You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
(1) |
4
(1) |
5
|
6
(1) |
7
|
|
8
|
9
(1) |
10
(4) |
11
(3) |
12
(6) |
13
(13) |
14
(1) |
|
15
(1) |
16
(3) |
17
|
18
(1) |
19
(3) |
20
(7) |
21
(5) |
|
22
|
23
(1) |
24
|
25
(3) |
26
|
27
(3) |
28
|
|
29
(1) |
30
(1) |
31
(5) |
|
|
|
|
Author: petarj
Date: Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
New Revision: 16217
Log:
force old implementation of std::string for leak_cpp_interior test
This patch forces leak_cpp_interior to be compiled using old implementation
of std::string.
Related issue #373069
Patch by Aleksandar Rikalo.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+#define _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
#define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
- by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
- by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+ by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+ by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
- by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
- by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+ by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+ by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
- by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
- by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+ by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+ by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
- by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
- by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+ by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+ by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2017-01-31 12:34:01
|
Author: iraisr
Date: Tue Jan 31 12:33:54 2017
New Revision: 16216
Log:
Fix +1 error in get_elf_symbol_info() when computing value of 'hi' address for ML_(find_rx_mapping)()
Fixes BZ#375772
Modified:
trunk/NEWS
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c
Modified: trunk/NEWS
==============================================================================
--- trunk/NEWS (original)
+++ trunk/NEWS Tue Jan 31 12:33:54 2017
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@
373555 Rename BBPTR to GSPTR as it denotes guest state pointer only
373938 const IRExpr arguments for matchIRExpr()
375514 valgrind_get_tls_addr() does not work in case of static TLS
+375772 +1 error in get_elf_symbol_info() when computing value of 'hi' address
+ for ML_(find_rx_mapping)()
Release 3.12.0 (20 October 2016)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c
==============================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c (original)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c Tue Jan 31 12:33:54 2017
@@ -692,15 +692,15 @@
in_rx = (ML_(find_rx_mapping)(
di,
(*sym_avmas_out).main,
- (*sym_avmas_out).main + *sym_size_out) != NULL);
+ (*sym_avmas_out).main + *sym_size_out - 1) != NULL);
if (in_text)
vg_assert(in_rx);
if (!in_rx) {
TRACE_SYMTAB(
"ignore -- %#lx .. %#lx outside .text svma range %#lx .. %#lx\n",
- (*sym_avmas_out).main, (*sym_avmas_out).main + *sym_size_out,
+ (*sym_avmas_out).main, (*sym_avmas_out).main + *sym_size_out - 1,
di->text_avma,
- di->text_avma + di->text_size);
+ di->text_avma + di->text_size - 1);
return False;
}
} else {
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@
TRACE_SYMTAB(
"ignore -- %#lx .. %#lx outside .data / .sdata / .rodata "
"/ .bss / .sbss svma ranges\n",
- (*sym_avmas_out).main, (*sym_avmas_out).main + *sym_size_out);
+ (*sym_avmas_out).main, (*sym_avmas_out).main + *sym_size_out - 1);
return False;
}
}
|
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2017-01-31 12:29:16
|
2017-01-31 13:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Wielaard <mj...@re...>: > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 05:12 +0100, Ivo Raisr wrote: > > Please have a look at the proposed patch for bug 375772 [1]: > > +1 error in get_elf_symbol_info() when computing value of 'hi' address > for > > ML_(find_rx_mapping)() > > > > Symbol sizes could be zero, which would cause this to make hi < lo. I > cannot immediately see if the code guards against that. Otherwise this > looks correct. > Indeed, that was my worry as well. Fortunately get_elf_symbol_info() guards against this problem at the beginning of this function. Thank you for looking into it, Mark! I. |
|
From: Mark W. <mj...@re...> - 2017-01-31 12:20:04
|
On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 05:12 +0100, Ivo Raisr wrote: > Please have a look at the proposed patch for bug 375772 [1]: > +1 error in get_elf_symbol_info() when computing value of 'hi' address for > ML_(find_rx_mapping)() > Symbol sizes could be zero, which would cause this to make hi < lo. I cannot immediately see if the code guards against that. Otherwise this looks correct. Cheers, Mark |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2017-01-31 04:12:52
|
Please have a look at the proposed patch for bug 375772 [1]: +1 error in get_elf_symbol_info() when computing value of 'hi' address for ML_(find_rx_mapping)() Kind regards, I. [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375772 |