You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(10) |
2
(3) |
3
(25) |
4
(8) |
|
5
(13) |
6
(8) |
7
(9) |
8
(10) |
9
(8) |
10
(13) |
11
(12) |
|
12
|
13
(7) |
14
(8) |
15
(11) |
16
(13) |
17
(13) |
18
(11) |
|
19
(13) |
20
(7) |
21
(1) |
22
(1) |
23
(1) |
24
(8) |
25
(15) |
|
26
(16) |
27
(20) |
28
(17) |
29
(10) |
30
(2) |
|
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 23:50:44
|
On Saturday, June 04, 2011, Tom Hughes wrote: > In fact what we really want is the difference between the virtual > address for the section in the debuginfo and the actual address it was > mapped at, whether that is the address chosen by the prelinker and > placed in the header of the library, or just a random address chosen by > the dynamic linker when loading it. readelf.c:2154 has this rx_dbias = di->rx_map_avma - di->rx_map_foff + phdr->p_offset - phdr->p_vaddr; I haven't peered at that enough to see if it's the same as what you said. --------- But what I really don't understand is, why now? L. David Baron sent us a patch to make external debuginfo work in the presence of prelinking in early April 2006, and we landed it shortly thereafter. Surely if this had been broken all along we would have heard about it long before now. It's not like either prelinking or debuginfo is obscure stuff. This isn't a regression relative to 3.6.1, either .. 3.6.1 fails in exactly the same way. /me mystified. J |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2011-06-03 23:32:31
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2011-06-04 00:27:39 +0100 (Sat, 04 Jun 2011)
New Revision: 11795
Log:
Followup fix to r11794 (generalise processing of PT_LOAD entries):
change some incorrect "rx->bias" (which due to lameness of C's type
system was valid) to "inrx->bias".
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c 2011-06-02 10:06:25 UTC (rev 11794)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readelf.c 2011-06-03 23:27:39 UTC (rev 11795)
@@ -1557,11 +1557,11 @@
if (inrx && size >= 0 && !di->text_present) {
di->text_present = True;
di->text_svma = svma;
- di->text_avma = svma + rx->bias;
+ di->text_avma = svma + inrx->bias;
di->text_size = size;
- di->text_bias = rx->bias;
+ di->text_bias = inrx->bias;
di->text_debug_svma = svma;
- di->text_debug_bias = rx->bias;
+ di->text_debug_bias = inrx->bias;
TRACE_SYMTAB("acquiring .text svma = %#lx .. %#lx\n",
di->text_svma,
di->text_svma + di->text_size - 1);
@@ -1623,12 +1623,12 @@
if (inrx && size >= 0 && !di->rodata_present) {
di->rodata_present = True;
di->rodata_svma = svma;
- di->rodata_avma = svma + rx->bias;
+ di->rodata_avma = svma + inrx->bias;
di->rodata_size = size;
- di->rodata_bias = rx->bias;
+ di->rodata_bias = inrx->bias;
di->rodata_debug_svma = svma;
di->rodata_debug_bias = inrx->bias;
- /* NB was 'inrw' prior to rXXXXX */
+ /* NB was 'inrw' prior to r11794 */
TRACE_SYMTAB("acquiring .rodata svma = %#lx .. %#lx\n",
di->rodata_svma,
di->rodata_svma + di->rodata_size - 1);
@@ -1811,7 +1811,7 @@
if (0 == VG_(strcmp)(name, ".plt")) {
if (inrx && size > 0 && !di->plt_present) {
di->plt_present = True;
- di->plt_avma = svma + rx->bias;
+ di->plt_avma = svma + inrx->bias;
di->plt_size = size;
TRACE_SYMTAB("acquiring .plt avma = %#lx\n", di->plt_avma);
} else {
@@ -1872,7 +1872,7 @@
ELF object. */
if (0 == VG_(strcmp)(name, ".eh_frame")) {
if (inrx && size > 0 && di->n_ehframe < N_EHFRAME_SECTS) {
- di->ehframe_avma[di->n_ehframe] = svma + rx->bias;
+ di->ehframe_avma[di->n_ehframe] = svma + inrx->bias;
di->ehframe_size[di->n_ehframe] = size;
TRACE_SYMTAB("acquiring .eh_frame avma = %#lx\n",
di->ehframe_avma[di->n_ehframe]);
|
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-06-03 22:21:05
|
On 03/06/11 23:18, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 03/06/11 22:53, Julian Seward wrote: > >> Of course this leads to the obvious question of how to figure out >> the magic number we need to add to addresses added to debuginfo >> symbols to get them to match those in the main object. I guess >> that must be stashed in the main object somewhere, since it's >> that that the prelinking affects? > > Is it not just the difference between the virtual addresses for the > relevant section in the section table of the two files? In fact what we really want is the difference between the virtual address for the section in the debuginfo and the actual address it was mapped at, whether that is the address chosen by the prelinker and placed in the header of the library, or just a random address chosen by the dynamic linker when loading it. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-06-03 22:18:20
|
On 03/06/11 22:53, Julian Seward wrote: > Of course this leads to the obvious question of how to figure out > the magic number we need to add to addresses added to debuginfo > symbols to get them to match those in the main object. I guess > that must be stashed in the main object somewhere, since it's > that that the prelinking affects? Is it not just the difference between the virtual addresses for the relevant section in the section table of the two files? Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 21:54:11
|
On Friday, June 03, 2011, Tom Hughes wrote: > I was bit surprised by that... You can do "prelink -u" to remove the > prelinking if you want to test that it is the cause. It does indeed change it by a non-integral number of pages, and it causes it to agree with the debuginfo address. So your explanation is right, and this must be a valgrind bug and not duff debuginfo rpms from Fedora (darn!). Of course this leads to the obvious question of how to figure out the magic number we need to add to addresses added to debuginfo symbols to get them to match those in the main object. I guess that must be stashed in the main object somewhere, since it's that that the prelinking affects? J [root@f14x86 ~]# nm -D /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14 | c++filt | grep "delete\[" 06023000 T operator delete[](void*) 06023030 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) [root@f14x86 ~]# prelink -u /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14 [root@f14x86 ~]# nm -D /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14 | c++filt | grep "delete\[" 000ab7a0 T operator delete[](void*) 000ab7d0 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) [root@f14x86 ~]# nm /usr/lib/debug/.build- id/f9/77d45a4ab80ec37972bf0777e8bd7064441be3.debug | c++filt | grep "delete\[" 000ab7a0 T operator delete[](void*) 000ab7d0 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-06-03 21:42:46
|
On 03/06/11 22:34, Julian Seward wrote: > > On Friday, June 03, 2011, Tom Hughes wrote: >> Yes, we should be taking the value from the base package, > > ok fine .. > >> or if we take >> the value from the debug package then it needs relocating to the real >> load address of the library - that is true regardless of prelinking >> though so I'm surprised we're not already doing it? > > I thought we did that already. > > But the implication of what you say is that the prelinking process can > change not just the page number for a symbol but also its offset within > a page -- since that's what we're seeing here. Is that correct? I was bit surprised by that... You can do "prelink -u" to remove the prelinking if you want to test that it is the cause. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 21:35:14
|
On Friday, June 03, 2011, Tom Hughes wrote: > Yes, we should be taking the value from the base package, ok fine .. > or if we take > the value from the debug package then it needs relocating to the real > load address of the library - that is true regardless of prelinking > though so I'm surprised we're not already doing it? I thought we did that already. But the implication of what you say is that the prelinking process can change not just the page number for a symbol but also its offset within a page -- since that's what we're seeing here. Is that correct? J |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-06-03 21:29:13
|
On 03/06/11 21:33, Julian Seward wrote: > Now, what's really strange is that this only happens when the > debuginfo rpm for libstdc++ is installed. When the debuginfo > rpm is not installed, it works fine. It appears that the base > library's dynamic symbol table disagrees with the debuginfo > object on what the address of delete[] et al is: > > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14 > 06023000 T operator delete[](void*) > 06023030 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) > 06022fa0 T operator delete(void*) > 06022fd0 T operator delete(void*, std::nothrow_t const&) > > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f9/77d45a4ab80ec37972bf0777e8bd7064441be3.debug > 000ab7a0 T operator delete[](void*) > 000ab7d0 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) > 000ab740 T operator delete(void*) > 000ab770 T operator delete(void*, std::nothrow_t const&) That's quite normal - the main library has been prelinked but that doesn't update the debuginfo. See prelink(8) for more information. > So .. I'm completely confused. Are the symbols in debuginfo > packages expected to conflict with those in base packages? > If so, should we prefer the base package version? Or reject > the debuginfo version as incorrect? In this case the segfault > happens when the debuginfo package is installed because it takes > the (incorrect) addresses from the debuginfo package in preference > to the base package. Yes, we should be taking the value from the base package, or if we take the value from the debug package then it needs relocating to the real load address of the library - that is true regardless of prelinking though so I'm surprised we're not already doing it? Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 21:13:52
