You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
|
|
3
(1) |
4
(16) |
5
(6) |
6
(17) |
7
(18) |
8
(13) |
9
(7) |
|
10
(7) |
11
(15) |
12
(14) |
13
(10) |
14
(9) |
15
(17) |
16
(6) |
|
17
|
18
(18) |
19
(7) |
20
(20) |
21
(10) |
22
(8) |
23
(5) |
|
24
(2) |
25
(2) |
26
(10) |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-04 19:17:30
|
Author: weidendo
Date: 2010-10-04 20:17:21 +0100 (Mon, 04 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 11393
Log:
Make sure that string buffers for cost arrays are large enough.
17 64bit values fit into 512 bytes (but not 256...).
Modified:
trunk/callgrind/dump.c
trunk/callgrind/global.h
trunk/callgrind/main.c
Modified: trunk/callgrind/dump.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/callgrind/dump.c 2010-10-03 12:35:03 UTC (rev 11392)
+++ trunk/callgrind/dump.c 2010-10-04 19:17:21 UTC (rev 11393)
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
* print_fn_pos, fprint_apos, fprint_fcost, fprint_jcc,
* fprint_fcc_ln, dump_run_info, dump_state_info
*/
-static Char outbuf[FILENAME_LEN + FN_NAME_LEN + OBJ_NAME_LEN];
+static Char outbuf[FILENAME_LEN + FN_NAME_LEN + OBJ_NAME_LEN + COSTS_LEN];
Int CLG_(get_dump_counter)(void)
{
Modified: trunk/callgrind/global.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/callgrind/global.h 2010-10-03 12:35:03 UTC (rev 11392)
+++ trunk/callgrind/global.h 2010-10-04 19:17:21 UTC (rev 11393)
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@
#define FILENAME_LEN 256
#define FN_NAME_LEN 4096 /* for C++ code :-) */
#define OBJ_NAME_LEN 256
+#define COSTS_LEN 512 /* at least 17x 64bit values */
#define BUF_LEN 512
#define COMMIFY_BUF_LEN 128
#define RESULTS_BUF_LEN 256
Modified: trunk/callgrind/main.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/callgrind/main.c 2010-10-03 12:35:03 UTC (rev 11392)
+++ trunk/callgrind/main.c 2010-10-04 19:17:21 UTC (rev 11393)
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@
static
void finish(void)
{
- Char buf[RESULTS_BUF_LEN], fmt[128];
+ Char buf[32+COSTS_LEN], fmt[128];
Int l1, l2, l3;
FullCost total;
|
|
From: adnan i. <adn...@se...> - 2010-10-04 15:51:54
|
Tom & John thanx again
This helped a lot to understand things. Running ldd on a simple dynamically
linked program shows following (which also clarifies from where these paths
are appearing in valgrind).
libc.so.6 => /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 (0x2aad7000)
/lib32/ld.so.1 (0x2aaa8000)
Version information:
./abi-n32-dyn:
libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib32/tls/libc.so.6
/lib32/tls/libc.so.6:
ld.so.1 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib32/ld.so.1
ld.so.1 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib32/ld.so.1
Adnan
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:28 PM, John Reiser <jr...@bi...> wrote:
> > We have confirmed that right interpreter (linker mentioned in .interp
> > section of dynamically linked executable) is used. However when shared
> > objects are to be loaded, paths do not seem correct. For example: one of
> > the path is /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 which does not exist.
>
> It is normal for the PT_INTERP ld-linux to try several locations before
> finding any given shared library. For instance, if shell environment
> variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set, then those directories will be tried
> in order. After that, then ld-linux has a builtin search path of
> "/lib:/usr/lib".
>
> Mixed in with these are further choices which depend on detected hardware
> capabilities (perhaps floating point instruction set, etc.) and the
> environment that was assumed when glibc was built: kind of threads,
> preference for virtual addresses used by (and/or addressing mode used
> to access) Thread Local Storage (TLS), etc.
>
> However, if /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 is not found then ld-linux should
> proceed to try the next location for libc.so.6.
>
> _Perhaps_ there is a bug in valgrind such that the code that ld-linux
> uses to detect the actual hardware gets the wrong answer.
