You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
|
|
3
(5) |
4
(7) |
5
(16) |
6
(7) |
7
(5) |
8
|
9
|
|
10
(3) |
11
(7) |
12
(7) |
13
(15) |
14
(4) |
15
(8) |
16
(10) |
|
17
(1) |
18
(7) |
19
(5) |
20
(17) |
21
(10) |
22
(5) |
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
(10) |
27
(21) |
28
(18) |
29
(7) |
30
(4) |
|
From: Josef W. <Jos...@gm...> - 2011-04-20 21:18:28
|
On Wednesday 20 April 2011, sv...@va... wrote: > Author: sewardj > Date: 2011-04-20 12:54:32 +0100 (Wed, 20 Apr 2011) > New Revision: 11704 > > Log: > Change a bunch of < > style includes to " " style. Oops. Thanks. That is a relict from the old times when callgrind was standalone, using installed valgrind headers. Josef |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-04-20 20:38:08
|
Nightly build on sless390 ( SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 gcc 4.3.4 on z10 (s390x) ) Started at 2011-04-20 22:10:01 CEST Ended at 2011-04-20 22:37:53 CEST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 460 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-04-20 20:28:52
|
Nightly build on fedora390 ( Fedora 13/14/15 mix with gcc 3.5.3 on z196 (s390x) ) Started at 2011-04-20 22:10:01 CEST Ended at 2011-04-20 22:27:58 CEST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 459 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2011-04-20 20:12:10
|
I also support the statement that line numbers are often not precise enough. If there is a user demand for this (at work, nobody ever complained), then this should for sure not be hardcoded, i.e. this should be the addition of a command line option to disable showing the program counter. > On 04/20/2011 07:21 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> Spending much time on debugging the reports from the TSan tool I would >> suggest not to remove the addresses. >> You don't need those while you have the debug info, > > In practice, line numbers are not precise enough. The same line often > maps to many different and non-consecutive PCs, and consecutive PCs > often map to non-consecutive lines. Debugging often involves mental > "backward execution". Not having the correct PC as a starting point > makes it much harder than necessary. |
|
From: Konstantin S. <kon...@gm...> - 2011-04-20 18:15:47
|
> > > * Support for Android? [bug 266035] There appear to be increasing > requests for this. I have no idea of the state of the patchset on > 266035. If it works well and is low-ish risk then maybe it should > be integrated for 3.7.0. If you care about Android support, please > try this out and give feedback. > > Evgeniy will update the bug very soon. He can run a hacked Memcheck and TSan on Android, but that's not as smooth as on x86/Linux yet :) --kcc |
|
From: Konstantin S. <kon...@gm...> - 2011-04-20 18:13:17
|
I would implement an option to enable/disable addresses (--show-pc=no/yes). As for the default value -- I don't know. (TSan's default is no, but I myself suffer from it periodically). --kcc On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Alexander Potapenko <gl...@go...>wrote: > Spending much time on debugging the reports from the TSan tool I would > suggest not to remove the addresses. > You don't need those while you have the debug info, but if you don't, > you'll have to re-run the program with the --show-pc=yes option in > order to debug a newly appeared report (the old and known ones are > already suppressed, aren't they?). > Maybe just move the address to the end of line? Like this: > > Invalid write of size 1 > at ddd (errs1.c:7), pc=0x400544 > by ccc (errs1.c:8), pc=0x400550 > by bbb (errs1.c:9), pc=0x40055B > > > Alex > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: > > On 20/04/11 11:12, Julian Seward wrote: > > > >> * change of backtrace format? For years we've had code addresses > >> in backtraces. They use up valuable screen space, but 99% of the > >> time are completely useless. Should we omit them by default, > >> as does the TSan tool? > >> eg > >> Invalid write of size 1 > >> at 0x400544: ddd (errs1.c:7) > >> by 0x400550: ccc (errs1.c:8) > >> by 0x40055B: bbb (errs1.c:9) > >> by 0x400566: aaa (errs1.c:10) > >> by 0x4005AE: main (errs1.c:17) > >> vs > >> Invalid write of size 1 > >> #0 ddd (errs1.c:7) > >> #1 ccc (errs1.c:8) > >> #2 bbb (errs1.c:9) > >> #3 aaa (errs1.c:10) > >> #4 main (errs1.c:17) > > > > I agree that the address is generally not useful, except I would say in > > the case of the first frame, where it gives you the address of the exact > > instruction which triggered the report. > > > > Maybe we could capture that on the first line, something like: > > > > Invalid write of size 1 at 0x400544 > > > > and then drop the addresses from the stack trace. > > > > Tom > > > > -- > > Tom Hughes (to...@co...) > > http://compton.nu/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and > improve > > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about > boosting > > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Valgrind-developers mailing list > > Val...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers > > > > > > -- > Alexander Potapenko > Software Engineer > Google Moscow > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-developers mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers > |
|
From: Michael S. <ms...@ap...> - 2011-04-20 15:53:04
|
Or only show the address when line number information is not available? On Apr 20, 2011, at 7:21 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Spending much time on debugging the reports from the TSan tool I would > suggest not to remove the addresses. > You don't need those while you have the debug info, but if you don't, > you'll have to re-run the program with the --show-pc=yes option in > order to debug a newly appeared report (the old and known ones are > already suppressed, aren't they?). > Maybe just move the address to the end of line? Like this: > > Invalid write of size 1 > at ddd (errs1.c:7), pc=0x400544 > by ccc (errs1.c:8), pc=0x400550 > by bbb (errs1.c:9), pc=0x40055B > > > Alex > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: >> On 20/04/11 11:12, Julian Seward wrote: >> >>> * change of backtrace format? For years we've had code addresses >>> in backtraces. They use up valuable screen space, but 99% of the >>> time are completely useless. Should we omit them by default, >>> as does the TSan tool? >>> eg >>> Invalid write of size 1 >>> at 0x400544: ddd (errs1.c:7) >>> by 0x400550: ccc (errs1.c:8) >>> by 0x40055B: bbb (errs1.c:9) >>> by 0x400566: aaa (errs1.c:10) >>> by 0x4005AE: main (errs1.c:17) >>> vs >>> Invalid write of size 1 >>> #0 ddd (errs1.c:7) >>> #1 ccc (errs1.c:8) >>> #2 bbb (errs1.c:9) >>> #3 aaa (errs1.c:10) >>> #4 main (errs1.c:17) >> >> I agree that the address is generally not useful, except I would say in >> the case of the first frame, where it gives you the address of the exact >> instruction which triggered the report. >> >> Maybe we could capture that on the first line, something like: >> >> Invalid write of size 1 at 0x400544 >> >> and then drop the addresses from the stack trace. >> >> Tom >> >> -- >> Tom Hughes (to...@co...) >> http://compton.nu/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload >> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top >> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve >> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting >> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Valgrind-developers mailing list >> Val...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers >> > > > > -- > Alexander Potapenko > Software Engineer > Google Moscow > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-developers mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair |
