You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
|
|
3
(1) |
4
(16) |
5
(6) |
6
(17) |
7
(18) |
8
(13) |
9
(7) |
|
10
(7) |
11
(15) |
12
(14) |
13
(10) |
14
(9) |
15
(17) |
16
(6) |
|
17
|
18
(18) |
19
(7) |
20
(20) |
21
(10) |
22
(8) |
23
(5) |
|
24
(2) |
25
(2) |
26
(10) |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-05 22:29:59
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-05 23:29:49 +0100 (Tue, 05 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 2060
Log:
Thumb instructions: instead of generating tons of lardy boilerplate IR
to compute the guarding condition for instructions, and then leaning
heavily on ir_opt to almost always fold it out, avoid generating it in
the first place if it's not necessary, as per the ITxxx optimisation
analysis. This reduces startup time of Thumb applications by 0%-30%
by reducing the amount of time the JIT has to spend translating. No
effect on ARM instructions since those don't require a complex IR
preamble to establish the gating condition.
Modified:
trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-10-04 09:34:46 UTC (rev 2059)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-10-05 22:29:49 UTC (rev 2060)
@@ -14017,6 +14017,10 @@
//UInt hwcaps = archinfo->hwcaps;
HChar dis_buf[128]; // big enough to hold LDMIA etc text
+ /* Summary result of the ITxxx backwards analysis: False == safe
+ but suboptimal. */
+ Bool guaranteedUnconditional = False;
+
/* What insn variants are we supporting today? */
//allow_VFP = (0 != (hwcaps & VEX_HWCAPS_ARM_VFP));
// etc etc
@@ -14117,7 +14121,7 @@
the instruction word, first for 16-bit insns, then for 32-bit
insns. */
- /* --- BEGIN optimisation --- */
+ /* --- BEGIN ITxxx optimisation analysis --- */
/* This is a crucial optimisation for the ITState boilerplate that
follows. Examine the 9 halfwords preceding this instruction,
and if we are absolutely sure that none of them constitute an
@@ -14156,7 +14160,7 @@
{
/* Summary result of this analysis: False == safe but
suboptimal. */
- Bool forceZ = False;
+ vassert(guaranteedUnconditional == False);
UInt pc = guest_R15_curr_instr_notENC;
vassert(0 == (pc & 1));
@@ -14165,7 +14169,7 @@
if (pageoff >= 18) {
/* It's safe to poke about in the 9 halfwords preceding this
insn. So, have a look at them. */
- forceZ = True; /* assume no 'it' insn found, till we do */
+ guaranteedUnconditional = True; /* assume no 'it' insn found, till we do */
UShort* hwp = (UShort*)(HWord)pc;
Int i;
@@ -14180,19 +14184,13 @@
where x can be anything, but y must be nonzero. */
if ((hwp[i] & 0xFF00) == 0xBF00 && (hwp[i] & 0xF) != 0) {
/* might be an 'it' insn. Play safe. */
- forceZ = False;
+ guaranteedUnconditional = False;
break;
}
}
}
- /* So, did we get lucky? */
- if (forceZ) {
- IRTemp t = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(t, mkU32(0));
- put_ITSTATE(t);
- }
}
- /* --- END optimisation --- */
+ /* --- END ITxxx optimisation analysis --- */
/* Generate the guarding condition for this insn, by examining
ITSTATE. Assign it to condT. Also, generate new
@@ -14203,75 +14201,178 @@
decode_success handle this, but in cases where the insn contains
a side exit, we have to update them before the exit. */
- IRTemp old_itstate = get_ITSTATE();
+ /* If the ITxxx optimisation analysis above could not prove that
+ this instruction is guaranteed unconditional, we insert a
+ lengthy IR preamble to compute the guarding condition at
+ runtime. If it can prove it (which obviously we hope is the
+ normal case) then we insert a minimal preamble, which is
+ equivalent to setting guest_ITSTATE to zero and then folding
+ that through the full preamble (which completely disappears). */
- IRTemp new_itstate = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(new_itstate, binop(Iop_Shr32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU8(8)));
+ IRTemp condT = IRTemp_INVALID;
+ IRTemp old_itstate = IRTemp_INVALID;
+ IRTemp new_itstate = IRTemp_INVALID;
+ IRTemp cond_AND_notInIT_T = IRTemp_INVALID;
- put_ITSTATE(new_itstate);
+ if (guaranteedUnconditional) {
+ /* BEGIN "partial eval { ITSTATE = 0; STANDARD_PREAMBLE; }" */
- /* Same strategy as for ARM insns: generate a condition temporary
- at this point (or IRTemp_INVALID, meaning
- unconditional). We leave it to lower-level instruction decoders
- to decide whether they can generate straight-line code, or
- whether they must generate a side exit before the instruction.
