You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
|
|
3
(1) |
4
(16) |
5
(6) |
6
(17) |
7
(18) |
8
(13) |
9
(7) |
|
10
(7) |
11
(15) |
12
(14) |
13
(10) |
14
(9) |
15
(17) |
16
(6) |
|
17
|
18
(18) |
19
(7) |
20
(20) |
21
(10) |
22
(8) |
23
(5) |
|
24
(2) |
25
(2) |
26
(10) |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 19:15:41
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-11 20:15:33 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 11429
Log:
Remove some fluff detected by llvm-2.8 (clang):
- "*(int *)0 = " is apparently ignored by LLVM for who-knows-why
reason. Cast the zero to a volatile int * instead.
- remove an unused function that gcc failed to mention was unused
(why? because it was marked __attribute__((noreturn)) ?)
As an aside, clang/llvm-2.8 seemed to be able to successfully
compile Valgrind.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c
trunk/coregrind/m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c
trunk/coregrind/vg_preloaded.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c 2010-10-11 19:09:53 UTC (rev 11428)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf3.c 2010-10-11 19:15:33 UTC (rev 11429)
@@ -220,15 +220,6 @@
return &c->region_start_img[ c->region_next ];
}
-__attribute__((noreturn))
-static void failWith ( Cursor* c, HChar* str ) {
- vg_assert(c);
- vg_assert(c->barf);
- c->barf(str);
- /*NOTREACHED*/
- vg_assert(0);
-}
-
/* FIXME: document assumptions on endianness for
get_UShort/UInt/ULong. */
static inline UChar get_UChar ( Cursor* c ) {
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c 2010-10-11 19:09:53 UTC (rev 11428)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c 2010-10-11 19:15:33 UTC (rev 11429)
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@
{
VALGRIND_PRINTF_BACKTRACE("Program aborting because of call to %s\n", str);
_exit(99);
- *(int *)0 = 'x';
+ *(volatile int *)0 = 'x';
}
#define PANIC(soname, fnname) \
Modified: trunk/coregrind/vg_preloaded.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/vg_preloaded.c 2010-10-11 19:09:53 UTC (rev 11428)
+++ trunk/coregrind/vg_preloaded.c 2010-10-11 19:15:33 UTC (rev 11429)
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
VG_USERREQ__LIBC_FREERES_DONE,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
/*NOTREACHED*/
- *(int *)0 = 'x';
+ *(volatile int *)0 = 'x';
}
/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 19:10:01
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-11 20:09:53 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 11428
Log:
Enable support for sys_ppoll on arm-linux (Rodrigo Belem, rod...@op...).
See #253636.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-arm-linux.c
trunk/include/vki/vki-scnums-arm-linux.h
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-arm-linux.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-arm-linux.c 2010-10-11 18:55:24 UTC (rev 11427)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-arm-linux.c 2010-10-11 19:09:53 UTC (rev 11428)
@@ -1632,7 +1632,6 @@
PLAX_(__NR_shmget, sys_shmget), //307
PLAXY(__NR_shmctl, sys_shmctl), // 308
// LINX_(__NR_pselect6, sys_pselect6), //
-// LINXY(__NR_ppoll, sys_ppoll), // 309
// LINX_(__NR_unshare, sys_unshare), // 310
LINX_(__NR_set_robust_list, sys_set_robust_list), // 311
@@ -1663,7 +1662,8 @@
// correspond to what's in include/vki/vki-scnums-arm-linux.h.
// From here onwards, please ensure the numbers are correct.
- LINX_(__NR_pselect6, sys_pselect6), // 335
+ LINX_(__NR_pselect6, sys_pselect6), // 335
+ LINXY(__NR_ppoll, sys_ppoll), // 336
LINXY(__NR_signalfd4, sys_signalfd4), // 355
LINX_(__NR_eventfd2, sys_eventfd2), // 356
Modified: trunk/include/vki/vki-scnums-arm-linux.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/include/vki/vki-scnums-arm-linux.h 2010-10-11 18:55:24 UTC (rev 11427)
+++ trunk/include/vki/vki-scnums-arm-linux.h 2010-10-11 19:09:53 UTC (rev 11428)
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@
#define __NR_fchmodat 333
#define __NR_faccessat 334
#define __NR_pselect6 335 /* JRS 20100812: is this correct? */
- /* 336 for ppoll */
+#define __NR_ppoll 336
#define __NR_unshare 337
#define __NR_set_robust_list 338
#define __NR_get_robust_list 339
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 18:57:18
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-11 19:57:10 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 2064
Log:
Handle NOP.W (Thumb) and NOP (ARM). Partial fix for #253636.