> _Perhaps_ it is possible that valgrind's placement of various things
> in the address space has confused ld-linux about TLS.
>
> In order to debug this, run
> LD_DEBUG=libs ./my_app <args>...
> LD_DEBUG=libs valgrind ./my_app <args>...
> and compare. In general, "LD_DEBUG=help /bin/date" gives documentation.
>
> A more detailed analysis can be obtained by comparing:
> strace -e files -o strace.plain ./my_app <args>...
> strace -e files -o strace.valgrind valgrind ./my_app <args>...
> which reveals *all* file accesses.
>
> --
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
> two and get a better understanding.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Valgrind-developers mailing list
> Val...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
>
|
|
From: John R. <jr...@bi...> - 2010-10-04 15:28:47
|
> We have confirmed that right interpreter (linker mentioned in .interp > section of dynamically linked executable) is used. However when shared > objects are to be loaded, paths do not seem correct. For example: one of > the path is /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 which does not exist. It is normal for the PT_INTERP ld-linux to try several locations before finding any given shared library. For instance, if shell environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set, then those directories will be tried in order. After that, then ld-linux has a builtin search path of "/lib:/usr/lib". Mixed in with these are further choices which depend on detected hardware capabilities (perhaps floating point instruction set, etc.) and the environment that was assumed when glibc was built: kind of threads, preference for virtual addresses used by (and/or addressing mode used to access) Thread Local Storage (TLS), etc. However, if /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 is not found then ld-linux should proceed to try the next location for libc.so.6. _Perhaps_ there is a bug in valgrind such that the code that ld-linux uses to detect the actual hardware gets the wrong answer. _Perhaps_ it is possible that valgrind's placement of various things in the address space has confused ld-linux about TLS. In order to debug this, run LD_DEBUG=libs ./my_app <args>... LD_DEBUG=libs valgrind ./my_app <args>... and compare. In general, "LD_DEBUG=help /bin/date" gives documentation. A more detailed analysis can be obtained by comparing: strace -e files -o strace.plain ./my_app <args>... strace -e files -o strace.valgrind valgrind ./my_app <args>... which reveals *all* file accesses. -- |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2010-10-04 14:10:29
|
On 04/10/10 15:06, adnan iqbal wrote: > We have confirmed that right interpreter (linker mentioned in .interp > section of dynamically linked executable) is used. However when shared > objects are to be loaded, paths do not seem correct. For example: one of > the path is /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 which does not exist. So what should it be? What does ldd say about the libraries that the program needs? Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: adnan i. <adn...@se...> - 2010-10-04 14:06:41
|
Hi Tom, Thanx for a very quick reply. Your answer is certainly very logical and sensible. However the problem that we are having right now, confuses things a bit. Here goes the complete scenario. We have ported valgrind for mips to an extent that we think almost all available instructions and complete coregrind has been ported for NABI32. Statically compiled C/Assembaly programs run perfectly fine whereas dynamically linked programs cause some trouble. We have confirmed that right interpreter (linker mentioned in .interp section of dynamically linked executable) is used. However when shared objects are to be loaded, paths do not seem correct. For example: one of the path is /lib32/tls/libc.so.6 which does not exist. Regards Adnan On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: > On 04/10/10 14:02, adnan iqbal wrote: > > Valgrinding of any dynamically linked program starts with the >> valgrinding of linker. this also results in loading (via >> sys_open/sys_read OR mmapping) several shared objects (e.g., >> ld.so.cache and libc-2.9.so <http://libc-2.9.so>). >> >> I am trying to figure out from where the path of these shared objects is >> obtained/controlled. For example in x86-linux the path used for >> libc-2.9.so <http://libc-2.9.so> is /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so >> <http://libc-2.9.so>. I need to do so because it appears that for other >> >> ports of valgrind it shall be necessary to replace these paths with more >> appropriate ones. >> > > This is nothing to do with valgrind - valgrind just runs ld.so in the same > way the kernel normally does and ld.so decides what other shared libraries > are needed and where to load then from. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes (to...@co...) > http://compton.nu/ > |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2010-10-04 13:37:13
|
On 04/10/10 14:02, adnan iqbal wrote: > Valgrinding of any dynamically linked program starts with the > valgrinding of linker. this also results in loading (via > sys_open/sys_read OR mmapping) several shared objects (e.g., > ld.so.cache and libc-2.9.so <http://libc-2.9.so>). > I am trying to figure out from where the path of these shared objects is > obtained/controlled. For example in x86-linux the path used for > libc-2.9.so <http://libc-2.9.so> is /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so > <http://libc-2.9.so>. I need to do so because it appears that for other > ports of valgrind it shall be necessary to replace these paths with more > appropriate ones. This is nothing to do with valgrind - valgrind just runs ld.so in the same way the kernel normally does and ld.so decides what other shared libraries are needed and where to load then from. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: adnan i. <adn...@se...> - 2010-10-04 13:30:18