- condT :: Ity_I32 and is always either zero or one. */
- IRTemp condT1 = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(condT1,
- mk_armg_calculate_condition_dyn(
- binop(Iop_Xor32,
- binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU32(0xF0)),
- mkU32(0xE0))
- )
- );
+ // ITSTATE = 0 :: I32
+ IRTemp z32 = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(z32, mkU32(0));
+ put_ITSTATE(z32);
- /* This is a bit complex, but needed to make Memcheck understand
- that, if the condition in old_itstate[7:4] denotes AL (that is,
- if this instruction is to be executed unconditionally), then
- condT does not depend on the results of calling the helper.
+ // old_itstate = 0 :: I32
+ //
+ // old_itstate = get_ITSTATE();
+ old_itstate = z32; /* 0 :: I32 */
- We test explicitly for old_itstate[7:4] == AL ^ 0xE, and in that
- case set condT directly to 1. Else we use the results of the
- helper. Since old_itstate is always defined and because
- Memcheck does lazy V-bit propagation through Mux0X, this will
- cause condT to always be a defined 1 if the condition is 'AL'.
- From an execution semantics point of view this is irrelevant
- since we're merely duplicating part of the behaviour of the
- helper. But it makes it clear to Memcheck, in this case, that
- condT does not in fact depend on the contents of the condition
- code thunk. Without it, we get quite a lot of false errors.
+ // new_itstate = old_itstate >> 8
+ // = 0 >> 8
+ // = 0 :: I32
+ //
+ // new_itstate = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ // assign(new_itstate,
+ // binop(Iop_Shr32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU8(8)));
+ new_itstate = z32;
- So, just to clarify: from a straight semantics point of view, we
- can simply do "assign(condT, mkexpr(condT1))", and the simulator
- still runs fine. It's just that we get loads of false errors
- from Memcheck. */
- IRTemp condT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(condT, IRExpr_Mux0X(
- unop(Iop_32to8, binop(Iop_And32,
- mkexpr(old_itstate),
- mkU32(0xF0))),
- mkU32(1),
- mkexpr(condT1)
- ));
+ // ITSTATE = 0 :: I32(again)
+ //
+ // put_ITSTATE(new_itstate);
- /* Something we don't have in ARM: generate a 0 or 1 value
- indicating whether or not we are in an IT block (NB: 0 = in IT
- block, 1 = not in IT block). This is used to gate condition
- code updates in 16-bit Thumb instructions. */
- IRTemp notInITt = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(notInITt,
- binop(Iop_Xor32,
- binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU32(1)),
- mkU32(1)));
+ // condT1 = calc_cond_dyn( xor(and(old_istate,0xF0), 0xE0) )
+ // = calc_cond_dyn( xor(0,0xE0) )
+ // = calc_cond_dyn ( 0xE0 )
+ // = 1 :: I32
+ // Not that this matters, since the computed value is not used:
+ // see condT folding below
+ //
+ // IRTemp condT1 = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ // assign(condT1,
+ // mk_armg_calculate_condition_dyn(
+ // binop(Iop_Xor32,
+ // binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU32(0xF0)),
+ // mkU32(0xE0))
+ // )
+ // );
- /* Compute 'condT && notInITt' -- that is, the instruction is going
- to execute, and we're not in an IT block. This is the gating
- condition for updating condition codes in 16-bit Thumb
- instructions, except for CMP, CMN and TST. */
- IRTemp cond_AND_notInIT_T = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(cond_AND_notInIT_T,
- binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(notInITt), mkexpr(condT)));
+ // condT = 32to8(and32(old_itstate,0xF0)) == 0 ? 1 : condT1
+ // = 32to8(and32(0,0xF0)) == 0 ? 1 : condT1
+ // = 32to8(0) == 0 ? 1 : condT1
+ // = 0 == 0 ? 1 : condT1
+ // = 1
+ //
+ // condT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ // assign(condT, IRExpr_Mux0X(
+ // unop(Iop_32to8, binop(Iop_And32,
+ // mkexpr(old_itstate),
+ // mkU32(0xF0))),
+ // mkU32(1),
+ // mkexpr(condT1)
+ // ));
+ condT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(condT, mkU32(1));
+ // notInITt = xor32(and32(old_itstate, 1), 1)
+ // = xor32(and32(0, 1), 1)
+ // = xor32(0, 1)
+ // = 1 :: I32
+ //
+ // IRTemp notInITt = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ // assign(notInITt,
+ // binop(Iop_Xor32,
+ // binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU32(1)),
+ // mkU32(1)));
+
+ // cond_AND_notInIT_T = and32(notInITt, condT)
+ // = and32(1, 1)
+ // = 1
+ //
+ // cond_AND_notInIT_T = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ // assign(cond_AND_notInIT_T,
+ // binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(notInITt), mkexpr(condT)));
+ cond_AND_notInIT_T = condT; /* 1 :: I32 */
+
+ /* END "partial eval { ITSTATE = 0; STANDARD_PREAMBLE; }" */
+ } else {
+ /* BEGIN { STANDARD PREAMBLE; } */
+
+ old_itstate = get_ITSTATE();
+
+ new_itstate = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(new_itstate,
+ binop(Iop_Shr32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU8(8)));
+
+ put_ITSTATE(new_itstate);
+
+ /* Same strategy as for ARM insns: generate a condition