Add a comment re conditionalisation of Thumb memory barrier insns.
Modified:
trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-10-11 18:03:13 UTC (rev 2063)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-10-11 18:57:10 UTC (rev 2064)
@@ -13808,6 +13808,12 @@
}
}
+ /* ------------------- NOP ------------------ */
+ if (0x0320F000 == (insn & 0x0FFFFFFF)) {
+ DIP("nop%s\n", nCC(INSN_COND));
+ goto decode_success;
+ }
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------- */
/* -- ARMv7 instructions -- */
/* ----------------------------------------------------------- */
@@ -17643,6 +17649,10 @@
/* -------------- v7 barrier insns -------------- */
if (INSN0(15,0) == 0xF3BF && (INSN1(15,0) & 0xFF0F) == 0x8F0F) {
+ /* XXX this isn't really right, is it? The generated IR does
+ them unconditionally. I guess it doesn't matter since it
+ doesn't do any harm to do them even when the guarding
+ condition is false -- it's just a performance loss. */
switch (INSN1(7,4)) {
case 0x4: /* DSB */
stmt( IRStmt_MBE(Imbe_Fence) );
@@ -17661,6 +17671,12 @@
}
}
+ /* ------------------- NOP ------------------ */
+ if (INSN0(15,0) == 0xF3AF && INSN1(15,0) == 0x8000) {
+ DIP("nop\n");
+ goto decode_success;
+ }
+
/* ----------------------------------------------------------- */
/* -- VFP (CP 10, CP 11) instructions (in Thumb mode) -- */
/* ----------------------------------------------------------- */
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 18:55:33
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-11 19:55:24 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 11427
Log:
Add tests for NOP cases.
Modified:
trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.c
trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.stdout.exp
trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.c
trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.stdout.exp
Modified: trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.c 2010-10-11 17:41:46 UTC (rev 11426)
+++ trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.c 2010-10-11 18:55:24 UTC (rev 11427)
@@ -905,5 +905,14 @@
TESTINST2("rev16 r0, r1", 0xbb6d14ec, r0, r1, 0);
TESTINST2("rev16 r0, r1", 0x68983cc9, r0, r1, 0);
+ printf("------------ NOP (begin) ------------\n");
+ printf("nop\n");
+ __asm__ __volatile__("nop" ::: "memory","cc");
+ printf("nopeq\n");
+ __asm__ __volatile__("nopeq" ::: "memory","cc");
+ printf("nopne\n");
+ __asm__ __volatile__("nopne" ::: "memory","cc");
+ printf("------------ NOP (end) ------------\n");
+
return 0;
}
Modified: trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.stdout.exp
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 17:41:46 UTC (rev 11426)
+++ trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intARM.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 18:55:24 UTC (rev 11427)
@@ -794,3 +794,8 @@
rev16 r0, r1 :: rd 0xb8e54b3d rm 0xe5b83d4b, carryin 0, cpsr 0x00000000
rev16 r0, r1 :: rd 0x6dbbec14 rm 0xbb6d14ec, carryin 0, cpsr 0x00000000
rev16 r0, r1 :: rd 0x9868c93c rm 0x68983cc9, carryin 0, cpsr 0x00000000
+------------ NOP (begin) ------------
+nop
+nopeq
+nopne
+------------ NOP (end) ------------
Modified: trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.c 2010-10-11 17:41:46 UTC (rev 11426)
+++ trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.c 2010-10-11 18:55:24 UTC (rev 11427)
@@ -5842,6 +5842,13 @@
TESTINST2("rev16 r8, r9", 0xbb6d14ec, r8, r9, 0);
TESTINST2("rev16 r8, r9", 0x68983cc9, r8, r9, 0);
+ printf("------------ NOP (begin) ------------\n");
+ printf("nop\n");
+ __asm__ __volatile__("nop" ::: "memory","cc");
+ printf("nop.w\n");
+ __asm__ __volatile__("nop.w" ::: "memory","cc");
+ printf("------------ NOP (end) ------------\n");
+
// plus whatever stuff we can throw in from the old ARM test program
old_main();
Modified: trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.stdout.exp