|
From: John R. <jr...@bi...> - 2011-04-20 15:00:45
|
On 04/20/2011 07:21 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Spending much time on debugging the reports from the TSan tool I would > suggest not to remove the addresses. > You don't need those while you have the debug info, In practice, line numbers are not precise enough. The same line often maps to many different and non-consecutive PCs, and consecutive PCs often map to non-consecutive lines. Debugging often involves mental "backward execution". Not having the correct PC as a starting point makes it much harder than necessary. but if you don't, > you'll have to re-run the program with the --show-pc=yes option in > order to debug a newly appeared report (the old and known ones are > already suppressed, aren't they?). > Maybe just move the address to the end of line? Like this: > > Invalid write of size 1 > at ddd (errs1.c:7), pc=0x400544 > by ccc (errs1.c:8), pc=0x400550 > by bbb (errs1.c:9), pc=0x40055B Fields that have an almost-fixed width should have a preference for the fixed side [the left side] of a line, so that columnar organization tends to be evident and usable. The width of the PC is nearly fixed, while the width of the source designator is much more variable. The above example, with only one filename, and with line numbers having the same floor(log10(__LINE__)), is not typical. -- |
|
From: John R. <jr...@bi...> - 2011-04-20 14:41:18
|
> It's time to think a bit about a 3.7.0 release. [snip] > Other stuff that I forgot / missed? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250101 [contains patch] huge "free" memory usage due to m_mallocfree.c "superblocks fragmentation" Quadratic behavior should not be tolerated. -- |
|
From: Alexander P. <gl...@go...> - 2011-04-20 14:21:27
|
Spending much time on debugging the reports from the TSan tool I would
suggest not to remove the addresses.
You don't need those while you have the debug info, but if you don't,
you'll have to re-run the program with the --show-pc=yes option in
order to debug a newly appeared report (the old and known ones are
already suppressed, aren't they?).
Maybe just move the address to the end of line? Like this:
Invalid write of size 1
at ddd (errs1.c:7), pc=0x400544
by ccc (errs1.c:8), pc=0x400550
by bbb (errs1.c:9), pc=0x40055B
Alex
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
> On 20/04/11 11:12, Julian Seward wrote:
>
>> * change of backtrace format? For years we've had code addresses
>> in backtraces. They use up valuable screen space, but 99% of the
>> time are completely useless. Should we omit them by default,
>> as does the TSan tool?
>> eg
>> Invalid write of size 1
>> at 0x400544: ddd (errs1.c:7)
>> by 0x400550: ccc (errs1.c:8)
>> by 0x40055B: bbb (errs1.c:9)
>> by 0x400566: aaa (errs1.c:10)
>> by 0x4005AE: main (errs1.c:17)
>> vs
>> Invalid write of size 1
>> #0 ddd (errs1.c:7)
>> #1 ccc (errs1.c:8)
>> #2 bbb (errs1.c:9)
>> #3 aaa (errs1.c:10)
>> #4 main (errs1.c:17)
>
> I agree that the address is generally not useful, except I would say in
> the case of the first frame, where it gives you the address of the exact
> instruction which triggered the report.
>
> Maybe we could capture that on the first line, something like:
>
> Invalid write of size 1 at 0x400544
>
> and then drop the addresses from the stack trace.
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
> http://compton.nu/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Valgrind-developers mailing list
> Val...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
>
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Moscow
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2011-04-20 11:54:41
|
Author: sewardj Date: 2011-04-20 12:54:32 +0100 (Wed, 20 Apr 2011) New Revision: 11704 Log: Change a bunch of < > style includes to " " style. Modified: trunk/callgrind/bbcc.c trunk/callgrind/command.c trunk/callgrind/costs.c trunk/callgrind/dump.c trunk/callgrind/main.c trunk/callgrind/threads.c Modified: trunk/callgrind/bbcc.c =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/bbcc.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703) +++ trunk/callgrind/bbcc.c 2011-04-20 11:54:32 UTC (rev 11704) @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ #include "global.h" #include "costs.h" -#include <pub_tool_threadstate.h> +#include "pub_tool_threadstate.h" /*------------------------------------------------------------*/ /*--- BBCC operations ---*/ Modified: trunk/callgrind/command.c =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/command.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703) +++ trunk/callgrind/command.c 2011-04-20 11:54:32 UTC (rev 11704) @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ #include "config.h" #include "global.h" -#include <pub_tool_threadstate.h> // VG_N_THREADS +#include "pub_tool_threadstate.h" // VG_N_THREADS // Version for the syntax in command/result files for interactive control #define COMMAND_VERSION "1.0" Modified: trunk/callgrind/costs.c =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/costs.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703) +++ trunk/callgrind/costs.c 2011-04-20 11:54:32 UTC (rev 11704) @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ #include "global.h" -#include <pub_tool_mallocfree.h> +#include "pub_tool_mallocfree.h" #define COSTCHUNK_SIZE 100000 Modified: trunk/callgrind/dump.c =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/dump.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703) +++ trunk/callgrind/dump.c 2011-04-20 11:54:32 UTC (rev 11704) @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ #include "config.h" #include "global.h" -#include <pub_tool_threadstate.h> -#include <pub_tool_libcfile.h> +#include "pub_tool_threadstate.h" +#include "pub_tool_libcfile.h" /* Dump Part Counter */ Modified: trunk/callgrind/main.c =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/main.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703) +++ trunk/callgrind/main.c 2011-04-20 11:54:32 UTC (rev 11704) @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ #include "callgrind.h" #include "global.h" -#include <pub_tool_threadstate.h> +#include "pub_tool_threadstate.h" #include "cg_branchpred.c" Modified: trunk/callgrind/threads.c =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/threads.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703) +++ trunk/callgrind/threads.c 2011-04-20 11:54:32 UTC (rev 11704) @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ #include "global.h" -#include <pub_tool_threadstate.h> +#include "pub_tool_threadstate.h" /* forward decls */ static exec_state* exec_state_save(void); |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-04-20 11:46:20