|
Hi, Valgrinding of any dynamically linked program starts with the valgrinding of linker. this also results in loading (via sys_open/sys_read OR mmapping) several shared objects (e.g., ld.so.cache and libc-2.9.so). I am trying to figure out from where the path of these shared objects is obtained/controlled. For example in x86-linux the path used for libc-2.9.sois /lib/tls/i686/cmov/ libc-2.9.so. I need to do so because it appears that for other ports of valgrind it shall be necessary to replace these paths with more appropriate ones. Thanx Adnan |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-04 09:34:54
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-04 10:34:46 +0100 (Mon, 04 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 2059
Log:
Give all the ARM code generation enums non-overlapping value ranges, so
as to get better diagnostic information about type errors from gcc-4.5.
Modified:
trunk/priv/host_arm_defs.h
Modified: trunk/priv/host_arm_defs.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/host_arm_defs.h 2010-10-01 14:06:22 UTC (rev 2058)
+++ trunk/priv/host_arm_defs.h 2010-10-04 09:34:46 UTC (rev 2059)
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
/* --- Addressing Mode suitable for Neon --- */
typedef
enum {
- ARMamN_R,
+ ARMamN_R=5,
ARMamN_RR
/* ... */
}
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMri84_I84=5, /* imm8 `ror` (2 * imm4) */
+ ARMri84_I84=7, /* imm8 `ror` (2 * imm4) */
ARMri84_R /* reg */
}
ARMRI84Tag;
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
/* --------- Reg or imm5 operands --------- */
typedef
enum {
- ARMri5_I5=7, /* imm5, 1 .. 31 only (no zero!) */
+ ARMri5_I5=9, /* imm5, 1 .. 31 only (no zero!) */
ARMri5_R /* reg */
}
ARMRI5Tag;
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMNRS_Reg,
+ ARMNRS_Reg=11,
ARMNRS_Scalar
}
ARMNRS_tag;
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
/* --------- */
typedef
enum {
- ARMalu_ADD=10, /* plain 32-bit add */
+ ARMalu_ADD=20, /* plain 32-bit add */
ARMalu_ADDS, /* 32-bit add, and set the flags */
ARMalu_ADC, /* 32-bit add with carry */
ARMalu_SUB, /* plain 32-bit subtract */
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMsh_SHL=20,
+ ARMsh_SHL=40,
ARMsh_SHR,
ARMsh_SAR
}
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMun_NEG=30,
+ ARMun_NEG=50,
ARMun_NOT,
ARMun_CLZ
}
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMmul_PLAIN=40,
+ ARMmul_PLAIN=60,
ARMmul_ZX,
ARMmul_SX
}
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMvfp_ADD=50,
+ ARMvfp_ADD=70,
ARMvfp_SUB,
ARMvfp_MUL,
ARMvfp_DIV
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMvfpu_COPY=60,
+ ARMvfpu_COPY=80,
ARMvfpu_NEG,
ARMvfpu_ABS,
ARMvfpu_SQRT
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMneon_VAND=70,
+ ARMneon_VAND=90,
ARMneon_VORR,
ARMneon_VXOR,
ARMneon_VADD,
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMneon_VSHL,
+ ARMneon_VSHL=150,
ARMneon_VSAL, /* Yah, not SAR but SAL */
ARMneon_VQSHL,
ARMneon_VQSAL
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMneon_COPY,
+ ARMneon_COPY=160,
ARMneon_COPYLU,
ARMneon_COPYLS,
ARMneon_COPYN,
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMneon_SETELEM,
+ ARMneon_SETELEM=200,
ARMneon_GETELEMU,
ARMneon_GETELEMS
}
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
typedef
enum {
- ARMneon_TRN=100,
+ ARMneon_TRN=210,
ARMneon_ZIP,
ARMneon_UZP
/* ... */
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@
typedef
enum {
/* baseline */
- ARMin_Alu=70,
+ ARMin_Alu=220,
ARMin_Shift,
ARMin_Unary,
ARMin_CmpOrTst,
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-10-04 08:00:34
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-10-04 02:30:15 EDT Ended at 2010-10-04 04:00:18 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 449 tests, 14 stderr failures, 11 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stderr) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-04 05:40:17
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-10-03 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-04 00:40:02 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 443 tests, 19 stderr failures, 6 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-04 00:03:26.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:39:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-04 00:03:26.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:39:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-04 00:03:26.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:39:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:29:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:30:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-04 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:30:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-04 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:30:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-04 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:30:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:31:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-10-04 00:26:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-10-04 00:26:16.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:19:16.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:19:18.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:20:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 281
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/capget.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- capget.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ capget.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:20:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
capget result:
-effective 0
-permitted 0
+effective 0x........