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 17:41:46 UTC (rev 11426)
+++ trunk/none/tests/arm/v6intThumb.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 18:55:24 UTC (rev 11427)
@@ -16638,6 +16638,10 @@
rev16 r8, r9 :: rd 0xb8e54b3d rm 0xe5b83d4b, c:v-in 0, cpsr 0xc0000000 NZ
rev16 r8, r9 :: rd 0x6dbbec14 rm 0xbb6d14ec, c:v-in 0, cpsr 0xc0000000 NZ
rev16 r8, r9 :: rd 0x9868c93c rm 0x68983cc9, c:v-in 0, cpsr 0xc0000000 NZ
+------------ NOP (begin) ------------
+nop
+nop.w
+------------ NOP (end) ------------
MOV
mov r0, r1 :: rd 0x00000001 rm 0x00000001, c:v-in 0, cpsr 0xc0000000 NZ
cpy r0, r1 :: rd 0x00000001 rm 0x00000001, c:v-in 0, cpsr 0xc0000000 NZ
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 18:03:23
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-10-11 19:03:13 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 2063
Log:
Fix bogus register constraints for ARM mode LDREX and STREX.
Derived from a patch by Rodrigo Belem <rod...@op...>
Partially fixes #253636.
Modified:
trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-10-06 20:47:22 UTC (rev 2062)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-10-11 18:03:13 UTC (rev 2063)
@@ -13287,7 +13287,7 @@
if (0x01900F9F == (insn & 0x0FF00FFF)) {
UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
- if (rT == 15 || rN == 15 || rT == 14 /* || (rT & 1)*/) {
+ if (rT == 15 || rN == 15) {
/* undecodable; fall through */
} else {
IRTemp res;
@@ -13313,8 +13313,7 @@
UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
UInt rD = INSN(15,12);
if (rT == 15 || rN == 15 || rD == 15
- || rT == 14 /* || (rT & 1)*/
- || rD == rT || rN == rT) {
+ || rD == rT || rD == rN) {
/* undecodable; fall through */
} else {
IRTemp resSC1, resSC32;
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 17:41:56
|
Author: sewardj Date: 2010-10-11 18:41:46 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010) New Revision: 11426 Log: Improve NEON instruction set tests, so as to run tests with different data in high and low d-register halves. (Dmitry Zhurikhin, zh...@is...) Modified: trunk/none/tests/arm/neon128.c trunk/none/tests/arm/neon128.stdout.exp trunk/none/tests/arm/neon64.c trunk/none/tests/arm/neon64.stdout.exp [... diff too large to include ...] |
|
From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2010-10-11 09:35:24
|
Nightly build on ocean ( Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS, x86_64 )
Started at 2010-10-11 02:00:01 PDT
Ended at 2010-10-11 02:35:08 PDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 557 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr)
helgrind/tests/pth_barrier3 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_barrier3 (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_barrier3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_barrier3.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:18:53.000000000 -0700
+++ pth_barrier3.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:31:48.000000000 -0700
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ERROR SUMMARY: 31 errors from 1 contexts
+ERROR SUMMARY: 31 errors from 31 contexts
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- bad_percentify.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-10-11 02:18:00.000000000 -0700
+++ bad_percentify.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:33:44.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,32 +1,29 @@
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:88)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:93)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:98)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:18:00.000000000 -0700
+++ supp.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:34:54.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Syscall param write(buf) is non-contiguous
- at 0x........: write (in /...libc...)