|
> These instructions have a startup cost, so just doing 8 or > 16 bytes at a time is slower but it probably should work > reasonably enough. Yeah. This is kind of similar to the way CRC32 works on amd64. > Then I have to find a good way to let a clean > helper return a 128 bit value. I don't know of any good way using the existing IR infrastructure. One bad way I have used in the past (try not to die laughing) is to call the helper twice, passing it a bool that indicates whether it should return the lower or upper 64 bits of the result. Yes, it's brain-dead-moron stuff. But yes, it works. See amd64g_calculate_RCR(). In fact it is very annoying not to be able to pass 128 bit values to/from clean helpers -- it has caused a lot of extra complexity in the SSEx implementations. And in future for AVX I suspect I will want to pass 256 bit vectors to/from helpers. It would be good perhaps to contemplate how to extend the clean helper IR stuff just a little bit, so it is possible to pass 128 values in/out by reference. Maybe the cleanest solution is to allow args and/or result type to be Ity_V128, and put the burden on the instruction selectors, so that when they see such an arg type or result type, they generate code to allocate space on the (host) stack, and pass the address of that instead to the helper. Of course this means we'd also have to document that a helper function expecting to deal with such arguments must pass/return them by reference. IOW specify how to write such a function in a way that is compatible with the proposed instruction selector changes. > The message digest functions (e.g. SHA512) will be a little more > tricky, since they have up to 128byte as data block size. Here > we might need a dirty helper instead of a clean one. And I still > dont know how to pass back 512bits without going over memory. I have no suggestions for that. J |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-04-20 11:17:30
|
On 20/04/11 11:12, Julian Seward wrote: > * change of backtrace format? For years we've had code addresses > in backtraces. They use up valuable screen space, but 99% of the > time are completely useless. Should we omit them by default, > as does the TSan tool? > eg > Invalid write of size 1 > at 0x400544: ddd (errs1.c:7) > by 0x400550: ccc (errs1.c:8) > by 0x40055B: bbb (errs1.c:9) > by 0x400566: aaa (errs1.c:10) > by 0x4005AE: main (errs1.c:17) > vs > Invalid write of size 1 > #0 ddd (errs1.c:7) > #1 ccc (errs1.c:8) > #2 bbb (errs1.c:9) > #3 aaa (errs1.c:10) > #4 main (errs1.c:17) I agree that the address is generally not useful, except I would say in the case of the first frame, where it gives you the address of the exact instruction which triggered the report. Maybe we could capture that on the first line, something like: Invalid write of size 1 at 0x400544 and then drop the addresses from the stack trace. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-04-20 11:01:04
|
Am 20.04.2011 11:24, schrieb Julian Seward: > Can you explain more about the instruction(s)? What exactly are the > inputs and the outputs? I am wondering if this can be done somehow > using clean helpers. One example is the KM (Cipher Message) instruction: KM R1,R2 Register 0 contains the function code(e.g. KM-AES-256) Register 1 contains the parameter block (e.g. the key) Register R1 contains the address of the target Register R2 contains the address of the source Register R2+1 contains the length of the source Your comment about clean helper made me rethink and I was rereading that stuff again. The encryption functions seem to be ok. It seems that the length must be a multiple of the basic data block size (e.g. 16 for AES) and for the ones I checked, the output is really calculated blockwise. (the chaining value is updated in the parameter block). These instructions have a startup cost, so just doing 8 or 16 bytes at a time is slower but it probably should work reasonably enough. Then I have to find a good way to let a clean helper return a 128 bit value. The message digest functions (e.g. SHA512) will be a little more tricky, since they have up to 128byte as data block size. Here we might need a dirty helper instead of a clean one. And I still dont know how to pass back 512bits without going over memory. Christian For reference the instructions KM, KMC, KLMD, KMAC etc. are in http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dz9zr008.pdf |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-04-20 10:13:13
|
Greetings.
It's time to think a bit about a 3.7.0 release. The following are
proposals, for contemplation/discussion.
I'd propose a release at end July or some time in August. That would
put it approximately 10 months after 3.6.0. In the past the gap
between releases has become IMO too long, so I'd like to ship 3.7.0
sooner rather than leave it late in the year.
Pretty definite to go in is:
* support for Fedora 15, Ubuntu 11.04, gcc 4.6, LLVM 2.9 [bug 242137,
unresolved, apparently line numbers don't work], Xcode 4.0.x [bug
267997, complete, but needs more testing]. General help in
testing/verifying these is required -- there's no way I can properly
test all this stuff myself.
* s390x port [bug 243404, completed, misc tidyup patches in progress]
* initial support for Power7 instructions [bug 267630, in progress]
* merge the HGDEV2 branch -- scalability and feature improvements for
Helgrind [no bug number]
* gdbserver integration [bug 214909, in progress]
* remove the AIX port. It has not been buildable since 3.4.1 and is
badly bit-rotted
* reduce the scope of exp-ptrcheck by removing the heap checks,
leaving just the stack and global array checking. The heap checking
was expensive, sometimes had a high false positive level, and
Memcheck does a better job 99%+ of the time. But the stack and
global checks are marginally useful. As a result, rename it to
"exp-sgcheck" ("sg" == stack and global)
More speculative:
* Alon Zakai's massdiff (Massif heap-snapshot differencing) patch [bug
269067]. I'd like this to be included, in some form -- the ability
to difference heap snapshots is very useful.
* Support for Android? [bug 266035] There appear to be increasing
requests for this. I have no idea of the state of the patchset on
266035. If it works well and is low-ish risk then maybe it should
be integrated for 3.7.0. If you care about Android support, please
try this out and give feedback.
* AVX (256-bit vector instructions) support for x86_64. AVX is a
massive bundle of stuff, and getting this completed in the next
three months strikes me as close to impossible. It might be
possible to get the basic infrastructure in place, though (VEX
prefix decoding, basic 256-bit vector stuff in IR and in the x86_64
backend, etc).
It also seems fairly low priority to me. AFAICS we have no bug
reports about non-support of AVX so far. Even the uptake of SSE4.x
was surprisingly slow.