+permitted 0x........
inheritable 0
HEAP SUMMARY:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:20:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:22:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-04 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:22:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:22:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:23:48.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:24:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2010-10-04 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:24:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:27:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2010-10-04 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:27:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:27:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,23 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1979)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5731)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2010-10-04 00:27:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:27:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,19 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2010-10-04 00:27:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2010-10-04 00:27:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,22 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2010-10-04 00:27:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ap+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000bp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000cp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ep+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000fp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000011p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049fp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3cp+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0938p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7484p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7dp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-04 04:32:30
|
Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 9.8.0 i386 )
Started at 2010-10-03 23:05:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-03 23:32:15 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 434 tests, 70 stderr failures, 14 stdout failures, 9 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar (stderr)
memcheck/tests/null_socket (stdout)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/signal2 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/signal2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
massif/tests/peak (stderr)
massif/tests/peak (post)
massif/tests/peak2 (stderr)
massif/tests/peak2 (post)
massif/tests/realloc (stderr)
massif/tests/realloc (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (post)
none/tests/async-sigs (stderr)
none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stdout)
none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stderr)
none/tests/faultstatus (stderr)
none/tests/pending (stdout)
none/tests/pending (stderr)
none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stdout)
none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stderr)
none/tests/require-text-symbol-2 (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout)
helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg04_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared (stderr)
helgrind/tests/rwlock_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/rwlock_test (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc16_byterace (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc19_shadowmem (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc24_nonzero_sem (stderr)
drd/tests/bug-235681 (stderr)
drd/tests/hold_lock_1 (stderr)
drd/tests/hold_lock_2 (stderr)
drd/tests/monitor_example (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_broadcast (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race2 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race3 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached (stdout)
drd/tests/pth_detached (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stdout)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_race (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_test (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking (stderr)
drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr)
drd/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/trylock (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bug-235681.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug-235681.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ bug-235681.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-Done.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/hold_lock_1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hold_lock_1.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ hold_lock_1.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:18.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,17 +11,12 @@
by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
Locking rwlock exclusively ...
-Acquired at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_wrlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Lock on rwlock 0x........ was held during ... ms (threshold: 500 ms).
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Locking rwlock shared ...
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/hold_lock_2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hold_lock_2.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ hold_lock_2.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,12 @@
Locking mutex ...
Locking rwlock exclusively ...
-Locking rwlock shared ...
-Acquired at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_rdlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Lock on rwlock 0x........ was held during ... ms (threshold: 500 ms).
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/monitor_example.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- monitor_example.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ monitor_example.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-Finished successfully.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (monitor_example.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_broadcast.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_broadcast.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_broadcast.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,14 @@
-Done.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: csema_v (pth_broadcast.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_broadcast.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cancel_locked.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cancel_locked.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-Test finished.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- pth_cancel_locked.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cancel_locked.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,18 +1,14 @@
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
-Test finished.