+ temporary at this point (or IRTemp_INVALID, meaning
+ unconditional). We leave it to lower-level instruction
+ decoders to decide whether they can generate straight-line
+ code, or whether they must generate a side exit before the
+ instruction. condT :: Ity_I32 and is always either zero or
+ one. */
+ IRTemp condT1 = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(condT1,
+ mk_armg_calculate_condition_dyn(
+ binop(Iop_Xor32,
+ binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU32(0xF0)),
+ mkU32(0xE0))
+ )
+ );
+
+ /* This is a bit complex, but needed to make Memcheck understand
+ that, if the condition in old_itstate[7:4] denotes AL (that
+ is, if this instruction is to be executed unconditionally),
+ then condT does not depend on the results of calling the
+ helper.
+
+ We test explicitly for old_itstate[7:4] == AL ^ 0xE, and in
+ that case set condT directly to 1. Else we use the results
+ of the helper. Since old_itstate is always defined and
+ because Memcheck does lazy V-bit propagation through Mux0X,
+ this will cause condT to always be a defined 1 if the
+ condition is 'AL'. From an execution semantics point of view
+ this is irrelevant since we're merely duplicating part of the
+ behaviour of the helper. But it makes it clear to Memcheck,
+ in this case, that condT does not in fact depend on the
+ contents of the condition code thunk. Without it, we get
+ quite a lot of false errors.
+
+ So, just to clarify: from a straight semantics point of view,
+ we can simply do "assign(condT, mkexpr(condT1))", and the
+ simulator still runs fine. It's just that we get loads of
+ false errors from Memcheck. */
+ condT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(condT, IRExpr_Mux0X(
+ unop(Iop_32to8, binop(Iop_And32,
+ mkexpr(old_itstate),
+ mkU32(0xF0))),
+ mkU32(1),
+ mkexpr(condT1)
+ ));
+
+ /* Something we don't have in ARM: generate a 0 or 1 value
+ indicating whether or not we are in an IT block (NB: 0 = in
+ IT block, 1 = not in IT block). This is used to gate
+ condition code updates in 16-bit Thumb instructions. */
+ IRTemp notInITt = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(notInITt,
+ binop(Iop_Xor32,
+ binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(old_itstate), mkU32(1)),
+ mkU32(1)));
+
+ /* Compute 'condT && notInITt' -- that is, the instruction is
+ going to execute, and we're not in an IT block. This is the
+ gating condition for updating condition codes in 16-bit Thumb
+ instructions, except for CMP, CMN and TST. */
+ cond_AND_notInIT_T = newTemp(Ity_I32);
+ assign(cond_AND_notInIT_T,
+ binop(Iop_And32, mkexpr(notInITt), mkexpr(condT)));
+ /* END { STANDARD PREAMBLE; } */
+ }
+
+
/* At this point:
* ITSTATE has been updated
* condT holds the guarding condition for this instruction (0 or 1),
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-10-05 08:05:00
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-10-05 02:32:21 EDT Ended at 2010-10-05 04:04:43 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 449 tests, 14 stderr failures, 11 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stderr) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-05 05:40:13
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-10-04 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-05 00:39:59 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 443 tests, 19 stderr failures, 6 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-05 00:03:26.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:39:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-05 00:03:26.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:39:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-05 00:03:26.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:39:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:29:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:30:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-05 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:30:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-05 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:30:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-05 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:30:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:31:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-10-05 00:26:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:16.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-10-05 00:26:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:19:12.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:19:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:20:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 281
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/capget.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- capget.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ capget.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:20:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
capget result:
-effective 0
-permitted 0
+effective 0x........
