You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(26) |
2
(24) |
|
3
(21) |
4
(23) |
5
(19) |
6
(24) |
7
(27) |
8
(28) |
9
(18) |
|
10
(15) |
11
(14) |
12
(17) |
13
(18) |
14
(24) |
15
(27) |
16
(17) |
|
17
(26) |
18
(22) |
19
(27) |
20
(25) |
21
(19) |
22
(22) |
23
(17) |
|
24
(30) |
25
(21) |
26
(14) |
27
(20) |
28
(25) |
29
(23) |
30
(22) |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2012-06-08 16:36:39
|
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 15:36 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Mostly though this will be triggered by code where even the high level
> semantics cause a problem. An example in our code is a function with a
> writev type interface like this:
>
> void fn(const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < iovcnt; i++)
> {
> void *buffer = iov[i].iov_base;
> int length = iov[i].iov_len;
>
> ... do stuff with buffer ...
> }
> }
>
> because the body of that loop uses the same instructions to operate on
> different arrays accessed by indexing iov you run into this problem.
(I am not very good at knowing what kind of IR instrumentation one can
reasonably do, so the below looks probably like science-fiction or
like 'here a miracle occurs during IR instrumentation').
Wouldn't it be possible to have the IR instrumented to make/remember
the difference between 'assign an address of a variable to buffer'
and 'increment/decrement the value of buffer' ?
Then the instrumented IR could say that a first access to an array can
only be valid if a value has been assigned.
A first access with a 'incremented/decremented value' would be
considered as invalid.
Philippe
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-06-08 16:01:33
|
florian 2012-06-08 17:01:19 +0100 (Fri, 08 Jun 2012)
New Revision: 12624
Log:
Amend do_shadow_Dirty and do_origins_Dirty so they no longer assert
if the helper call touches an odd number of bytes in memory.
Modified files:
trunk/memcheck/mc_translate.c
Modified: trunk/memcheck/mc_translate.c (+34 -4)
===================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/mc_translate.c 2012-06-08 08:13:17 +01:00 (rev 12623)
+++ trunk/memcheck/mc_translate.c 2012-06-08 17:01:19 +01:00 (rev 12624)
@@ -4309,7 +4309,17 @@
curr = mkUifU32(mce, here, curr);
toDo -= 2;
}
- tl_assert(toDo == 0); /* also need to handle 1-byte excess */
+ /* chew off the remaining 8-bit chunk, if any */
+ if (toDo == 1) {
+ here = mkPCastTo(
+ mce, Ity_I32,
+ expr2vbits_Load ( mce, end, Ity_I8,
+ d->mAddr, d->mSize - toDo )
+ );
+ curr = mkUifU32(mce, here, curr);
+ toDo -= 1;
+ }
+ tl_assert(toDo == 0);
}
/* Whew! So curr is a 32-bit V-value summarising pessimistically
@@ -4377,7 +4387,15 @@
NULL/*guard*/ );
toDo -= 2;
}
- tl_assert(toDo == 0); /* also need to handle 1-byte excess */
+ /* chew off the remaining 8-bit chunk, if any */
+ if (toDo == 1) {
+ do_shadow_Store( mce, end, d->mAddr, d->mSize - toDo,
+ NULL, /* original data */
+ mkPCastTo( mce, Ity_I8, curr ),
+ NULL/*guard*/ );
+ toDo -= 1;
+ }
+ tl_assert(toDo == 0);
}
}
@@ -5894,7 +5912,13 @@
curr = gen_maxU32( mce, curr, here );
toDo -= 2;
}
- tl_assert(toDo == 0); /* also need to handle 1-byte excess */
+ /* chew off the remaining 8-bit chunk, if any */
+ if (toDo == 1) {
+ here = gen_load_b( mce, 1, d->mAddr, d->mSize - toDo );
+ curr = gen_maxU32( mce, curr, here );
+ toDo -= 1;
+ }
+ tl_assert(toDo == 0);
}
/* Whew! So curr is a 32-bit B-value which should give an origin
@@ -5959,7 +5983,13 @@
NULL/*guard*/ );
toDo -= 2;
}
- tl_assert(toDo == 0); /* also need to handle 1-byte excess */
+ /* chew off the remaining 8-bit chunk, if any */
+ if (toDo == 1) {
+ gen_store_b( mce, 1, d->mAddr, d->mSize - toDo, curr,
+ NULL/*guard*/ );
+ toDo -= 1;
+ }
+ tl_assert(toDo == 0);
}
}
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 14:36:43
|
On 08/06/12 15:29, Dan Shelton wrote:
> On 8 June 2012 16:17, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>> On 08/06/12 15:08, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 June 2012 15:54, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/06/12 14:51, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list.
>>>>>>> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that
>>>>>> exp-sgcheck
>>>>>> works - there's a reason it's experimental.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to
>>>>>> access
>>>>>> one array it will always access the same array until the end of the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>> function.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number
>>>>> of arguments like sprintf work as expected?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's nothing to do with having a variable number of arguments, you could
>>>> get
>>>> exactly the same warning with a fixed number of arguments if you wrote a
>>>> function like this:
>>>>
>>>> void foo(char *a, char *b)
>>>> {
>>>> char *p;
>>>>
>>>> for (p = a; *p; p++)
>>>> {
>>>> ...
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> for (p = b; *p; p++)
>>>> {
>>>> ...
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> The problem is the reuse of a variable (p in this example) to access
>>>> different arrays.
>>>
>>>
>>> It can't get an option to always check the pointer for every access?
>>
>>
>> It does check it! That's the problem...
>>
>> My example above actually might work, depending on exactly what the compiler
>> does, but it is easy to construct a variant that will fail.
>>
>> The details of how sgcheck works can be found here:
>>
>> http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/sg-manual.html#sg-manual.how-works.sg-checks
>>
>> but basically, the first time an instruction is executed we remember which
>> array it accessed and then expect it to access the same array in future,
>> until the function ends anyway.
>>
>> So if the compile realised those two loops were the same and merged them
>> that code would fail - a version which had two nested loops and used p in
>> the inner loop to point to different arrays selected by the outer loop would
>> always fail.
>
> So basically you say: As soon as the compiler optimises we're doomed?
> Can a different choice of compiler (pcc ?) or disabling the optimiser
> help?
Disabling the optimiser might sometimes help - we generally recommend
using unoptimised code anyway.
Mostly though this will be triggered by code where even the high level
semantics cause a problem. An example in our code is a function with a
writev type interface like this:
void fn(const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < iovcnt; i++)
{
void *buffer = iov[i].iov_base;
int length = iov[i].iov_len;
... do stuff with buffer ...
}
}
because the body of that loop uses the same instructions to operate on
different arrays accessed by indexing iov you run into this problem.
>>>> And no, we know of no good solution.
>>>>
>>>> Basically exp-sgcheck was an interesting experiment, but in my experience
>>>> it
>>>> is not workable for real world programs.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there any tool based on valgrind which can do checks on global
>>> arrays and stack variables and is not experimental?