|
On Friday, June 03, 2011, Josef Weidendorfer wrote: > In real hardware, instead of modulo (which obviously takes a lot of time), > you probably would do some hashing of a subset of address bits. > > We probably need to do something similar. And make this a special case only > if needed. Do you have any suggestion for how to implement such a hash fn? One good thing is that these strange caches generally appear only at L3 or LL, and so the number of references we'd have to process is relatively small compared to (eg) D1 or I1. That makes the extra costs not so bad. re my earlier suggestion about kludging this by simulating a different associativity .. If I remember Hennessy & Patterson correctly, associativity above 4 makes very little difference to the hit rate. That's why I suggested it. eg > L3: 12MB, 16-way, 64B lines (12288 sets) If we instead pretended it was 12-way, then there would be 16384 sets. I would be happy with such an approximation. I don't know if it's always possible though -- need to think about the address arithmetic more. Any preferences (or other proposals) ? I don't mind either way. I only care that the performance hit is minimal. J |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 20:34:03
|
I spent some time today chasing a segfault that happened on 32-bit Fedora 14. It happens when memcheck (or helgrind or drd) runs, well, basically any C++ program. A simple test case is drd/tests/annotate_smart_pointer. The segfault happens when the redirection mechanism spots a transfer to a (guest) address which it believes is the entry point for "operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_ const&)", and redirects this to memcheck's own implementation. Unfortunately the redirected address is not the entry point for that function, so all hell breaks loose and a segfault quickly follows. Now, what's really strange is that this only happens when the debuginfo rpm for libstdc++ is installed. When the debuginfo rpm is not installed, it works fine. It appears that the base library's dynamic symbol table disagrees with the debuginfo object on what the address of delete[] et al is: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14 06023000 T operator delete[](void*) 06023030 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) 06022fa0 T operator delete(void*) 06022fd0 T operator delete(void*, std::nothrow_t const&) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f9/77d45a4ab80ec37972bf0777e8bd7064441be3.debug 000ab7a0 T operator delete[](void*) 000ab7d0 T operator delete[](void*, std::nothrow_t const&) 000ab740 T operator delete(void*) 000ab770 T operator delete(void*, std::nothrow_t const&) At a stretch it might be plausible if they had different page numbers but the same page offset. But even the page offsets are different, eg operator delete[](void*) has 000 vs 7a0. objdump -d-ing /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14 shows that the symbols attached to it, are correct. eg 06023000 really does look convincingly like code for operator delete[](void*). I checked the build-id tags in the base and debuginfo package, and they agree, so it's not like V is picking up the wrong one. So .. I'm completely confused. Are the symbols in debuginfo packages expected to conflict with those in base packages? If so, should we prefer the base package version? Or reject the debuginfo version as incorrect? In this case the segfault happens when the debuginfo package is installed because it takes the (incorrect) addresses from the debuginfo package in preference to the base package. Any insights gratefully received. J |
|
From: Josef W. <Jos...@gm...> - 2011-06-03 18:07:14
|
On Friday 03 June 2011, Frank Chang wrote: > Good morning , We can't find the cgview source code, See http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdesdk/kcachegrind See "Obtaining The Source Code" at http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Sources You need cmake to compile. Warning: cgview is not released, and you are on your own with buggy behavior. Why not using kcachegrind? Josef > makefile and config file We would appreciate if we could try cgview to > try to debug a botteneck in our program. > If it is possible, how can we get the cgview > source files & makefile & config.xx? Could we download it > or could we get access to KDE SVN archive and cgview archives. Thank you. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, > secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. > Get your free trial download today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-users mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users > |
|
From: Frank C. <fra...@ho...> - 2011-06-03 16:14:20
|
Good morning , We can't find the cgview source code, makefile and config file We would appreciate if we could try cgview to try to debug a botteneck in our program. If it is possible, how can we get the cgview source files & makefile & config.xx? Could we download it or could we get access to KDE SVN archive and cgview archives. Thank you. |
|
From: Дмитрий Д. <di...@gm...> - 2011-06-03 13:52:22
|
FYI: * *https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925 done *2011-04-14 * Dmitry 2011/6/3 Julian Seward <js...@ac...> > On Friday, June 03, 2011, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > has this strspn already been activated? > > No, it hasn't -- it's still commented out in the trunk sources. > > Try uncommenting it, commenting out the assert, and adding the > relevant macro defn and use. See strcspn immediately above for > an example. If it works, pls send the resulting patch. > > J > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with > vRanger. > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is > safe, > secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. > Get your free trial download today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-developers mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers > |
|
From: Josef W. <Jos...@gm...> - 2011-06-03 12:42:04
|
On Friday 03 June 2011, Julian Seward wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 03, 2011, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > The latest Intel i7's have finally switched to a saner method of
> > recording the cache details in the cpuid that doesn't rely on a lookup
> > table to get the details.
>
> 'bout time too! It's good that you're looking into this.
>
> > The attached patch implements support for this, but there is one problem
> > (which is why I haven't committed it yet) namely that, at least on the
> > machine I am testing on, the L3 cache is 12Mb but 16 way associative
> > which means that it causes cachegrind/callgrind to assert because the
> > set count (12288) is not a power of two.
>
> I've seen the same failure when running on a 6-core AMD, which
> has a 48 way associative L3 as a result. It's as if each core
> contributes 8 ways to the L3.
Hmm... already 2 cases then.
> > Suggestions on the best way to deal with this gratefully received...
>
> Well, one obvious sick hack is to round both the size and associativity
> down to the next lowest power of 2, so everything is power-of-2 sized.
>
> That'd be pretty bad though, since eg Atom has a 24k D1 (or I1 ? I forget)
> and we'd wind up simulating only a 16k cache.
Atom works, it has 6-way associativity for 24k L1 data => 64 Sets.
> Better is maybe if you can massage the associativity number somehow
> without messing with the size. Presumably the loss of accuracy
> induced by messing with the associativity alone is much smaller than
> that induced by messing with the size. If you see what I mean.
>
> That said, I guess the best fix is fix the cache simulators themselves,
> but that's beyond my ken -- Nick's/Josef's department.
Currently, when calculating the set number from the address, the simulator
does bit shifting. With non-power-of-2 number of sets, that is not possible.
We can use modulo to get the set from the address with the following patch:
--- a/cachegrind/cg_sim.c
+++ b/cachegrind/cg_sim.c
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ __attribute__((always_inline)) \
static __inline__ \
void cachesim_##L##_doref(Addr a, UChar size, ULong* m1, ULong *mL) \
{ \
- UInt set1 = ( a >> L.line_size_bits) & (L.sets_min_1); \
- UInt set2 = ((a+size-1) >> L.line_size_bits) & (L.sets_min_1); \
+ UInt set1 = ( a >> L.line_size_bits) % (L.sets); \
+ UInt set2 = ((a+size-1) >> L.line_size_bits) % (L.sets); \
UWord tag = a >> L.tag_shift; \
UWord tag2; \
Int i, j; \
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ void cachesim_##L##_doref(Addr a, UChar size, ULong* m1, ULong *mL) \
\
/* Second case: word straddles two lines. */ \
/* Nb: this is a fast way of doing ((set1+1) % L.sets) */ \
- } else if (((set1 + 1) & (L.sets-1)) == set2) { \
+ } else if (((set1 + 1) % (L.sets)) == set2) { \
set = &(L.tags[set1 * L.assoc]); \
However, this has a huge performance impact in all cases. Before (on my
Core i5):
~> time valgrind --tool=cachegrind ls /usr/bin >/dev/null
...