* change of backtrace format? For years we've had code addresses
in backtraces. They use up valuable screen space, but 99% of the
time are completely useless. Should we omit them by default,
as does the TSan tool?
eg
Invalid write of size 1
at 0x400544: ddd (errs1.c:7)
by 0x400550: ccc (errs1.c:8)
by 0x40055B: bbb (errs1.c:9)
by 0x400566: aaa (errs1.c:10)
by 0x4005AE: main (errs1.c:17)
vs
Invalid write of size 1
#0 ddd (errs1.c:7)
#1 ccc (errs1.c:8)
#2 bbb (errs1.c:9)
#3 aaa (errs1.c:10)
#4 main (errs1.c:17)
Other stuff that I forgot / missed?
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-04-20 09:25:34
|
> Since crypto cannot be modeled in an efficient way we first > thought that a dirty helper might be the right solution, but there are > some problems: > - Dirty can only have one memory area > - The length field (mSize) cannot be an IRTemp > > What might be a good approach to tackle these instruction? Can we enhance > Dirty helpers to accept multiple memory areas with dynamic length fields > (this would require changes in most tools, I guess)? This would be particularly complicated for Memcheck. See do_shadow_Dirty and do_origins_Dirty in mc_translate.c for the current handling. It's not pretty. Can you explain more about the instruction(s)? What exactly are the inputs and the outputs? I am wondering if this can be done somehow using clean helpers. J |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-04-20 08:54:50
|
Folks, Currently Divya is doing some more work on missing instructions for s390x (e.g. stck, translate etc.). I will open bugzillas for these when the patches are ready. There are some crypto instructions (hashing, DES, etc.) which we also want to implement. These instruction get a parameter block two memory fields and a length. Since crypto cannot be modeled in an efficient way we first thought that a dirty helper might be the right solution, but there are some problems: - Dirty can only have one memory area - The length field (mSize) cannot be an IRTemp What might be a good approach to tackle these instruction? Can we enhance Dirty helpers to accept multiple memory areas with dynamic length fields (this would require changes in most tools, I guess)? Any better ideas? Christian |
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2011-04-19 07:37:01
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2011-04-19 02:00:06 EDT Ended at 2011-04-19 03:36:46 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 457 tests, 12 stderr failures, 9 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2011-04-19 05:42:11
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2011-04-18 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2011-04-19 00:41:56 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 447 tests, 15 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin-amd64
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin-amd64 2011-04-19 00:04:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:41:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,67 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Assertion failed: (!r), function main, file tc23_bogus_condwait.c, line 86.
-Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
- at 0x........: __kill (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: __assert_rtn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:86)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin-x86 2011-04-19 00:04:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:41:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2011-04-19 00:04:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:41:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2011-04-19 00:04:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:41:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:03.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:31:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:03.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:32:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:03.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:33:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -2,39 +2,24 @@
Thread #x is the program's root thread
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with invalid mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:13.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2011-04-19 00:28:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:13.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2011-04-19 00:28:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:11.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:21:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp-s390x 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:21:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:11.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:21:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp-s390x 2011-04-19 00:04:11.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:21:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump2.c:46)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
Signal caught, as expected
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:22:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2011-04-19 00:04:11.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:23:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,18 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -115,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:23:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2011-04-19 00:04:11.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:23:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:23:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:25:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-s390x 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:25:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,8 +1,15 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:11.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:26:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2011-04-19 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:26:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:19.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:29:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2011-04-19 00:04:19.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:29:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:18.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:29:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,27 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1986)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5738)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1986)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5738)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:18.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2011-04-19 00:29:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:18.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:29:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,20 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:18.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2011-04-19 00:29:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:18.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2011-04-19 00:30:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,25 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2011-04-19 00:04:18.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2011-04-19 00:30:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-04-19 02:54:00
|
Nightly build on vauxhall ( x86_64, Fedora 14 ) Started at 2011-04-19 03:20:03 BST Ended at 2011-04-19 03:53:42 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 569 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2011-04-19 02:51:51
|
Nightly build on ultra ( gcc 4.5.1 Linux 2.6.37.1-1.2-desktop x86_64 )
Started at 2011-04-18 21:30:01 CDT
Ended at 2011-04-18 21:51:28 CDT
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 569 tests, 76 stderr failures, 57 stdout failures, 3 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/tronical (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_exit_group (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_fork (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_supp (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_vfork (stderr)
cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stdout)
none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stderr)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cpuid (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cpuid (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stderr)
none/tests/x86/getseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/getseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stdout)
none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/jcxz (stdout)
none/tests/x86/jcxz (stderr)
none/tests/x86/lahf (stdout)
none/tests/x86/lahf (stderr)
none/tests/x86/looper (stdout)
none/tests/x86/looper (stderr)
none/tests/x86/movx (stdout)
none/tests/x86/movx (stderr)
none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stdout)
none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stderr)
none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stdout)
none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stderr)
none/tests/x86/smc1 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/smc1 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/ssse3_misaligned (stderr)
none/tests/x86/x86locked (stdout)
none/tests/x86/x86locked (stderr)
none/tests/x86/xadd (stdout)
none/tests/x86/xadd (stderr)
none/tests/x86-linux/seg_override (stdout)
none/tests/x86-linux/seg_override (stderr)
none/tests/x86-linux/sigcontext (stdout)
none/tests/x86-linux/sigcontext (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stdout)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/complex_rep (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/fldcw_check (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/million (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/rep_prefix (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test (post)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll (stdout)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll (stderr)
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 569 tests, 76 stderr failures, 56 stdout failures, 3 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/tronical (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_exit_group (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_fork (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_supp (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_vfork (stderr)
cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stdout)
none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stderr)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cpuid (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cpuid (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stderr)
none/tests/x86/getseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/getseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stdout)
none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/jcxz (stdout)
none/tests/x86/jcxz (stderr)
none/tests/x86/lahf (stdout)
none/tests/x86/lahf (stderr)
none/tests/x86/looper (stdout)
none/tests/x86/looper (stderr)
none/tests/x86/movx (stdout)
none/tests/x86/movx (stderr)
none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stdout)
none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stderr)
none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stdout)
none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stderr)
none/tests/x86/smc1 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/smc1 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/ssse3_misaligned (stderr)
none/tests/x86/x86locked (stdout)
none/tests/x86/x86locked (stderr)
none/tests/x86/xadd (stdout)
none/tests/x86/xadd (stderr)
none/tests/x86-linux/seg_override (stdout)
none/tests/x86-linux/seg_override (stderr)
none/tests/x86-linux/sigcontext (stdout)
none/tests/x86-linux/sigcontext (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/complex_rep (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/fldcw_check (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/million (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/rep_prefix (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test (post)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll (stdout)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll (stderr)
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short Mon Apr 18 21:40:37 2011
--- new.short Mon Apr 18 21:51:27 2011
***************
*** 8,10 ****
! == 569 tests, 76 stderr failures, 56 stdout failures, 3 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
--- 8,10 ----
! == 569 tests, 76 stderr failures, 57 stdout failures, 3 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
***************
*** 133,134 ****
--- 133,135 ----
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
+ drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stdout)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fpu-28-108.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:57.038586498 -0500
+++ fpu-28-108.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:14.538343888 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1 @@
-
-
-I refs:
-I1 misses:
-LLi misses:
-I1 miss rate:
-LLi miss rate:
-
-D refs:
-D1 misses:
-LLd misses:
-D1 miss rate:
-LLd miss rate:
-
-LL refs:
-LL misses:
-LL miss rate:
+valgrind: ./fpu-28-108: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:08.286046813 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:49:57.796615993 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-....................
