You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
(2) |
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
(2) |
12
(1) |
13
(1) |
|
14
(1) |
15
(2) |
16
(2) |
17
(5) |
18
(2) |
19
(1) |
20
(1) |
|
21
|
22
|
23
(1) |
24
(3) |
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
(1) |
30
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2018-01-17 16:26:37
|
2018-01-17 13:36 GMT+01:00 Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...>: > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 12:22 +0100, Ivo Raisr wrote: >> This is very nice! Have you tried building whole Valgrind test suite >> in C99 mode? >> I was afraid that a number of warnings will roar... perhaps not. > > Yes I did and I didn't see warnings (we probably would have before > since newer gcc versions already default to gnu99 or even gnu11). > > I have checked it in now so we can see what the nightly builders say. > If that looks good then I will also remove the extra -std=gnu99 added > to some of the Makefiles to make it all consistent. If any of it turns > out to be bad, or if someone does see errors/warnings from this, please > yell and I'll revert. Excellent! Thank you, Mark. I. |
|
From: Mark W. <ma...@kl...> - 2018-01-17 12:36:38
|
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 12:22 +0100, Ivo Raisr wrote: > This is very nice! Have you tried building whole Valgrind test suite > in C99 mode? > I was afraid that a number of warnings will roar... perhaps not. Yes I did and I didn't see warnings (we probably would have before since newer gcc versions already default to gnu99 or even gnu11). I have checked it in now so we can see what the nightly builders say. If that looks good then I will also remove the extra -std=gnu99 added to some of the Makefiles to make it all consistent. If any of it turns out to be bad, or if someone does see errors/warnings from this, please yell and I'll revert. Thanks, Mark |
|
From: Mark W. <ma...@so...> - 2018-01-17 12:36:33
|
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=valgrind.git;h=29cc9fc0ed871d8347a9e5f8194473efa870231b commit 29cc9fc0ed871d8347a9e5f8194473efa870231b Author: Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...> Date: Wed Jan 17 13:30:35 2018 +0100 Make sure we can compile in C99 mode. Use AC_PROG_CC_C99 in configure.ac to make sure the compiler we use is always in C99 mode. If we detect the compiler doesn't support C99 then error out. Diff: --- configure.ac | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 3cc9732..901c595 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ else fi rm $tmpfile +# Make sure we can compile in C99 mode. +AC_PROG_CC_C99 +if test "$ac_cv_prog_cc_c99" == "no"; then + AC_MSG_ERROR([Valgrind relies on a C compiler supporting C99]) +fi # We don't want gcc < 3.0 AC_MSG_CHECKING([for a supported version of gcc]) |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2018-01-17 11:22:30
|
2018-01-17 11:12 GMT+01:00 Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...>: >> Why not persuade gcc to build the test program in C99/GNU99? >> Valgrind core is built with gnu99 anyway... > > O, I hadn't noticed that. But instead of adding -std=gnu99 to various > Makefiles would it by a good idea to just compile everything in C99 > mode? The following added to configure.ac makes sure that it is: > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 3cc9732..901c595 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ else > fi > rm $tmpfile > > +# Make sure we can compile in C99 mode. > +AC_PROG_CC_C99 > +if test "$ac_cv_prog_cc_c99" == "no"; then > + AC_MSG_ERROR([Valgrind relies on a C compiler supporting C99]) > +fi > > # We don't want gcc < 3.0 > AC_MSG_CHECKING([for a supported version of gcc]) > > This will make sure that the compile used will either compile as is in > C99 mode, or add the appropriate flag (-std=gnu99) to the compiler > invocation to make it so. Hi Mark, This is very nice! Have you tried building whole Valgrind test suite in C99 mode? I was afraid that a number of warnings will roar... perhaps not. I. |
|
From: Mark W. <ma...@kl...> - 2018-01-17 10:13:06
|
Hi Ivo, Adding (valgrind-developers to the CC). On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 18:40 +0100, Ivo Raisr wrote: > 2018-01-16 11:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Wielaard <ma...@so...>: > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=valgrind.git;h=400ad0e36e27 > > 9aa80a23256abdde705dfa9d48b6 > > > > commit 400ad0e36e279aa80a23256abdde705dfa9d48b6 > > Author: Mark Wielaard <ma...@kl...> > > Date: Tue Jan 16 11:08:59 2018 +0100 > > > > Fix memcheck/tests/linux/dlclose_leak.c build under -std=gnu90. > > > > Older gcc (4.8) default to GNU C90. Causing: > > > > dlclose_leak.c:14:5: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are > > only > > allowed in C99 mode > > > > Fix by declaring int i before the loop. > > Why not persuade gcc to build the test program in C99/GNU99? > Valgrind core is built with gnu99 anyway... O, I hadn't noticed that. But instead of adding -std=gnu99 to various Makefiles would it by a good idea to just compile everything in C99 mode? The following added to configure.ac makes sure that it is: diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 3cc9732..901c595 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ else fi rm $tmpfile +# Make sure we can compile in C99 mode. +AC_PROG_CC_C99 +if test "$ac_cv_prog_cc_c99" == "no"; then + AC_MSG_ERROR([Valgrind relies on a C compiler supporting C99]) +fi # We don't want gcc < 3.0 AC_MSG_CHECKING([for a supported version of gcc]) This will make sure that the compile used will either compile as is in C99 mode, or add the appropriate flag (-std=gnu99) to the compiler invocation to make it so. Tested with the testcase "fix" reverted against an older gcc to make sure it works as intended. Cheers, Mark |