You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
(1) |
11
|
12
(2) |
|
13
(1) |
14
|
15
(3) |
16
|
17
|
18
(1) |
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
(2) |
|
27
(6) |
28
(2) |
29
|
30
(1) |
|
|
|
|
From: Eyal S. <eya...@gm...> - 2022-11-28 22:15:27
|
Only quit on the first error if that error is "counted": A test ought to be possible. I would make a file that fails memcheck twice, with the first kind of failure being ignored. And then we'd watch for the output to exit on the second one and not the first one. I'll look into it. NEWS would be like: "exit-on-first-error" now works like you probably expected it to all along. Ha! Allow running launchers directly: I no longer recall why I even did this. I remember that it was convenient for something in my testing and it didn't seem like we should be bossing the user around! I'm ambivalent on it. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432801 : Yup, no resolution. The comment is wrong, I'm not adding support in addition to the existing support for 32x4 vectorized compared. I'm improving the translation for the 32x4 compare and also adding support for 64x2, 16x8, and 8x16. This one showed up in actual code, both in the bug and in my work, too. What does it mean to find a solution for all targets? Doesn't this work already solve the problem for all targets? it's platform agnostic because it just works on the IR, I think! And this latest one, it's pretty simple. Eyal On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 2:59 PM Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...> wrote: > Hi Eyal, > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 07:09:00PM -0700, Eyal Soha wrote: > > If you're curious, here are all the other improvements that I have made > to > > valgrind in my branch. Maybe they could get merged, too? > > > > > https://github.com/eyal0/valgrind/commit/4f130b5b5ea6be2c0c93f6359a88f7a2e51e459e > Only quit on the first error if that error is "counted". > > Looks reasonable, but could use a testcase, NEWS entry and possibly a > documentation update. > > > > https://github.com/eyal0/valgrind/commit/eccc56d407f2b2f277765bc0dae42cadb86c133a > Allow running launchers directly. > > hmmm, is this really more convenient than simply running with > VALGRIND_LAUNCHER=/usr/bin/valgrind gdb as explained in README_DEVELOPERS? > > > > https://github.com/eyal0/valgrind/commit/c3a5f06e4620599339601640e9a18c383ecb4e2e > This adds support for 64bit, 16bit, and 8bit to the existing 32bit support. > > This is the patch discussed in > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432801 > Which seems to have fallen through the cracks. > > Julian hoped to get a cheap and effective solution > that works for all targets for unsigned < and <= > comparisons on scalar values. I don't know if he did? > > Cheers, > > Mark > |
|
From: Mark W. <ma...@kl...> - 2022-11-28 21:59:12
|
Hi Eyal, On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 07:09:00PM -0700, Eyal Soha wrote: > If you're curious, here are all the other improvements that I have made to > valgrind in my branch. Maybe they could get merged, too? > > https://github.com/eyal0/valgrind/commit/4f130b5b5ea6be2c0c93f6359a88f7a2e51e459e Only quit on the first error if that error is "counted". Looks reasonable, but could use a testcase, NEWS entry and possibly a documentation update. > https://github.com/eyal0/valgrind/commit/eccc56d407f2b2f277765bc0dae42cadb86c133a Allow running launchers directly. hmmm, is this really more convenient than simply running with VALGRIND_LAUNCHER=/usr/bin/valgrind gdb as explained in README_DEVELOPERS? > https://github.com/eyal0/valgrind/commit/c3a5f06e4620599339601640e9a18c383ecb4e2e This adds support for 64bit, 16bit, and 8bit to the existing 32bit support. This is the patch discussed in https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432801 Which seems to have fallen through the cracks. Julian hoped to get a cheap and effective solution that works for all targets for unsigned < and <= comparisons on scalar values. I don't know if he did? Cheers, Mark |