You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
(1) |
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
(6) |
13
(4) |
14
(3) |
15
(1) |
16
(2) |
|
17
(7) |
18
(1) |
19
(5) |
20
(3) |
21
(1) |
22
(5) |
23
|
|
24
(1) |
25
(3) |
26
(2) |
27
(1) |
28
(2) |
29
(1) |
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2016-01-26 10:34:24
|
Author: iraisr
Date: Tue Jan 26 10:34:16 2016
New Revision: 15775
Log:
Fix expected output of test memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior on Solaris 12.
C++ allocator from Solaris Studio allocates for std::string
57 bytes instead of former 40 bytes on 64-bit, and 45 bytes instead of 28 on 32-bit.
Confirmed with truss and --trace-alloc=yes.
n-i-bz
Added:
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris
trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/Makefile.am
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/Makefile.am
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/Makefile.am (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/Makefile.am Tue Jan 26 10:34:16 2016
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
cond_st.stderr.exp-64bit-non-arm \
cond_st.stderr.exp-32bit-non-arm \
leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit leak_cpp_interior.vgtest \
+ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris \
custom_alloc.stderr.exp custom_alloc.vgtest \
custom_alloc.stderr.exp-s390x-mvc \
custom-overlap.stderr.exp custom-overlap.vgtest \
Added: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris (added)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris Tue Jan 26 10:34:16 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+
+valgrind output will go to log
+VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+ by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
+ by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ still reachable: 273 bytes in 8 blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 114 bytes in 2 blocks
+ length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
+ suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
+To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
+
+leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 177 (+177) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 96 (-177) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 162 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics length64
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 194 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (-83) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 162 (+83) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 114 (+114) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
+ still reachable: 273 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ newarray : 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+48) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics all
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 273 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 32 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics none
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 225 (+225) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
+ still reachable: 48 (-225) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+Searching for pointers pointing in 20 bytes from 0x........
+*0x........ interior points at 8 bytes inside 0x........
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "ptr"
+block at 0x........ considered reachable by ptr 0x........ using newarray heuristic
+destruct MyClass
+destruct MyClass
+destruct MyClass
+destruct Ce
+destruct Be
+destruct Ae
+destruct Ce
+destruct Be
+destruct Ae
+destruct C
+destruct B
+destruct A
+destruct C
+destruct B
+destruct A
+Finished!
+
+HEAP SUMMARY:
+ in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ total heap usage: 9 allocs, 9 frees, 281 bytes allocated
+
+All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
+
+For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Added: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris (added)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris Tue Jan 26 10:34:16 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+
+valgrind output will go to log
+VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
+4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+ by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
+ by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ still reachable: 197 bytes in 8 blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 90 bytes in 2 blocks
+ length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
+ newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
+To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
+
+leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 149 (+149) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 48 (-149) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 0 (-90) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 145 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics length64
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 142 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 83 (-59) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
+ still reachable: 114 (+59) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 90 (+90) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 (-83) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
+ still reachable: 197 (+83) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 90 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 24 (+24) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics all
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 197 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 90 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 28 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+leak_check summary heuristics none
+LEAK SUMMARY:
+ definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 173 (+173) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
+ still reachable: 24 (-173) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ of which reachable via heuristic:
+ stdstring : 0 (-90) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
+To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
+
+Searching for pointers pointing in 20 bytes from 0x........
+*0x........ interior points at 4 bytes inside 0x........
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "ptr"
+block at 0x........ considered reachable by ptr 0x........ using newarray heuristic
+destruct MyClass
+destruct MyClass
+destruct MyClass
+destruct Ce
+destruct Be
+destruct Ae
+destruct Ce
+destruct Be
+destruct Ae
+destruct C
+destruct B
+destruct A
+destruct C
+destruct B
+destruct A
+Finished!
+
+HEAP SUMMARY:
+ in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
+ total heap usage: 9 allocs, 9 frees, 201 bytes allocated
+
+All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
+
+For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2016-01-26 04:31:12
|
Author: iraisr
Date: Tue Jan 26 04:31:04 2016
New Revision: 15774
Log:
Fix compilation error on Solaris.
Include <sys/segments.h> only on x86/amd64 architecture.
n-i-bz
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/solaris/thr_daemon_exit_standalone.c
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/solaris/thr_daemon_exit_standalone.c
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/solaris/thr_daemon_exit_standalone.c (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/solaris/thr_daemon_exit_standalone.c Tue Jan 26 04:31:04 2016
@@ -3,10 +3,13 @@
#include <sys/lwp.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
-#include <sys/segments.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/ucontext.h>
+#if defined(__amd64) || defined(__i386)
+#include <sys/segments.h>
+#endif
+
extern void bzero(void *ptr, size_t n);
#if defined(VGP_x86_solaris)
|