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,15 +1,9 @@
-Thread 2:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cond_race.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race3.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race3.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func2 (pth_detached.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached.stdout.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached.stdout.out 2010-10-03 23:31:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-..
+.
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func2 (pth_detached.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stdout.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stdout.out 2010-10-03 23:31:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-....................
+..........
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.diff1
=================================================
--- pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.exp1 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,39 +1,9 @@
-Thread 3:
-Inconsistent association of condition variable and mutex: condition variable 0x........, mutexes 0x........ and 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: _pthread_cond_wait (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.exp2 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,39 +1,9 @@
-Thread 2:
-Inconsistent association of condition variable and mutex: condition variable 0x........, mutexes 0x........ and 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: _pthread_cond_wait (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
Statically initialized condition variable.
-Uninitialized condition variable.
-condition variable has not been initialized: cond 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_uninitialized_cond.c:?)
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_uninitialized_cond.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
-Thread 3:
-Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #? of thread 3
-Conflicting store by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #? of thread 3
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp2 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
-Thread 3:
-Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:17, in frame #? of thread 3
-Conflicting store by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:17, in frame #? of thread 3
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_test.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_test.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
-s_counter - expected_counter = 0
-s_grand_sum - expected_grand_sum = 0
-Finished.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_test.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_type_checking.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_type_checking.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:31:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,16 +1,10 @@
-Attempt to use a user-defined rwlock as a POSIX rwlock: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-Attempt to use a POSIX rwlock as a user-defined rwlock: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-Finished.
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:32:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-Reader-writer lock not locked by calling thread: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:35)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:24)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:24)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc17_sembar.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc17_sembar.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ tc17_sembar.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:32:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
starting
-done, result is 88, should be 88
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: gomp_barrier_wait (tc17_sembar.c:82)
+ by 0x........: child (tc17_sembar.c:171)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:32:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,63 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:32:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
- Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-03 23:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:32:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,86 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/trylock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- trylock.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:31.000000000 -0500
+++ trylock.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:32:12.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,20 +1,10 @@
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_wrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_trywrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_rdlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock().
-Attempt to lock for writing recursively (not allowed).
-Recursive writer locking not allowed: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_wrlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_trylock().
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_lock().
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_timedlock().
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_hbefore.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ annotate_hbefore.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (annotate_hbefore.c:277)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg01_all_ok.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ hg01_all_ok.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg01_all_ok.c:28)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg02_deadlock.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ hg02_deadlock.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -21,4 +21,11 @@
...
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg02_deadlock.c:38)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg03_inherit.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ hg03_inherit.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,19 +1,10 @@
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:46)
-Thread #x is the program's root thread
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:49)
-Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
- at 0x........: t2 (hg03_inherit.c:28)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- This conflicts with a previous read of size 4 by thread #x
- at 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:60)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside shared[1],
- declared at hg03_inherit.c:11, in frame #x of thread x
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg04_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg04_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ hg04_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@
declared at hg04_race.c:6, in frame #x of thread x
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg04_race.c:23)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@
declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg05_race2.c:31)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg06_readshared.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ hg06_readshared.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg06_readshared.c:27)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,25 +1,10 @@
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:48)
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:47)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:46)
-Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:29)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:29)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
- declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #x of thread x
-
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/rwlock_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_test.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_test.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
-s_counter - expected_counter = 0
-s_grand_sum - expected_grand_sum = 0
-Finished.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_test.c:80)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc01_simple_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc01_simple_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,4 +25,11 @@
declared at tc01_simple_race.c:9
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc01_simple_race.c:30)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc02_simple_tls.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc02_simple_tls.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc02_simple_tls.c:30)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc03_re_excl.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc03_re_excl.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc03_re_excl.c:36)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc05_simple_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc05_simple_race.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,4 +25,11 @@
declared at tc05_simple_race.c:10
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc05_simple_race.c:38)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -43,4 +43,11 @@
declared at tc06_two_races.c:9
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc06_two_races.c:37)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -39,17 +39,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>__bsdthread_create</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -62,7 +52,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@*</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create</fn>
<dir>...</dir>
<file>hg_intercepts.c</file>
<line>...</line>
@@ -120,12 +110,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -174,12 +164,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -228,12 +218,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
@@ -282,12 +272,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc07_hbl1.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc07_hbl1.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc07_hbl1.c:92)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- tc07_hbl1.stdout.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc07_hbl1.stdout.out 2010-10-03 23:30:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-x = 2
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc08_hbl2.stderr.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc08_hbl2.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc08_hbl2.c:131)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- tc08_hbl2.stdout.exp 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc08_hbl2.stdout.out 2010-10-03 23:30:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
child: new value 6
-child: new value 10
-done, x = 10
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-03 23:19:11.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-03 23:30:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,56 +26,16 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
-Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
- ...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-04 02:53:19
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-10-04 03:05:07 BST Ended at 2010-10-04 03:53:00 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 551 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-04 02:38:26
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-10-04 03:10:04 BST Ended at 2010-10-04 03:38:02 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 558 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-03 12:35:12
|
Author: sewardj Date: 2010-10-03 13:35:03 +0100 (Sun, 03 Oct 2010) New Revision: 11392 Log: callgrind/main.c, finish(): 'Char buf[RESULTS_BUF_LEN]' can be overrun in some cases. Increase RESULTS_BUF_LEN accordingly. Modified: trunk/callgrind/global.h Modified: trunk/callgrind/global.h =================================================================== --- trunk/callgrind/global.h 2010-09-30 15:11:01 UTC (rev 11391) +++ trunk/callgrind/global.h 2010-10-03 12:35:03 UTC (rev 11392) @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ #define OBJ_NAME_LEN 256 #define BUF_LEN 512 #define COMMIFY_BUF_LEN 128 -#define RESULTS_BUF_LEN 128 +#define RESULTS_BUF_LEN 256 #define LINE_BUF_LEN 64 |
|
From: Eric P. <eri...@or...> - 2010-10-01 19:12:44
|
Le 30/09/2010 19:23, Vince Weaver a écrit : > Hello > > Anyone monitoring Bugzilla might nave noticed I've been slowly adding > patches for various amd64 unhandled instructions. I thought I should > explain my rationale, as suddenly posting a bunch of fixes right before a > proposed release isn't that great an idea. > > I have a large hand-crafted assembly file that I use in an attempt to > validate the hardware performance counters on various systems. It > attempts to do a pretty thorough explortaion of the amd64 instruction > space, in order to find instructions that the hardware counters miscount > (and there are a number of instructions that are miscounted). > > I use DBI tools to sanity check the "known good" counts for this > benchmark. Pin and Qemu can handle it, but there's currently numerous > instructions that Valgrind can't handle (mainly because the instructions > are rare enough that gcc doesn't emit them). Since I prefer using > Valgrind to Pin or Qemu I've been slowly trying to get them all fixed, > but it takes a while. [Fixing Valgrind isn't that bad, it's coming up > with good test cases that's a pain]. > > The eventual goal is to maybe have the exp-bbv plugin compensate for the > overcounts so you can more easily compare to real hardware, but that's a > long term goal. > > The current list of missing instructions that my program turns up (I > haven't opened bugs for all of them yet, many of them had > been noticed previously) > > * Bug 246525 -- moves to/from a segment reg not working. > * Bug 252695 -- xchg r16,r16 (patch available) > * Bug 195825 -- xlatb > * Bugs 126240, 88116 -- enter instruction > * -- push of a segment register > * -- repne cmps > * Bug 143324 -- lea with 16-bit destination (patch available) > * -- fbstp > * -- fbld > * -- fcoms > * Bug 212352 -- fcoml > * -- fcomps > * Bug 126241 -- fdecstp > * -- ficoms > * -- ficoml > * -- ficomps > * -- ficompl > * Bug 126256 -- fnop > * Bug 143325 -- fnsave > * Bug 153326 -- frstor > * -- ftst > * Bugs 143323, 149838 -- fxrstor > > for the sake of record, some of those fixes are also needed to run valgrind on Wine on amd64 to list a few: move from/to seg, push/pop seg, fxrstor those which are not listed here: push eflags, iret I have dirty work for all of those (wine/amd64 does work on valgind/amd64), that also needs some cleanup not sure I'll have time to do it before vg3.6 A+ -- Eric Pouech "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams) |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2010-10-01 14:38:00
|
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010, Florian Krohm wrote:
> On Monday 27 September 2010 05:18:37 am Julian Seward wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > It's time to do a new release -- in fact, it's well overdue.
