You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(15) |
|
2
(24) |
3
(16) |
4
(17) |
5
(11) |
6
(20) |
7
(11) |
8
(15) |
|
9
(10) |
10
(9) |
11
(10) |
12
(24) |
13
(16) |
14
(15) |
15
(8) |
|
16
(13) |
17
(15) |
18
(35) |
19
(11) |
20
(10) |
21
(11) |
22
(9) |
|
23
(10) |
24
(9) |
25
(9) |
26
(9) |
27
(9) |
28
(12) |
29
(16) |
|
30
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2006-04-01 23:06:36
|
Author: njn
Date: 2006-04-02 00:06:29 +0100 (Sun, 02 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 5808
Log:
Partial fix for the sh-mem.c failure on PPC32. This should make it work
on PPC32 now but break it on the other platforms. Julian will commit a
change to ensure the 32-bit floats are copied through the FP regs on all
platforms to make the broken ones work again.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/sh-mem.c
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/sh-mem.c
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/sh-mem.c 2006-03-31 19:34:51 UTC (rev 5807)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/sh-mem.c 2006-04-01 23:06:29 UTC (rev 5808)
@@ -64,17 +64,17 @@
// Check that all the bytes in a[x..y-1] have their V byte equal to 'byt=
e'.
// 'str' and 'offset' are only used for printing an error message if
// something goes wrong.
-void check_all(U4 x, U4 y, U1 byte, char* str, int offset)
+void check_all(U4 x, U4 y, U1 expected_byte, char* str, int offset)
{
U1 sh[SZB_OF_a]; // Used for getting a[]'s V bits
int i;
=20
VALGRIND_GET_VBITS(a, sh, sizeof(a));
for (i =3D x; i < y; i++) {
- if ( byte !=3D sh[i] ) {
+ if ( expected_byte !=3D sh[i] ) {
fprintf(stderr, "\n\nFAILURE: %s, offset %d, byte %d -- "
"is 0x%x, should be 0x%x\n\n",
- str, offset, i, sh[i], byte);
+ str, offset, i, sh[i], expected_byte);
exit(1);
}
}
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
int main(void)
{
int h, i, j;
- U1 *undefA;
+ U1 *undefA, expected_byte;
=20
if (0 =3D=3D RUNNING_ON_VALGRIND) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: this program only works when run under Val=
grind\n");
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
// will be the same as 'Ty' if 'ITy' is an integer type). 'ITy' is u=
sed
// when doing shifting/masking and stuff like that.
=20
-#define DO(NNN, Ty, ITy) \
+#define DO(NNN, Ty, ITy, isF4) \
fprintf(stderr, "-- NNN: %d %s %s ------------------------\n", NNN, #=
Ty, #ITy); \
/* For all of the alignments from (0..NNN-1), eg. if NNN=3D=3D4, we d=
o */ \
/* alignments of 0, 1, 2, 3. */ \
@@ -164,16 +164,25 @@
undefN_Ty =3D (Ty*)&undefN_ITy; \
if (0 =3D=3D j % 32) fprintf(stderr, "%d...", j); /* progress m=
eter */ \
\
+ \
+ /* A nasty exception: all machines so far (x86/AMD64/PPC32/PPC6=
4)
+ * don't have 32-bit floats. So 32-bit floats get cast to 64-b=
it
+ * floats. Memcheck does a PCast in this case, which means tha=
t if
+ * any V bits for the 32-bit float are undefined (ie. 0 !=3D j)=
, all
+ * the V bits in the 64-bit float are undefined. So account fo=
r
+ * this when checking. */ \
+ expected_byte =3D ( (isF4 && 0 !=3D j) ? 0xff : j ); \
+ \
/* STOREVn. Note that we use the first element of the undefN_T=
y
* array, as explained above. */ \
for (i =3D 0; i < nN-1; i++) { aNb[i] =3D undefN_Ty[0]; } \
- check_all(h, n-NNN+h, j, "STOREVn", h); \
+ check_all(h, n-NNN+h, expected_byte, "STOREVn", h); \
\
/* LOADVn -- by copying the values to one place and then back,=20
* we ensure that LOADVn gets exercised. */ \
for (i =3D 0; i < nN-1; i++) { bNb[i] =3D aNb[i]; } \
for (i =3D 0; i < nN-1; i++) { aNb[i] =3D bNb[i]; } \
- check_all(h, n-NNN+h, j, "LOADVn", h); \
+ check_all(h, n-NNN+h, expected_byte, "LOADVn", h); \
} \
fprintf(stderr, "\n"); \
}
@@ -182,12 +191,12 @@
// reason being that on 32-bit machines just using integer types neve=
r
// exercises LOADV8/STOREV8 -- for integer types these loads/stores g=
et
// broken into two 32-bit loads/stores.
- DO(1, U1, U1);
- DO(2, U2, U2);
- DO(4, U4, U4);
- DO(4, F4, U4);
- DO(8, U8, U8);
- DO(8, F8, U8);
+ DO(1, U1, U1, /*isF4*/0);
+ DO(2, U2, U2, /*isF4*/0);
+ DO(4, U4, U4, /*isF4*/0);
+ DO(4, F4, U4, /*isF4*/1);
+ DO(8, U8, U8, /*isF4*/0);
+ DO(8, F8, U8, /*isF4*/0);
=20
return 0;
}
|
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2006-04-01 22:44:27
|
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Greg Parker wrote: > Darwin/x86 syscalls are going to be fun to implement. Here's why: > > Second, the PRE_REG_READ macros are all wrong. Redefining them to > use mem_read instead of reg_read might work. I don't want to have > to rewrite the syscall wrappers themselves. (PRE_REG_READ would > then be a misnomer; perhaps PRE_ARG_READ would be better.) Yes, PRE_ARG_READ would be better. There is a problem in Memcheck with using pre_mem_read instead of pre_reg_read, though. If you use pre_reg_read, if it finds an error it will say: Syscall param XXX contains uninitialised byte(s) If you use pre_mem_read, it will say: Syscall param XXX points to uninitialised byte(s) which is incorrect in this case. One way to fix it is to change the "CorePart" type by breaking the "Vg_CoreSysCall" type into "Vg_CoreSysCallRegArg" and "Vg_CoreSysCallMemArg". Then pre_mem_read can do the right thing. Nick |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2006-04-01 22:31:36
|
Author: njn Date: 2006-04-01 23:31:30 +0100 (Sat, 01 Apr 2006) New Revision: 275 Log: remove redundant sentence Modified: trunk/info/platforms.html Modified: trunk/info/platforms.html =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- trunk/info/platforms.html 2006-04-01 13:37:43 UTC (rev 274) +++ trunk/info/platforms.html 2006-04-01 22:31:30 UTC (rev 275) @@ -61,8 +61,7 @@ =20 <p>Valgrind 3.X has the infrastructure to support multiple platforms. A platform is a specific (CPU,OS) pairing, such as x86/Linux or -AMD64/Linux. Support for each platform involves some CPU-specific code, -some OS-specific code, and some platform-specific code.</p> +AMD64/Linux.</p> =20 <p>Maintaining each port takes a lot of effort, more so than for most other programs. Valgrind is fragile due to the low-level nature of what |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2006-04-01 13:37:50
|
Author: sewardj Date: 2006-04-01 14:37:43 +0100 (Sat, 01 Apr 2006) New Revision: 274 Log: Update. Modified: trunk/info/platforms.html Modified: trunk/info/platforms.html =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- trunk/info/platforms.html 2006-03-31 12:24:48 UTC (rev 273) +++ trunk/info/platforms.html 2006-04-01 13:37:43 UTC (rev 274) @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ <tr><th> </th> <th>Linux</th> <th>*BSD</th> <th>Darwin</th> <th>Sola= ris</th></tr> <tr><td>x86 </td> <td>done </td> <td>low</td> <td>high</td> <td>l= ow</td></tr> <tr><td>amd64</td> <td>done </td> <td>low</td> <td>eventually?</td= > <td></td></tr> -<tr><td>ppc32</td> <td>in progress</td> <td></td> <td>high</td> <td></td= ></tr> +<tr><td>ppc32</td> <td>done </td> <td></td> <td>high</td> <td></td= ></tr> +<tr><td>ppc64</td> <td>done </td> <td></td> <td>?</td> <td></td></= tr> <tr><td>arm </td> <td>low </td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td></t= r> <tr><td>mips </td> <td>low </td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td></t= r> </table> @@ -112,6 +113,6 @@ As ever we retain a flexible approach, and are interested in hearing=20 your comments/porting needs if you have any.</p> =20 -<p>August 27, 2005.</p> +<p>March 31, 2006.</p> =20 =20 |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2006-04-01 13:26:44
|
> As I recall the trickiest thing with sysenter is knowing where > the kernel returns to after the call? Because it uses sysexit and > can return to an arbitrary address if I recall correctly. I think sysenter is pretty much ready to go, or trivially fixable to be. Here's what vex thinks: Implementation of sysenter is necessarily partial. sysenter is a kind of system call entry. When doing a sysenter, the return address is not known -- that is something that is beyond Vex's knowledge. So the generated IR forces a return to the scheduler, which can do what it likes to simulate the sysenter, but it MUST set this thread's guest_EIP field with the continuation address before resuming execution. If that doesn't happen, the thread will jump to address zero, which is probably fatal. Hence you can make sysenter behave how you like by filling in the relevant case in scheduler.c. J |
|
From: <js...@ac...> - 2006-04-01 11:16:43
|
Nightly build on minnie ( SuSE 10.0, ppc32 ) started at 2006-04-01 02:00:01 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 197 tests, 12 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/leakotron (stdout) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/sh-mem (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_changes (stdout) memcheck/tests/stack_changes (stderr) memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 196 tests, 12 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/leakotron (stdout) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/sh-mem (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_changes (stdout) memcheck/tests/stack_changes (stderr) memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 02:11:10 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 02:22:03 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 196 tests, 12 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 197 tests, 12 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2006-04-01 08:56:41
|
In message <200...@ka...>
Greg Parker <gp...@us...> wrote:
> 2. Darwin/x86 uses `sysenter` for most syscalls. Valgrind doesn't support
> sysenter yet (according to scheduler.c). This shouldn't be too bad
> either, I think.
There are various threads about sysenter/syscall support in the
archives - mostly relating to solaris/x86 and solaris/amd64 but
we worked out most of the questions about how to handle it I think.
As I recall the trickiest thing with sysenter is knowing where
the kernel returns to after the call? Because it uses sysexit and
can return to an arbitrary address if I recall correctly.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/
|
|
From: Greg P. <gp...@us...> - 2006-04-01 03:08:11
|
Darwin/x86 syscalls are going to be fun to implement. Here's why: 1. Darwin's BSD calls and Mach traps are slightly different. I already have the machinery to handle this from the PPC32 side, so it shouldn't be too bad (except for signal management, which I'm ignoring for now because signals are relatively rare on Darwin). 2. Darwin/x86 uses `sysenter` for most syscalls. Valgrind doesn't support sysenter yet (according to scheduler.c). This shouldn't be too bad either, I think. 3. Darwin/x86 syscalls pass their parameters on the stack instead of in registers, except for the syscall number in %eax. This is where the real fun begins. First, do_syscall_for_client needs to read and write the arguments in memory instead of in the VEX state. This is a problem if a syscall is made with a shallow client stack and we naively copy the max argument count (8 words afaik) from the too-small stack. It's also a problem if the client's %esp is totally trashed, but I'm willing to forgo that error check. Second, the PRE_REG_READ macros are all wrong. Redefining them to use mem_read instead of reg_read might work. I don't want to have to rewrite the syscall wrappers themselves. (PRE_REG_READ would then be a misnomer; perhaps PRE_ARG_READ would be better.) -- Greg Parker gp...@us... |
|
From: <js...@ac...> - 2006-04-01 03:01:37
|
Nightly build on phoenix ( SuSE 10.0 ) started at 2006-04-01 03:30:01 BST Checking out vex source tree ... done Building vex ... done Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 228 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out vex source tree ... done Building vex ... done Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 227 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 03:46:29 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 04:01:25 2006 *************** *** 10,12 **** ! == 227 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) --- 10,12 ---- ! == 228 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) |
|
From: <js...@ac...> - 2006-04-01 02:55:09
|
Nightly build on g5 ( YDL 4.0, ppc970 ) started at 2006-04-01 04:40:00 CEST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 202 tests, 8 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/leakotron (stdout) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/sh-mem (stderr) callgrind/tests/clreq (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr) none/tests/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/mftocrf (stdout) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 201 tests, 7 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/leakotron (stdout) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/sh-mem (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr) none/tests/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/mftocrf (stdout) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 04:47:36 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 04:55:03 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 201 tests, 7 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 202 tests, 8 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) *************** *** 14,15 **** --- 14,16 ---- memcheck/tests/sh-mem (stderr) + callgrind/tests/clreq (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2006-04-01 02:44:22
|
Nightly build on dunsmere ( athlon, Fedora Core 4 ) started at 2006-04-01 03:30:07 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 230 tests, 8 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 229 tests, 8 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 03:37:22 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 03:44:16 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 229 tests, 8 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 230 tests, 8 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2006-04-01 02:32:20
|
Nightly build on alvis ( i686, Red Hat 7.3 ) started at 2006-04-01 03:15:04 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 229 tests, 21 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/addressable (stderr) memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr) memcheck/tests/describe-block (stderr) memcheck/tests/erringfds (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-0 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-regroot (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/match-overrun (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/partial_load_dflt (stderr) memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr) memcheck/tests/partiallydefinedeq (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigkill (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_changes (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 228 tests, 21 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/addressable (stderr) memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr) memcheck/tests/describe-block (stderr) memcheck/tests/erringfds (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-0 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-regroot (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/match-overrun (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/partial_load_dflt (stderr) memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr) memcheck/tests/partiallydefinedeq (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigkill (stderr) memcheck/tests/stack_changes (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 03:24:11 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 03:32:10 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 228 tests, 21 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/addressable (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 229 tests, 21 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/addressable (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2006-04-01 02:30:52
|
Nightly build on gill ( x86_64, Fedora Core 2 ) started at 2006-04-01 03:00:03 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 252 tests, 7 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/amd64/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr) none/tests/tls (stdout) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 251 tests, 7 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/amd64/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr) none/tests/tls (stdout) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 03:14:07 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 03:30:45 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 251 tests, 7 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 252 tests, 7 stderr failures, 2 stdout failures ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2006-04-01 02:25:33
|
Nightly build on dellow ( x86_64, Fedora Core 4 ) started at 2006-04-01 03:10:08 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 252 tests, 6 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/amd64/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 251 tests, 5 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/amd64/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 03:18:29 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 03:25:25 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 251 tests, 5 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) --- 8,11 ---- ! == 252 tests, 6 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= ! memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2006-04-01 02:24:37
|
Nightly build on aston ( x86_64, Fedora Core 3 ) started at 2006-04-01 03:05:13 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 252 tests, 6 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/amd64/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 251 tests, 6 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/scalar_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) none/tests/amd64/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sat Apr 1 03:15:55 2006 --- new.short Sat Apr 1 03:24:31 2006 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 251 tests, 6 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 252 tests, 6 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= memcheck/tests/stack_switch (stderr) |