You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(30) |
2
(8) |
3
(5) |
4
(5) |
|
5
(3) |
6
(9) |
7
(5) |
8
(14) |
9
(17) |
10
(27) |
11
(10) |
|
12
(6) |
13
(10) |
14
(7) |
15
(16) |
16
(9) |
17
(14) |
18
(8) |
|
19
(5) |
20
(13) |
21
(21) |
22
(13) |
23
(4) |
24
(1) |
25
(4) |
|
26
(2) |
27
(7) |
28
(4) |
29
(5) |
30
(12) |
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2015-04-04 18:43:19
|
Author: florian
Date: Sat Apr 4 19:43:11 2015
New Revision: 3118
Log:
Tweak STATIC_ASSERT such that there is no warning about an unused
variable when used at block scope.
Modified:
trunk/priv/main_util.h
Modified: trunk/priv/main_util.h
==============================================================================
--- trunk/priv/main_util.h (original)
+++ trunk/priv/main_util.h Sat Apr 4 19:43:11 2015
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@
#endif
// Poor man's static assert
-#define STATIC_ASSERT(x) extern int vex__unused_array[(x) ? 1 : -1]
+#define STATIC_ASSERT(x) extern int vex__unused_array[(x) ? 1 : -1] \
+ __attribute__((unused))
/* Stuff for panicking and assertion. */
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2015-04-04 18:43:08
|
Author: florian
Date: Sat Apr 4 19:43:00 2015
New Revision: 15066
Log:
Tweak STATIC_ASSERT such that there is no warning about an unused
variable when used at block scope.
Modified:
trunk/include/pub_tool_basics.h
Modified: trunk/include/pub_tool_basics.h
==============================================================================
--- trunk/include/pub_tool_basics.h (original)
+++ trunk/include/pub_tool_basics.h Sat Apr 4 19:43:00 2015
@@ -369,7 +369,8 @@
})
// Poor man's static assert
-#define STATIC_ASSERT(x) extern int VG_(VG_(VG_(unused)))[(x) ? 1 : -1]
+#define STATIC_ASSERT(x) extern int VG_(VG_(VG_(unused)))[(x) ? 1 : -1] \
+ __attribute__((unused))
#endif /* __PUB_TOOL_BASICS_H */
|
|
From: santosh <ys...@gm...> - 2015-04-04 16:00:20
|
Hello, I still get the error: disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x10E40301 I thought Valgrind 3.10.1 has support for CPU: e500v2? NO? Thanks, Santosh |
|
From: Petar J. <mip...@gm...> - 2015-04-04 03:15:52
|
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Florian Krohm <fl...@ei...> wrote: > Yes. But comparing _valEx makes sense when it has a deterministic value > (i.e. after a pipe call). So not comparing the _valEx value at all does > not sound right either. I agree. > How is this (for mips64): > > Index: coregrind/m_syscall.c > =================================================================== > --- coregrind/m_syscall.c (revision 15062) > +++ coregrind/m_syscall.c (working copy) > @@ -859,6 +859,7 @@ > ULong V0 = do_syscall_WRK(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6,sysno,v1_a3); > ULong V1 = (ULong)v1_a3[0]; > ULong A3 = (ULong)v1_a3[1]; > + if (sysno != _NR_pipe) V1 = 0; // V1 is unused for this syscall > return VG_(mk_SysRes_mips64_linux)( V0, V1, A3 ); > > #else > > Does that help? > > I have tested a similar change right away, but it was not sufficient. I believe I need to modify at least putSyscallStatusIntoGuestState(), will see if anything else is missing after more testing. Petar |
|
From: Ivo R. <iv...@iv...> - 2015-04-04 02:52:17
|
2015-04-02 22:05 GMT+02:00 Philippe Waroquiers < phi...@sk...>: > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 21:27 +0200, Ivo Raisr wrote: > > > > Back to memcheck annotations in setHelperAnns(). I tried to add > > another element of fxState for FP and - what surprise - no effect on x86 > > +amd64/Linux. > > All tests passed, nothing failed. > > I suspect that all this is working due to the default value: > --vex-iropt-register-updates=unwindregs-at-mem-access > > Even if the dirty helper does not indicate > that the FP must be up to date at dirty helper call, > the above flag will ensure the FP has a correct value. > > I am wondering what is the behaviour of memcheck > if we fix the dirty helper (i.e. indicate it reads FP) > but use sp-at-mem-access for > --vex-iropt-register-updates? > Are all tests still ok? > You are right, the default --vex-iropt-register-updates=unwindregs-at-mem-access was in place. But "sp-at-mem-access" is not correct option for stack unwinding. I used "unwindregs-at-mem-access" instead to play with. So with --vex-iropt-register-updates=unwindregs-at-mem-access there is no difference whatsoever for the following cases: - setHelperAnns() with the fix (dirty helpers read FP) - setHelperAnns() without the fix (original state) - setHelperAnns() set no annotations at all [di->nFxState = 0] This supports my earlier statement that annotations on dirty helpers injected by *tools* are not processed, unlike annotations injected by guest->IR translation. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345811 I. |