> >
> > I'm proposing to make a release in 3 weeks, on Monday 18 October.
> > In previous releases it's been inconvenient to have to freeze the
> > trunk as release day draws near, so I am proposing this time to
> > make the 3.6 branch one week before that (11 Oct) and
> > stabilise/release from the branch. That means a bit more work
> > moving changes between branches, but I think it's worth it.
> >
> > The release platforms will be: {x86,amd64,arm,ppc32,ppc64}-linux
> > and {x86,amd64}-darwin.
> >
> > I believe the tree is in pretty good shape for a release now.
> > There are a number of bugs still to be resolved, but nothing
> > particularly critical. I'll list the ones I'd like to have fixed
> > in a followup message.
>
> Julian,
>
> would you consider including https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246888
> It makes the build system more robust for those modifying the guest state
> and helps new ports, too.
Done.
J
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2010-10-01 14:37:05
|
> Anyone monitoring Bugzilla might nave noticed I've been slowly adding > patches for various amd64 unhandled instructions. Yes, I'd been wondering about that. > but it takes a while. [Fixing Valgrind isn't that bad, it's coming up > with good test cases that's a pain]. Overall, improving instruction coverage is no bad thing, although as you say, it's the test cases that are the critical part. > I'm hoping the interger fixes might be ready before the 3.6 code freeze. > The floating point ones are more of a long-term project. (ambiguous) You mean, you are hoping to finalise a package of tests + implementations for missing integer instructions, for before the freeze? Can you file a meta-bug for this, which uses the depends-on field to reference the other bugs for the individual instructions, that you listed in your message? J |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-01 14:06:35
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-01 15:06:22 +0100 (Fri, 01 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 2058
Log:
Improve constant folding of expressions of the form 'op(t,t)'
where t is an IRTemp. This superficially fixes #213865, although
it doesn't actually fix all the Intel-prescribed dependency-breaking
cases tterrib listed there. The newly-handled cases here are:
OrV128(t,t) ==> t
Sub64(t,t) ==> 0
CmpEQ64(t,t), CmpEQ8x8(t,t), CmpEQ8x16(t,t) ==> all-1s
Modified:
trunk/priv/ir_opt.c
Modified: trunk/priv/ir_opt.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/ir_opt.c 2010-09-30 14:51:51 UTC (rev 2057)
+++ trunk/priv/ir_opt.c 2010-10-01 14:06:22 UTC (rev 2058)
@@ -926,20 +926,37 @@
/* Make a zero which has the same type as the result of the given
primop. */
-static IRExpr* mkZeroForXor ( IROp op )
+static IRExpr* mkZeroOfPrimopResultType ( IROp op )
{
switch (op) {
case Iop_Xor8: return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_U8(0));
case Iop_Xor16: return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_U16(0));
case Iop_Sub32:
case Iop_Xor32: return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_U32(0));
+ case Iop_Sub64:
case Iop_Xor64: return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_U64(0));
case Iop_XorV128: return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_V128(0));
- default: vpanic("mkZeroForXor: bad primop");
+ default: vpanic("mkZeroOfPrimopResultType: bad primop");
}
}
+/* Make a value containing all 1-bits, which has the same type as the
+ result of the given primop. */
+static IRExpr* mkOnesOfPrimopResultType ( IROp op )
+{
+ switch (op) {
+ case Iop_CmpEQ64:
+ return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_U1(toBool(1)));
+ case Iop_CmpEQ8x8:
+ return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_U64(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL));
+ case Iop_CmpEQ8x16:
+ return IRExpr_Const(IRConst_V128(0xFFFF));
+ default:
+ vpanic("mkOnesOfPrimopResultType: bad primop");
+ }
+}
+
static IRExpr* fold_Expr ( IRExpr* e )
{
Int shift;
@@ -1568,34 +1585,47 @@
e2 = e->Iex.Binop.arg2;
} else
- /* Or8/16/32/64(t,t) ==> t, for some IRTemp t */
+ /* Or8/16/32/64/V128(t,t) ==> t, for some IRTemp t */
/* And8/16/32/64(t,t) ==> t, for some IRTemp t */
/* Max32U(t,t) ==> t, for some IRTemp t */
- if ( (e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_And64
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_And32
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_And16
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_And8
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Or64
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Or32
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Or16
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Or8
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Max32U)
- && sameIRTemps(e->Iex.Binop.arg1, e->Iex.Binop.arg2)) {
- e2 = e->Iex.Binop.arg1;
+ switch (e->Iex.Binop.op) {
+ case Iop_And64: case Iop_And32:
+ case Iop_And16: case Iop_And8:
+ case Iop_Or64: case Iop_Or32:
+ case Iop_Or16: case Iop_Or8: case Iop_OrV128:
+ case Iop_Max32U:
+ if (sameIRTemps(e->Iex.Binop.arg1, e->Iex.Binop.arg2))
+ e2 = e->Iex.Binop.arg1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
}
/* Xor8/16/32/64/V128(t,t) ==> 0, for some IRTemp t */
- /* Sub32(t,t) ==> 0, for some IRTemp t */
- if ( (e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Xor64
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Xor32
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Xor16
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Xor8
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_XorV128
- || e->Iex.Binop.op == Iop_Sub32)
- && sameIRTemps(e->Iex.Binop.arg1, e->Iex.Binop.arg2)) {
- e2 = mkZeroForXor(e->Iex.Binop.op);