+....
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test.post.diff
=================================================
--- clone_test.post.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.376050116 -0500
+++ clone_test.post.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.830287598 -0500
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-T 4 996 5 2 3 98991
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 1001 2 3 98994
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-
-
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 15 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 1501007
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
-
-T 2 3 99996
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 99996 4
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 99998 2
-
-
-# Thread 2
-# Total intervals: 25 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 2500001
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
-
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- clone_test.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.376050116 -0500
+++ clone_test.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.812288464 -0500
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 15 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 1501007
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
-# Thread 2
-# Total intervals: 25 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 2500001
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- ll.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.375050164 -0500
+++ ll.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.853286492 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 39 (Interval Size 1000)
-# Total instructions: 39439
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- ll.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.375050164 -0500
+++ ll.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.847286780 -0500
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-[0;1;37;47m#################################################################[0;30;47m#####[1;37m#########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m################################################################[0;30;47m#######[1;37m########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m###################[31m#[37m############################################[0;30;47m##[1;37mO[0;30;47m#[1;37mO[0;30;47m##[1;37m########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m##[0;30;47m######[1;37m##########[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m###########################################[0;30;47m#[1;33m#####[0;30;47m#[1;37m########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#############[0;30;47m#[1;37m##########################################[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[33m###[37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#########[31m###[37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m#[0;30;47m####[1;37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m####[0;30;47m###[1;37m##[0;30;47m#####[1;37m#[0;30;47m######[1;37m#####[0;30;47m#[1;37m##########[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m########[31m#[37m##[31m#[0;30;47m#[1;37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m#######[0;30;47m#[1;37m############[0;30;47m##[1;37m####[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#######[31m#[37m###[31m#[0;30;47m#[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[0;30;47m###[1;37m#########[0;30;47m#[1;37m############[0;30;47m###[1;37m###[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##########[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[0;30;47m###[1;37m########[33m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m###########[0;30;47m##[1;33m#[37m###[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#######[0;30;47m#[1;37m#[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[33m######[0;30;47m#[1;37m#######[30m#[33m######[37m#[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[0;30;47m##[1;37m#[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m#[0;30;47m#[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m###[1;37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m####[33m#######[0;30;47m#[1;37m#####[0;30;47m#[1;33m#######[37m#[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m##[0;30;47m############[1;37m##[0;30;47m###[1;37m##[0;30;47m####[1;37m###[0;30;47m####[1;37m###[0;30;47m####[1;37m#[0;30;47m###[1;37m#[0;30;47m#####[1;37m#[0;30;47m######[1;37m###[33m#####[30m#[0;30;47m#####[1m#[33m#####[37m###[1;37;40m
-
-[7CLinux Version 2.6.29, Compiled #1 SMP Mon May 4 09:51:54 EDT 2009
-[5COne 1665MHz AMD Athlon(tm) Processor, 512M RAM, 3330.53 Bogomips Total
-[37Ctobler[0m
-
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/complex_rep.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- complex_rep.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.506043878 -0500
+++ complex_rep.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.701293800 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 0 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 8206
-# Total reps: 2100228
-# Unique reps: 2052
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/fldcw_check.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fldcw_check.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.505043926 -0500
+++ fldcw_check.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.725292646 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 0 (Interval Size 10000)
-# Total instructions: 9261
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 2061
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/million.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- million.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.504043974 -0500
+++ million.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.749291492 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 10 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 1000000
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/rep_prefix.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rep_prefix.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:47.504043974 -0500
+++ rep_prefix.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:51:27.776290194 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 0 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 124
-# Total reps: 229402
-# Unique reps: 26
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- bad_percentify.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2011-04-18 21:40:45.296149908 -0500
+++ bad_percentify.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:50:56.874775928 -0500
@@ -1,32 +1,29 @@
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:88)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:93)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:98)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:44.196202682 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:48:12.701666920 -0500
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <fn>do_clone.clone.0</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -122,11 +122,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
@@ -176,11 +171,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
@@ -230,11 +220,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
@@ -284,11 +269,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:51.420856044 -0500
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:45:12.564320448 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2011-04-18 21:40:52.335812142 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:45:33.259326553 -0500
@@ -72,17 +72,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -128,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2011-04-18 21:40:52.290814302 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:45:33.259326553 -0500
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2011-04-18 21:40:52.349811470 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:45:33.259326553 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,8 +27,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -37,8 +38,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -47,8 +49,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -57,8 +60,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -67,8 +71,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -77,8 +82,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -87,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2011-04-18 21:40:52.287814446 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:45:33.259326553 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug133694.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.945974789 -0500
+++ bug133694.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.648434667 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./bug133694: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- bug133694.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.940975029 -0500
+++ bug133694.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.623435867 -0500
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-success
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- int3-x86.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.942974933 -0500
+++ int3-x86.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.675433371 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./int3-x86: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- int3-x86.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.947974693 -0500
+++ int3-x86.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.654434379 -0500
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-main
-in int_handler, EIP is ...
-PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.945974789 -0500
+++ scalar.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.703432025 -0500
@@ -1,3275 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
- 0:__NR_restart_syscall n/a
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
- 1: __NR_exit below
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
- 2: __NR_fork other
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
- 3: __NR_read 1+3s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param (syscallno) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(buf) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(count) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 4: __NR_write 3s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param write(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(buf) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(count) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 5: __NR_open (2-args) 2s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param open(filename) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param open(flags) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param open(filename) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 5: __NR_open (3-args) 1s 0m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param open(mode) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 6: __NR_close 1s 0m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param close(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 7: __NR_waitpid 3s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param waitpid(pid) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param waitpid(status) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param waitpid(options) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param waitpid(status) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 8: __NR_creat 2s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param creat(pathname) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param creat(mode) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param creat(pathname) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_exit_group.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_exit_group.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.946974741 -0500
+++ scalar_exit_group.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.735430489 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
-252: __NR_exit_group 1s 0m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param exit_group(status) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
+valgrind: ./scalar_exit_group: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_fork.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_fork.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.940975029 -0500
+++ scalar_fork.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.763429143 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
- 2: __NR_fork 0e
------------------------------------------------------
+valgrind: ./scalar_fork: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_supp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_supp.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.946974741 -0500
+++ scalar_supp.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.791427799 -0500
@@ -1,9 +1 @@
-Syscall param (syscallno) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(count) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
+valgrind: ./scalar_supp: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_vfork.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_vfork.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:48.946974741 -0500
+++ scalar_vfork.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.818426501 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
-190: __NR_vfork 0e
------------------------------------------------------
+valgrind: ./scalar_vfork: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug152022.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.226817373 -0500
+++ bug152022.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.014465119 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./bug152022: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- espindola2.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.233817037 -0500
+++ espindola2.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.047463535 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./espindola2: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fpeflags.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.236816893 -0500
+++ fpeflags.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.074462237 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./fpeflags: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fprem.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fprem.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.227817325 -0500
+++ fprem.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.103460845 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./fprem: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fprem.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- fprem.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.225817421 -0500
+++ fprem.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.080461949 -0500
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-fprem 0.693147
-fprem1 0.693147
-fsincos 0.130278
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fxsave.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.236816893 -0500
+++ fxsave.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.143458923 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./fxsave: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- fxsave.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:40:52.234816989 -0500
+++ fxsave.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.118460123 -0500
@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
-Re-run with any arg to suppress least-significant
- 16 bits of FP numbers
-
-BEFORE
- 0 7f 03 00 10 fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1f 00 00 ff ff ff ff
- 32 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 48 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 64 xx xx cf fb 84 9a 20 9a fd 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 80 xx xx cf d1 f7 17 72 b1 fe 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 96 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
-112 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
-128 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-144 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-160 78 56 34 12 44 33 22 11 88 77 66 55 21 43 65 87
-176 01 ef cd ab dd cc bb aa 11 00 ff ee ba dc fe 10
-192 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-208 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-224 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-240 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-256 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-272 79 b9 f9 b9 99 ff 99 bb 99 77 99 bb 9b 9f 9b 97
-288 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-304 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-320 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-336 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-352 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-368 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-384 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-400 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-416 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-432 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-448 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-464 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-480 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-496 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-
