffffff => fffff00000000000
- fres. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:35:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,20 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:35:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,25 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ap+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000bp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000cp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ep+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000fp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000011p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049fp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3cp+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0938p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7484p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7dp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
+-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/test_fx.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- test_fx.stderr.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ test_fx.stderr.out 2011-10-10 00:35:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,25 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: do_fsqrt (test_fx.c:9)
+ by 0x........: do_one (test_fx.c:48)
+ by 0x........: main (test_fx.c:81)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: do_fsqrt (test_fx.c:9)
+ by 0x........: do_one (test_fx.c:48)
+ by 0x........: main (test_fx.c:81)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/test_fx.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- test_fx.stdout.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ test_fx.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-
-fsqrt 0.000000e+00 -> 0.00000000000000e+00
-fsqrt inf -> inf
-fsqrt -inf -> nan
-fsqrt nan -> nan
-fsqrt nan -> nan
-fsqrt -5.000000e+100 -> nan
-fsqrt -5.000000e+20 -> nan
-fsqrt -5.010000e+02 -> nan
-fsqrt -6.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrt -1.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrt -2.000000e-20 -> nan
-fsqrt -2.000000e-200 -> nan
-fsqrt 2.000000e-200 -> 1.41421356237310e-100
-fsqrt 2.000000e-20 -> 1.41421356237310e-10
-fsqrt 1.000000e+00 -> 1.00000000000000e+00
-fsqrt 6.000000e+00 -> 2.44948974278318e+00
-fsqrt 5.010000e+02 -> 2.23830292855994e+01
-fsqrt 5.000000e+20 -> 2.23606797749979e+10
-fsqrt 5.000000e+100 -> 2.23606797749979e+50
-
-fsqrts 0.000000e+00 -> 0.000000e+00
-fsqrts inf -> inf
-fsqrts -inf -> nan
-fsqrts nan -> nan
-fsqrts nan -> nan
-fsqrts -5.000000e+100 -> nan
-fsqrts -5.000000e+20 -> nan
-fsqrts -5.010000e+02 -> nan
-fsqrts -6.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrts -1.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrts -2.000000e-20 -> nan
-fsqrts -2.000000e-200 -> nan
-fsqrts 2.000000e-200 -> 1.414214e-100
-fsqrts 2.000000e-20 -> 1.414214e-10
-fsqrts 1.000000e+00 -> 1.000000e+00
-fsqrts 6.000000e+00 -> 2.449490e+00
-fsqrts 5.010000e+02 -> 2.238303e+01
-fsqrts 5.000000e+20 -> 2.236068e+10
-fsqrts 5.000000e+100 -> 2.236068e+50
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/test_fx.stdout.diff_Minus_nan
=================================================
--- test_fx.stdout.exp_Minus_nan 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ test_fx.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-
-fsqrt 0.000000e+00 -> 0.00000000000000e+00
-fsqrt inf -> inf
-fsqrt -inf -> nan
-fsqrt nan -> nan
-fsqrt -nan -> -nan
-fsqrt -5.000000e+100 -> nan
-fsqrt -5.000000e+20 -> nan
-fsqrt -5.010000e+02 -> nan
-fsqrt -6.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrt -1.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrt -2.000000e-20 -> nan
-fsqrt -2.000000e-200 -> nan
-fsqrt 2.000000e-200 -> 1.41421356237310e-100
-fsqrt 2.000000e-20 -> 1.41421356237310e-10
-fsqrt 1.000000e+00 -> 1.00000000000000e+00
-fsqrt 6.000000e+00 -> 2.44948974278318e+00
-fsqrt 5.010000e+02 -> 2.23830292855994e+01
-fsqrt 5.000000e+20 -> 2.23606797749979e+10
-fsqrt 5.000000e+100 -> 2.23606797749979e+50
-
-fsqrts 0.000000e+00 -> 0.000000e+00
-fsqrts inf -> inf
-fsqrts -inf -> nan
-fsqrts nan -> nan
-fsqrts -nan -> -nan
-fsqrts -5.000000e+100 -> nan
-fsqrts -5.000000e+20 -> nan
-fsqrts -5.010000e+02 -> nan
-fsqrts -6.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrts -1.000000e+00 -> nan
-fsqrts -2.000000e-20 -> nan
-fsqrts -2.000000e-200 -> nan
-fsqrts 2.000000e-200 -> 1.414214e-100
-fsqrts 2.000000e-20 -> 1.414214e-10
-fsqrts 1.000000e+00 -> 1.000000e+00
-fsqrts 6.000000e+00 -> 2.449490e+00
-fsqrts 5.010000e+02 -> 2.238303e+01
-fsqrts 5.000000e+20 -> 2.236068e+10
-fsqrts 5.000000e+100 -> 2.236068e+50
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/test_gx.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- test_gx.stdout.exp 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ test_gx.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,13 +51,13 @@
frsqrte -1.010000e+00 -> nan
frsqrte -2.000000e-20 -> nan
frsqrte -2.000000e-200 -> nan
-frsqrte 2.000000e-200 -> 7.0e+99
+frsqrte 2.000000e-200 -> 7.1e+99
frsqrte 2.000000e-20 -> 7.1e+09
-frsqrte 1.010000e+00 -> 9.7e-01
+frsqrte 1.010000e+00 -> 9.8e-01
frsqrte 6.000000e+00 -> 4.0e-01
-frsqrte 5.010000e+02 -> 4.5e-02
-frsqrte 5.000000e+20 -> 4.5e-11
-frsqrte 5.000000e+100 -> 4.4e-51
+frsqrte 5.010000e+02 -> 4.4e-02
+frsqrte 5.000000e+20 -> 4.4e-11
+frsqrte 5.000000e+100 -> 4.5e-51
frsqrtes 0.000000e+00 -> inf
frsqrtes inf -> 0.0e+00
@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@
frsqrtes -1.010000e+00 -> nan
frsqrtes -2.000000e-20 -> nan
frsqrtes -2.000000e-200 -> nan
-frsqrtes 2.000000e-200 -> 7.0e+99
+frsqrtes 2.000000e-200 -> 7.1e+99
frsqrtes 2.000000e-20 -> 7.1e+09
-frsqrtes 1.010000e+00 -> 9.7e-01
+frsqrtes 1.010000e+00 -> 9.8e-01
frsqrtes 6.000000e+00 -> 4.0e-01
-frsqrtes 5.010000e+02 -> 4.5e-02
-frsqrtes 5.000000e+20 -> 4.5e-11
-frsqrtes 5.000000e+100 -> 4.4e-51
+frsqrtes 5.010000e+02 -> 4.4e-02
+frsqrtes 5.000000e+20 -> 4.4e-11
+frsqrtes 5.000000e+100 -> 4.5e-51
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/test_gx.stdout.diff_Minus_nan
=================================================
--- test_gx.stdout.exp_Minus_nan 2011-10-10 00:08:02.000000000 -0500
+++ test_gx.stdout.out 2011-10-10 00:35:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
fre inf -> 0.0e+00
fre -inf -> -0.0e+00
fre nan -> nan
-fre -nan -> -nan
+fre nan -> nan
fre -5.000000e+100 -> -2.0e-101
fre -5.000000e+20 -> -2.0e-21
fre -5.010000e+02 -> -2.0e-0...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-10-10 03:21:29
|
valgrind revision: 12131 VEX revision: 2214 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.8, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2011-10-10 03:41:01 BST Ended at 2011-10-10 04:21:14 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 574 tests, 1 stderr failure, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2011-10-10 03:00:10
|
valgrind revision: 12131
VEX revision: 2214