+ at 0x........: write (syscall-template.S:82)
by 0x........: main (supp.c:16)
First byte (0x........) is 3 bytes inside a 6-byte block alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/pth_barrier3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_barrier3.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ pth_barrier3.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:03.000000000 -0700
@@ -23,3 +23,573 @@
by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:21.000000000 -0700
@@ -40,16 +40,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>clone.S</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,11 +122,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -175,11 +177,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -229,11 +232,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
@@ -283,11 +287,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:40.000000000 -0700
@@ -71,12 +71,14 @@
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_wait failed
with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
@@ -86,12 +88,14 @@
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of pthread_broadcast_signal
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
@@ -142,6 +146,12 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -152,4 +162,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 20 errors from 20 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 21 errors from 21 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc27-amd64
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc27-amd64 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:40.000000000 -0700
@@ -71,12 +71,14 @@
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_wait failed
with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
@@ -86,12 +88,14 @@
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of pthread_broadcast_signal
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:17:57.000000000 -0700
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:29:52.000000000 -0700
@@ -2,31 +2,38 @@
Thread #x is the program's root thread
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with invalid mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:18:15.000000000 -0700
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:24:40.000000000 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/pth_barrier3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_barrier3.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:01:33.000000000 -0700
+++ pth_barrier3.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:14:29.000000000 -0700
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ERROR SUMMARY: 31 errors from 1 contexts
+ERROR SUMMARY: 31 errors from 31 contexts
=================================================
./valgrind-old/exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- bad_percentify.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-10-11 02:00:41.000000000 -0700
+++ bad_percentify.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:16:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,32 +1,29 @@
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:88)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:93)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
+ at 0x........: ...
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:98)
by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
+ Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 2 back from here
Actual: unknown
=================================================
./valgrind-old/exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:00:41.000000000 -0700
+++ supp.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:17:35.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Syscall param write(buf) is non-contiguous
- at 0x........: write (in /...libc...)
+ at 0x........: write (syscall-template.S:82)
by 0x........: main (supp.c:16)
First byte (0x........) is 3 bytes inside a 6-byte block alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/pth_barrier3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_barrier3.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ pth_barrier3.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:11:47.000000000 -0700
@@ -23,3 +23,573 @@
by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:84)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
+
+Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+ at 0x........: threadfunc (pth_barrier.c:57)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: barriers_and_races (pth_barrier.c:72)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_barrier.c:107)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:07.000000000 -0700
@@ -40,16 +40,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>clone.S</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,11 +122,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -175,11 +177,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -229,11 +232,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
@@ -283,11 +287,12 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:09.000000000 -0700
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:09.000000000 -0700
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:09.000000000 -0700
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:27.000000000 -0700
@@ -71,12 +71,14 @@
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_wait failed
with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
@@ -86,12 +88,14 @@
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of pthread_broadcast_signal
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
@@ -142,6 +146,12 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -152,4 +162,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 20 errors from 20 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 21 errors from 21 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc27-amd64
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc27-amd64 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:27.000000000 -0700
@@ -71,12 +71,14 @@
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_wait failed
with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:147)
@@ -86,12 +88,14 @@
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of pthread_broadcast_signal
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:165)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:00:38.000000000 -0700
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:12:40.000000000 -0700
@@ -2,31 +2,38 @@
Thread #x is the program's root thread
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with invalid mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_switch.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 02:00:56.000000000 -0700
+++ stack_switch.stderr.out 2010-10-11 02:07:29.000000000 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Syscall param clone(child_tidptr) contains uninitialised byte(s)
+ ...