==4991== D1 misses: 57,898 ( 41,713 rd + 16,185 wr)
==4991== LLd misses: 17,322 ( 4,840 rd + 12,482 wr)
...
real 0m0.668s
user 0m0.600s
sys 0m0.060s
After, with patch:
time ./cachegrind-amd64-linux --tool=cachegrind ls /usr/bin >/dev/null
...
==5042== D1 misses: 57,888 ( 41,709 rd + 16,179 wr)
==5042== LLd misses: 17,326 ( 4,846 rd + 12,480 wr)
...
real 0m1.108s
user 0m1.080s
sys 0m0.020s
:(
Not sure yet where the slight changes in D1/LLd misses come from. I assume
the recompilation of cachegrind leads to minimal changes in the address space
layout?
In real hardware, instead of modulo (which obviously takes a lot of time),
you probably would do some hashing of a subset of address bits. However, it
leads to a small non-uniformity for covering the address space by the sets.
We probably need to do something similar. And make this a special case only
if needed.
Josef
>
> J
>
>
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 11:43:53
|
On Friday, June 03, 2011, Tom Hughes wrote: > The latest Intel i7's have finally switched to a saner method of > recording the cache details in the cpuid that doesn't rely on a lookup > table to get the details. 'bout time too! It's good that you're looking into this. > The attached patch implements support for this, but there is one problem > (which is why I haven't committed it yet) namely that, at least on the > machine I am testing on, the L3 cache is 12Mb but 16 way associative > which means that it causes cachegrind/callgrind to assert because the > set count (12288) is not a power of two. I've seen the same failure when running on a 6-core AMD, which has a 48 way associative L3 as a result. It's as if each core contributes 8 ways to the L3. > Suggestions on the best way to deal with this gratefully received... Well, one obvious sick hack is to round both the size and associativity down to the next lowest power of 2, so everything is power-of-2 sized. That'd be pretty bad though, since eg Atom has a 24k D1 (or I1 ? I forget) and we'd wind up simulating only a 16k cache. Better is maybe if you can massage the associativity number somehow without messing with the size. Presumably the loss of accuracy induced by messing with the associativity alone is much smaller than that induced by messing with the size. If you see what I mean. That said, I guess the best fix is fix the cache simulators themselves, but that's beyond my ken -- Nick's/Josef's department. J |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-06-03 11:09:09
|
The latest Intel i7's have finally switched to a saner method of
recording the cache details in the cpuid that doesn't rely on a lookup
table to get the details.
The attached patch implements support for this, but there is one problem
(which is why I haven't committed it yet) namely that, at least on the
machine I am testing on, the L3 cache is 12Mb but 16 way associative
which means that it causes cachegrind/callgrind to assert because the
set count (12288) is not a power of two.
The full configuration of the caches on this machine is:
I1: 32KB, 4-way, 64B lines (128 sets)
D1: 32KB, 8-way, 64B lines (64 sets)
L2: 256KB, 8-way, 64B lines (512 sets)
L3: 12MB, 16-way, 64B lines (12288 sets)
Suggestions on the best way to deal with this gratefully received...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://compton.nu/
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 09:10:20
|
On Friday, June 03, 2011, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: > Hi, > > has this strspn already been activated? No, it hasn't -- it's still commented out in the trunk sources. Try uncommenting it, commenting out the assert, and adding the relevant macro defn and use. See strcspn immediately above for an example. If it works, pls send the resulting patch. J |
|
From: Christoph B. <bar...@or...> - 2011-06-03 08:55:48
|
Hi,
has this strspn already been activated?
I get the following error with valgrind 3.6.1 from opensuse 11.4:
==00:08:50:58.719 17760== Invalid read of size 8
==00:08:50:58.719 17760== at 0x5AD3A44: __strspn_sse42 (in
/lib64/libc-2.11.3.so)
...
==00:08:50:58.719 17760== Address 0x1d15bf878 is 0 bytes after a block
of size 65,496 alloc'd
==00:08:50:58.719 17760== at 0x4C2683D: malloc (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
...
Christoph
Am 20.08.2010 20:24, schrieb sv...@va...:
> Author: sewardj
> Date: 2010-08-20 19:24:16 +0100 (Fri, 20 Aug 2010)
> New Revision: 11270
>
> Log:
> Add in comments a (validated) strspn replacement, should it become
> necessary.
>
>
>
> Modified:
> trunk/memcheck/mc_replace_strmem.c
>
>
> Modified: trunk/memcheck/mc_replace_strmem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/memcheck/mc_replace_strmem.c 2010-08-20 18:22:07 UTC (rev 11269)
> +++ trunk/memcheck/mc_replace_strmem.c 2010-08-20 18:24:16 UTC (rev 11270)
> @@ -984,6 +984,36 @@
> #endif
>
>
> +// And here's a validated strspn replacement, should it
> +// become necessary.
> +//UWord mystrspn( UChar* s, UChar* accept )
> +//{
> +// /* find the length of 'accept', not including terminating zero */
> +// UWord nacc = 0;
> +// while (accept[nacc]) nacc++;
> +// if (nacc == 0) return 0;
> +//
> +// UWord len = 0;
> +// while (1) {
> +// UWord i;
> +// UChar sc = *s;
> +// if (sc == 0)
> +// break;
> +// for (i = 0; i< nacc; i++) {
> +// if (sc == accept[i])
> +// break;
> +// }
> +// assert(i>= 0&& i<= nacc);
> +// if (i == nacc)
> +// break;
> +// s++;
> +// len++;
> +// }
> +//
> +// return len;
> +//}
> +
> +
> /*------------------------------------------------------------*/
> /*--- Improve definedness checking of process environment ---*/
> /*------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Valgrind-developers mailing list
> Val...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2011-06-03 08:32:45
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2011-06-03 02:52:49 EDT Ended at 2011-06-03 04:32:33 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 460 tests, 19 stderr failures, 9 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/addressable (stderr) memcheck/tests/custom_alloc (stderr) memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/describe-block (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool (stderr) memcheck/tests/mempool2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin1-yes (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin3-no (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2011-06-03 06:24:27
|
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Geoff Shannon <ear...@gm...> wrote: > > I'm new to contributing to Valgrind and I was looking at the Project > suggestions page and I saw the %f support for VG_(printf) mentioned and I > was wondering if that was still an outstanding issue and if there was > anybody who'd done work on it, or had any thoughts about it. AFAIK it's still unimplemented. Nick |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2011-06-03 05:44:33
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2011-06-02 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2011-06-03 00:44:18 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 460 tests, 15 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/mcvabits (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin-amd64
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin-amd64 2011-06-03 00:05:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:43:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,67 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Assertion failed: (!r), function main, file tc23_bogus_condwait.c, line 86.
-Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
- at 0x........: __kill (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: __assert_rtn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:86)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin-x86 2011-06-03 00:05:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:43:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2011-06-03 00:05:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:43:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2011-06-03 00:05:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:43:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:15.000000000 -0500
+++ mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.out 2011-06-03 00:21:16.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,30 +26,27 @@
$1 = void
[Switching to thread 2 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
-Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
+Remote failure reply: E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
set pc, calling from gdb a function in the debugged process, ...)
can only be accepted if the thread is VgTs_Runnable or VgTs_Yielding state
Thread status is VgTs_WaitSys
-'
[Switching to thread 3 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
-Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
+Remote failure reply: E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
set pc, calling from gdb a function in the debugged process, ...)
can only be accepted if the thread is VgTs_Runnable or VgTs_Yielding state
Thread status is VgTs_WaitSys
-'
[Switching to thread 4 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
-Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
+Remote failure reply: E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
set pc, calling from gdb a function in the debugged process, ...)
can only be accepted if the thread is VgTs_Runnable or VgTs_Yielding state
Thread status is VgTs_WaitSys
-'
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcvabits.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcvabits.stderrB.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:15.000000000 -0500
+++ mcvabits.stderrB.out 2011-06-03 00:21:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,55 +1,32 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 defined
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-00000000 00000000 0000
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff00ff00 ff00ff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff000000 0000ff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 10 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff00ffff ffffff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 2 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 2 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ff00
-Address 0x........ len 2 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 2 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 2 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 2 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-____
-Address 0x........ len 2 has 2 bytes unaddressable
-Address 0x........ len 6 addressable
- Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 6 not defined:
-Uninitialised value at 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-ffffff00 ff00
-Address 0x........ len 10 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-Address 0x........ len 10 not addressable:
-bad address 0x........
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "undefined"
-0000____ 00000000 0000
-Address 0x........ len 10 has 2 bytes unaddressable
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
+Undefined command: "eval". Try "help".
monitor command request to kill this process
Remote connection closed
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:13.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:33:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:13.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:34:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:13.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:35:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -2,39 +2,24 @@
Thread #x is the program's root thread
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with invalid mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:21.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2011-06-03 00:30:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:21.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2011-06-03 00:30:18.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:23:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp-s390x 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:23:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:23:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp-s390x 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:23:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump2.c:46)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
Signal caught, as expected
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:18.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:24:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:25:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,18 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -115,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:25:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:25:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:25:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:27:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-s390x 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:27:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,8 +1,15 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:28:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2011-06-03 00:05:20.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:28:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:29.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:31:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2011-06-03 00:05:29.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:31:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:28.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:31:49.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,27 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1986)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5738)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1986)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5738)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:28.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2011-06-03 00:31:49.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2011-06-03 00:05:28.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2011-06-03 00:31:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,20 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-06-03 02:52:01
|
Nightly build on vauxhall ( x86_64, Fedora 14 ) Started at 2011-06-03 03:20:02 BST Ended at 2011-06-03 03:51:45 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 566 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2011-06-03 02:51:27
|
Nightly build on ultra ( gcc 4.5.1 Linux 2.6.37.1-1.2-desktop x86_64 )
Started at 2011-06-02 21:30:01 CDT
Ended at 2011-06-02 21:51:14 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 566 tests, 76 stderr failures, 56 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 0 stdoutB failures, 3 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot (stderrB)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/fprem (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushfw_x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/pushpopmem (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/sse2_memory (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/tronical (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_exit_group (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_fork (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_supp (stderr)
memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_vfork (stderr)
cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stdout)
none/tests/x86/aad_aam (stderr)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bt_everything (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bt_literal (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug125959-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug126147-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug132813-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug135421-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug137714-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/bug152818-x86 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cmpxchg8b (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cpuid (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cpuid (stderr)
none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stdout)
none/tests/x86/cse_fail (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fcmovnu (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fpu_lazy_eflags (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stderr)
none/tests/x86/getseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/getseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stdout)
none/tests/x86/incdec_alt (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_basic (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_cmov (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_fpu (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_mmx (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse2 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_sse3 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/insn_ssse3 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/jcxz (stdout)
none/tests/x86/jcxz (stderr)
none/tests/x86/lahf (stdout)
none/tests/x86/lahf (stderr)
none/tests/x86/looper (stdout)
none/tests/x86/looper (stderr)
none/tests/x86/movx (stdout)
none/tests/x86/movx (stderr)
none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/pushpopseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stdout)
none/tests/x86/sbbmisc (stderr)
none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stdout)
none/tests/x86/shift_ndep (stderr)
none/tests/x86/smc1 (stdout)
none/tests/x86/smc1 (stderr)
none/tests/x86/ssse3_misaligned (stderr)
none/tests/x86/x86locked (stdout)
none/tests/x86/x86locked (stderr)
none/tests/x86/xadd (stdout)
none/tests/x86/xadd (stderr)
none/tests/x86-linux/seg_override (stdout)
none/tests/x86-linux/seg_override (stderr)
none/tests/x86-linux/sigcontext (stdout)
none/tests/x86-linux/sigcontext (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/complex_rep (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/fldcw_check (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/million (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86/rep_prefix (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test (stderr)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test (post)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll (stdout)
exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fpu-28-108.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:49.028447677 -0500
+++ fpu-28-108.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:41.388507465 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1 @@
-
-
-I refs:
-I1 misses:
-LLi misses:
-I1 miss rate:
-LLi miss rate:
-
-D refs:
-D1 misses:
-LLd misses:
-D1 miss rate:
-LLd miss rate:
-
-LL refs:
-LL misses:
-LL miss rate:
+valgrind: ./fpu-28-108: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test.post.diff
=================================================
--- clone_test.post.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:40.933181376 -0500
+++ clone_test.post.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.245767899 -0500
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-T 4 996 5 2 3 98991
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 1001 2 3 98994
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-
-
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 15 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 1501007
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
-
-T 2 3 99996
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 99996 4
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 100000
-T 99998 2
-
-
-# Thread 2
-# Total intervals: 25 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 2500001
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
-
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/clone_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- clone_test.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:40.933181376 -0500
+++ clone_test.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.227769531 -0500
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 15 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 1501007
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
-# Thread 2
-# Total intervals: 25 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 2500001
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- ll.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:40.932181466 -0500
+++ ll.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.265766087 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 39 (Interval Size 1000)
-# Total instructions: 39439
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86-linux/ll.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- ll.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:40.932181466 -0500
+++ ll.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.260766539 -0500
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-[0;1;37;47m#################################################################[0;30;47m#####[1;37m#########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m################################################################[0;30;47m#######[1;37m########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m###################[31m#[37m############################################[0;30;47m##[1;37mO[0;30;47m#[1;37mO[0;30;47m##[1;37m########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m##[0;30;47m######[1;37m##########[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m###########################################[0;30;47m#[1;33m#####[0;30;47m#[1;37m########[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#############[0;30;47m#[1;37m##########################################[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[33m###[37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#########[31m###[37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m#[0;30;47m####[1;37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m####[0;30;47m###[1;37m##[0;30;47m#####[1;37m#[0;30;47m######[1;37m#####[0;30;47m#[1;37m##########[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m########[31m#[37m##[31m#[0;30;47m#[1;37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m#######[0;30;47m#[1;37m############[0;30;47m##[1;37m####[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#######[31m#[37m###[31m#[0;30;47m#[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[0;30;47m###[1;37m#########[0;30;47m#[1;37m############[0;30;47m###[1;37m###[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##########[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[0;30;47m###[1;37m########[33m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m###########[0;30;47m##[1;33m#[37m###[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#######[0;30;47m#[1;37m#[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m#[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[33m######[0;30;47m#[1;37m#######[30m#[33m######[37m#[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m######[0;30;47m##[1;37m#[31m##[0;30;47m#[1;37m#[0;30;47m#[1;37m##[0;30;47m##[1;37m#####[0;30;47m##[1;37m##[0;30;47m###[1;37m###[0;30;47m###[1;37m####[0;30;47m##[1;37m###[0;30;47m##[1;37m####[33m#######[0;30;47m#[1;37m#####[0;30;47m#[1;33m#######[37m#[1;37;40m
-[0;1;37;47m##[0;30;47m############[1;37m##[0;30;47m###[1;37m##[0;30;47m####[1;37m###[0;30;47m####[1;37m###[0;30;47m####[1;37m#[0;30;47m###[1;37m#[0;30;47m#####[1;37m#[0;30;47m######[1;37m###[33m#####[30m#[0;30;47m#####[1m#[33m#####[37m###[1;37;40m
-
-[7CLinux Version 2.6.29, Compiled #1 SMP Mon May 4 09:51:54 EDT 2009
-[5COne 1665MHz AMD Athlon(tm) Processor, 512M RAM, 3330.53 Bogomips Total
-[37Ctobler[0m
-
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/complex_rep.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- complex_rep.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:41.048170955 -0500
+++ complex_rep.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.128778507 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 0 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 8206
-# Total reps: 2100228
-# Unique reps: 2052
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/fldcw_check.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fldcw_check.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:41.048170955 -0500
+++ fldcw_check.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.152776331 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 0 (Interval Size 10000)
-# Total instructions: 9261
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 2061
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/million.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- million.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:41.047171045 -0500
+++ million.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.174774336 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 10 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 1000000
-# Total reps: 0
-# Unique reps: 0
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-bbv/tests/x86/rep_prefix.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rep_prefix.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:41.046171136 -0500
+++ rep_prefix.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:14.199772070 -0500
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-# Thread 1
-# Total intervals: 0 (Interval Size 100000)
-# Total instructions: 124
-# Total reps: 229402
-# Unique reps: 26
-# Total fldcw instructions: 0
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- bad_percentify.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2011-06-02 21:41:12.227345059 -0500
+++ bad_percentify.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:51:05.278581020 -0500
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
by 0x........: myvprintf_str (bad_percentify.c:187)
by 0x........: VG_debugLog_vprintf (bad_percentify.c:479)
by 0x........: vprintf_to_buf (bad_percentify.c:89)
- by 0x........: vprintf_WRK (bad_percentify.c:102)
+ by 0x........: vprintf_WRK (bad_percentify.c:101)
by 0x........: VG_vprintf (bad_percentify.c:115)
by 0x........: VG_printf (bad_percentify.c:124)
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:622)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mssnapshot.stderrB.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:41.626118576 -0500
+++ mssnapshot.stderrB.out 2011-06-02 21:45:00.976610373 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
relaying data between gdb and process ....