GCC version: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.5.1 20101208 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 167585]
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.11.3 (20110203), by Roland McGrath et al.
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.37.1-1.2-desktop x86_64
Vendor version: Welcome to openSUSE 11.4 "Celadon" - Kernel %r (%t).
Nightly build on ultra ( gcc 4.5.1 Linux 2.6.37.1-1.2-desktop x86_64 )
Started at 2011-10-09 21:30:01 CDT
Ended at 2011-10-09 22:00:00 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 584 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2011-10-09 21:44:18.767264977 -0500
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2011-10-09 21:52:35.611297012 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=b1d398a5cb1609e7ac1c51a26588e87fc20f753c"
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=e23cbc772e670af00bea9874f925e2e61afda713"
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=92ec8fe859846a62345f74696ab349721415587a"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
v.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2011-10-09 21:44:22.404389644 -0500
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:53:32.334241739 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2011-10-09 21:44:23.356422278 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:53:55.854048120 -0500
@@ -72,17 +72,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -128,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc234-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc234-s390x 2011-10-09 21:44:23.325421214 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:53:55.854048120 -0500
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
+ at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
@@ -13,8 +12,7 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
+ at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
@@ -22,8 +20,7 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
+ at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
@@ -120,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2011-10-09 21:44:23.308420631 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:53:55.854048120 -0500
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2011-10-09 21:44:23.369422722 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:53:55.854048120 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2011-10-09 21:44:23.305420529 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:53:55.854048120 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2011-10-09 21:30:20.027522165 -0500
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2011-10-09 21:36:42.980643996 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=b1d398a5cb1609e7ac1c51a26588e87fc20f753c"
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=e23cbc772e670af00bea9874f925e2e61afda713"
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=92ec8fe859846a62345f74696ab349721415587a"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
v.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2011-10-09 21:30:23.975657432 -0500
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:37:39.909594896 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2011-10-09 21:30:25.006692758 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:38:03.459401943 -0500
@@ -72,17 +72,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -128,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc234-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc234-s390x 2011-10-09 21:30:24.975691696 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:38:03.459401943 -0500
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
+ at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
@@ -13,8 +12,7 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
+ at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
@@ -22,8 +20,7 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
+ at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
@@ -120,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2011-10-09 21:30:24.958691113 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:38:03.459401943 -0500
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2011-10-09 21:30:25.019693203 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:38:03.459401943 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2011-10-09 21:30:24.955691010 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-10-09 21:38:03.459401943 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
|
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-10-10 03:00:09
|
valgrind revision: 12131 VEX revision: 2214 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.10.2, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 11 (Leonidas) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 11 ) Started at 2011-10-10 03:30:50 BST Ended at 2011-10-10 03:59:50 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 574 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/long_namespace_xml (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-10-10 02:48:01
|
valgrind revision: 12131 VEX revision: 2214 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat 4.4.5-2) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.12.2, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 13 (Goddard) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 13 ) Started at 2011-10-10 03:21:11 BST Ended at 2011-10-10 03:47:37 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 574 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) helgrind/tests/pth_barrier3 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-10-10 02:38:02
|
valgrind revision: 12131 VEX revision: 2214 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.13, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 14 ) Started at 2011-10-10 03:11:01 BST Ended at 2011-10-10 03:37:41 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 588 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-10-10 02:33:59
|
valgrind revision: 12131 VEX revision: 2214 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.6.1 20110908 (Red Hat 4.6.1-9) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.14, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 15 ) Started at 2011-10-10 03:01:46 BST Ended at 2011-10-10 03:33:32 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 588 tests, 10 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_barrier (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 588 tests, 10 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) none/tests/shell (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Mon Oct 10 03:19:39 2011 --- new.short Mon Oct 10 03:33:32 2011 *************** *** 15,18 **** memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) - none/tests/shell (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) --- 15,18 ---- memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) + drd/tests/annotate_barrier (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) |