You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
(1) |
3
(5) |
4
(4) |
5
(7) |
6
(4) |
|
7
(3) |
8
(5) |
9
|
10
(5) |
11
|
12
(4) |
13
|
|
14
|
15
(3) |
16
(1) |
17
(2) |
18
|
19
(1) |
20
|
|
21
(1) |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
(3) |
27
|
|
28
(2) |
29
(1) |
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2016-08-26 13:10:22
|
Author: mjw
Date: Fri Aug 26 14:10:14 2016
New Revision: 15940
Log:
Allow building vbit_test when srdir != builddir.
Link against libvex-<arch>-<os>.a in top_builddir.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/Makefile.am
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/Makefile.am
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/Makefile.am (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/vbit-test/Makefile.am Fri Aug 26 14:10:14 2016
@@ -39,5 +39,5 @@
-I$(top_srcdir)/VEX/pub
vbit_test_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS_PRI) -std=c99
vbit_test_DEPENDENCIES =
-vbit_test_LDADD = $(top_srcdir)/VEX/libvex-@VGCONF_ARCH_PRI@-@VGCONF_OS@.a
+vbit_test_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/VEX/libvex-@VGCONF_ARCH_PRI@-@VGCONF_OS@.a
vbit_test_LDFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS_PRI) -std=c99 @LIB_UBSAN@
|
|
From: Mark W. <mj...@re...> - 2016-08-26 11:40:42
|
Hi Philippe, On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 13:14 +0200, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > For sure, removing limitation 1 is good : users are less limited, > and unless someone really wants a suppression of more than 25 entries, > this does not change the behaviour. > > Removing limitation 2 means that users using --num-callers > 25 > and --gen-suppressions=yes will now generate bigger suppression > entries. > > IMO, that is a consistent/understandable behaviour , but as this is a > (small) behaviour difference with 3.11, better ask for feedback before > commit :). > > So, any objection/feedback ? I cannot imagine (maybe I am not trying too hard?) that anybody would rely on --gen-suppressions=yes being limited to just 25 entries by default. So such a change seems fine to me. Thanks, Mark |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2016-08-26 11:14:53
|
Hello, https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199468 complains that valgrind suppressions entries are limited to 25, which is smaller than the max size for --num-callers (Florian changed it to 500 in 2012). This difference between the 2 max gives 2 limitations: 1. You cannot write a suppression entry that precisely match the produced backtrace, when using --num-callers > 25 2. When using --gen-suppressions=yes, the generated suppressions are limited to 25 entries. The fix is easy : remove VG_MAX_SUPP_CALLERS and replace it by VG_DEEPEST_BACKTRACE. For sure, removing limitation 1 is good : users are less limited, and unless someone really wants a suppression of more than 25 entries, this does not change the behaviour. Removing limitation 2 means that users using --num-callers > 25 and --gen-suppressions=yes will now generate bigger suppression entries. IMO, that is a consistent/understandable behaviour , but as this is a (small) behaviour difference with 3.11, better ask for feedback before commit :). So, any objection/feedback ? Thanks Philippe NB: of course, all existing suppression entries/files still work as before. |