You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
(5) |
3
(2) |
4
(8) |
5
(10) |
|
6
(3) |
7
(9) |
8
(7) |
9
(8) |
10
(7) |
11
(4) |
12
(11) |
|
13
(5) |
14
(17) |
15
(6) |
16
(15) |
17
|
18
(3) |
19
(1) |
|
20
(6) |
21
(18) |
22
(5) |
23
(9) |
24
(6) |
25
(3) |
26
(1) |
|
27
(1) |
28
|
29
(8) |
30
(5) |
|
|
|
|
From: Florian K. <fl...@ei...> - 2015-09-20 13:44:33
|
On 20.09.2015 13:21, Florian Krohm wrote: > We should also consider the small patch set by Jean Delvare which was > posted to valgrind-developers sep 9: > "VKI_I2C_SMBUS: Fixes and cleanups". > > This patch set relates to r14908 which is the changeset for BZ #342603. > This is a bug that we say was fixed in 3.11. So we should fix it properly. > > I cannot tell whether the patch is correct or not. But as the person who > provided r14908 was on copy and has not spoken up since, I presume this > is good to go in. > > I'll commit to HEAD shortly. > r15655, r15656, r15657 Florian |
|
From: Florian K. <fl...@ei...> - 2015-09-20 13:43:26
|
Thanks for the patches. I applied them as r15655-r15657. Florian On 09.09.2015 10:47, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been testing VKI_I2C_SMBUS with i2c-tools and found a few issues. > > I am familiar with the Linux kernel I2C API, but not with VKI, so > please let me know if I got anything wrong. > > [PATCH 1/4] VKI_I2C_SMBUS: Fix size of block transactions > [PATCH 2/4] VKI_I2C_SMBUS: Fix test on quick transaction > [PATCH 3/4] VKI_I2C_SMBUS: Fix typo in comment > [PATCH 4/4] VKI_I2C_SMBUS: Drop irrelevant comment > |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2015-09-20 13:42:13
|
Author: florian
Date: Sun Sep 20 14:42:06 2015
New Revision: 15657
Log:
Fix up a few comments.
Patch by Jean Delvare <jde...@su...>.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c
==============================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c (original)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c Sun Sep 20 14:42:06 2015
@@ -6862,7 +6862,7 @@
PRE_MEM_READ("ioctl(VKI_I2C_SMBUS).i2c_smbus_ioctl_data.command",
(Addr)&vkis->command, sizeof(vkis->command));
/* i2c_smbus_write_quick hides its value in read_write, so
- this variable can hava a different meaning */
+ this variable can have a different meaning */
/* to make matters worse i2c_smbus_write_byte stores its
value in command */
if ( ! ((vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK) ||
@@ -9387,9 +9387,7 @@
struct vki_i2c_smbus_ioctl_data *vkis
= (struct vki_i2c_smbus_ioctl_data *) ARG3;
/* i2c_smbus_write_quick hides its value in read_write, so
- this variable can hava a different meaning */
- /* to make matters worse i2c_smbus_write_byte stores its
- value in command */
+ this variable can have a different meaning */
if ((vkis->read_write == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_READ)
|| (vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_PROC_CALL)
|| (vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL)) {
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2015-09-20 13:41:32
|
Author: florian
Date: Sun Sep 20 14:41:25 2015
New Revision: 15656
Log:
Followup to r14908 (BZ #342603).
Comparing the command byte with VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK is like comparing
apples to carrots, it makes no sense. The command byte is unused for
quick transactions anyway so checking its value is pointless.
Patch by Jean Delvare <jde...@su...>.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c
==============================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c (original)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c Sun Sep 20 14:41:25 2015
@@ -6865,8 +6865,7 @@
this variable can hava a different meaning */
/* to make matters worse i2c_smbus_write_byte stores its
value in command */
- if ( ! (((vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK)
- && (vkis->command == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK)) ||
+ if ( ! ((vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK) ||
((vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_BYTE)
&& (vkis->read_write == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_WRITE)))) {
/* the rest uses the byte array to store the data,
@@ -9394,8 +9393,7 @@
if ((vkis->read_write == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_READ)
|| (vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_PROC_CALL)
|| (vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL)) {
- if ( ! ((vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK)
- && (vkis->command == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK))) {
+ if ( ! (vkis->size == VKI_I2C_SMBUS_QUICK)) {
UInt size;
switch(vkis->size) {
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_BYTE:
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2015-09-20 13:40:55
|
Author: florian
Date: Sun Sep 20 14:40:47 2015
New Revision: 15655
Log:
Followup to r14908 (BZ #342603).
The first byte of the data array holds the length, so the actual data
length is the value of that byte plus one.
Patch by Jean Delvare <jde...@su...>.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c
==============================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c (original)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c Sun Sep 20 14:40:47 2015
@@ -6884,7 +6884,7 @@
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_BROKEN:
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL:
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA:
- size = vkis->data->block[0];
+ size = 1 + vkis->data->block[0];
break;
default:
size = 0;
@@ -9410,7 +9410,7 @@
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_BROKEN:
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL:
case VKI_I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA:
- size = vkis->data->block[0];
+ size = 1 + vkis->data->block[0];
break;
default:
size = 0;
|
|
From: Florian K. <fl...@ei...> - 2015-09-20 11:22:12
|
On 19.09.2015 15:40, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 15:44 +0200, Julian Seward wrote: >> I plan to branch for 3.11.0 in the next 24 hours or so. Please >> yell ASAP if you believe there to be big breakage on the trunk >> that should be fixed before that. >> >> If the branch seems stable then I propose to let the branch stabilise >> until Mon 21 Sept and release at that point. > > I think the branch and valgrind-3.11.0.TEST1 are pretty stable and good. > I have been testing a bit with some additional patches to get slightly > less test failures and suppress some warnings. These are not urgently > needed, but would be nice to have in the final release: > > r15647 > libvex_test: Use arm64_[di]MinLine_lg2_szB values that make libvex > happy. > > r15650 > Fix various compiler warnings for the arm architecture. > > r15651 > Do not compile with -Wcast-align on arm. > > r15653 > Add Power PC ISA check to the vbit-test (bug #352765) > > r15654 > Filter out glibc warning messages about unexpected futex results in > tests. > > Additionally there are the following 3 VEX revisions for some issues on > ppc: > > r3188 > guard dis_dfp_fmt_conv and dis_dfp_exponent_test with allow_DFP > > r3189 > Add support for the Power PC Program Priority Register (bug #352769) > > =Note= there is one open review comment about this patch from Matthias. > In the ppc64 case the guest_PSPB is initialized to zero. The comment and > the ppc32 case explicitly say it should be non-zero. > > r3190 > Add support for the Power PC mbar instruction (bug #352768) > > With or without these patches I think valgrind 3.11.0 will be a great > release. > We should also consider the small patch set by Jean Delvare which was posted to valgrind-developers sep 9: "VKI_I2C_SMBUS: Fixes and cleanups". This patch set relates to r14908 which is the changeset for BZ #342603. This is a bug that we say was fixed in 3.11. So we should fix it properly. I cannot tell whether the patch is correct or not. But as the person who provided r14908 was on copy and has not spoken up since, I presume this is good to go in. I'll commit to HEAD shortly. Florian |