-ZEROED
- 0 7f 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1f 00 00 ff ff ff ff
- 32 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 48 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 64 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 80 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 96 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-112 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-128 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-144 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-160 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-176 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-192 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-208 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-224 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-240 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-256 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-272 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-288 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-304 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-320 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-336 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-352 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-368 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-384 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-400 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-416 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-432 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-448 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-464 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-480 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-496 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-
-RESTORED
- 0 7f 03 00 10 fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1f 00 00 ff ff ff ff
- 32 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 48 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 64 xx xx cf fb 84 9a 20 9a fd 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 80 xx xx cf d1 f7 17 72 b1 fe 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 96 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
-112 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
-128 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-144 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-160 78 56 34 12 44 33 22 11 88 77 66 55 21 43 65 87
-176 01 ef cd ab dd cc bb aa 11 00 ff ee ba dc fe 10
-192 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-208 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-224 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-240 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-256 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-272 79 b9 f9 b9 99 ff 99 bb 99 77 99 bb 9b 9f 9b 97
-288 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-304 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-320 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-336 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-352 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-368 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-384 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_basic.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.910160818 -0500
+++ insn_basic.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.183457001 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_basic: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_basic.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.924160146 -0500
+++ insn_basic.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.159458155 -0500
@@ -1,1056 +0,0 @@
-adcb_1 ... ok
-adcb_2 ... ok
-adcb_3 ... ok
-adcb_4 ... ok
-adcb_5 ... ok
-adcb_6 ... ok
-adcb_7 ... ok
-adcb_8 ... ok
-adcb_9 ... ok
-adcb_10 ... ok
-adcb_11 ... ok
-adcb_12 ... ok
-adcw_1 ... ok
-adcw_2 ... ok
-adcw_3 ... ok
-adcw_4 ... ok
-adcw_5 ... ok
-adcw_6 ... ok
-adcw_7 ... ok
-adcw_8 ... ok
-adcw_9 ... ok
-adcw_10 ... ok
-adcw_11 ... ok
-adcw_12 ... ok
-adcw_13 ... ok
-adcw_14 ... ok
-adcl_1 ... ok
-adcl_2 ... ok
-adcl_3 ... ok
-adcl_4 ... ok
-adcl_5 ... ok
-adcl_6 ... ok
-adcl_7 ... ok
-adcl_8 ... ok
-adcl_9 ... ok
-adcl_10 ... ok
-adcl_11 ... ok
-adcl_12 ... ok
-adcl_13 ... ok
-adcl_14 ... ok
-addb_1 ... ok
-addb_2 ... ok
-addb_3 ... ok
-addb_4 ... ok
-addb_5 ... ok
-addb_6 ... ok
-addw_1 ... ok
-addw_2 ... ok
-addw_3 ... ok
-addw_4 ... ok
-addw_5 ... ok
-addw_6 ... ok
-addw_7 ... ok
-addl_1 ... ok
-addl_2 ... ok
-addl_3 ... ok
-addl_4 ... ok
-addl_5 ... ok
-addl_6 ... ok
-addl_7 ... ok
-andb_1 ... ok
-andb_2 ... ok
-andb_3 ... ok
-andb_4 ... ok
-andb_5 ... ok
-andb_6 ... ok
-andw_1 ... ok
-andw_2 ... ok
-andw_3 ... ok
-andw_4 ... ok
-andw_5 ... ok
-andw_6 ... ok
-andw_7 ... ok
-andl_1 ... ok
-andl_2 ... ok
-andl_3 ... ok
-andl_4 ... ok
-andl_5 ... ok
-andl_6 ... ok
-andl_7 ... ok
-bsfw_1 ... ok
-bsfw_2 ... ok
-bsfl_1 ... ok
-bsfl_2 ... ok
-bsrw_1 ... ok
-bsrw_2 ... ok
-bsrl_1 ... ok
-bsrl_2 ... ok
-bswapl_1 ... ok
-btw_1 ... ok
-btw_2 ... ok
-btw_3 ... ok
-btw_4 ... ok
-btw_5 ... ok
-btw_6 ... ok
-btw_7 ... ok
-btw_8 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_cmov.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.909160866 -0500
+++ insn_cmov.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.230454745 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_cmov: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_cmov.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.922160242 -0500
+++ insn_cmov.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.198456281 -0500
@@ -1,384 +0,0 @@
-cmova_1 ... ok
-cmova_2 ... ok
-cmova_3 ... ok
-cmova_4 ... ok
-cmova_5 ... ok
-cmova_6 ... ok
-cmova_7 ... ok
-cmova_8 ... ok
-cmovae_1 ... ok
-cmovae_2 ... ok
-cmovae_3 ... ok
-cmovae_4 ... ok
-cmovb_1 ... ok
-cmovb_2 ... ok
-cmovb_3 ... ok
-cmovb_4 ... ok
-cmovbe_1 ... ok
-cmovbe_2 ... ok
-cmovbe_3 ... ok
-cmovbe_4 ... ok
-cmovbe_5 ... ok
-cmovbe_6 ... ok
-cmovbe_7 ... ok
-cmovbe_8 ... ok
-cmovc_1 ... ok
-cmovc_2 ... ok
-cmovc_3 ... ok
-cmovc_4 ... ok
-cmove_1 ... ok
-cmove_2 ... ok
-cmove_3 ... ok
-cmove_4 ... ok
-cmovg_1 ... ok
-cmovg_2 ... ok
-cmovg_3 ... ok
-cmovg_4 ... ok
-cmovg_5 ... ok
-cmovg_6 ... ok
-cmovg_7 ... ok
-cmovg_8 ... ok
-cmovg_9 ... ok
-cmovg_10 ... ok
-cmovg_11 ... ok
-cmovg_12 ... ok
-cmovg_13 ... ok
-cmovg_14 ... ok
-cmovg_15 ... ok
-cmovg_16 ... ok
-cmovge_1 ... ok
-cmovge_2 ... ok
-cmovge_3 ... ok
-cmovge_4 ... ok
-cmovge_5 ... ok
-cmovge_6 ... ok
-cmovge_7 ... ok
-cmovge_8 ... ok
-cmovl_1 ... ok
-cmovl_2 ... ok
-cmovl_3 ... ok
-cmovl_4 ... ok
-cmovl_5 ... ok
-cmovl_6 ... ok
-cmovl_7 ... ok
-cmovl_8 ... ok
-cmovle_1 ... ok
-cmovle_2 ... ok
-cmovle_3 ... ok
-cmovle_4 ... ok
-cmovle_5 ... ok
-cmovle_6 ... ok
-cmovle_7 ... ok
-cmovle_8 ... ok
-cmovle_9 ... ok
-cmovle_10 ... ok
-cmovle_11 ... ok
-cmovle_12 ... ok
-cmovle_13 ... ok
-cmovle_14 ... ok
-cmovle_15 ... ok
-cmovle_16 ... ok
-cmovna_1 ... ok
-cmovna_2 ... ok
-cmovna_3 ... ok
-cmovna_4 ... ok
-cmovna_5 ... ok
-cmovna_6 ... ok
-cmovna_7 ... ok
-cmovna_8 ... ok
-cmovnae_1 ... ok