+permitted 0x........
inheritable 0
HEAP SUMMARY:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:20:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:21:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-05 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:21:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:21:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:23:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:24:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2010-10-05 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:24:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:27:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2010-10-05 00:03:22.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:27:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:27:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,23 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1979)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5731)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2010-10-05 00:27:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:27:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,19 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2010-10-05 00:27:50.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2010-10-05 00:27:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,22 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2010-10-05 00:03:21.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2010-10-05 00:27:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ap+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000bp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000cp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ep+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000fp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000011p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049fp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3cp+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0938p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7484p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7dp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-05 04:31:55
|
Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 9.8.0 i386 )
Started at 2010-10-04 23:05:00 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-04 23:31:37 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 434 tests, 70 stderr failures, 14 stdout failures, 9 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar (stderr)
memcheck/tests/null_socket (stdout)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/signal2 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/signal2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
massif/tests/peak (stderr)
massif/tests/peak (post)
massif/tests/peak2 (stderr)
massif/tests/peak2 (post)
massif/tests/realloc (stderr)
massif/tests/realloc (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (post)
none/tests/async-sigs (stderr)
none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stdout)
none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stderr)
none/tests/faultstatus (stderr)
none/tests/pending (stdout)
none/tests/pending (stderr)
none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stdout)
none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stderr)
none/tests/require-text-symbol-2 (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout)
helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg04_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared (stderr)
helgrind/tests/rwlock_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/rwlock_test (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc16_byterace (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc19_shadowmem (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc24_nonzero_sem (stderr)
drd/tests/bug-235681 (stderr)
drd/tests/hold_lock_1 (stderr)
drd/tests/hold_lock_2 (stderr)
drd/tests/monitor_example (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_broadcast (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race2 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race3 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached (stdout)
drd/tests/pth_detached (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stdout)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_race (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_test (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking (stderr)
drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr)
drd/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/trylock (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bug-235681.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug-235681.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ bug-235681.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-Done.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/hold_lock_1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hold_lock_1.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ hold_lock_1.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,17 +11,12 @@
by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
Locking rwlock exclusively ...
-Acquired at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_wrlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Lock on rwlock 0x........ was held during ... ms (threshold: 500 ms).
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Locking rwlock shared ...
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/hold_lock_2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hold_lock_2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ hold_lock_2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,12 @@
Locking mutex ...
Locking rwlock exclusively ...
-Locking rwlock shared ...
-Acquired at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_rdlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Lock on rwlock 0x........ was held during ... ms (threshold: 500 ms).
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/monitor_example.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- monitor_example.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ monitor_example.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-Finished successfully.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (monitor_example.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_broadcast.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_broadcast.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_broadcast.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,14 @@
-Done.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: csema_v (pth_broadcast.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_broadcast.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cancel_locked.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cancel_locked.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-Test finished.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- pth_cancel_locked.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cancel_locked.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,18 +1,14 @@
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
-Test finished.
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,15 +1,9 @@
-Thread 2:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cond_race.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race3.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race3.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func2 (pth_detached.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached.stdout.out 2010-10-04 23:30:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-..
+.
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func2 (pth_detached.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stdout.out 2010-10-04 23:30:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-....................
+..........
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.diff1
=================================================
--- pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.exp1 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,39 +1,9 @@
-Thread 3:
-Inconsistent association of condition variable and mutex: condition variable 0x........, mutexes 0x........ and 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: _pthread_cond_wait (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.exp2 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,39 +1,9 @@
-Thread 2:
-Inconsistent association of condition variable and mutex: condition variable 0x........, mutexes 0x........ and 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: _pthread_cond_wait (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
Statically initialized condition variable.
-Uninitialized condition variable.
-condition variable has not been initialized: cond 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_uninitialized_cond.c:?)
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_uninitialized_cond.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
-Thread 3:
-Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #? of thread 3
-Conflicting store by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #? of thread 3
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp2 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
-Thread 3:
-Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:17, in frame #? of thread 3
-Conflicting store by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:17, in frame #? of thread 3
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_test.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_test.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
-s_counter - expected_counter = 0
-s_grand_sum - expected_grand_sum = 0
-Finished.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_test.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_type_checking.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_type_checking.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,16 +1,10 @@
-Attempt to use a user-defined rwlock as a POSIX rwlock: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-Attempt to use a POSIX rwlock as a user-defined rwlock: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-Finished.
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-Reader-writer lock not locked by calling thread: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:35)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:24)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:24)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc17_sembar.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc17_sembar.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ tc17_sembar.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
starting
-done, result is 88, should be 88
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: gomp_barrier_wait (tc17_sembar.c:82)
+ by 0x........: child (tc17_sembar.c:171)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,63 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
- Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-04 23:18:50.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,86 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/trylock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- trylock.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:51.000000000 -0500
+++ trylock.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:31:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,20 +1,10 @@
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_wrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_trywrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_rdlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock().
-Attempt to lock for writing recursively (not allowed).
-Recursive writer locking not allowed: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_wrlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_trylock().
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_lock().
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_timedlock().
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_hbefore.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ annotate_hbefore.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (annotate_hbefore.c:277)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg01_all_ok.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ hg01_all_ok.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg01_all_ok.c:28)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg02_deadlock.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ hg02_deadlock.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -21,4 +21,11 @@
...
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg02_deadlock.c:38)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg03_inherit.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:26.000000000 -0500
+++ hg03_inherit.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,19 +1,10 @@
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:46)
-Thread #x is the program's root thread
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:49)
-Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
- at 0x........: t2 (hg03_inherit.c:28)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- This conflicts with a previous read of size 4 by thread #x
- at 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:60)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside shared[1],
- declared at hg03_inherit.c:11, in frame #x of thread x
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg04_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg04_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ hg04_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@
declared at hg04_race.c:6, in frame #x of thread x
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg04_race.c:23)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:48.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@
declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg05_race2.c:31)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg06_readshared.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ hg06_readshared.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:49.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg06_readshared.c:27)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:50.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,25 +1,10 @@
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:48)
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:47)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:46)
-Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:29)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:29)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
- declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #x of thread x
-
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/rwlock_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_test.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_test.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
-s_counter - expected_counter = 0
-s_grand_sum - expected_grand_sum = 0
-Finished.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_test.c:80)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc01_simple_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc01_simple_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,4 +25,11 @@
declared at tc01_simple_race.c:9
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc01_simple_race.c:30)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc02_simple_tls.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc02_simple_tls.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc02_simple_tls.c:30)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc03_re_excl.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc03_re_excl.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc03_re_excl.c:36)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc05_simple_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc05_simple_race.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,4 +25,11 @@
declared at tc05_simple_race.c:10
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc05_simple_race.c:38)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -43,4 +43,11 @@
declared at tc06_two_races.c:9
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc06_two_races.c:37)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -39,17 +39,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>__bsdthread_create</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -62,7 +52,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@*</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create</fn>
<dir>...</dir>
<file>hg_intercepts.c</file>
<line>...</line>
@@ -120,12 +110,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -174,12 +164,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -228,12 +218,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
@@ -282,12 +272,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc07_hbl1.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc07_hbl1.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc07_hbl1.c:92)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- tc07_hbl1.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc07_hbl1.stdout.out 2010-10-04 23:29:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-x = 2
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc08_hbl2.stderr.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc08_hbl2.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:29:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc08_hbl2.c:131)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- tc08_hbl2.stdout.exp 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc08_hbl2.stdout.out 2010-10-04 23:29:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
child: new value 6
-child: new value 10
-done, x = 10
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-04 23:18:27.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-04 23:30:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,56 +26,16 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
-Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
- ...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-05 02:52:52
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-10-05 03:05:06 BST Ended at 2010-10-05 03:52:34 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 551 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-05 02:40:12
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-10-05 03:10:04 BST Ended at 2010-10-05 03:39:56 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 558 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |