You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(5) |
2
(16) |
3
(23) |
|
4
(13) |
5
(1) |
6
(1) |
7
(17) |
8
(18) |
9
(14) |
10
(12) |
|
11
|
12
(6) |
13
(19) |
14
(4) |
15
(7) |
16
(30) |
17
(12) |
|
18
(2) |
19
(13) |
20
(3) |
21
(3) |
22
(17) |
23
(16) |
24
(5) |
|
25
(14) |
26
(15) |
27
(4) |
28
(15) |
29
(16) |
30
(16) |
31
(15) |
|
From: Carl E. L. <ce...@li...> - 2013-08-20 22:11:32
|
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:10 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 09:22 -0700, Carl E. Love wrote: > > The comment says the tend is a noop. That is how it is implemented in > > Julian's first proposal. When I read the comment, I was thinking I had forgotten > > to issue the tend instruction as I said in my previous message. But when > > I really looked at the code, I am generating the Iop for the TEND instruction. > > I checked the code generation for handling the TEND and the tend instruction is > > being generated/executed on the host CPU. So, it really is the comment that > > is in error not the code. I fixed the comment and reran the test. The test > > is taking the failure path. Unfortunately, the failure wasn't due to forgetting > > to do the tend instruction on the underlying CPU. > > Then what does the TEXASR value say? That should tell you why your > host transaction aborted. And depending on the failure, the TFIAR > register will tell (exactly or close to it) what the failure address > is. The value from the TEXASR register is 0x120000018000001 which according to my decoding of the bits indicate: persistent failure, footprint overflow, privilege state, failure summary is complete, transaction level 1. The key thing here is the "footprint overflow" which is described in the ISA as "an attempt to perform a storage access in Transactional state which exceeds the capacity for tracking transactional accesses". Basically, we can't track all of the guest program instructions between the tbegin and tend with all of the valgrind instructions mixed in. The value of the TFIAR register was 0x382de231 which is somewhere in the valgrind tool code space. |
|
From: Carl E. L. <ce...@li...> - 2013-08-20 20:39:36
|
I have created bugzilla 323803 for adding transactional memory support
for Power. This bugzilla is specifically for implementing the first
approach for supporting the TM instructions in Valgrind. Please review
the patch and let me know if you have any comments. Thanks.
Carl Love
|
|
From: Peter B. <be...@vn...> - 2013-08-20 18:10:57
|
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 09:22 -0700, Carl E. Love wrote: > The comment says the tend is a noop. That is how it is implemented in > Julian's first proposal. When I read the comment, I was thinking I had forgotten > to issue the tend instruction as I said in my previous message. But when > I really looked at the code, I am generating the Iop for the TEND instruction. > I checked the code generation for handling the TEND and the tend instruction is > being generated/executed on the host CPU. So, it really is the comment that > is in error not the code. I fixed the comment and reran the test. The test > is taking the failure path. Unfortunately, the failure wasn't due to forgetting > to do the tend instruction on the underlying CPU. Then what does the TEXASR value say? That should tell you why your host transaction aborted. And depending on the failure, the TFIAR register will tell (exactly or close to it) what the failure address is. Peter |