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=b1d398a5cb1609e7ac1c51a26588e87fc20f753c"
vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=e23cbc772e670af00bea9874f925e2e61afda713"
+Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
+Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=1493bf69b1d671cbad9be1d1b0284fbd9138444b"
general valgrind monitor commands:
help [debug] : monitor command help. With debug: + debugging commands
vg.wait [<ms>] : sleep <ms> (default 0) then continue
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:39.686294385 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:48:34.498252583 -0500
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <fn>do_clone.clone.0</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -122,11 +122,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
@@ -176,11 +171,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
@@ -230,11 +220,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
@@ -284,11 +269,6 @@
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
<xauxwhat><text>declared at tc06_two_races.c:9</text> <file>tc06_two_races.c</file> <line>...</line> </xauxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.068806552 -0500
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:45:40.745005228 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc212-s390x
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc212-s390x 2011-06-02 21:40:46.007721457 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:01.056163907 -0500
@@ -72,17 +72,6 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
- at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
- by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
- by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -128,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2011-06-02 21:40:45.962725535 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:01.056163907 -0500
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6512)
- Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
+ Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: g_serviceFn (origin5-bz2.c:6429)
+ by 0x........: default_bzalloc (origin5-bz2.c:4470)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (origin5-bz2.c:1578)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5192)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (origin5-bz2.c:5678)
+ by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6498)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2011-06-02 21:40:46.019720368 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:01.056163907 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,8 +27,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -37,8 +38,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -47,8 +49,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -57,8 +60,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -67,8 +71,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -77,8 +82,9 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -87,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 4
+Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2011-06-02 21:40:45.960725718 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:01.056163907 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 8
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug133694.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.541035653 -0500
+++ bug133694.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.744656497 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./bug133694: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/bug133694.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- bug133694.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.533036385 -0500
+++ bug133694.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.722658490 -0500
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-success
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- int3-x86.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.537036013 -0500
+++ int3-x86.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.770654140 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./int3-x86: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/int3-x86.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- int3-x86.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.543035472 -0500
+++ int3-x86.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.750655952 -0500
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-main
-in int_handler, EIP is ...
-PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.540035743 -0500
+++ scalar.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.795651873 -0500
@@ -1,3275 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
- 0:__NR_restart_syscall n/a
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
- 1: __NR_exit below
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
- 2: __NR_fork other
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
- 3: __NR_read 1+3s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param (syscallno) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(buf) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(count) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param read(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 4: __NR_write 3s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param write(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(buf) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(count) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 5: __NR_open (2-args) 2s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param open(filename) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param open(flags) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param open(filename) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 5: __NR_open (3-args) 1s 0m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param open(mode) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 6: __NR_close 1s 0m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param close(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 7: __NR_waitpid 3s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param waitpid(pid) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param waitpid(status) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param waitpid(options) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param waitpid(status) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
-
------------------------------------------------------
- 8: __NR_creat 2s 1m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param creat(pathname) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param creat(mode) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param creat(pathname) points to unaddressable byte(s)
- ...
- Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_exit_group.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_exit_group.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.541035653 -0500
+++ scalar_exit_group.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.821649517 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
-252: __NR_exit_group 1s 0m
------------------------------------------------------
-Syscall param exit_group(status) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
+valgrind: ./scalar_exit_group: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_fork.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_fork.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.533036385 -0500
+++ scalar_fork.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.845647340 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
- 2: __NR_fork 0e
------------------------------------------------------
+valgrind: ./scalar_fork: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_supp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_supp.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.542035563 -0500
+++ scalar_supp.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.874644713 -0500
@@ -1,9 +1 @@
-Syscall param (syscallno) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(fd) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
-Syscall param write(count) contains uninitialised byte(s)
- ...