+ /* Sub32/64(t,t) ==> 0, for some IRTemp t */
+ switch (e->Iex.Binop.op) {
+ case Iop_Xor64: case Iop_Xor32:
+ case Iop_Xor16: case Iop_Xor8:
+ case Iop_XorV128:
+ case Iop_Sub64: case Iop_Sub32:
+ if (sameIRTemps(e->Iex.Binop.arg1, e->Iex.Binop.arg2))
+ e2 = mkZeroOfPrimopResultType(e->Iex.Binop.op);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
}
+ switch (e->Iex.Binop.op) {
+ case Iop_CmpEQ64:
+ case Iop_CmpEQ8x8:
+ case Iop_CmpEQ8x16:
+ if (sameIRTemps(e->Iex.Binop.arg1, e->Iex.Binop.arg2))
+ e2 = mkOnesOfPrimopResultType(e->Iex.Binop.op);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
}
}
@@ -1618,6 +1648,14 @@
}
}
+ /* Show cases where we've found but not folded 'op(t,t)'. */
+ if (0 && e == e2 && e->tag == Iex_Binop
+ && sameIRTemps(e->Iex.Binop.arg1, e->Iex.Binop.arg2)) {
+ vex_printf("IDENT: ");
+ ppIRExpr(e); vex_printf("\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Show the overall results of folding. */
if (DEBUG_IROPT && e2 != e) {
vex_printf("FOLD: ");
ppIRExpr(e); vex_printf(" -> ");
|
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-01 05:40:06
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-09-30 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-01 00:39:52 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 443 tests, 18 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-01 00:03:28.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:39:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-01 00:03:28.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:39:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-01 00:03:28.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:39:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:29:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:30:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-01 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:30:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-01 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:30:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-01 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:30:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:31:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:17.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-10-01 00:25:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:17.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-10-01 00:26:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:19:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:19:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:20:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 281
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/capget.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- capget.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ capget.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:20:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
capget result:
-effective 0
-permitted 0
+effective 0x........
+permitted 0x........
inheritable 0
HEAP SUMMARY:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:20:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:21:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-01 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:21:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:21:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:23:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:24:18.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2010-10-01 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:24:18.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:23.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:27:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2010-10-01 00:03:23.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:27:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:27:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,23 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1979)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5731)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2010-10-01 00:27:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:27:45.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,19 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2010-10-01 00:27:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2010-10-01 00:27:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,22 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2010-10-01 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2010-10-01 00:27:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ap+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000bp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000cp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ep+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000fp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000011p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049fp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3cp+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0938p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7484p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7dp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
--inf:PASSED:...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-01 02:52:51
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-10-01 03:05:05 BST Ended at 2010-10-01 03:52:28 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 551 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-01 02:39:06
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-10-01 03:10:07 BST Ended at 2010-10-01 03:38:51 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 558 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |