You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(6) |
2
(3) |
3
|
4
(3) |
5
(10) |
6
(4) |
7
(5) |
|
8
(1) |
9
(3) |
10
(11) |
11
(18) |
12
(13) |
13
(4) |
14
(11) |
|
15
(12) |
16
(6) |
17
(1) |
18
(13) |
19
(14) |
20
(12) |
21
(3) |
|
22
(17) |
23
(18) |
24
(17) |
25
(24) |
26
(15) |
27
(7) |
28
(23) |
|
29
(31) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-02-01 14:59:42
|
CVS commit by nethercote: tweak M +1 -1 contact.html 1.2 --- devel-home/valgrind/contact.html #1.1:1.2 @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ <p> If you want to give detailed, general feedback, please fill out our -<a href="survey2">survey</a>. +<a href="surveys.html">survey</a>. <p> |
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-02-01 14:58:50
|
CVS commit by nethercote: Minor tweaks; added ntop to users list M +4 -2 survey2 1.5 M +2 -1 surveys.html 1.5 M +3 -0 users.html 1.24 --- devel-home/valgrind/survey2 #1.4:1.5 @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ # # - Your response is confidential; we won't make raw data public, only -# summaries. The only exception to this is if you answer "yes" to the -# question below about mentioning your project on the Valgrind website. +# summaries (which may include anonymous quotes). The only exception to this +# is if you answer "yes" to the question below about mentioning your project +# on the Valgrind website. # # - We have no plans to commercialize Valgrind. You can relax, that's not what @@ -268,4 +269,5 @@ # If so, please specify any information you gave in the previous answer that # you do *not* want mentioned (eg. "don't mention the development location"). +# We will not mention your name. --- devel-home/valgrind/surveys.html #1.4:1.5 @@ -13,5 +13,6 @@ Survey responses tell us what is good and bad about Valgrind, sate our curiosity about how it is used, and encourage us to continue our efforts. -By completing the survey, you are supporting Valgrind. +By completing the survey, you are supporting Valgrind, and helping us improve +it. <p> --- devel-home/valgrind/users.html #1.23:1.24 @@ -266,4 +266,7 @@ <dt><a href="http://synce.sf.net">SynCE</a> <dd>A WinCE communications layer. + +<dt><a href="http://www.ntop.org">ntop</a> +<dd>A network traffic probe that shows network usage. </dl> |
|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-02-01 13:34:08
|
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > That doesn't really help. Just because you put them in weird-hacks, it > doesn't mean you don't have to document them (since it's probably a bug > that weird-hacks isn't properly documented in the usage message). I've > never particularly liked weird-hacks, and I don't think we should extend > it. It does help with the usage message, which is what I want to minimise. The amount of documentation in the manual doesn't worry me. > Perhaps we should just add a third set of options: --help-unusual, or > something. Yeah, sounds alright to me. Reducing the size of the descriptions for the unusual ones would help too; not easy, but could use the approach taken for --partial-loads-ok: "too hard to explain here; see manual" N |
|
From: Robert W. <rj...@du...> - 2004-02-01 06:29:39
|
> One thing I wasn't sure about: do I need to include a call to > fd_allowed()? Not every call to record_fd_opened() is preceded by one > (eg. fcntl()), although most are... maybe the missing ones are oversights= ? I don't know - that was something Jeremy put in, to check if the file descriptor is within the range allowed for use by the client. I think.=20 Jeremy? Help! Regards, Robert. --=20 Robert Walsh Amalgamated Durables, Inc. - "We don't make the things you buy." Email: rj...@du... |
|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2004-02-01 03:40:46
|
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 14:58, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > Of course, for backwards compatibility, we could let the old invocations > still work. The way --weird-hacks works internally would have to be > changed slightly, eg. into a bit-mask, because it currently only allows > one weird hack at a time. > > Comments? That doesn't really help. Just because you put them in weird-hacks, it doesn't mean you don't have to document them (since it's probably a bug that weird-hacks isn't properly documented in the usage message). I've never particularly liked weird-hacks, and I don't think we should extend it. Perhaps we should just add a third set of options: --help-unusual, or something. J |