+
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-10-11 08:02:21
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-10-11 02:31:32 EDT Ended at 2010-10-11 04:02:01 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 449 tests, 14 stderr failures, 11 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stderr) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Christian B. <bor...@de...> - 2010-10-11 07:25:18
|
There are more failures when the test uses memcheck instead of nullgrind: accept01, getsockname01 and getpeername01 fail with something like --18618-- VALGRIND INTERNAL ERROR: Valgrind received a signal 11 (SIGSEGV) - exiting --18618-- si_code=1; Faulting address: 0x0; sp: 0x403b6a9d0 valgrind: the 'impossible' happened: Killed by fatal signal ==18618== at 0x401074328: vgModuleLocal_buf_and_len_pre_check (syswrap-generic.c:1000) ==18618== by 0x40107464B: vgModuleLocal_generic_PRE_sys_getpeername (syswrap-generic.c:1493) ==18618== by 0x401073A53: vgPlain_client_syscall (syswrap-main.c:1490) ==18618== by 0x40106F963: handle_syscall (scheduler.c:899) The attached patch fixes the problem but the accept01 test also shows that I should not use ML_(valid_client_addr) but VG_(am_is_valid_for_client) instead for my first patch, since we cannot dereference memory that belongs to a reservation. I will attach this patch to the bugzilla and will also replace the other one. (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253383) |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-10-11 07:04:16
|
Author: bart Date: 2010-10-11 08:04:07 +0100 (Mon, 11 Oct 2010) New Revision: 11425 Log: none/tests/ppc*/jm-insns.c: Minor simplification. Modified: trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c Modified: trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c =================================================================== --- trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c 2010-10-10 18:59:07 UTC (rev 11424) +++ trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c 2010-10-11 07:04:07 UTC (rev 11425) @@ -181,11 +181,7 @@ #undef uint32_t #undef uint64_t #define uint32_t unsigned int -#ifndef __powerpc64__ #define uint64_t unsigned long long -#else -#define uint64_t unsigned long -#endif /* __powerpc64__ */ #ifndef __powerpc64__ typedef uint32_t HWord_t; |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-11 05:40:12
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-10-10 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-11 00:39:58 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 443 tests, 19 stderr failures, 6 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/testVMX (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-11 00:03:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:39:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-11 00:03:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:39:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-11 00:03:25.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:39:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:06.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:29:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:06.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:30:16.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-11 00:03:06.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:30:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-11 00:03:06.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:30:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-11 00:03:06.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:30:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:06.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:31:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-10-11 00:26:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:14.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-10-11 00:26:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:19:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:19:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:20:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 281
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/capget.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- capget.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:12.000000000 -0500
+++ capget.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:20:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
capget result:
-effective 0
-permitted 0
+effective 0x........
+permitted 0x........
inheritable 0
HEAP SUMMARY:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:12.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:20:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:21:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:21:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:21:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:23:45.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:24:24.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2010-10-11 00:03:13.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:24:24.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:20.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:27:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2010-10-11 00:03:20.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:27:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:19.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:27:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,23 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1990)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5742)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:19.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2010-10-11 00:27:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:19.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:27:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,19 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:19.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2010-10-11 00:27:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:19.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2010-10-11 00:27:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,22 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2010-10-11 00:03:19.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2010-10-11 00:27:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ap+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000bp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000cp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ep+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000fp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000011p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049fp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3cp+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0938p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7484p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7dp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-10-11 04:32:07
|
Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 9.8.0 i386 )
Started at 2010-10-10 23:05:00 CDT
Ended at 2010-10-10 23:31:47 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 434 tests, 70 stderr failures, 14 stdout failures, 9 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/darwin/scalar (stderr)
memcheck/tests/null_socket (stdout)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/signal2 (stdout)
memcheck/tests/signal2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
massif/tests/peak (stderr)
massif/tests/peak (post)
massif/tests/peak2 (stderr)
massif/tests/peak2 (post)
massif/tests/realloc (stderr)
massif/tests/realloc (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_0_10 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_10_10 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_0 (post)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (stderr)
massif/tests/thresholds_5_10 (post)
none/tests/async-sigs (stderr)
none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stdout)
none/tests/coolo_sigaction (stderr)
none/tests/faultstatus (stderr)
none/tests/pending (stdout)
none/tests/pending (stderr)
none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stdout)
none/tests/pth_blockedsig (stderr)
none/tests/require-text-symbol-2 (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stdout)
none/tests/x86/badseg (stderr)
none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout)
helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg04_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared (stderr)
helgrind/tests/rwlock_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/rwlock_test (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc11_XCHG (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc16_byterace (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc19_shadowmem (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stdout)
helgrind/tests/tc21_pthonce (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc24_nonzero_sem (stderr)
drd/tests/bug-235681 (stderr)
drd/tests/hold_lock_1 (stderr)
drd/tests/hold_lock_2 (stderr)
drd/tests/monitor_example (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_broadcast (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race2 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_cond_race3 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached (stdout)
drd/tests/pth_detached (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stdout)
drd/tests/pth_detached2 (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_race (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_test (stderr)
drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking (stderr)
drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial (stderr)
drd/tests/tc17_sembar (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/trylock (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/bug-235681.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bug-235681.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ bug-235681.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-Done.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/hold_lock_1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hold_lock_1.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ hold_lock_1.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:50.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,17 +11,12 @@
by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
Locking rwlock exclusively ...