-
+valgrind: ./scalar_supp: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86-linux/scalar_vfork.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- scalar_vfork.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:42.542035563 -0500
+++ scalar_vfork.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.900642354 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
------------------------------------------------------
-190: __NR_vfork 0e
------------------------------------------------------
+valgrind: ./scalar_vfork: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug152022.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.865734325 -0500
+++ bug152022.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.235702636 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./bug152022: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- espindola2.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.871733782 -0500
+++ espindola2.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.261700279 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./espindola2: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fpeflags.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.873733601 -0500
+++ fpeflags.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.287697923 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./fpeflags: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fprem.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fprem.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.866734234 -0500
+++ fprem.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.312695658 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./fprem: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fprem.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- fprem.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.865734325 -0500
+++ fprem.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.293697380 -0500
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-fprem 0.693147
-fprem1 0.693147
-fsincos 0.130278
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fxsave.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.874733510 -0500
+++ fxsave.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.338693300 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./fxsave: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- fxsave.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.871733782 -0500
+++ fxsave.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.318695113 -0500
@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
-Re-run with any arg to suppress least-significant
- 16 bits of FP numbers
-
-BEFORE
- 0 7f 03 00 10 fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1f 00 00 ff ff ff ff
- 32 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 48 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 64 xx xx cf fb 84 9a 20 9a fd 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 80 xx xx cf d1 f7 17 72 b1 fe 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 96 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
-112 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
-128 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-144 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-160 78 56 34 12 44 33 22 11 88 77 66 55 21 43 65 87
-176 01 ef cd ab dd cc bb aa 11 00 ff ee ba dc fe 10
-192 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-208 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-224 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-240 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-256 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-272 79 b9 f9 b9 99 ff 99 bb 99 77 99 bb 9b 9f 9b 97
-288 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-304 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-320 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-336 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-352 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-368 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-384 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-400 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-416 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-432 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-448 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-464 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-480 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-496 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-
-ZEROED
- 0 7f 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1f 00 00 ff ff ff ff
- 32 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 48 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 64 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 80 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 96 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-112 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-128 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-144 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-160 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-176 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-192 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-208 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-224 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-240 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-256 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-272 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-288 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-304 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-320 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-336 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-352 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-368 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-384 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-400 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-416 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-432 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-448 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-464 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-480 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-496 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-
-RESTORED
- 0 7f 03 00 10 fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 16 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1f 00 00 ff ff ff ff
- 32 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 48 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 64 xx xx cf fb 84 9a 20 9a fd 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 80 xx xx cf d1 f7 17 72 b1 fe 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
- 96 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 80 ff 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00
-112 xx xx 68 21 a2 da 0f c9 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
-128 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-144 xx xx 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-160 78 56 34 12 44 33 22 11 88 77 66 55 21 43 65 87
-176 01 ef cd ab dd cc bb aa 11 00 ff ee ba dc fe 10
-192 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-208 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-224 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-240 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-256 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
-272 79 b9 f9 b9 99 ff 99 bb 99 77 99 bb 9b 9f 9b 97
-288 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-304 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-320 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-336 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-352 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-368 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
-384 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_basic.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.715391461 -0500
+++ insn_basic.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.363691034 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_basic: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_basic.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.729390193 -0500
+++ insn_basic.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.343692846 -0500
@@ -1,1056 +0,0 @@
-adcb_1 ... ok
-adcb_2 ... ok
-adcb_3 ... ok
-adcb_4 ... ok
-adcb_5 ... ok
-adcb_6 ... ok
-adcb_7 ... ok
-adcb_8 ... ok
-adcb_9 ... ok
-adcb_10 ... ok
-adcb_11 ... ok
-adcb_12 ... ok
-adcw_1 ... ok
-adcw_2 ... ok
-adcw_3 ... ok
-adcw_4 ... ok
-adcw_5 ... ok
-adcw_6 ... ok
-adcw_7 ... ok
-adcw_8 ... ok
-adcw_9 ... ok
-adcw_10 ... ok
-adcw_11 ... ok
-adcw_12 ... ok
-adcw_13 ... ok
-adcw_14 ... ok
-adcl_1 ... ok
-adcl_2 ... ok
-adcl_3 ... ok
-adcl_4 ... ok
-adcl_5 ... ok
-adcl_6 ... ok
-adcl_7 ... ok
-adcl_8 ... ok
-adcl_9 ... ok
-adcl_10 ... ok
-adcl_11 ... ok
-adcl_12 ... ok
-adcl_13 ... ok
-adcl_14 ... ok
-addb_1 ... ok
-addb_2 ... ok
-addb_3 ... ok
-addb_4 ... ok
-addb_5 ... ok
-addb_6 ... ok
-addw_1 ... ok
-addw_2 ... ok
-addw_3 ... ok
-addw_4 ... ok
-addw_5 ... ok
-addw_6 ... ok
-addw_7 ... ok
-addl_1 ... ok
-addl_2 ... ok
-addl_3 ... ok
-addl_4 ... ok
-addl_5 ... ok
-addl_6 ... ok
-addl_7 ... ok
-andb_1 ... ok
-andb_2 ... ok
-andb_3 ... ok
-andb_4 ... ok
-andb_5 ... ok
-andb_6 ... ok
-andw_1 ... ok
-andw_2 ... ok
-andw_3 ... ok
-andw_4 ... ok
-andw_5 ... ok
-andw_6 ... ok
-andw_7 ... ok
-andl_1 ... ok
-andl_2 ... ok
-andl_3 ... ok
-andl_4 ... ok
-andl_5 ... ok
-andl_6 ... ok
-andl_7 ... ok
-bsfw_1 ... ok
-bsfw_2 ... ok
-bsfl_1 ... ok
-bsfl_2 ... ok
-bsrw_1 ... ok
-bsrw_2 ... ok
-bsrl_1 ... ok
-bsrl_2 ... ok
-bswapl_1 ... ok
-btw_1 ... ok
-btw_2 ... ok
-btw_3 ... ok
-btw_4 ... ok
-btw_5 ... ok
-btw_6 ... ok
-btw_7 ... ok
-btw_8 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_cmov.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.714391552 -0500
+++ insn_cmov.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.391688496 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_cmov: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_cmov.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.727390375 -0500
+++ insn_cmov.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.369690490 -0500
@@ -1,384 +0,0 @@
-cmova_1 ... ok
-cmova_2 ... ok
-cmova_3 ... ok
-cmova_4 ... ok
-cmova_5 ... ok
-cmova_6 ... ok
-cmova_7 ... ok
-cmova_8 ... ok
-cmovae_1 ... ok
-cmovae_2 ... ok
-cmovae_3 ... ok
-cmovae_4 ... ok
-cmovb_1 ... ok
-cmovb_2 ... ok
-cmovb_3 ... ok
-cmovb_4 ... ok
-cmovbe_1 ... ok
-cmovbe_2 ... ok
-cmovbe_3 ... ok
-cmovbe_4 ... ok
-cmovbe_5 ... ok
-cmovbe_6 ... ok
-cmovbe_7 ... ok
-cmovbe_8 ... ok
-cmovc_1 ... ok
-cmovc_2 ... ok
-cmovc_3 ... ok
-cmovc_4 ... ok
-cmove_1 ... ok
-cmove_2 ... ok
-cmove_3 ... ok
-cmove_4 ... ok
-cmovg_1 ... ok
-cmovg_2 ... ok
-cmovg_3 ... ok
-cmovg_4 ... ok
-cmovg_5 ... ok
-cmovg_6 ... ok
-cmovg_7 ... ok
-cmovg_8 ... ok
-cmovg_9 ... ok
-cmovg_10 ... ok
-cmovg_11 ... ok
-cmovg_12 ... ok
-cmovg_13 ... ok
-cmovg_14 ... ok
-cmovg_15 ... ok
-cmovg_16 ... ok
-cmovge_1 ... ok
-cmovge_2 ... ok
-cmovge_3 ... ok
-cmovge_4 ... ok
-cmovge_5 ... ok
-cmovge_6 ... ok
-cmovge_7 ... ok
-cmovge_8 ... ok
-cmovl_1 ... ok
-cmovl_2 ... ok
-cmovl_3 ... ok
-cmovl_4 ... ok
-cmovl_5 ... ok
-cmovl_6 ... ok
-cmovl_7 ... ok
-cmovl_8 ... ok
-cmovle_1 ... ok
-cmovle_2 ... ok
-cmovle_3 ... ok
-cmovle_4 ... ok
-cmovle_5 ... ok
-cmovle_6 ... ok
-cmovle_7 ... ok
-cmovle_8 ... ok
-cmovle_9 ... ok
-cmovle_10 ... ok
-cmovle_11 ... ok
-cmovle_12 ... ok
-cmovle_13 ... ok
-cmovle_14 ... ok
-cmovle_15 ... ok
-cmovle_16 ... ok
-cmovna_1 ... ok
-cmovna_2 ... ok
-cmovna_3 ... ok
-cmovna_4 ... ok
-cmovna_5 ... ok
-cmovna_6 ... ok
-cmovna_7 ... ok
-cmovna_8 ... ok
-cmovnae_1 ... ok
-cmovnae_2 ... ok
-cmovnae_3 ... ok
-cmovnae_4 ... ok
-cmovnb_1 ... ok
-cmovnb_2 ... ok
-cmovnb_3 ... ok
-cmovnb_4 ... ok
-cmovnbe_1 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_fpu.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.720391009 -0500
+++ insn_fpu.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.417686140 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_fpu: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_fpu.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_fpu.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.704392459 -0500
+++ insn_fpu.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.398687862 -0500
@@ -1,452 +0,0 @@
-fabs_1 ... ok
-fabs_2 ... ok
-fabs_3 ... ok
-fabs_4 ... ok
-fadds_1 ... ok
-fadds_2 ... ok
-fadds_3 ... ok
-fadds_4 ... ok
-faddl_1 ... ok
-faddl_2 ... ok
-faddl_3 ... ok
-faddl_4 ... ok
-fadd_1 ... ok
-fadd_2 ... ok
-fadd_3 ... ok
-fadd_4 ... ok
-fadd_5 ... ok
-fadd_6 ... ok
-fadd_7 ... ok
-fadd_8 ... ok
-fadd_9 ... ok
-fadd_10 ... ok
-fadd_11 ... ok
-fadd_12 ... ok
-fadd_13 ... ok
-fadd_14 ... ok
-fadd_15 ... ok
-fadd_16 ... ok
-faddp_1 ... ok
-faddp_2 ... ok
-faddp_3 ... ok
-faddp_4 ... ok
-faddp_5 ... ok
-faddp_6 ... ok
-faddp_7 ... ok
-faddp_8 ... ok
-faddp_9 ... ok
-faddp_10 ... ok
-faddp_11 ... ok
-faddp_12 ... ok
-faddp_13 ... ok
-faddp_14 ... ok
-faddp_15 ... ok
-faddp_16 ... ok
-fiadds_1 ... ok
-fiadds_2 ... ok
-fiadds_3 ... ok
-fiadds_4 ... ok
-fiadds_5 ... ok
-fiadds_6 ... ok
-fiadds_7 ... ok
-fiadds_8 ... ok
-fiaddl_1 ... ok
-fiaddl_2 ... ok
-fiaddl_3 ... ok
-fiaddl_4 ... ok
-fiaddl_5 ... ok
-fiaddl_6 ... ok
-fiaddl_7 ... ok
-fiaddl_8 ... ok
-fcomi_1 ... ok
-fcomi_2 ... ok
-fcomi_3 ... ok
-fcomi_4 ... ok
-fcomi_5 ... ok
-fcomi_6 ... ok
-fcomip_1 ... ok
-fcomip_2 ... ok
-fcomip_3 ... ok
-fcomip_4 ... ok
-fcomip_5 ... ok
-fcomip_6 ... ok
-fucomi_1 ... ok
-fucomi_2 ... ok
-fucomi_3 ... ok
-fucomi_4 ... ok
-fucomi_5 ... ok
-fucomi_6 ... ok
-fucomip_1 ... ok
-fucomip_2 ... ok
-fucomip_3 ... ok
-fucomip_4 ... ok
-fucomip_5 ... ok
-fucomip_6 ... ok
-fchs_1 ... ok
-fchs_2 ... ok
-fchs_3 ... ok
-fchs_4 ... ok
-fdivs_1 ... ok
-fdivs_2 ... ok
-fdivs_3 ... ok
-fdivs_4 ... ok
-fdivl_1 ... ok
-fdivl_2 ... ok
-fdivl_3 ... ok
-fdivl_4 ... ok
-fdiv_1 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_mmx.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.721390918 -0500
+++ insn_mmx.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.444683692 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_mmx: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmx.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_mmx.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.705392368 -0500
+++ insn_mmx.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.424685504 -0500
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
-movd_1 ... ok
-movd_2 ... ok
-movd_3 ... ok
-movd_4 ... ok
-movq_1 ... ok
-movq_2 ... ok
-movq_3 ... ok
-packssdw_1 ... ok
-packssdw_2 ... ok
-packsswb_1 ... ok
-packsswb_2 ... ok
-packuswb_1 ... ok
-packuswb_2 ... ok
-paddb_1 ... ok
-paddb_2 ... ok
-paddd_1 ... ok
-paddd_2 ... ok
-paddsb_1 ... ok
-paddsb_2 ... ok
-paddsw_1 ... ok
-paddsw_2 ... ok
-paddusb_1 ... ok
-paddusb_2 ... ok
-paddusw_1 ... ok
-paddusw_2 ... ok
-paddw_1 ... ok
-paddw_2 ... ok
-pand_1 ... ok
-pand_2 ... ok
-pandn_1 ... ok
-pandn_2 ... ok
-pcmpeqb_1 ... ok
-pcmpeqb_2 ... ok
-pcmpeqd_1 ... ok
-pcmpeqd_2 ... ok
-pcmpeqw_1 ... ok
-pcmpeqw_2 ... ok
-pcmpgtb_1 ... ok
-pcmpgtb_2 ... ok
-pcmpgtd_1 ... ok
-pcmpgtd_2 ... ok
-pcmpgtw_1 ... ok
-pcmpgtw_2 ... ok
-pmaddwd_1 ... ok
-pmaddwd_2 ... ok
-pmulhw_1 ... ok
-pmulhw_2 ... ok
-pmullw_1 ... ok
-pmullw_2 ... ok
-por_1 ... ok
-por_2 ... ok
-pslld_1 ... ok
-pslld_2 ... ok
-pslld_3 ... ok
-psllq_1 ... ok
-psllq_2 ... ok
-psllq_3 ... ok
-psllw_1 ... ok
-psllw_2 ... ok
-psllw_3 ... ok
-psrad_1 ... ok
-psrad_2 ... ok
-psrad_3 ... ok
-psraw_1 ... ok
-psraw_2 ... ok
-psraw_3 ... ok
-psrld_1 ... ok
-psrld_2 ... ok
-psrld_3 ... ok
-psrlq_1 ... ok
-psrlq_2 ... ok
-psrlq_3 ... ok
-psrlw_1 ... ok
-psrlw_2 ... ok
-psrlw_3 ... ok
-psubb_1 ... ok
-psubb_2 ... ok
-psubd_1 ... ok
-psubd_2 ... ok
-psubsb_1 ... ok
-psubsb_2 ... ok
-psubsw_1 ... ok
-psubsw_2 ... ok
-psubusb_1 ... ok
-psubusb_2 ... ok
-psubusw_1 ... ok
-psubusw_2 ... ok
-psubw_1 ... ok
-psubw_2 ... ok
-punpckhbw_1 ... ok
-punpckhbw_2 ... ok
-punpckhdq_1 ... ok
-punpckhdq_2 ... ok
-punpckhwd_1 ... ok
-punpckhwd_2 ... ok
-punpcklbw_1 ... ok
-punpcklbw_2 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_sse.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.709392006 -0500
+++ insn_sse.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.474680973 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_sse: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_sse.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.722390827 -0500
+++ insn_sse.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.451683057 -0500
@@ -1,154 +0,0 @@
-addps_1 ... ok
-addps_2 ... ok
-addss_1 ... ok
-addss_2 ... ok
-andnps_1 ... ok
-andnps_2 ... ok
-andps_1 ... ok
-andps_2 ... ok
-cmpeqps_1 ... ok
-cmpeqps_2 ... ok
-cmpeqss_1 ... ok
-cmpeqss_2 ... ok
-cmpleps_1 ... ok
-cmpleps_2 ... ok
-cmpless_1 ... ok
-cmpless_2 ... ok
-cmpltps_1 ... ok
-cmpltps_2 ... ok
-cmpltss_1 ... ok
-cmpltss_2 ... ok
-cmpunordps_1 ... ok
-cmpunordps_2 ... ok
-cmpunordss_1 ... ok
-cmpunordss_2 ... ok
-cmpneqps_1 ... ok
-cmpneqps_2 ... ok
-cmpneqss_1 ... ok
-cmpneqss_2 ... ok
-cmpnleps_1 ... ok
-cmpnleps_2 ... ok
-cmpnless_1 ... ok
-cmpnless_2 ... ok
-cmpnltps_1 ... ok
-cmpnltps_2 ... ok
-cmpnltss_1 ... ok
-cmpnltss_2 ... ok
-cmpordps_1 ... ok
-cmpordps_2 ... ok
-cmpordss_1 ... ok
-cmpordss_2 ... ok
-comiss_1 ... ok
-comiss_2 ... ok
-comiss_3 ... ok
-comiss_4 ... ok
-comiss_5 ... ok
-comiss_6 ... ok
-cvtpi2ps_1 ... ok
-cvtpi2ps_2 ... ok
-cvtps2pi_1 ... ok
-cvtps2pi_2 ... ok
-cvtsi2ss_1 ... ok
-cvtsi2ss_2 ... ok
-cvtss2si_1 ... ok
-cvtss2si_2 ... ok
-cvttps2pi_1 ... ok
-cvttps2pi_2 ... ok
-cvttss2si_1 ... ok
-cvttss2si_2 ... ok
-divps_1 ... ok
-divps_2 ... ok
-divss_1 ... ok
-divss_2 ... ok
-maxps_1 ... ok
-maxps_2 ... ok
-maxss_1 ... ok
-maxss_2 ... ok
-minps_1 ... ok
-minps_2 ... ok
-minss_1 ... ok
-minss_2 ... ok
-movaps_1 ... ok
-movaps_2 ... ok
-movhlps_1 ... ok
-movhps_1 ... ok
-movhps_2 ... ok
-movlhps_1 ... ok
-movlps_1 ... ok
-movlps_2 ... ok
-movmskps_1 ... ok
-movntps_1 ... ok
-movntq_1 ... ok
-movss_1 ... ok
-movss_2 ... ok
-movss_3 ... ok
-movups_1 ... ok
-movups_2 ... ok
-mulps_1 ... ok
-mulps_2 ... ok
-mulss_1 ... ok
-mulss_2 ... ok
-orps_1 ... ok
-orps_2 ... ok
-pavgb_1 ... ok
-pavgb_2 ... ok
-pavgw_1 ... ok
-pavgw_2 ... ok
-pextrw_1 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- insn_sse2.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.714391552 -0500
+++ insn_sse2.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.501678524 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./../../../none/tests/x86/insn_sse2: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- insn_sse2.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:41:11.728390284 -0500
+++ insn_sse2.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.481680337 -0500
@@ -1,343 +0,0 @@
-addpd_1 ... ok
-addpd_2 ... ok
-addsd_1 ... ok
-addsd_2 ... ok
-andpd_1 ... ok
-andpd_2 ... ok
-andnpd_1 ... ok
-andnpd_2 ... ok
-cmpeqpd_1 ... ok
-cmpeqpd_2 ... ok
-cmpltpd_1 ... ok
-cmpltpd_2 ... ok
-cmplepd_1 ... ok
-cmplepd_2 ... ok
-cmpunordpd_1 ... ok
-cmpunordpd_2 ... ok
-cmpneqpd_1 ... ok
-cmpneqpd_2 ... ok
-cmpnltpd_1 ... ok
-cmpnltpd_2 ... ok
-cmpnlepd_1 ... ok
-cmpnlepd_2 ... ok
-cmpordpd_1 ... ok
-cmpordpd_2 ... ok
-cmpeqsd_1 ... ok
-cmpeqsd_2 ... ok
-cmpltsd_1 ... ok
-cmpltsd_2 ... ok
-cmplesd_1 ... ok
-cmplesd_2 ... ok
-cmpunordsd_1 ... ok
-cmpunordsd_2 ... ok
-cmpneqsd_1 ... ok
-cmpneqsd_2 ... ok
-cmpnltsd_1 ... ok
-cmpnltsd_2 ... ok
-cmpnlesd_1 ... ok
-cmpnlesd_2 ... ok
-cmpordsd_1 ... ok
-cmpordsd_2 ... ok
-comisd_1 ... ok
-comisd_2 ... ok
-comisd_3 ... ok
-comisd_4 ... ok
-comisd_5 ... ok
-comisd_6 ... ok
-cvtdq2pd_1 ... ok
-cvtdq2pd_2 ... ok
-cvtdq2ps_1 ... ok
-cvtdq2ps_2 ... ok
-cvtpd2dq_1 ... ok
-cvtpd2dq_2 ... ok
-cvtpd2pi_1 ... ok
-cvtpd2pi_2 ... ok
-cvtpd2ps_1 ... ok
-cvtpd2ps_2 ... ok
-cvtpi2pd_1 ... ok
-cvtpi2pd_2 ... ok
-cvtps2dq_1 ... ok
-cvtps2dq_2 ... ok
-cvtps2pd_1 ... ok
-cvtps2pd_2 ... ok
-cvtsd2si_1 ... ok
-cvtsd2si_2 ... ok
-cvtsd2ss_1 ... ok
-cvtsd2ss_2 ... ok
-cvtsi2sd_1 ... ok
-cvtsi2sd_2 ... ok
-cvtss2sd_1 ... ok
-cvtss2sd_2 ... ok
-cvttpd2pi_1 ... ok
-cvttpd2pi_2 ... ok
-cvttpd2dq_1 ... ok
-cvttpd2dq_2 ... ok
-cvttps2dq_1 ... ok
-cvttps2dq_2 ... ok
-cvttsd2si_1 ... ok
-cvttsd2si_2 ... ok
-divpd_1 ... ok
-divpd_2 ... ok
-divsd_1 ... ok
-divsd_2 ... ok
-lfence_1 ... ok
-maxpd_1 ... ok
-maxpd_2 ... ok
-maxsd_1 ... ok
-maxsd_2 ... ok
-mfence_1 ... ok
-minpd_1 ... ok
-minpd_2 ... ok
-minsd_1 ... ok
-minsd_2 ... ok
-movapd_1 ... ok
-movapd_2 ... ok
-movd_1 ... ok
-movd_2 ... ok
-movd_3 ... ok
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- more_x86_fp.stderr.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.867734143 -0500
+++ more_x86_fp.stderr.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.528676077 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+valgrind: ./more_x86_fp: No such file or directory
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/more_x86_fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- more_x86_fp.stdout.exp 2011-06-02 21:40:45.866734234 -0500
+++ more_x86_fp.stdout.out 2011-06-02 21:46:39.507677980 -0500
@@ -1,175 +0,0 @@
-a=2.000000 b=3.000000 a+b=5.000000
-a=2.000000 b=3.000000 a-b=-1.000000
-a=2.000000 b=3.000000 a*b=6.000000
-a=2.000000 b=3.000000 a/b=0.666667
-a=2.000000 b=3.000000 fmod(a, b)=2.000000
-a=2.000000 sqrt(a)=1.414214
-a=2.000000 sin(a)=0.909297
-a=2.000000 cos(a)=-0.416147
-a=2.000000 tan(a)=-2.185040
-a=2.000000 log(a)=0.693147
-a=2.000000 exp(a)=7.389056
-a=2.000000 b=3.000000 atan2(a, b)=0.588003
-a=2.000000 asin(sin(a))=1.141593
-a=2.000000 acos(cos(a))=2.000000
-a=2.000000 atan(tan(a))=-1.141593
-a=1.400000 b=-5.000000 a+b=-3.600000
-a=1.400000 b=-5.000000 a-b=6.400000
-a=1.400000 b=-5.000000 a*b=-7.000000
-a=1.400000 b=-5.000000 a/b=-0.280000
-a=1.400000 b=-5.000000 fmod(a, b)=1.400000
-a=1.400000 sqrt(a)=1.183216
-a=1.400000 sin(a)=0.985450
-a=1.400000 cos(a)=0.169967
-a=1.400000 tan(a)=5.797884
-a=1.400000 log(a)=0.336472
...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-06-03 02:46:37
|
Nightly build on bristol ( x86_64, Fedora 15 ) Started at 2011-06-03 03:20:02 BST Ended at 2011-06-03 03:46:12 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 570 tests, 23 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc (stdoutB) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) cachegrind/tests/chdir (stderr) cachegrind/tests/clreq (stderr) cachegrind/tests/dlclose (stderr) cachegrind/tests/notpower2 (stderr) cachegrind/tests/wrap5 (stderr) cachegrind/tests/x86/fpu-28-108 (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2-hwpref (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2-use (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2-wb (stderr) callgrind/tests/notpower2 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-cache (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork1 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork2 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork3 (stderr) callgrind/tests/threads-use (stderr) none/tests/amd64/bug127521-64 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/bug127521-64 (stderr) none/tests/shell (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) exp-sgcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2011-06-03 02:39:03
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2011-06-03 03:10:10 BST Ended at 2011-06-03 03:38:41 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 569 tests, 4 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderr) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stdoutB) gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcwatchpoints (stdoutB) none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/amd64/sse4-64 (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |