You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
(2) |
8
(16) |
9
|
10
|
11
(1) |
|
12
(19) |
13
(12) |
14
(15) |
15
(5) |
16
(15) |
17
(1) |
18
(15) |
|
19
|
20
(3) |
21
(1) |
22
(12) |
23
(4) |
24
(5) |
25
(15) |
|
26
(4) |
27
(12) |
28
|
29
(2) |
30
(13) |
31
(13) |
|
|
From: Ming C. <Min...@fl...> - 2014-01-20 08:18:20
|
Hi John, Thanks for your kind suggestion and I wrote some simple testing program. The tool should be ok in supporting member function pointer. The basic cause is that because valgrind will slow down some of my threads and previously seems ok statement sequence now not ok any more. So thanks for helping me find a potential bug. All the Best! -----Original Message----- From: John Reiser [mailto:jreiser@BitWagon.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 10:35 AM To: val...@li... Subject: Re: [Valgrind-developers] Does valgrind support C++ member function pointer > I am using valgrind-3.5.0 to do memory leak check. The command is to this effect: That version (valgrind-3.5.0) is around 4 years old. valgrind-3.9.0 was released a few months ago. You should upgrade to valgrind-3.9.0. It contains many new and/or improved features, and *dozens* of bug fixes in contrast to valgrind-3.5.0. > valgrind --tool=memcheck <my_prog> > > > > If I just run <my_prog> everything looks ok. However if running under valgrind the moment it ran to a member function pointer, my_prog failed but valgrind ran. So I want to confirm valgrind support member function well? Please tell us more about exactly what happened. Did memcheck complain? What was the message that memcheck gave? (Copy+paste the message and tracebacks into a reply posting to this mailing list.) Did memcheck itself crash, such as with SIGSEGV? If so then that is a bug in memcheck. Did your program "crash" when run under memcheck? If so then it is almost certainly the case that memcheck has found a bug in your program. Yes, valgrind(memcheck) supports calling a function through a member function pointer. If in doubt, then construct a small stand-alone test case (15 lines or so) and try it. If the test case works under memcheck, then that demonstrates that your problem is not the same as the test case. If the test case fails under memcheck, then you have something which is perfect for submitting as a bug report against memcheck. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list Val...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers |
|
From: John R.
|
> I am using valgrind-3.5.0 to do memory leak check. The command is to this effect: That version (valgrind-3.5.0) is around 4 years old. valgrind-3.9.0 was released a few months ago. You should upgrade to valgrind-3.9.0. It contains many new and/or improved features, and *dozens* of bug fixes in contrast to valgrind-3.5.0. > valgrind --tool=memcheck <my_prog> > > > > If I just run <my_prog> everything looks ok. However if running under valgrind the moment it ran to a member function pointer, my_prog failed but valgrind ran. So I want to confirm valgrind support member function well? Please tell us more about exactly what happened. Did memcheck complain? What was the message that memcheck gave? (Copy+paste the message and tracebacks into a reply posting to this mailing list.) Did memcheck itself crash, such as with SIGSEGV? If so then that is a bug in memcheck. Did your program "crash" when run under memcheck? If so then it is almost certainly the case that memcheck has found a bug in your program. Yes, valgrind(memcheck) supports calling a function through a member function pointer. If in doubt, then construct a small stand-alone test case (15 lines or so) and try it. If the test case works under memcheck, then that demonstrates that your problem is not the same as the test case. If the test case fails under memcheck, then you have something which is perfect for submitting as a bug report against memcheck. -- |