>>
>>
>> No, because this is basically a research grade problem that is currently (to
>> my knowledge unsolved) as to how to do such checks on an unmodified program.
>
> Why does Purify (your closest competitor AFAIK) handle this right?
Because it works at link time to modify the code and insert canary words
between stack items I believe.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://compton.nu/
|
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@go...> - 2012-06-08 14:36:37
|
Architectural question (as follow-up to the recent issue with exp-sgcheck): Does it make sense to add a C interpreter to valgrind to cover the more severe cases of problems where the plain valgrind architecture can't help? |
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@go...> - 2012-06-08 14:29:50
|
On 8 June 2012 16:17, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
> On 08/06/12 15:08, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>
>> On 8 June 2012 15:54, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/06/12 14:51, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list.
>>>>>> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that
>>>>> exp-sgcheck
>>>>> works - there's a reason it's experimental.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to
>>>>> access
>>>>> one array it will always access the same array until the end of the
>>>>> current
>>>>> function.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number
>>>> of arguments like sprintf work as expected?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's nothing to do with having a variable number of arguments, you could
>>> get
>>> exactly the same warning with a fixed number of arguments if you wrote a
>>> function like this:
>>>
>>> void foo(char *a, char *b)
>>> {
>>> char *p;
>>>
>>> for (p = a; *p; p++)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> for (p = b; *p; p++)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> The problem is the reuse of a variable (p in this example) to access
>>> different arrays.
>>
>>
>> It can't get an option to always check the pointer for every access?
>
>
> It does check it! That's the problem...
>
> My example above actually might work, depending on exactly what the compiler
> does, but it is easy to construct a variant that will fail.
>
> The details of how sgcheck works can be found here:
>
> http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/sg-manual.html#sg-manual.how-works.sg-checks
>
> but basically, the first time an instruction is executed we remember which
> array it accessed and then expect it to access the same array in future,
> until the function ends anyway.
>
> So if the compile realised those two loops were the same and merged them
> that code would fail - a version which had two nested loops and used p in
> the inner loop to point to different arrays selected by the outer loop would
> always fail.
So basically you say: As soon as the compiler optimises we're doomed?
Can a different choice of compiler (pcc ?) or disabling the optimiser
help?
>>> And no, we know of no good solution.
>>>
>>> Basically exp-sgcheck was an interesting experiment, but in my experience
>>> it
>>> is not workable for real world programs.
>>
>>
>> Is there any tool based on valgrind which can do checks on global
>> arrays and stack variables and is not experimental?
>
>
> No, because this is basically a research grade problem that is currently (to
> my knowledge unsolved) as to how to do such checks on an unmodified program.
Why does Purify (your closest competitor AFAIK) handle this right?
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 14:17:51
|
On 08/06/12 15:08, Dan Shelton wrote:
> On 8 June 2012 15:54, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>> On 08/06/12 14:51, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list.
>>>>> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that exp-sgcheck
>>>> works - there's a reason it's experimental.
>>>>
>>>> Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to access
>>>> one array it will always access the same array until the end of the
>>>> current
>>>> function.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number
>>> of arguments like sprintf work as expected?
>>
>>
>> It's nothing to do with having a variable number of arguments, you could get
>> exactly the same warning with a fixed number of arguments if you wrote a
>> function like this:
>>
>> void foo(char *a, char *b)
>> {
>> char *p;
>>
>> for (p = a; *p; p++)
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> for (p = b; *p; p++)
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The problem is the reuse of a variable (p in this example) to access
>> different arrays.
>
> It can't get an option to always check the pointer for every access?
It does check it! That's the problem...
My example above actually might work, depending on exactly what the
compiler does, but it is easy to construct a variant that will fail.
The details of how sgcheck works can be found here:
http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/sg-manual.html#sg-manual.how-works.sg-checks
but basically, the first time an instruction is executed we remember
which array it accessed and then expect it to access the same array in
future, until the function ends anyway.
So if the compile realised those two loops were the same and merged them
that code would fail - a version which had two nested loops and used p
in the inner loop to point to different arrays selected by the outer
loop would always fail.
>> And no, we know of no good solution.
>>
>> Basically exp-sgcheck was an interesting experiment, but in my experience it
>> is not workable for real world programs.
>
> Is there any tool based on valgrind which can do checks on global
> arrays and stack variables and is not experimental?
No, because this is basically a research grade problem that is currently
(to my knowledge unsolved) as to how to do such checks on an unmodified
program.
Tools which can do so work at compile/link time by inserting guards
between the stack variables to spot overrunning accesses, or by
adjusting the code which accesses arrays to do bounds checcks. An
unmodified program will have arrays directly adjacent to each other in
memory making any attempt to spot such things very hard.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://compton.nu/
|
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@go...> - 2012-06-08 14:08:38
|
On 8 June 2012 15:54, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
> On 08/06/12 14:51, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>
>> On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>>
>>>> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list.
>>>> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that exp-sgcheck
>>> works - there's a reason it's experimental.
>>>
>>> Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to access
>>> one array it will always access the same array until the end of the
>>> current
>>> function.
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number
>> of arguments like sprintf work as expected?
>
>
> It's nothing to do with having a variable number of arguments, you could get
> exactly the same warning with a fixed number of arguments if you wrote a
> function like this:
>
> void foo(char *a, char *b)
> {
> char *p;
>
> for (p = a; *p; p++)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> for (p = b; *p; p++)
> {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> The problem is the reuse of a variable (p in this example) to access
> different arrays.
It can't get an option to always check the pointer for every access?
> And no, we know of no good solution.
>
> Basically exp-sgcheck was an interesting experiment, but in my experience it
> is not workable for real world programs.
Is there any tool based on valgrind which can do checks on global
arrays and stack variables and is not experimental?
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 13:55:02
|
On 08/06/12 14:51, Dan Shelton wrote:
> On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:
>> On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>
>>> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list.
>>> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please?
>>
>>
>> Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that exp-sgcheck
>> works - there's a reason it's experimental.
>>
>> Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to access
>> one array it will always access the same array until the end of the current
>> function.
>
> Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number
> of arguments like sprintf work as expected?
It's nothing to do with having a variable number of arguments, you could
get exactly the same warning with a fixed number of arguments if you
wrote a function like this:
void foo(char *a, char *b)
{
char *p;
for (p = a; *p; p++)
{
...
}
for (p = b; *p; p++)
{
...
}
}
The problem is the reuse of a variable (p in this example) to access
different arrays.
And no, we know of no good solution.
Basically exp-sgcheck was an interesting experiment, but in my
experience it is not workable for real world programs.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://compton.nu/
|
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@go...> - 2012-06-08 13:52:05
|
On 8 June 2012 15:51, Dan Shelton <dan...@go...> wrote: > On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: >> On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote: >> >>> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list. >>> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please? >> >> >> Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that exp-sgcheck >> works - there's a reason it's experimental. >> >> Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to access >> one array it will always access the same array until the end of the current >> function. > > Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number > of arguments like sprintf work as expected? (this should be implemented in a general way, not by whitelisting sprintf/printf/fprintf) |
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@go...> - 2012-06-08 13:51:18
|
On 31 May 2012 21:27, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: > On 31/05/12 19:45, Dan Shelton wrote: > >> This bug report just came through the AT&T AST/ksh93 development list. >> Can someone confirm that this is a bug, please? > > > Well it's not a bug as such more a limitation of the way that exp-sgcheck > works - there's a reason it's experimental. > > Basically exp-sgcheck assumes that once a pointer has been used to access > one array it will always access the same array until the end of the current > function. Is it possible to change that so that functions with variable number of arguments like sprintf work as expected? |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2012-06-08 13:50:19
|
On Thursday, June 07, 2012, Maynard Johnson wrote: > Hi, Julian, > Do you have a date yet that you're targeting for the next release? Good question. I propose Friday July 6, that is, exactly four weeks from today. That gives a two weeks for pushing in critical bug fixes, and two weeks for stabilising and releng stuff. If it turns out later that more time is needed, we can slip a week to Fri 13 (hmm :-), but I would prefer not to do that. From my own point of view, the only stuff I want to complete for 3.8.0 is AVX support, and that's well in hand already. Comments, other proposals? J |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-06-08 07:13:24
|
cborntra 2012-06-08 08:13:17 +0100 (Fri, 08 Jun 2012)
New Revision: 12623
Log:
avoid gcc warning regarding local/global variable shadowing in cdsg test
Modified files:
trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c
trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c (+5 -5)
===================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 07:59:33 +01:00 (rev 12622)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 08:13:17 +01:00 (rev 12623)
@@ -8,15 +8,15 @@
/* CDSG needs quad-word alignment */
-quad_word op1, op2, op3;
+quad_word _op1, _op2, _op3;
void
test(quad_word op1_init, quad_word op2_init, quad_word op3_init)
{
int cc; // unused
- op1 = op1_init;
- op2 = op2_init;
- op3 = op3_init;
+ _op1 = op1_init;
+ _op2 = op2_init;
+ _op3 = op3_init;
__asm__ volatile (
"lmg %%r0,%%r1,%1\n\t"
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
"cdsg %%r0,%%r2,%2\n\t" // cdsg 1st,3rd,2nd
"stmg %%r0,%%r1,%1\n" // store r0,r1 to op1
"stmg %%r2,%%r3,%3\n" // store r2,r3 to op3
- : "=d"(cc), "+QS" (op1), "+QS" (op2), "+QS" (op3)
+ : "=d"(cc), "+QS" (_op1), "+QS" (_op2), "+QS" (_op3)
:
: "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "cc");
}
Modified: trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c (+24 -24)
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 07:59:33 +01:00 (rev 12622)
+++ trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 08:13:17 +01:00 (rev 12623)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
/* CDSG needs quad-word alignment */
-quad_word op1, op2, op3;
+quad_word _op1, _op2, _op3;
void
test(quad_word op1_init, quad_word op2_init, quad_word op3_init,
@@ -17,63 +17,63 @@
quad_word op1_before, op2_before, op3_before;
int cc = 1 - expected_cc;
- op1 = op1_init;
- op2 = op2_init;
- op3 = op3_init;
+ _op1 = op1_init;
+ _op2 = op2_init;
+ _op3 = op3_init;
- op1_before = op1;
- op2_before = op2;
- op3_before = op3;
+ op1_before = _op1;
+ op2_before = _op2;
+ op3_before = _op3;
- printf("before op1 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op1.high, op1.low);
- printf("before op2 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op2.high, op2.low);
- printf("before op3 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op3.high, op3.low);
+ printf("before op1 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", _op1.high, _op1.low);
+ printf("before op2 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", _op2.high, _op2.low);
+ printf("before op3 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", _op3.high, _op3.low);
__asm__ volatile (
"lmg %%r0,%%r1,%1\n\t"
"lmg %%r2,%%r3,%3\n\t"
"cdsg %%r0,%%r2,%2\n\t" // cdsg 1st,3rd,2nd
- "stmg %%r0,%%r1,%1\n" // store r0,r1 to op1
- "stmg %%r2,%%r3,%3\n" // store r2,r3 to op3
+ "stmg %%r0,%%r1,%1\n" // store r0,r1 to _op1
+ "stmg %%r2,%%r3,%3\n" // store r2,r3 to _op3
"ipm %0\n\t"
"srl %0,28\n\t"
- : "=d" (cc), "+QS" (op1), "+QS" (op2), "+QS" (op3)
+ : "=d" (cc), "+QS" (_op1), "+QS" (_op2), "+QS" (_op3)
:
: "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "cc");
- printf("after op1 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op1.high, op1.low);
- printf("after op2 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op2.high, op2.low);
- printf("after op3 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op3.high, op3.low);
+ printf("after op1 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", _op1.high, _op1.low);
+ printf("after op2 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", _op2.high, _op2.low);
+ printf("after op3 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", _op3.high, _op3.low);
printf("cc = %d\n", cc);
if (cc != expected_cc) {
printf("condition code is incorrect\n");
}
- // op3 never changes
- if (op3.low != op3_before.low || op3.high != op3_before.high) {
+ // _op3 never changes
+ if (_op3.low != op3_before.low || _op3.high != op3_before.high) {
printf("operand #3 modified\n");
}
if (expected_cc == 0) {
// 3rd operand stored at 2nd operand location
- // op1 did not change
- if (op1.low != op1_before.low || op1.high != op1_before.high) {
+ // _op1 did not change
+ if (_op1.low != op1_before.low || _op1.high != op1_before.high) {
printf("operand #1 modified\n");
}
- if (op2.high != op3.high || op2.low != op3.low) {
+ if (_op2.high != _op3.high || _op2.low != _op3.low) {
printf("operand #2 incorrect\n");
}
} else {
// 2nd operand stored at 1st operand location
- // op2 did not change
- if (op2.low != op2_before.low || op2.high != op2_before.high) {
+ // _op2 did not change
+ if (_op2.low != op2_before.low || _op2.high != op2_before.high) {
printf("operand #2 modified\n");
}
- if (op1.high != op2.high || op1.low != op2.low) {
+ if (_op1.high != _op2.high || _op1.low != _op2.low) {
printf("operand #1 incorrect\n");
}
}
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-06-08 06:59:42
|
cborntra 2012-06-08 07:59:33 +0100 (Fri, 08 Jun 2012)
New Revision: 12622
Log:
s390: also fix the memcheck testcase for cdsg regarding alignment
Modified files:
trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c
trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.stderr.exp
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.stderr.exp (+6 -6)
===================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.stderr.exp 2012-06-08 07:59:18 +01:00 (rev 12621)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.stderr.exp 2012-06-08 07:59:33 +01:00 (rev 12622)
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: test (cdsg.c:17)
- by 0x........: op1_undefined (cdsg.c:35)
- by 0x........: main (cdsg.c:60)
+ at 0x........: test (cdsg.c:21)
+ by 0x........: op1_undefined (cdsg.c:39)
+ by 0x........: main (cdsg.c:64)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: test (cdsg.c:17)
- by 0x........: op2_undefined (cdsg.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (cdsg.c:61)
+ at 0x........: test (cdsg.c:21)
+ by 0x........: op2_undefined (cdsg.c:49)
+ by 0x........: main (cdsg.c:65)
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c (+9 -5)
===================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 07:59:18 +01:00 (rev 12621)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 07:59:33 +01:00 (rev 12622)
@@ -4,15 +4,19 @@
typedef struct {
uint64_t high;
uint64_t low;
-} quad_word;
+} __attribute__((aligned(16))) quad_word;
-void
+
+/* CDSG needs quad-word alignment */
+quad_word op1, op2, op3;
+
+void
test(quad_word op1_init, quad_word op2_init, quad_word op3_init)
{
int cc; // unused
- quad_word op1 = op1_init;
- quad_word op2 = op2_init;
- quad_word op3 = op3_init;
+ op1 = op1_init;
+ op2 = op2_init;
+ op3 = op3_init;
__asm__ volatile (
"lmg %%r0,%%r1,%1\n\t"
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-06-08 06:59:25
|
bart 2012-06-08 07:59:18 +0100 (Fri, 08 Jun 2012)
New Revision: 12621
Log:
drd: Add a suppression pattern
Modified files:
trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp
Modified: trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp (+6 -0)
===================================================================
--- trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp 2012-06-08 07:39:43 +01:00 (rev 12620)
+++ trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp 2012-06-08 07:59:18 +01:00 (rev 12621)
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
drd:ConflictingAccess
fun:write
}
+{
+ drd-libc-random
+ drd:ConflictingAccess
+ fun:random_r
+ fun:random
+}
#
# Suppression patterns for libstdc++, the implementation of the standard C++
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-06-08 06:39:54
|
cborntra 2012-06-08 07:39:43 +0100 (Fri, 08 Jun 2012)
New Revision: 12620
Log:
CDSG needs quad word (16 byte) aligned data structures. Since the stack
on s390 has only 8 byte alignment gcc cant guarantee 16 byte alignment
for local variables. As a global variable gcc can do that.
Modified files:
trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c
Modified: trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c (+13 -8)
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-07 12:38:40 +01:00 (rev 12619)
+++ trunk/none/tests/s390x/cdsg.c 2012-06-08 07:39:43 +01:00 (rev 12620)
@@ -4,21 +4,26 @@
typedef struct {
uint64_t high;
uint64_t low;
-} quad_word;
+} __attribute__((aligned(16))) quad_word;
-void
+
+/* CDSG needs quad-word alignment */
+quad_word op1, op2, op3;
+
+void
test(quad_word op1_init, quad_word op2_init, quad_word op3_init,
int expected_cc)
{
+ quad_word op1_before, op2_before, op3_before;
int cc = 1 - expected_cc;
- quad_word op1 = op1_init;
- quad_word op2 = op2_init;
- quad_word op3 = op3_init;
+ op1 = op1_init;
+ op2 = op2_init;
+ op3 = op3_init;
- quad_word op1_before = op1;
- quad_word op2_before = op2;
- quad_word op3_before = op3;
+ op1_before = op1;
+ op2_before = op2;
+ op3_before = op3;
printf("before op1 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op1.high, op1.low);
printf("before op2 = (%#lx, %#lx)\n", op2.high, op2.low);
|
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2012-06-08 04:35:07
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) Assembler: C library: unknown uname -mrs: Darwin 10.8.0 i386 Vendor version: unknown Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 10.8.0 i386 ) Started at 2012-06-07 23:05:00 CDT Ended at 2012-06-07 23:34:28 CDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 493 tests, 478 stderr failures, 130 stdout failures, 3 stderrB failures, 3 stdoutB failures, 32 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mchelp (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mchelp (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcinvokeWS (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlfork_chain (stdout) gdbserver_tests/nlfork_chain (stderr) memcheck/tests/accounting (stderr) memcheck/tests/addressable (stdout) memcheck/tests/addressable (stderr) memcheck/tests/atomic_incs (stdout) memcheck/tests/atomic_incs (stderr) memcheck/tests/badaddrvalue (stdout) memcheck/tests/badaddrvalue (stderr) memcheck/tests/badfree-2trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/badfree (stderr) memcheck/tests/badfree3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr) memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/badloop (stderr) memcheck/tests/badpoll (stderr) memcheck/tests/badrw (stderr) memcheck/tests/big_blocks_freed_list (stderr) memcheck/tests/brk2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/buflen_check (stderr) memcheck/tests/bug287260 (stderr) memcheck/tests/calloc-overflow (stderr) memcheck/tests/clientperm (stdout) memcheck/tests/clientperm (stderr) memcheck/tests/clireq_nofill (stdout) memcheck/tests/clireq_nofill (stderr) memcheck/tests/custom-overlap (stderr) memcheck/tests/custom_alloc (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/aio (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/env (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/pth-supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar_fork (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar_nocancel (stderr) memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar_vfork (stderr) memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stderr) memcheck/tests/describe-block (stderr) memcheck/tests/doublefree (stderr) memcheck/tests/err_disable1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/err_disable2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/err_disable3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/erringfds (stdout) memcheck/tests/erringfds (stderr) memcheck/tests/error_counts (stderr) memcheck/tests/errs1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/execve1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/execve2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/exitprog (stderr) memcheck/tests/file_locking (stderr) memcheck/tests/fprw (stderr) memcheck/tests/fwrite (stderr) memcheck/tests/holey_buffer_too_small (stderr) memcheck/tests/inits (stderr) memcheck/tests/inline (stdout) memcheck/tests/inline (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-0 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cases-full (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cases-possible (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cases-summary (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-delta (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-pool-0 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-pool-1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-pool-2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-pool-3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-pool-4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-pool-5 (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) memcheck/tests/long-supps (stderr) memcheck/tests/long_namespace_xml (stdout) memcheck/tests/long_namespace_xml (stderr) memcheck/tests/mallinfo (stderr) memcheck/tests/malloc1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/malloc2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/malloc3 (stdout) memcheck/tests/malloc3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/malloc_free_fill (stderr) memcheck/tests/malloc_usable (stderr) memcheck/tests/manuel1 (stdout) memcheck/tests/manuel1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/manuel2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/manuel2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/match-overrun (stderr) memcheck/tests/memalign2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/memalign_test (stderr) memcheck/tests/memcmptest (stdout) memcheck/tests/memcmptest (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/metadata (stdout) memcheck/tests/metadata (stderr) memcheck/tests/mismatches (stderr) memcheck/tests/mmaptest (stderr) memcheck/tests/nanoleak2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/nanoleak_supp (stderr) memcheck/tests/new_nothrow (stderr) memcheck/tests/new_override (stdout) memcheck/tests/new_override (stderr) memcheck/tests/noisy_child (stderr) memcheck/tests/null_socket (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin1-yes (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin2-not-quite (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin3-no (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin4-many (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin6-fp (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stdout) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) memcheck/tests/partial_load_dflt (stderr) memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr) memcheck/tests/partiallydefinedeq (stdout) memcheck/tests/partiallydefinedeq (stderr) memcheck/tests/pdb-realloc (stderr) memcheck/tests/pdb-realloc2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/pdb-realloc2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/pipe (stderr) memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr) memcheck/tests/post-syscall (stderr) memcheck/tests/realloc1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/realloc2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/realloc3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/sbfragment (stdout) memcheck/tests/sbfragment (stderr) memcheck/tests/sh-mem-random (stdout) memcheck/tests/sh-mem-random (stderr) memcheck/tests/sh-mem (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigkill (stderr) memcheck/tests/signal2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/signal2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/sigprocmask (stderr) memcheck/tests/static_malloc (stderr) memcheck/tests/str_tester (stderr) memcheck/tests/strchr (stderr) memcheck/tests/supp1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/supp2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr) memcheck/tests/suppfree (stderr) memcheck/tests/test-plo-no (stderr) memcheck/tests/test-plo-yes (stderr) memcheck/tests/trivialleak (stderr) memcheck/tests/unit_libcbase (stderr) memcheck/tests/unit_oset (stdout) memcheck/tests/unit_oset (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stdout) memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stdout) memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr) memcheck/tests/vcpu_bz2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/vcpu_bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/vcpu_fbench (stdout) memcheck/tests/vcpu_fbench (stderr) memcheck/tests/vcpu_fnfns (stdout) memcheck/tests/vcpu_fnfns (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap1 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap3 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap4 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap5 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap5 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap6 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap6 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap7 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap7 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) memcheck/tests/writev1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022 (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/tronical (stderr) memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stdout) memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stderr) memcheck/tests/xml1 (stdout) memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr) cachegrind/tests/chdir (stderr) cachegrind/tests/clreq (stderr) cachegrind/tests/dlclose (stdout) cachegrind/tests/dlclose (stderr) cachegrind/tests/notpower2 (stderr) cachegrind/tests/wrap5 (stdout) cachegrind/tests/wrap5 (stderr) cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108 (stderr) callgrind/tests/clreq (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2-hwpref (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2-use (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2-wb (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-cache (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-cache (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork1 (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork1 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork2 (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork2 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork3 (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork3 (stderr) callgrind/tests/threads-use (stderr) callgrind/tests/threads (stderr) massif/tests/alloc-fns-A (stderr) massif/tests/alloc-fns-A (post) massif/tests/alloc-fns-B (stderr) massif/tests/alloc-fns-B (post) massif/tests/basic (stderr) massif/tests/basic (post) massif/tests/basic2 (stderr) massif/tests/basic2 (post) massif/tests/big-alloc (stderr) massif/tests/big-alloc (post) massif/tests/culling1 (stderr) massif/tests/culling2 (stderr) massif/tests/custom_alloc (stderr) massif/tests/custom_alloc (post) massif/tests/deep-A (stderr) massif/tests/deep-A (post) massif/tests/deep-B (stderr) massif/tests/deep-B (post) massif/tests/deep-C (stderr) massif/tests/deep-C (post) massif/tests/deep-D (stderr) massif/tests/deep-D (post) massif/tests/ignored (stderr) massif/tests/ignored (post) massif/tests/ignoring (stderr) massif/tests/ignoring (post) massif/tests/insig (stderr) massif/tests/insig (post) massif/tests/long-names (stderr) massif/tests/long-names (post) massif/tests/long-time (stderr) massif/tests/long-time (post) massif/tests/malloc_usable (stderr) massif/tests/new-cpp (stderr) massif/tests/new-cpp (post) massif/tests/no-stack-no-heap (stderr) massif/tests/no-stack-no-heap (post) massif/tests/null (stderr) massif/tests/null (post) massif/tests/one (stderr) massif/tests/one (post) massif/tests/overloaded-new (stderr) massif/tests/overloaded-new (post) massif/tests/pages_as_heap (stderr) massif/tests/peak (stderr) massif/tests/peak (post) massif/tests/peak2 (stderr) massif/tests/peak2 (post) massif/tests/realloc (stderr) massif/tests/realloc (post) massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (stderr) massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (post) massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (stderr) massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (post) massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (stderr) massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (post) massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (stderr) massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (post) massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (stderr) massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (post) massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (stderr) massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (post) massif/tests/zero1 (stderr) massif/tests/zero1 (post) massif/tests/zero2 (stderr) massif/tests/zero2 (post) lackey/tests/true (stderr) none/tests/allexec32 (stdout) none/tests/allexec32 (stderr) none/tests/allexec64 (stdout) none/tests/allexec64 (stderr) none/tests/ansi (stderr) none/tests/args (stdout) none/tests/args (stderr) none/tests/async-sigs (stderr) none/tests/bitfield1 (stderr) none/tests/bug129866 (stdout) none/tests/bug129866 (stderr) none/tests/closeall (stderr) none/tests/cmd-with-special (stderr) none/tests/cmdline5 (stderr) none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stdout) none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stderr) none/tests/coolo_strlen (stderr) none/tests/darwin/access_extended (stderr) none/tests/darwin/apple-main-arg (stderr) none/tests/darwin/rlimit (stderr) none/tests/discard (stdout) none/tests/discard (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/exec-sigmask (stderr) none/tests/execve (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/fcntl_setown (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_cmsg (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_creat (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_dup (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_dup2 (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_ipv4 (stdout) none/tests/fdleak_ipv4 (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_open (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_pipe (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_socketpair (stderr) none/tests/floored (stdout) none/tests/floored (stderr) none/tests/fork (stdout) none/tests/fork (stderr) none/tests/fucomip (stderr) none/tests/gxx304 (stderr) none/tests/manythreads (stdout) none/tests/manythreads (stderr) none/tests/map_unaligned (stderr) none/tests/map_unmap (stdout) none/tests/map_unmap (stderr) none/tests/mmap_fcntl_bug (stderr) none/tests/mq (stderr) none/tests/munmap_exe (stderr) none/tests/nestedfns (stdout) none/tests/nestedfns (stderr) none/tests/nodir (stderr) none/tests/pending (stdout) none/tests/pending (stderr) none/tests/process_vm_readv_writev (stderr) none/tests/procfs-non-linux (stderr) none/tests/pth_atfork1 (stdout) none/tests/pth_atfork1 (stderr) none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stdout) none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stderr) none/tests/pth_cancel1 (stdout) none/tests/pth_cancel1 (stderr) none/tests/pth_cancel2 (stderr) none/tests/pth_cvsimple (stdout) none/tests/pth_cvsimple (stderr) none/tests/pth_empty (stderr) none/tests/pth_exit (stderr) none/tests/pth_exit2 (stderr) none/tests/pth_mutexspeed (stdout) none/tests/pth_mutexspeed (stderr) none/tests/pth_once (stdout) none/tests/pth_once (stderr) none/tests/pth_rwlock (stderr) none/tests/pth_stackalign (stdout) none/tests/pth_stackalign (stderr) none/tests/rcrl (stdout) none/tests/rcrl (stderr) none/tests/readline1 (stdout) none/tests/readline1 (stderr) none/tests/require-text-symbol-1 (stderr) none/tests/require-text-symbol-2 (stderr) none/tests/res_search (stdout) none/tests/res_search (stderr) none/tests/resolv (stdout) none/tests/resolv (stderr) none/tests/rlimit64_nofile (stderr) none/tests/rlimit_nofile (stderr) none/tests/sem (stderr) none/tests/semlimit (stderr) none/tests/sha1_test (stderr) none/tests/shell (stdout) none/tests/shell (stderr) none/tests/shell_nosuchfile (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid1 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) none/tests/shortpush (stderr) none/tests/shorts (stderr) none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout) none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr) none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout) none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr) none/tests/syscall-restart1 (stderr) none/tests/syscall-restart2 (stderr) none/tests/syslog (stderr) none/tests/system (stderr) none/tests/thread-exits (stdout) none/tests/thread-exits (stderr) none/tests/threaded-fork (stdout) none/tests/threaded-fork (stderr) none/tests/threadederrno (stdout) none/tests/threadederrno (stderr) none/tests/timestamp (stderr) none/tests/vgprintf (stderr) none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stdout) none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stderr) none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout) none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr) none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stdout) none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stderr) none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stdout) none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stderr) none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stdout) none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stderr) none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stdout) none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stderr) none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stdout) none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stderr) none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stdout) none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stderr) none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stdout) none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stderr) none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stdout) none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stderr) none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stdout) none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stderr) none/tests/x86/cpuid (stdout) none/tests/x86/cpuid (stderr) none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stdout) none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stdout) none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stderr) none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stdout) none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stderr) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stderr) none/tests/x86/getseg (stdout) none/tests/x86/getseg (stderr) none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stdout) none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr) none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stdout) none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stderr) none/tests/x86/jcxz (stdout) none/tests/x86/jcxz (stderr) none/tests/x86/lahf (stdout) none/tests/x86/lahf (stderr) none/tests/x86/looper (stdout) none/tests/x86/looper (stderr) none/tests/x86/movx (stdout) none/tests/x86/movx (stderr) none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stdout) none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stderr) none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stdout) none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stderr) none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stdout) none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stderr) none/tests/x86/smc1 (stdout) none/tests/x86/smc1 (stderr) none/tests/x86/x86locked (stdout) none/tests/x86/x86locked (stderr) none/tests/x86/xadd (stdout) none/tests/x86/xadd (stderr) helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore (stderr) helgrind/tests/annotate_rwlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/annotate_smart_pointer (stderr) helgrind/tests/cond_timedwait_invalid (stderr) helgrind/tests/free_is_write (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg04_race (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared (stderr) helgrind/tests/locked_vs_unlocked1_fwd (stderr) helgrind/tests/locked_vs_unlocked1_rev (stderr) helgrind/tests/locked_vs_unlocked2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/locked_vs_unlocked3 (stderr) helgrind/tests/rwlock_race (stderr) helgrind/tests/rwlock_test (stderr) helgrind/tests/t2t_laog (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc10_rec_lock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc13_laog1 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc15_laog_lockdel (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc16_byterace (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc19_shadowmem (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc24_nonzero_sem (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_barrier (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_barrier_xml (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_hb_err (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_hb_race (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_hbefore (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_ignore_read (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_ignore_rw (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_ignore_rw2 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_ignore_write (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_ignore_write2 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_order_1 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_order_2 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_order_3 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_publish_hg (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_rwlock (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_rwlock_hg (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_smart_pointer (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_smart_pointer2 (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_spinlock (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_static (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_trace_memory (stderr) drd/tests/annotate_trace_memory_xml (stderr) drd/tests/atomic_var (stderr) drd/tests/bug-235681 (stderr) drd/tests/circular_buffer (stderr) drd/tests/custom_alloc (stderr) drd/tests/custom_alloc_fiw (stderr) drd/tests/fp_race (stderr) drd/tests/fp_race2 (stderr) drd/tests/fp_race_xml (stderr) drd/tests/free_is_write (stderr) drd/tests/free_is_write2 (stderr) drd/tests/hg01_all_ok (stderr) drd/tests/hg02_deadlock (stderr) drd/tests/hg03_inherit (stderr) drd/tests/hg04_race (stderr) drd/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) drd/tests/hg06_readshared (stderr) drd/tests/hold_lock_1 (stderr) drd/tests/hold_lock_2 (stderr) drd/tests/linuxthreads_det (stderr) drd/tests/memory_allocation (stderr) drd/tests/monitor_example (stderr) drd/tests/new_delete (stderr) drd/tests/pth_broadcast (stderr) drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked (stderr) drd/tests/pth_cleanup_handler (stderr) drd/tests/pth_cond_race (stderr) drd/tests/pth_cond_race2 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_cond_race3 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_create_chain (stderr) drd/tests/pth_detached (stderr) drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_detached3 (stderr) drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait (stderr) drd/tests/pth_mutex_reinit (stderr) drd/tests/pth_once (stderr) drd/tests/pth_process_shared_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond (stderr) drd/tests/read_and_free_race (stderr) drd/tests/recursive_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/rwlock_race (stderr) drd/tests/rwlock_test (stderr) drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking (stderr) drd/tests/sem_open (stderr) drd/tests/sem_open2 (stderr) drd/tests/sem_open3 (stderr) drd/tests/sem_open_traced (stderr) drd/tests/sigalrm (stderr) drd/tests/sigaltstack (stderr) drd/tests/tc01_simple_race (stderr) drd/tests/tc02_simple_tls (stderr) drd/tests/tc03_re_excl (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc05_simple_race (stderr) drd/tests/tc06_two_races (stderr) drd/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stdout) drd/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stderr) drd/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stdout) drd/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) drd/tests/tc10_rec_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc11_XCHG (stdout) drd/tests/tc11_XCHG (stderr) drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr) drd/tests/tc13_laog1 (stderr) drd/tests/tc15_laog_lockdel (stderr) drd/tests/tc16_byterace (stderr) drd/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr) drd/tests/tc19_shadowmem (stderr) drd/tests/tc21_pthonce (stdout) drd/tests/tc21_pthonce (stderr) drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/thread_name (stderr) drd/tests/thread_name_xml (stderr) drd/tests/threaded-fork (stderr) drd/tests/trylock (stderr) drd/tests/unit_bitmap (stderr) drd/tests/unit_vc (stderr) exp-bbv/tests/x86/complex_rep (stderr) exp-bbv/tests/x86/fldcw_check (stderr) exp-bbv/tests/x86/million (stderr) exp-bbv/tests/x86/rep_prefix (stderr) ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/chdir.stderr.diff ================================================= --- chdir.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ chdir.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:44.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,28 @@ -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3800DD05: ??? + by 0x3800DEC8: ??? + by 0x38055097: ??? + by 0x38056F27: ??? + by 0x3807C388: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/clreq.stderr.diff ================================================= --- clreq.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ clreq.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ + +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3800DD05: ??? + by 0x3800DEC8: ??? + by 0x38055097: ??? + by 0x38056F27: ??? + by 0x3807C388: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/dlclose.stderr.diff ================================================= --- dlclose.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ dlclose.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,28 @@ -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3800DD05: ??? + by 0x3800DEC8: ??? + by 0x38055097: ??? + by 0x38056F27: ??? + by 0x3807C388: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/dlclose.stdout.diff ================================================= --- dlclose.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ dlclose.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -This is myprint! ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/notpower2.stderr.diff ================================================= --- notpower2.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ notpower2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,28 @@ -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3800DD05: ??? + by 0x3800DEC8: ??? + by 0x38055097: ??? + by 0x38056F27: ??? + by 0x3807C388: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/wrap5.stderr.diff ================================================= --- wrap5.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ wrap5.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,28 @@ -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3800DD05: ??? + by 0x3800DEC8: ??? + by 0x38055097: ??? + by 0x38056F27: ??? + by 0x3807C388: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/wrap5.stdout.diff ================================================= --- wrap5.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ wrap5.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,37 +0,0 @@ -computing fact1(7) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(7) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(6) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(5) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(4) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(3) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(2) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(1) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(0) -in wrapper2-post: fact(0) = 1 -in wrapper1-post: fact(1) = 1 -in wrapper2-post: fact(2) = 2 -in wrapper1-post: fact(3) = 6 -in wrapper2-pre: fact(2) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(1) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(0) -in wrapper2-post: fact(0) = 1 -in wrapper1-post: fact(1) = 1 -in wrapper2-post: fact(2) = 2 -in wrapper2-post: fact(4) = 32 -in wrapper1-post: fact(5) = 160 -in wrapper2-pre: fact(2) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(1) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(0) -in wrapper2-post: fact(0) = 1 -in wrapper1-post: fact(1) = 1 -in wrapper2-post: fact(2) = 2 -in wrapper2-post: fact(6) = 972 -in wrapper1-post: fact(7) = 6804 -in wrapper2-pre: fact(2) -in wrapper1-pre: fact(1) -in wrapper2-pre: fact(0) -in wrapper2-post: fact(0) = 1 -in wrapper1-post: fact(1) = 1 -in wrapper2-post: fact(2) = 2 -fact1(7) = 6806 -allocated 51 Lards ================================================= ./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108.stderr.diff ================================================= --- fpu-28-108.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:33.000000000 -0500 +++ fpu-28-108.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,28 @@ -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3800DD05: ??? + by 0x3800DEC8: ??? + by 0x38055097: ??? + by 0x38056F27: ??? + by 0x3807C388: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. + ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/clreq.stderr.diff ================================================= --- clreq.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ clreq.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:45.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,6 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/notpower2-hwpref.stderr.diff ================================================= --- notpower2-hwpref.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ notpower2-hwpref.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/notpower2-use.stderr.diff ================================================= --- notpower2-use.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ notpower2-use.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw AcCost1 SpLoss1 AcCost2 SpLoss2 -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/notpower2-wb.stderr.diff ================================================= --- notpower2-wb.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ notpower2-wb.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw ILdmr DLdmr DLdmw -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/notpower2.stderr.diff ================================================= --- notpower2.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ notpower2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork-both.stderr.diff ================================================= --- simwork-both.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork-both.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,24 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw Bc Bcm Bi Bim -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: - -Branches: -Mispredicts: -Mispred rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork-both.stdout.diff ================================================= --- simwork-both.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork-both.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -Sum: 1000000 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork-branch.stderr.diff ================================================= --- simwork-branch.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork-branch.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,10 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Bc Bcm Bi Bim -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? -I refs: +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -Branches: -Mispredicts: -Mispred rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork-branch.stdout.diff ================================================= --- simwork-branch.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork-branch.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:46.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -Sum: 1000000 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork-cache.stderr.diff ================================================= --- simwork-cache.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork-cache.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork-cache.stdout.diff ================================================= --- simwork-cache.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork-cache.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -Sum: 1000000 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork1.stderr.diff ================================================= --- simwork1.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork1.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork1.stdout.diff ================================================= --- simwork1.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork1.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -Sum: 1000000 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork2.stderr.diff ================================================= --- simwork2.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw ILdmr DLdmr DLdmw -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork2.stdout.diff ================================================= --- simwork2.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork2.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -Sum: 1000000 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork3.stderr.diff ================================================= --- simwork3.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork3.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw AcCost1 SpLoss1 AcCost2 SpLoss2 -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c. + +If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org + +In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind +version, and what OS and version you are using. Thanks. -I refs: -I1 misses: -LLi misses: -I1 miss rate: -LLi miss rate: - -D refs: -D1 misses: -LLd misses: -D1 miss rate: -LLd miss rate: - -LL refs: -LL misses: -LL miss rate: ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/simwork3.stdout.diff ================================================= --- simwork3.stdout.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ simwork3.stdout.out 2012-06-07 23:31:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -Sum: 1000000 ================================================= ./valgrind-new/callgrind/tests/threads-use.stderr.diff ================================================= --- threads-use.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 23:19:29.000000000 -0500 +++ threads-use.stderr.out 2012-06-07 23:31:48.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,20 +1,28 @@ -Events : Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw AcCost1 SpLoss1 AcCost2 SpLoss2 Ge sysCount sysTime -Collected : +valgrind: m_scheduler/scheduler.c:707 (do_pre_run_checks): Assertion 'VG_IS_32_ALIGNED(a_vex)' failed. + at 0x3801E805: ??? + by 0x3801E9C8: ??? + by 0x38064287: ??? + by 0x38066117: ??? + by 0x3808B578: ??? + +sched status: + running_tid=1 + +Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable + at 0x8FE01030: _dyld_start (in /usr/lib/dyld) + + +Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution. +It contains workarounds to several common problems. +In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after +identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance +that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or +crashing, especially if it happe... [truncated message content] |
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2012-06-08 03:47:38
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.21.53.0.1-6.fc16 20110716 C library: GNU C Library development release version 2.14.90 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.1-3.fc16.ppc64 ppc64 Vendor version: Fedora release 16 (Verne) Nightly build on gcc110 ( Fedora release 16 (Verne), ppc64 ) Started at 2012-06-07 20:00:20 PDT Ended at 2012-06-07 20:46:31 PDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 526 tests, 15 stderr failures, 8 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 2 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stdout) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderr) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderrB) memcheck/tests/ppc32/power_ISA2_05 (stdout) memcheck/tests/ppc32/power_ISA2_05 (stderr) memcheck/tests/ppc64/power_ISA2_05 (stdout) memcheck/tests/ppc64/power_ISA2_05 (stderr) memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr) memcheck/tests/trivialleak (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) massif/tests/big-alloc (post) massif/tests/deep-D (post) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/shell (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid1 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 03:08:39
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.18.50.0.6-2 20080403 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.8 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2012-06-08 03:41:42 BST Ended at 2012-06-08 04:08:19 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 600 tests, 1 stderr failure, 1 stdout failure, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) none/tests/amd64/sse4-64 (stdout) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 03:03:13
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.19.51.0.14-3.fc11 20090722 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.10.2 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 11 (Leonidas) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 11 ) Started at 2012-06-08 03:32:09 BST Ended at 2012-06-08 04:02:50 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 602 tests, 2 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/long_namespace_xml (stderr) none/tests/amd64/sse4-64 (stdout) |
|
From: <br...@ac...> - 2012-06-08 02:58:06
|
valgrind revision: 12619
VEX revision: 2377
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Assembler: GNU assembler 2.15.92.0.2 20040927
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.9-42.EL s390x
Vendor version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
Nightly build on z10-ec ( s390x build on z10-EC )
Started at 2012-06-07 22:20:09 EDT
Ended at 2012-06-07 22:57:55 EDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 508 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-06-07 22:42:49.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:57:13.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-06-07 22:42:49.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:57:13.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-06-07 22:42:49.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:57:16.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-06-07 22:42:49.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:57:16.000000000 -0400
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-06-07 22:42:49.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:57:16.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:41:19.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:53:26.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:41:19.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:53:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:41:19.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:53:44.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:42:10.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:48:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:42:10.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:48:58.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-06-07 22:42:10.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:48:58.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:42:10.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:49:55.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-06-07 22:42:10.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:49:55.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-06-07 22:25:14.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:39:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-06-07 22:25:14.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:39:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-06-07 22:25:14.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:39:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-06-07 22:25:13.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:39:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-06-07 22:25:14.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:39:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:21:42.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:36:08.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:21:42.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:36:16.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:21:42.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:36:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:22:55.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:31:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:22:55.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:31:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-06-07 22:22:55.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:31:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-06-07 22:22:55.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:32:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-06-07 22:22:55.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-06-07 22:32:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 02:55:39
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat 4.4.5-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13 20091009 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.12.2 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 13 (Goddard) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 13 ) Started at 2012-06-08 03:21:46 BST Ended at 2012-06-08 03:55:19 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 602 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) helgrind/tests/pth_barrier3 (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2012-06-08 02:53:35
|
valgrind revision: 12619
VEX revision: 2377
C compiler: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.5.1 20101208 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 167585]
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils; openSUSE 11.4) 2.21
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.11.3 (20110203)
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop x86_64
Vendor version: Welcome to openSUSE 11.4 "Celadon" - Kernel %r (%t).
Nightly build on ultra ( gcc 4.5.1 Linux 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop x86_64 )
Started at 2012-06-07 21:30:01 CDT
Ended at 2012-06-07 21:53:24 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 610 tests, 1 stderr failure, 0 stdout failures, 6 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcbreak (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcleak (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcvabits (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcbreak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcbreak.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:41:59.163963467 -0500
+++ mcbreak.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:44:42.010364284 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
vgdb-error value changed from 999999 to 0
n_errs_found 1 n_errs_shown 1 (vgdb-error 0)
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:41:59.163963467 -0500
+++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:44:43.684121727 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcleak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcleak.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:41:59.160963902 -0500
+++ mcleak.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:45:02.522391737 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: f (leak-delta.c:14)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcmain_pic.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:41:59.166963032 -0500
+++ mcmain_pic.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:45:04.099163235 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:41:59.167962887 -0500
+++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:45:08.991454258 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
Address 0x........ len 10 defined
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:41:59.166963032 -0500
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:45:12.123000443 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=92ec8fe859846a62345f74696ab349721415587a"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
v.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2012-06-07 21:42:09.052530451 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:46:33.000279909 -0500
@@ -75,17 +75,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -131,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc234-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc234-s390x 2012-06-07 21:42:09.036532769 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:46:33.000279909 -0500
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2012-06-07 21:42:08.980540883 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:46:33.000279909 -0500
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2012-06-07 21:42:09.009536682 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:46:33.000279909 -0500
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2012-06-07 21:42:09.022534798 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:46:33.000279909 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcbreak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcbreak.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:30:31.798572865 -0500
+++ mcbreak.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:33:23.370709755 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
vgdb-error value changed from 999999 to 0
n_errs_found 1 n_errs_shown 1 (vgdb-error 0)
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 0
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:30:31.798572865 -0500
+++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:33:25.044467204 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcleak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcleak.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:30:31.795573300 -0500
+++ mcleak.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:33:43.968724815 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: f (leak-delta.c:14)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcmain_pic.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:30:31.801572430 -0500
+++ mcmain_pic.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:33:45.537497477 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:30:31.802572285 -0500
+++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:33:50.423789384 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
Address 0x........ len 10 defined
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2012-06-07 21:30:31.801572430 -0500
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2012-06-07 21:33:53.566333985 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=92ec8fe859846a62345f74696ab349721415587a"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
v.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2012-06-07 21:30:39.931394313 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:35:13.376768314 -0500
@@ -75,17 +75,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -131,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc234-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc234-s390x 2012-06-07 21:30:39.914396777 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:35:13.376768314 -0500
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2012-06-07 21:30:39.859404746 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:35:13.376768314 -0500
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2012-06-07 21:30:39.888400543 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:35:13.376768314 -0500
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2012-06-07 21:30:39.901398660 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-06-07 21:35:13.376768314 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 02:50:43
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.20.51.0.7-8.fc14 20100318 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.13 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 14 ) Started at 2012-06-08 03:11:43 BST Ended at 2012-06-08 03:50:23 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 617 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 02:45:25
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.21.51.0.6-6.fc15 20110118 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.14.1 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 15 ) Started at 2012-06-08 03:03:14 BST Ended at 2012-06-08 03:45:02 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 618 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-06-08 02:29:27
|
valgrind revision: 12619 VEX revision: 2377 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.21.53.0.1-6.fc16 20110716 C library: GNU C Library development release version 2.14.90 uname -mrs: Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 16 (Verne) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 16 ) Started at 2012-06-08 02:52:02 BST Ended at 2012-06-08 03:28:59 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 618 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/err_disable4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) memcheck/tests/str_tester (stderr) |