-cmovnae_2 ... ok
-cmovnae_3 ... ok
-cmovnae_4 ... ok
-cmovnb_1 ... ok
-cmovnb_2 ... ok
-cmovnb_3 ... ok
-cmovnb_4 ... ok
-cmovnbe_1 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_fpu.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.915160578 -0500
+++ insn_fpu.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.268452919 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_fpu: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_fpu.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.898161394 -0500
+++ insn_fpu.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.239454313 -0500
@@ -1,452 +0,0 @@
-fabs_1 ... ok
-fabs_2 ... ok
-fabs_3 ... ok
-fabs_4 ... ok
-fadds_1 ... ok
-fadds_2 ... ok
-fadds_3 ... ok
-fadds_4 ... ok
-faddl_1 ... ok
-faddl_2 ... ok
-faddl_3 ... ok
-faddl_4 ... ok
-fadd_1 ... ok
-fadd_2 ... ok
-fadd_3 ... ok
-fadd_4 ... ok
-fadd_5 ... ok
-fadd_6 ... ok
-fadd_7 ... ok
-fadd_8 ... ok
-fadd_9 ... ok
-fadd_10 ... ok
-fadd_11 ... ok
-fadd_12 ... ok
-fadd_13 ... ok
-fadd_14 ... ok
-fadd_15 ... ok
-fadd_16 ... ok
-faddp_1 ... ok
-faddp_2 ... ok
-faddp_3 ... ok
-faddp_4 ... ok
-faddp_5 ... ok
-faddp_6 ... ok
-faddp_7 ... ok
-faddp_8 ... ok
-faddp_9 ... ok
-faddp_10 ... ok
-faddp_11 ... ok
-faddp_12 ... ok
-faddp_13 ... ok
-faddp_14 ... ok
-faddp_15 ... ok
-faddp_16 ... ok
-fiadds_1 ... ok
-fiadds_2 ... ok
-fiadds_3 ... ok
-fiadds_4 ... ok
-fiadds_5 ... ok
-fiadds_6 ... ok
-fiadds_7 ... ok
-fiadds_8 ... ok
-fiaddl_1 ... ok
-fiaddl_2 ... ok
-fiaddl_3 ... ok
-fiaddl_4 ... ok
-fiaddl_5 ... ok
-fiaddl_6 ... ok
-fiaddl_7 ... ok
-fiaddl_8 ... ok
-fcomi_1 ... ok
-fcomi_2 ... ok
-fcomi_3 ... ok
-fcomi_4 ... ok
-fcomi_5 ... ok
-fcomi_6 ... ok
-fcomip_1 ... ok
-fcomip_2 ... ok
-fcomip_3 ... ok
-fcomip_4 ... ok
-fcomip_5 ... ok
-fcomip_6 ... ok
-fucomi_1 ... ok
-fucomi_2 ... ok
-fucomi_3 ... ok
-fucomi_4 ... ok
-fucomi_5 ... ok
-fucomi_6 ... ok
-fucomip_1 ... ok
-fucomip_2 ... ok
-fucomip_3 ... ok
-fucomip_4 ... ok
-fucomip_5 ... ok
-fucomip_6 ... ok
-fchs_1 ... ok
-fchs_2 ... ok
-fchs_3 ... ok
-fchs_4 ... ok
-fdivs_1 ... ok
-fdivs_2 ... ok
-fdivs_3 ... ok
-fdivs_4 ... ok
-fdivl_1 ... ok
-fdivl_2 ... ok
-fdivl_3 ... ok
-fdivl_4 ... ok
-fdiv_1 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_mmx.stderr.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.916160530 -0500
+++ insn_mmx.stderr.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.298451479 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_mmx: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_mmx.stdout.exp 2011-04-18 21:41:05.900161298 -0500
+++ insn_mmx.stdout.out 2011-04-18 21:46:12.275452583 -0500
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
-movd_1 ... ok
-movd_2 ... ok
-movd_3 ... ok
-movd_...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-04-19 02:39:21
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2011-04-19 03:10:04 BST Ended at 2011-04-19 03:39:05 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 573 tests, 3 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/amd64/sse4-64 (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-04-18 20:36:00
|
Nightly build on sless390 ( SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 gcc 4.3.4 on z10 (s390x) ) Started at 2011-04-18 22:10:01 CEST Ended at 2011-04-18 22:35:46 CEST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 460 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2011-04-18 20:31:48
|
Nightly build on fedora390 ( Fedora 13/14/15 mix with gcc 3.5.3 on z196 (s390x) ) Started at 2011-04-18 22:10:01 CEST Ended at 2011-04-18 22:31:01 CEST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 459 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2011-04-18 11:26:33
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2011-04-18 12:26:25 +0100 (Mon, 18 Apr 2011)
New Revision: 11703
Log:
Reinstate the check that a thread doing
pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast} holds the associated mutex, if that is
known. Basically you'd be nuts not to hold to this rule, even though
POSIX doesn't mandate it.
Modified:
branches/HGDEV2/helgrind/hg_main.c
Modified: branches/HGDEV2/helgrind/hg_main.c
===================================================================
--- branches/HGDEV2/helgrind/hg_main.c 2011-04-18 10:37:56 UTC (rev 11702)
+++ branches/HGDEV2/helgrind/hg_main.c 2011-04-18 11:26:25 UTC (rev 11703)
@@ -2178,32 +2178,53 @@
// Hmm. POSIX doesn't actually say that it's an error to call
// pthread_cond_signal with the associated mutex being unlocked.
// Although it does say that it should be "if consistent scheduling
- // is desired."
+ // is desired." For that reason, print "dubious" if the lock isn't
+ // held by any thread. Skip the "dubious" if it is held by some
+ // other thread; that sounds straight-out wrong.
//
- // For the moment, disable these checks.
- //lk = map_locks_maybe_lookup(cvi->mx_ga);
- //if (lk == NULL || cvi->mx_ga == 0) {
- // HG_(record_error_Misc)( thr,
- // "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: "
- // "no or invalid mutex associated with cond");
- //}
- ///* note: lk could be NULL. Be careful. */
- //if (lk) {
- // if (lk->kind == LK_rdwr) {
- // HG_(record_error_Misc)(thr,
- // "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: associated lock is a rwlock");
- // }
- // if (lk->heldBy == NULL) {
- // HG_(record_error_Misc)(thr,
- // "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: "
- // "associated lock is not held by any thread");
- // }
- // if (lk->heldBy != NULL && 0 == VG_(elemBag)(lk->heldBy, (Word)thr)) {
- // HG_(record_error_Misc)(thr,
- // "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: "
- // "associated lock is not held by calling thread");
- // }
- //}
+ // Anybody who writes code that signals on a CV without holding
+ // the associated MX needs to be shipped off to a lunatic asylum
+ // ASAP, even though POSIX doesn't actually declare such behaviour
+ // illegal -- it makes code extremely difficult to understand/
+ // reason about. In particular it puts the signalling thread in
+ // a situation where it is racing against the released waiter
+ // as soon as the signalling is done, and so there needs to be
+ // some auxiliary synchronisation mechanism in the program that
+ // makes this safe -- or the race(s) need to be harmless, or
+ // probably nonexistent.
+ //
+ if (1) {
+ Lock* lk = NULL;
+ if (cvi->mx_ga != 0) {
+ lk = map_locks_maybe_lookup( (Addr)cvi->mx_ga );
+ }
+ /* note: lk could be NULL. Be careful. */
+ if (lk) {
+ if (lk->kind == LK_rdwr) {
+ HG_(record_error_Misc)(thr,
+ "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: associated lock is a rwlock");
+ }
+ if (lk->heldBy == NULL) {
+ HG_(record_error_Misc)(thr,
+ "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: dubious: "
+ "associated lock is not held by any thread");
+ }
+ if (lk->heldBy != NULL && 0 == VG_(elemBag)(lk->heldBy, (Word)thr)) {
+ HG_(record_error_Misc)(thr,
+ "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: "
+ "associated lock is not held by calling thread");
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* Couldn't even find the damn thing. */
+ // But actually .. that's not necessarily an error. We don't
+ // know the (CV,MX) binding until a pthread_cond_wait or bcast
+ // shows us what it is, and if that may not have happened yet.
+ // So just keep quiet in this circumstance.
+ //HG_(record_error_Misc)( thr,
+ // "pthread_cond_{signal,broadcast}: "
+ // "no or invalid mutex associated with cond");
+ }
+ }
libhb_so_send( thr->hbthr, cvi->so, True/*strong_send*/ );
}
|