-Acquired at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_wrlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Lock on rwlock 0x........ was held during ... ms (threshold: 500 ms).
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Locking rwlock shared ...
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/hold_lock_2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hold_lock_2.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ hold_lock_2.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,12 @@
Locking mutex ...
Locking rwlock exclusively ...
-Locking rwlock shared ...
-Acquired at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_rdlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Lock on rwlock 0x........ was held during ... ms (threshold: 500 ms).
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (hold_lock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/monitor_example.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- monitor_example.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ monitor_example.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-Finished successfully.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (monitor_example.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_broadcast.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_broadcast.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_broadcast.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,14 @@
-Done.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: csema_v (pth_broadcast.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_broadcast.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cancel_locked.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cancel_locked.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-Test finished.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cancel_locked.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- pth_cancel_locked.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cancel_locked.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,18 +1,14 @@
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-Mutex still locked at thread exit: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_join (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread (pth_cancel_locked.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
-Test finished.
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,15 +1,9 @@
-Thread 2:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cond_race.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_cond_race3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_cond_race3.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_cond_race3.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: new_sem_from_pool (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func (pth_cond_race.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func2 (pth_detached.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached.stdout.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached.stdout.out 2010-10-10 23:31:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-..
+.
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_detach (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: thread_func2 (pth_detached.c:?)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_detached2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- pth_detached2.stdout.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_detached2.stdout.out 2010-10-10 23:31:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +1 @@
-....................
+..........
\ No newline at end of file
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.diff1
=================================================
--- pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.exp1 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,39 +1,9 @@
-Thread 3:
-Inconsistent association of condition variable and mutex: condition variable 0x........, mutexes 0x........ and 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: _pthread_cond_wait (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.exp2 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,39 +1,9 @@
-Thread 2:
-Inconsistent association of condition variable and mutex: condition variable 0x........, mutexes 0x........ and 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: thread_func (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: _pthread_cond_wait (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_inconsistent_cond_wait.c:?)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_uninitialized_cond.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:12.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
Statically initialized condition variable.
-Uninitialized condition variable.
-condition variable has not been initialized: cond 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (pth_uninitialized_cond.c:?)
-Done.
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_uninitialized_cond.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
-Thread 3:
-Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #? of thread 3
-Conflicting store by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #? of thread 3
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp2 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
-Thread 3:
-Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:17, in frame #? of thread 3
-Conflicting store by thread 3 at 0x........ size 4
- at 0x........: thread (rwlock_race.c:?)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
-declared at rwlock_race.c:17, in frame #? of thread 3
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_test.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_test.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
-s_counter - expected_counter = 0
-s_grand_sum - expected_grand_sum = 0
-Finished.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_test.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/rwlock_type_checking.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_type_checking.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_type_checking.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,16 +1,10 @@
-Attempt to use a user-defined rwlock as a POSIX rwlock: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-Attempt to use a POSIX rwlock as a user-defined rwlock: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (rwlock_type_checking.c:?)
-Finished.
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ tc12_rwl_trivial.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-Reader-writer lock not locked by calling thread: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:35)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:24)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (tc12_rwl_trivial.c:24)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc17_sembar.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc17_sembar.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ tc17_sembar.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
starting
-done, result is 88, should be 88
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: gomp_barrier_wait (tc17_sembar.c:82)
+ by 0x........: child (tc17_sembar.c:171)
+ by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ by 0x........: thread_start (in /...libc...)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,63 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
- Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,86 +1,9 @@
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/trylock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- trylock.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:55.000000000 -0500
+++ trylock.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:31:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,20 +1,10 @@
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_wrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_trywrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_rdlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock().
-Locking rwlock via pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock().
-Attempt to lock for writing recursively (not allowed).
-Recursive writer locking not allowed: rwlock 0x.........
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_wrlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_trylock().
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_lock().
-Locking mutex via pthread_mutex_timedlock().
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: main (trylock.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/annotate_hbefore.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- annotate_hbefore.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ annotate_hbefore.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (annotate_hbefore.c:277)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg01_all_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg01_all_ok.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ hg01_all_ok.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg01_all_ok.c:28)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg02_deadlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg02_deadlock.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ hg02_deadlock.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -21,4 +21,11 @@
...
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg02_deadlock.c:38)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg03_inherit.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg03_inherit.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ hg03_inherit.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,19 +1,10 @@
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:46)
-Thread #x is the program's root thread
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:49)
-Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
- at 0x........: t2 (hg03_inherit.c:28)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- This conflicts with a previous read of size 4 by thread #x
- at 0x........: main (hg03_inherit.c:60)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside shared[1],
- declared at hg03_inherit.c:11, in frame #x of thread x
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg04_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg04_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ hg04_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@
declared at hg04_race.c:6, in frame #x of thread x
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg04_race.c:23)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@
declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg05_race2.c:31)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg06_readshared.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg06_readshared.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ hg06_readshared.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (hg06_readshared.c:27)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/rwlock_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:29:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,25 +1,10 @@
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:48)
-Thread #x was created
- ...
- by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:47)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_race.c:46)
-Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:29)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
- at 0x........: thread_func (rwlock_race.c:29)
- by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "s_racy"
- declared at rwlock_race.c:18, in frame #x of thread x
-
-Result: 2
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/rwlock_test.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- rwlock_test.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ rwlock_test.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
-s_counter - expected_counter = 0
-s_grand_sum - expected_grand_sum = 0
-Finished.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (rwlock_test.c:80)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc01_simple_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc01_simple_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc01_simple_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,4 +25,11 @@
declared at tc01_simple_race.c:9
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc01_simple_race.c:30)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc02_simple_tls.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc02_simple_tls.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc02_simple_tls.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc02_simple_tls.c:30)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc03_re_excl.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc03_re_excl.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc03_re_excl.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc03_re_excl.c:36)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc05_simple_race.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc05_simple_race.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc05_simple_race.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,4 +25,11 @@
declared at tc05_simple_race.c:10
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc05_simple_race.c:38)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -43,4 +43,11 @@
declared at tc06_two_races.c:9
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc06_two_races.c:37)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -39,17 +39,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_clone</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>__bsdthread_create</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -62,7 +52,7 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@*</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create</fn>
<dir>...</dir>
<file>hg_intercepts.c</file>
<line>...</line>
@@ -120,12 +110,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -174,12 +164,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot1"</auxwhat>
@@ -228,12 +218,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
@@ -282,12 +272,12 @@
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <fn>_pthread_start</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>clone</fn>
+ <fn>thread_start</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
<auxwhat>Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprot2"</auxwhat>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc07_hbl1.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc07_hbl1.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc07_hbl1.c:92)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc07_hbl1.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- tc07_hbl1.stdout.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc07_hbl1.stdout.out 2010-10-10 23:30:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-x = 2
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc08_hbl2.stderr.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc08_hbl2.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc08_hbl2.c:131)
+
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc08_hbl2.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- tc08_hbl2.stdout.exp 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc08_hbl2.stdout.out 2010-10-10 23:30:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
child: new value 6
-child: new value 10
-done, x = 10
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-10-10 23:18:35.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-10-10 23:30:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,56 +26,16 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
+ General Protection Fault
+ at 0x........: misaligned_stack_error (in /usr/lib/dyld)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join$UNIX2003 (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_join* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
-Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
- ...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-11 02:57:28
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-10-11 03:05:07 BST Ended at 2010-10-11 03:57:09 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 551 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-11 02:53:52
|
Nightly build on vauxhall ( x86_64, Fedora 13 ) Started at 2010-10-11 03:20:04 BST Ended at 2010-10-11 03:53:23 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 547 tests, 10 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_atomic (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_rwlock (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_semaphore (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 547 tests, 10 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) drd/tests/pth_detached_sem (stdout) drd/tests/qt4_atomic (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_mutex (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_rwlock (stderr) drd/tests/qt4_semaphore (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Mon Oct 11 03:36:34 2010 --- new.short Mon Oct 11 03:53:23 2010 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 547 tests, 10 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 547 tests, 10 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/stack_switch (stderr) *************** *** 13,15 **** helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) - drd/tests/pth_detached_sem (stdout) drd/tests/qt4_atomic (stderr) --- 13,14 ---- |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-10-11 02:39:07
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-10-11 03:10:04 BST Ended at 2010-10-11 03:38:46 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 558 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |