You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
(1) |
3
(5) |
4
(4) |
5
(1) |
6
|
7
|
|
8
(2) |
9
(12) |
10
|
11
(2) |
12
(16) |
13
(3) |
14
(13) |
|
15
(20) |
16
(19) |
17
(13) |
18
(20) |
19
(17) |
20
(17) |
21
(14) |
|
22
(13) |
23
(14) |
24
(15) |
25
(14) |
26
(14) |
27
(13) |
28
(2) |
|
29
(16) |
30
(3) |
31
(20) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: Siddharth N. <si...@gm...> - 2012-01-16 18:53:16
|
Hi Josef, Thanks! That worked. Guess I missed it in the documentation. Siddharth On 16 January 2012 22:01, Josef Weidendorfer <Jos...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > On 16.01.2012 15:31, Siddharth Nilakantan wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have written a small extension to callgrind to do some tracking of > > memory addresses accessed in functions. My function simply looks at the > > current state and determines in which function execution is currently > > happening. Then it builds and maintains its own data structures. This > > has worked fine so far. > > Cool. > > > I want to take this further and also look at the execution context that > > Callgrind provides for the current BB being instrumented. However, from > > examination using gdb, I noticed that whatever program I run under > > Callgrind, the CLG_(current_state)->cxt->size is always 1 and > > CLG_(current_state)->cxt->fn[0] is the only valid entry. fn[1], fn[2] > > etc. never exist. > > Callgrind collects data for each execution context. If this always would > include the full call chain, for a lot of programs, you would get a > out-of-memory situation (e.g. firefox). > > Therefore, the default behavior is to only look at the current function > for determination of the context. You can change this: > > * use e.g. "--separate-callers=5" to always use the last 5 entries in > the call stack for the execution context. > * use "--separate-callers5=foo" to specify for function "foo", how much > call stack entries should be used for distinguish the execution > context when running "foo" > * use "--fn-skip=foo" to not change the execution context when calling > into or leaving function foo > > Josef > > > > > > my .gdbinit file: > > > > set env VALGRIND_LAUNCHER=~/valgrind-svnco/valgrind/coregrind/valgrind > > file ~/valgrind-svnco/valgrind/.in_place/callgrind-amd64-linux > > handle SIGILL SIGSEGV nostop noprint > > b sim.c:1667 > > run --cache-sim=yes ./toy_prg > > > > Is there something possibly wrong with my setup or is this is a bug in > > Callgrind? Is anyone else seeing things differently. > > > > Siddharth Nilakantan > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > > Mar 27 - Feb 2 > > Save $400 by Jan. 27 > > Register now! > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Valgrind-developers mailing list > > Val...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Mar 27 - Feb 2 > Save $400 by Jan. 27 > Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-developers mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers > |
|
From: abhishek b. <abh...@gm...> - 2012-01-16 18:32:28
|
I am trying to implement instruction "efscmpgt" for MontaVista ppc e500.
The instr is a SPFP specific.
Can someone please tell me how do I fill the details in mkFormA i.e., "??"
Below are the details.
host_ppc_defs.c
Int emit_PPCInstr ( UChar* buf,
.......
.....
..
3259 case Pin_FpUnary: {
3260 UInt fr_dst = fregNo(i->Pin.FpUnary.dst);
3261 UInt fr_src = fregNo(i->Pin.FpUnary.src);
3262 switch (i->Pin.FpUnary.op) {
3263 case Pfp_RSQRTE: // frsqrtre, PPC32 p424
3264 p = mkFormA( p, 63, fr_dst, 0, fr_src, 0, 26, 0 );
3265 break;
Case Pfp_CMPGT: // fcmpgt,
p = mkFormA(p, ??, fr_dst, 0, fr_src,0,??,0);
break;
3266 case Pfp_RES: // fres, PPC32 p421
3267 p = mkFormA( p, 59, fr_dst, 0, fr_src, 0, 24, 0 );
3268 break;
3269 case Pfp_SQRT: // fsqrt, PPC32 p427
3270 p = mkFormA( p, 63, fr_dst, 0, fr_src, 0, 22, 0 );
3271 break;
3272 case Pfp_ABS: // fabs, PPC32 p399
3273 p = mkFormX(p, 63, fr_dst, 0, fr_src, 264, 0);
3274 break;
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-01-16 17:31:29
|
Author: florian Date: 2012-01-16 17:26:48 +0000 (Mon, 16 Jan 2012) New Revision: 12339 Log: Announce fix for #270796. Also keep the bug list sorted. Modified: trunk/NEWS Modified: trunk/NEWS =================================================================== --- trunk/NEWS 2012-01-16 17:11:07 UTC (rev 12338) +++ trunk/NEWS 2012-01-16 17:26:48 UTC (rev 12339) @@ -29,13 +29,14 @@ where XXXXXX is the bug number as listed below. 247386 make perf does not run all performance tests +270796 s390x: Removed broken support for the TS insn 276993 fix mremap 'no thrash checks' +281482 valgrind's memcheck incorrect byte allocation count in realloc() for silly argument 283413 Fix wrong sanity check 286270 vgpreload is not friendly to 64->32 bit execs, gives ld.so warnings 286374 Running cachegrind with --branch-sim=yes on 64-bit PowerPC program fails 287858 VG_(strerror): unknown error 289699 vgdb connection in relay mode erroneously closed due to buffer overrun -281482 valgrind's memcheck incorrect byte allocation count in realloc() for silly argument Release 3.7.0 (5 November 2011) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-01-16 17:30:35
|
Author: florian
Date: 2012-01-16 17:25:55 +0000 (Mon, 16 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 2239
Log:
Remove broken support for TS insn in s390 port. The
atomicity was not modelled.
The insn is not issued (gcc) or used (glibc, libdfp)
and is discouraged in the principles of operations.
No point spending time on it. Fixes #270796
Modified:
trunk/priv/guest_s390_defs.h
trunk/priv/guest_s390_helpers.c
trunk/priv/guest_s390_toIR.c
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_s390_defs.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_s390_defs.h 2012-01-15 23:17:06 UTC (rev 2238)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_s390_defs.h 2012-01-16 17:25:55 UTC (rev 2239)
@@ -101,25 +101,24 @@
S390_CC_OP_LOAD_AND_TEST = 15,
S390_CC_OP_LOAD_POSITIVE_32 = 16,
S390_CC_OP_LOAD_POSITIVE_64 = 17,
- S390_CC_OP_TEST_AND_SET = 18,
- S390_CC_OP_TEST_UNDER_MASK_8 = 19,
- S390_CC_OP_TEST_UNDER_MASK_16 = 20,
- S390_CC_OP_SHIFT_LEFT_32 = 21,
- S390_CC_OP_SHIFT_LEFT_64 = 22,
- S390_CC_OP_INSERT_CHAR_MASK_32 = 23,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_RESULT_32 = 24,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_RESULT_64 = 25,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_RESULT_128 = 26,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_32_TO_INT_32 = 27,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_64_TO_INT_32 = 28,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_128_TO_INT_32 = 29,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_32_TO_INT_64 = 30,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_64_TO_INT_64 = 31,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_128_TO_INT_64 = 32,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_TDC_32 = 33,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_TDC_64 = 34,
- S390_CC_OP_BFP_TDC_128 = 35,
- S390_CC_OP_SET = 36
+ S390_CC_OP_TEST_UNDER_MASK_8 = 18,
+ S390_CC_OP_TEST_UNDER_MASK_16 = 19,
+ S390_CC_OP_SHIFT_LEFT_32 = 20,
+ S390_CC_OP_SHIFT_LEFT_64 = 21,
+ S390_CC_OP_INSERT_CHAR_MASK_32 = 22,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_RESULT_32 = 23,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_RESULT_64 = 24,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_RESULT_128 = 25,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_32_TO_INT_32 = 26,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_64_TO_INT_32 = 27,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_128_TO_INT_32 = 28,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_32_TO_INT_64 = 29,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_64_TO_INT_64 = 30,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_128_TO_INT_64 = 31,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_TDC_32 = 32,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_TDC_64 = 33,
+ S390_CC_OP_BFP_TDC_128 = 34,
+ S390_CC_OP_SET = 35
};
/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -152,7 +151,6 @@
| S390_CC_OP_LOAD_AND_TEST | S loaded value | | |
| S390_CC_OP_LOAD_POSITIVE_32 | S loaded value | | |
| S390_CC_OP_LOAD_POSITIVE_64 | S loaded value | | |
- | S390_CC_OP_TEST_AND_SET | Z tested value | | |
| S390_CC_OP_TEST_UNDER_MASK_8 | Z tested value | Z mask | |
| S390_CC_OP_TEST_UNDER_MASK_16 | Z tested value | Z mask | |
| S390_CC_OP_SHIFT_LEFT_32 | Z value to be shifted | Z shift amount | |
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_s390_helpers.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_s390_helpers.c 2012-01-15 23:17:06 UTC (rev 2238)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_s390_helpers.c 2012-01-16 17:25:55 UTC (rev 2239)
@@ -512,11 +512,6 @@
/* Like signed comparison with 0 */
return S390_CC_FOR_BINARY("cgr", cc_dep1, (Long)0);
- case S390_CC_OP_TEST_AND_SET:
- /* Shift the sign bit into the LSB. Note, that the tested value is an
- 8-bit value which has been zero-extended to 32/64 bit. */
- return cc_dep1 >> 7;
-
case S390_CC_OP_LOAD_POSITIVE_32:
__asm__ volatile (
"lpr %[result],%[op]\n\t"
@@ -1231,26 +1226,6 @@
mkU64(0)));
}
- /* S390_CC_OP_TEST_AND_SET */
- if (cc_op == S390_CC_OP_TEST_AND_SET) {
- /* cc_dep1 is the zero-extended loaded value
-
- cc == 0 --> leftmost bit is zero (cond == 8)
- cc == 1 --> leftmost bit is one (cond == 4)
-
- As cc is either 0 or 1, only the two leftmost bits of the mask
- are relevant. */
- IRExpr *bit = binop(Iop_Shr64, cc_dep1, mkU8(7));
-
- switch (cond & (8 + 4)) {
- case 0: return mkU32(0);
- case 4: return unop(Iop_1Uto32, binop(Iop_CmpNE64, bit, mkU64(0)));
- case 8: return unop(Iop_1Uto32, binop(Iop_CmpEQ64, bit, mkU64(0)));
- case 8 + 4: return mkU32(1);
- }
- /* not reached */
- }
-
missed:
;
}
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_s390_toIR.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_s390_toIR.c 2012-01-15 23:17:06 UTC (rev 2238)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_s390_toIR.c 2012-01-16 17:25:55 UTC (rev 2239)
@@ -7866,18 +7866,6 @@
}
static HChar *
-s390_irgen_TS(IRTemp op2addr)
-{
- IRTemp value = newTemp(Ity_I8);
-
- assign(value, load(Ity_I8, mkexpr(op2addr)));
- s390_cc_thunk_putZ(S390_CC_OP_TEST_AND_SET, value);
- store(mkexpr(op2addr), mkU8(255));
-
- return "ts";
-}
-
-static HChar *
s390_irgen_TM(UChar i2, IRTemp op1addr)
{
UChar mask;
@@ -11253,11 +11241,11 @@
switch ((ovl.value & 0xffff0000) >> 16) {
case 0x8000: /* SSM */ goto unimplemented;
case 0x8200: /* LPSW */ goto unimplemented;
- case 0x9300: s390_format_S_RD(s390_irgen_TS, ovl.fmt.S.b2, ovl.fmt.S.d2);
- goto ok;
+ case 0x9300: /* TS */ goto unimplemented;
case 0xb202: /* STIDP */ goto unimplemented;
case 0xb204: /* SCK */ goto unimplemented;
- case 0xb205: s390_format_S_RD(s390_irgen_STCK, ovl.fmt.S.b2, ovl.fmt.S.d2);goto ok;
+ case 0xb205: s390_format_S_RD(s390_irgen_STCK, ovl.fmt.S.b2, ovl.fmt.S.d2);
+ goto ok;
case 0xb206: /* SCKC */ goto unimplemented;
case 0xb207: /* STCKC */ goto unimplemented;
case 0xb208: /* SPT */ goto unimplemented;
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-01-16 17:15:48
|
Author: bart
Date: 2012-01-16 17:11:07 +0000 (Mon, 16 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 12338
Log:
debug info reader: Add support for DW_TAG_unspecified_type. Closes #278313.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c 2012-01-16 13:08:05 UTC (rev 12337)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c 2012-01-16 17:11:07 UTC (rev 12338)
@@ -2723,6 +2723,21 @@
goto bad_DIE;
}
+ /*
+ * Treat DW_TAG_unspecified_type as type void. An example of DW_TAG_unspecified_type:
+ *
+ * $ readelf --debug-dump /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.16.debug
+ * <1><10d4>: Abbrev Number: 53 (DW_TAG_unspecified_type)
+ * <10d5> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0xdb7): decltype(nullptr)
+ */
+ if (dtag == DW_TAG_unspecified_type) {
+ VG_(memset)(&typeE, 0, sizeof(typeE));
+ typeE.cuOff = D3_INVALID_CUOFF;
+ typeE.tag = Te_TyQual;
+ typeE.Te.TyQual.typeR = D3_FAKEVOID_CUOFF;
+ goto acquire_Type;
+ }
+
/* else ignore this DIE */
return;
/*NOTREACHED*/
|
|
From: Josef W. <Jos...@gm...> - 2012-01-16 16:31:48
|
Hi, On 16.01.2012 15:31, Siddharth Nilakantan wrote: > Hi All, > > I have written a small extension to callgrind to do some tracking of > memory addresses accessed in functions. My function simply looks at the > current state and determines in which function execution is currently > happening. Then it builds and maintains its own data structures. This > has worked fine so far. Cool. > I want to take this further and also look at the execution context that > Callgrind provides for the current BB being instrumented. However, from > examination using gdb, I noticed that whatever program I run under > Callgrind, the CLG_(current_state)->cxt->size is always 1 and > CLG_(current_state)->cxt->fn[0] is the only valid entry. fn[1], fn[2] > etc. never exist. Callgrind collects data for each execution context. If this always would include the full call chain, for a lot of programs, you would get a out-of-memory situation (e.g. firefox). Therefore, the default behavior is to only look at the current function for determination of the context. You can change this: * use e.g. "--separate-callers=5" to always use the last 5 entries in the call stack for the execution context. * use "--separate-callers5=foo" to specify for function "foo", how much call stack entries should be used for distinguish the execution context when running "foo" * use "--fn-skip=foo" to not change the execution context when calling into or leaving function foo Josef > > my .gdbinit file: > > set env VALGRIND_LAUNCHER=~/valgrind-svnco/valgrind/coregrind/valgrind > file ~/valgrind-svnco/valgrind/.in_place/callgrind-amd64-linux > handle SIGILL SIGSEGV nostop noprint > b sim.c:1667 > run --cache-sim=yes ./toy_prg > > Is there something possibly wrong with my setup or is this is a bug in > Callgrind? Is anyone else seeing things differently. > > Siddharth Nilakantan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Mar 27 - Feb 2 > Save $400 by Jan. 27 > Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-developers mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers |
|
From: Siddharth N. <si...@gm...> - 2012-01-16 14:32:15
|
Hi All, I have written a small extension to callgrind to do some tracking of memory addresses accessed in functions. My function simply looks at the current state and determines in which function execution is currently happening. Then it builds and maintains its own data structures. This has worked fine so far. I want to take this further and also look at the execution context that Callgrind provides for the current BB being instrumented. However, from examination using gdb, I noticed that whatever program I run under Callgrind, the CLG_(current_state)->cxt->size is always 1 and CLG_(current_state)->cxt->fn[0] is the only valid entry. fn[1], fn[2] etc. never exist. my .gdbinit file: set env VALGRIND_LAUNCHER=~/valgrind-svnco/valgrind/coregrind/valgrind file ~/valgrind-svnco/valgrind/.in_place/callgrind-amd64-linux handle SIGILL SIGSEGV nostop noprint b sim.c:1667 run --cache-sim=yes ./toy_prg Is there something possibly wrong with my setup or is this is a bug in Callgrind? Is anyone else seeing things differently. Siddharth Nilakantan |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-01-16 13:12:42
|
Author: bart
Date: 2012-01-16 13:08:05 +0000 (Mon, 16 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 12337
Log:
drd: Remove prefix from local variable names
Modified:
trunk/drd/drd_suppression.c
Modified: trunk/drd/drd_suppression.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/drd/drd_suppression.c 2012-01-16 09:22:25 UTC (rev 12336)
+++ trunk/drd/drd_suppression.c 2012-01-16 13:08:05 UTC (rev 12337)
@@ -37,52 +37,49 @@
/* Local variables. */
-static struct bitmap* DRD_(s_suppressed);
-static struct bitmap* DRD_(s_traced);
-static Bool DRD_(s_trace_suppression);
+static struct bitmap* s_suppressed;
+static struct bitmap* s_traced;
+static Bool s_trace_suppression;
/* Function definitions. */
void DRD_(suppression_set_trace)(const Bool trace_suppression)
{
- DRD_(s_trace_suppression) = trace_suppression;
+ s_trace_suppression = trace_suppression;
}
void DRD_(suppression_init)(void)
{
- tl_assert(DRD_(s_suppressed) == 0);
- tl_assert(DRD_(s_traced) == 0);
- DRD_(s_suppressed) = DRD_(bm_new)();
- DRD_(s_traced) = DRD_(bm_new)();
- tl_assert(DRD_(s_suppressed));
- tl_assert(DRD_(s_traced));
+ tl_assert(s_suppressed == 0);
+ tl_assert(s_traced == 0);
+ s_suppressed = DRD_(bm_new)();
+ s_traced = DRD_(bm_new)();
+ tl_assert(s_suppressed);
+ tl_assert(s_traced);
}
void DRD_(start_suppression)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2,
const char* const reason)
{
- if (DRD_(s_trace_suppression))
- {
+ if (s_trace_suppression)
VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg, "start suppression of 0x%lx sz %ld (%s)\n",
a1, a2 - a1, reason);
- }
tl_assert(a1 <= a2);
- DRD_(bm_access_range_store)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a2);
+ DRD_(bm_access_range_store)(s_suppressed, a1, a2);
}
void DRD_(finish_suppression)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
- if (DRD_(s_trace_suppression))
- {
+ if (s_trace_suppression) {
VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg, "finish suppression of 0x%lx sz %ld\n",
a1, a2 - a1);
VG_(get_and_pp_StackTrace)(VG_(get_running_tid)(), 12);
}
tl_assert(a1 <= a2);
- DRD_(bm_clear_store)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a2);
+ DRD_(bm_clear_store)(s_suppressed, a1, a2);
}
/**
@@ -92,7 +89,7 @@
*/
Bool DRD_(is_suppressed)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
- return DRD_(bm_has)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a2, eStore);
+ return DRD_(bm_has)(s_suppressed, a1, a2, eStore);
}
/**
@@ -102,54 +99,49 @@
*/
Bool DRD_(is_any_suppressed)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
- return DRD_(bm_has_any_store)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a2);
+ return DRD_(bm_has_any_store)(s_suppressed, a1, a2);
}
void DRD_(mark_hbvar)(const Addr a1)
{
- DRD_(bm_access_range_load)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a1 + 1);
+ DRD_(bm_access_range_load)(s_suppressed, a1, a1 + 1);
}
Bool DRD_(range_contains_suppression_or_hbvar)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
- return DRD_(bm_has_any_access)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a2);
+ return DRD_(bm_has_any_access)(s_suppressed, a1, a2);
}
void DRD_(start_tracing_address_range)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
tl_assert(a1 <= a2);
- DRD_(bm_access_range_load)(DRD_(s_traced), a1, a2);
- if (! DRD_(g_any_address_traced))
- {
+ DRD_(bm_access_range_load)(s_traced, a1, a2);
+ if (!DRD_(g_any_address_traced))
DRD_(g_any_address_traced) = True;
- }
}
void DRD_(stop_tracing_address_range)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
tl_assert(a1 <= a2);
- DRD_(bm_clear_load)(DRD_(s_traced), a1, a2);
+ DRD_(bm_clear_load)(s_traced, a1, a2);
if (DRD_(g_any_address_traced))
DRD_(g_any_address_traced)
- = DRD_(bm_has_any_load_g)(DRD_(s_traced));
+ = DRD_(bm_has_any_load_g)(s_traced);
}
Bool DRD_(is_any_traced)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
- return DRD_(bm_has_any_load)(DRD_(s_traced), a1, a2);
+ return DRD_(bm_has_any_load)(s_traced, a1, a2);
}
void DRD_(suppression_stop_using_mem)(const Addr a1, const Addr a2)
{
- if (DRD_(s_trace_suppression))
- {
+ if (s_trace_suppression) {
Addr b;
- for (b = a1; b < a2; b++)
- {
- if (DRD_(bm_has_1)(DRD_(s_suppressed), b, eStore))
- {
+ for (b = a1; b < a2; b++) {
+ if (DRD_(bm_has_1)(s_suppressed, b, eStore)) {
VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg,
"stop_using_mem(0x%lx, %ld) finish suppression of"
" 0x%lx\n", a1, a2 - a1, b);
@@ -158,6 +150,6 @@
}
tl_assert(a1);
tl_assert(a1 <= a2);
- DRD_(bm_clear)(DRD_(s_suppressed), a1, a2);
- DRD_(bm_clear)(DRD_(s_traced), a1, a2);
+ DRD_(bm_clear)(s_suppressed, a1, a2);
+ DRD_(bm_clear)(s_traced, a1, a2);
}
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2012-01-16 09:27:02
|
Author: bart
Date: 2012-01-16 09:22:25 +0000 (Mon, 16 Jan 2012)
New Revision: 12336
Log:
debug info reader: rearrange the source code such that gcc issues a warning if an enumeration label is missing.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/d3basics.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/d3basics.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/d3basics.c 2012-01-15 21:02:44 UTC (rev 12335)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/d3basics.c 2012-01-16 09:22:25 UTC (rev 12336)
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
switch (hashch) {
case DW_children_no: return "no children";
case DW_children_yes: return "has children";
- default: return "DW_children_???";
}
+ return "DW_children_???";
}
HChar* ML_(pp_DW_TAG) ( DW_TAG tag )
@@ -148,8 +148,8 @@
case DW_TAG_PGI_kanji_type: return "DW_TAG_PGI_kanji_type";
case DW_TAG_PGI_interface_block:
return "DW_TAG_PGI_interface_block";
- default: return "DW_TAG_???";
}
+ return "DW_TAG_???";
}
HChar* ML_(pp_DW_FORM) ( DW_FORM form )
@@ -180,8 +180,8 @@
case DW_FORM_exprloc: return "DW_FORM_exprloc";
case DW_FORM_flag_present:return "DW_FORM_flag_present";
case DW_FORM_ref_sig8: return "DW_FORM_ref_sig8";
- default: return "DW_FORM_???";
}
+ return "DW_FORM_???";
}
HChar* ML_(pp_DW_AT) ( DW_AT attr )
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@
case DW_AT_PGI_lbase: return "DW_AT_PGI_lbase";
case DW_AT_PGI_soffset: return "DW_AT_PGI_soffset";
case DW_AT_PGI_lstride: return "DW_AT_PGI_lstride";
- default: return "DW_AT_???";
}
+ return "DW_AT_???";
}
|
|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2012-01-16 04:30:53
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.6.2 20111027 (Red Hat 4.6.2-1) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.21.53.0.1-3.fc16 20110716 C library: GNU C Library development release version 2.14.90 uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.2.fc16.kh.ppc64 ppc64 Vendor version: Fedora release 16 (Verne) Nightly build on gcc110 ( Fedora release 16 (Verne), ppc64 ) Started at 2012-01-15 20:00:05 PST Ended at 2012-01-15 20:30:16 PST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 507 tests, 8 stderr failures, 8 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 2 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stdout) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderr) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderrB) memcheck/tests/ppc32/power_ISA2_05 (stdout) memcheck/tests/ppc32/power_ISA2_05 (stderr) memcheck/tests/ppc64/power_ISA2_05 (stdout) memcheck/tests/ppc64/power_ISA2_05 (stderr) memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) massif/tests/big-alloc (post) massif/tests/deep-D (post) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-01-16 04:07:55
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.18.50.0.6-2 20080403 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.8 uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:41:18 GMT Ended at 2012-01-16 04:07:23 GMT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 588 tests, 0 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/sse4-64 (stdout) |
|
From: <br...@ac...> - 2012-01-16 03:59:57
|
valgrind revision: 12335
VEX revision: 2238
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Assembler: GNU assembler 2.15.92.0.2 20040927
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.9-42.EL s390x
Vendor version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
Nightly build on z900 ( s390x build on z900 )
Started at 2012-01-15 19:30:52 EST
Ended at 2012-01-15 23:07:35 EST
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 479 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 478 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short Sun Jan 15 21:19:21 2012
--- new.short Sun Jan 15 23:07:35 2012
***************
*** 8,10 ****
! == 478 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
--- 8,10 ----
! == 479 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:03:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:03:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:04:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:04:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:04:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:39:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:40:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -20,5 +20,26 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1048 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:29.000000000 -0500
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:41:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:29.000000000 -0500
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:42:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:02:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:08:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:08:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:17:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:17:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 19:31:53.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:50:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:51:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -20,5 +20,47 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1096 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:52:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:53:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:20.000000000 -0500
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:13:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:18:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:18:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:28:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:28:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-01-16 03:56:49
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.19.51.0.14-3.fc11 20090722 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.10.2 uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 11 (Leonidas) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 11 ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:31:00 GMT Ended at 2012-01-16 03:56:19 GMT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 590 tests, 2 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/long_namespace_xml (stderr) none/tests/amd64/sse4-64 (stdout) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2012-01-16 03:54:05
|
valgrind revision: 12335
VEX revision: 2238
C compiler: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.5.1 20101208 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 167585]
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils; openSUSE 11.4) 2.21
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.11.3 (20110203), by Roland McGrath et al.
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop x86_64
Vendor version: Welcome to openSUSE 11.4 "Celadon" - Kernel %r (%t).
Nightly build on ultra ( gcc 4.5.1 Linux 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop x86_64 )
Started at 2012-01-15 21:30:01 CST
Ended at 2012-01-15 21:53:55 CST
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 600 tests, 3 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 6 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcbreak (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcleak (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcvabits (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
drd/tests/annotate_smart_pointer (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/annotate_smart_pointer.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_smart_pointer.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:31.327758936 -0600
+++ annotate_smart_pointer.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:51:35.038566154 -0600
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
+Conflicting store by thread x at 0x........ size 8
+ at 0x........: AnnotateCondVarSignal (unified_annotations.h:?)
+Allocation context: unknown.
+
+Conflicting load by thread x at 0x........ size 8
+ at 0x........: AnnotateCondVarSignal (unified_annotations.h:?)
+ by 0x........: U_AnnotateHappensBefore (unified_annotations.h:?)
+ by 0x........: smart_ptr<counter>::set(counter*, AtomicInt32*) (annotate_smart_pointer.cpp:?)
+ by 0x........: smart_ptr<counter>::operator=(counter*) (annotate_smart_pointer.cpp:?)
+ by 0x........: main (annotate_smart_pointer.cpp:?)
+Allocation context: unknown.
+
Done.
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcbreak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcbreak.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:08.867785415 -0600
+++ mcbreak.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:45:06.040793678 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
vgdb-error value changed from 999999 to 0
n_errs_found 1 (vgdb-error 0)
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:08.867785415 -0600
+++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:45:07.668646239 -0600
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcleak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcleak.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:08.863785765 -0600
+++ mcleak.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:45:26.496940925 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: f (leak-delta.c:14)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcmain_pic.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:08.870785138 -0600
+++ mcmain_pic.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:45:28.124793490 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:08.870785138 -0600
+++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:45:32.872363497 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
Address 0x........ len 10 defined
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:08.870785138 -0600
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:45:36.082072791 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=92ec8fe859846a62345f74696ab349721415587a"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
v.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:42:12.667442583 -0600
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:46:36.754577773 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2012-01-15 21:42:13.679351282 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:47:01.288355854 -0600
@@ -75,17 +75,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -131,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc234-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc234-s390x 2012-01-15 21:42:13.647354169 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:47:01.288355854 -0600
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2012-01-15 21:42:13.630355703 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:47:01.288355854 -0600
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2012-01-15 21:42:13.692350109 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:47:01.288355854 -0600
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2012-01-15 21:42:13.627355973 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:47:01.288355854 -0600
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/annotate_smart_pointer.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_smart_pointer.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:40.524897065 -0600
+++ annotate_smart_pointer.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:39:41.265103283 -0600
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
+Conflicting store by thread x at 0x........ size 8
+ at 0x........: AnnotateCondVarSignal (unified_annotations.h:?)
+Allocation context: unknown.
+
+Conflicting load by thread x at 0x........ size 8
+ at 0x........: AnnotateCondVarSignal (unified_annotations.h:?)
+ by 0x........: U_AnnotateHappensBefore (unified_annotations.h:?)
+ by 0x........: smart_ptr<counter>::set(counter*, AtomicInt32*) (annotate_smart_pointer.cpp:?)
+ by 0x........: smart_ptr<counter>::operator=(counter*) (annotate_smart_pointer.cpp:?)
+ by 0x........: main (annotate_smart_pointer.cpp:?)
+Allocation context: unknown.
+
Done.
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcbreak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcbreak.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:16.997020256 -0600
+++ mcbreak.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:33:17.268752589 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
vgdb-error value changed from 999999 to 0
n_errs_found 1 (vgdb-error 0)
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 0
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:16.997020256 -0600
+++ mcclean_after_fork.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:33:18.902605153 -0600
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcleak.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcleak.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:16.993020611 -0600
+++ mcleak.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:33:37.124960816 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
10 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: f (leak-delta.c:14)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcmain_pic.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:17.000019984 -0600
+++ mcmain_pic.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:33:38.752813923 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:17.001019894 -0600
+++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:33:43.501385425 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
Address 0x........ len 10 defined
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:17.000019984 -0600
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2012-01-15 21:33:46.709095971 -0600
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+
+
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=92ec8fe859846a62345f74696ab349721415587a"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
v.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:30:20.854672117 -0600
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:34:46.724680388 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2012-01-15 21:30:21.919576035 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:35:10.872501400 -0600
@@ -75,17 +75,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -131,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc234-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc234-s390x 2012-01-15 21:30:21.888578833 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:35:10.872501400 -0600
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2012-01-15 21:30:21.871580367 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:35:10.872501400 -0600
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2012-01-15 21:30:21.933574773 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:35:10.872501400 -0600
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4750)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2012-01-15 21:30:21.868580637 -0600
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:35:10.872501400 -0600
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: copy_input_until_stop (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-01-16 03:49:48
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat 4.4.5-2) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13 20091009 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.12.2 uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 13 (Goddard) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 13 ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:21:24 GMT Ended at 2012-01-16 03:49:34 GMT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 590 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) helgrind/tests/pth_barrier3 (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-01-16 03:40:44
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.20.51.0.7-8.fc14 20100318 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.13 uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 14 ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:11:11 GMT Ended at 2012-01-16 03:40:28 GMT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 604 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2012-01-16 03:32:58
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.6.1 20110908 (Red Hat 4.6.1-9) Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.21.51.0.6-6.fc15 20110118 C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.14 uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 Vendor version: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock) Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 15 ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:02:06 GMT Ended at 2012-01-16 03:32:34 GMT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 604 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2012-01-16 03:14:59
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 GCC version: gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.11.1 (20100118), by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.32.49-0.3-default s390x Vendor version: Welcome to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 (s390x) - Kernel %r (%t). Nightly build on sless390 ( SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 gcc 4.3.4 on z196 (s390x) ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:45:01 CET Ended at 2012-01-16 04:14:13 CET Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 515 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 514 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Mon Jan 16 03:59:39 2012 --- new.short Mon Jan 16 04:14:13 2012 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 514 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 515 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2012-01-16 03:05:36
|
valgrind revision: 12335 VEX revision: 2238 GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.5.3 20110121 (Red Hat 4.5.3-4) C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.12.1, by Roland McGrath et al. uname -mrs: Linux 3.1.0-rc9-andreas-gde346b6-dirty s390x Vendor version: unknown Nightly build on fedora390 ( Fedora 13/14/15 mix with gcc 3.5.3 on z196 (s390x) ) Started at 2012-01-16 03:45:01 CET Ended at 2012-01-16 04:05:32 CET Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 514 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 513 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr) drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Mon Jan 16 03:55:19 2012 --- new.short Mon Jan 16 04:05:32 2012 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 513 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 514 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr) |