You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(11) |
2
(26) |
3
(15) |
4
(4) |
|
5
(2) |
6
(7) |
7
(6) |
8
(22) |
9
(15) |
10
(13) |
11
(8) |
|
12
(6) |
13
(4) |
14
(9) |
15
(5) |
16
(2) |
17
(7) |
18
(7) |
|
19
(8) |
20
(14) |
21
(7) |
22
(21) |
23
(12) |
24
(12) |
25
(6) |
|
26
(6) |
27
(12) |
28
(17) |
29
(8) |
30
(8) |
|
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-23 22:06:10
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-09-23 23:05:59 +0100 (Thu, 23 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 11377
Log:
On arm-linux, add r7 to the set of registers that the CFI unwinder
knows how to unwind. This is important when unwinding Thumb code
the CFA is often stated as being at some offset from r7.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/debuginfo.c
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/priv_storage.h
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/storage.c
trunk/coregrind/m_libcassert.c
trunk/coregrind/m_machine.c
trunk/coregrind/m_signals.c
trunk/coregrind/m_stacktrace.c
trunk/coregrind/pub_core_basics.h
trunk/coregrind/pub_core_debuginfo.h
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/debuginfo.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/debuginfo.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/debuginfo.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -1944,10 +1944,10 @@
case Creg_IA_SP: return eec->uregs->xsp;
case Creg_IA_BP: return eec->uregs->xbp;
# elif defined(VGA_arm)
+ case Creg_ARM_R15: return eec->uregs->r15;
+ case Creg_ARM_R14: return eec->uregs->r14;
case Creg_ARM_R13: return eec->uregs->r13;
case Creg_ARM_R12: return eec->uregs->r12;
- case Creg_ARM_R15: return eec->uregs->r15;
- case Creg_ARM_R14: return eec->uregs->r14;
# elif defined(VGA_ppc32) || defined(VGA_ppc64)
# else
# error "Unsupported arch"
@@ -2155,6 +2155,9 @@
case CFIC_ARM_R11REL:
cfa = cfsi->cfa_off + uregs->r11;
break;
+ case CFIC_ARM_R7REL:
+ cfa = cfsi->cfa_off + uregs->r7;
+ break;
# elif defined(VGA_ppc32) || defined(VGA_ppc64)
# else
# error "Unsupported arch"
@@ -2221,7 +2224,7 @@
For x86 and amd64, the unwound registers are: {E,R}IP,
{E,R}SP, {E,R}BP.
- For arm, the unwound registers are: R11 R12 R13 R14 R15.
+ For arm, the unwound registers are: R7 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15.
*/
Bool VG_(use_CF_info) ( /*MOD*/D3UnwindRegs* uregsHere,
Addr min_accessible,
@@ -2310,6 +2313,7 @@
COMPUTE(uregsPrev.r13, uregsHere->r13, cfsi->r13_how, cfsi->r13_off);
COMPUTE(uregsPrev.r12, uregsHere->r12, cfsi->r12_how, cfsi->r12_off);
COMPUTE(uregsPrev.r11, uregsHere->r11, cfsi->r11_how, cfsi->r11_off);
+ COMPUTE(uregsPrev.r7, uregsHere->r7, cfsi->r7_how, cfsi->r7_off);
# elif defined(VGA_ppc32) || defined(VGA_ppc64)
# else
# error "Unknown arch"
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/priv_storage.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/priv_storage.h 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/priv_storage.h 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -130,15 +130,16 @@
CFIC_R13REL -> r13 + cfa_off
CFIC_R12REL -> r12 + cfa_off
CFIC_R11REL -> r11 + cfa_off
+ CFIC_R7REL -> r7 + cfa_off
CFIR_EXPR -> expr whose index is in cfa_off
- old_r14/r13/r12/r11/ra
- = case r14/r13/r12/r11/ra_how of
+ old_r14/r13/r12/r11/r7/ra
+ = case r14/r13/r12/r11/r7/ra_how of
CFIR_UNKNOWN -> we don't know, sorry
- CFIR_SAME -> same as it was before (r14/r13/r12/r11 only)
- CFIR_CFAREL -> cfa + r14/r13/r12/r11/ra_off
- CFIR_MEMCFAREL -> *( cfa + r14/r13/r12/r11/ra_off )
- CFIR_EXPR -> expr whose index is in r14/r13/r12/r11/ra_off
+ CFIR_SAME -> same as it was before (r14/r13/r12/r11/r7 only)
+ CFIR_CFAREL -> cfa + r14/r13/r12/r11/r7/ra_off
+ CFIR_MEMCFAREL -> *( cfa + r14/r13/r12/r11/r7/ra_off )
+ CFIR_EXPR -> expr whose index is in r14/r13/r12/r11/r7/ra_off
*/
#define CFIC_IA_SPREL ((UChar)1)
@@ -147,7 +148,8 @@
#define CFIC_ARM_R13REL ((UChar)4)
#define CFIC_ARM_R12REL ((UChar)5)
#define CFIC_ARM_R11REL ((UChar)6)
-#define CFIC_EXPR ((UChar)7) /* all targets */
+#define CFIC_ARM_R7REL ((UChar)7)
+#define CFIC_EXPR ((UChar)8) /* all targets */
#define CFIR_UNKNOWN ((UChar)64)
#define CFIR_SAME ((UChar)65)
@@ -181,12 +183,14 @@
UChar r13_how; /* a CFIR_ value */
UChar r12_how; /* a CFIR_ value */
UChar r11_how; /* a CFIR_ value */
+ UChar r7_how; /* a CFIR_ value */
Int cfa_off;
Int ra_off;
Int r14_off;
Int r13_off;
Int r12_off;
Int r11_off;
+ Int r7_off;
}
DiCfSI;
#elif defined(VGA_ppc32) || defined(VGA_ppc64)
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -2059,6 +2059,7 @@
/* ctx->state[j].reg[13].tag = RR_Same; */
ctx->state[j].reg[14].tag = RR_Same;
ctx->state[j].reg[12].tag = RR_Same;
+ ctx->state[j].reg[7].tag = RR_Same;
/* this can't be right though: R12 (IP) isn't callee saved. */
# endif
}
@@ -2163,6 +2164,11 @@
si->cfa_how = CFIC_ARM_R11REL;
si->cfa_off = ctxs->cfa_off;
}
+ else
+ if (ctxs->cfa_is_regoff && ctxs->cfa_reg == 7/*??_REG*/) {
+ si->cfa_how = CFIC_ARM_R7REL;
+ si->cfa_off = ctxs->cfa_off;
+ }
# endif
else {
why = 1;
@@ -2257,6 +2263,9 @@
SUMMARISE_HOW(si->r11_how, si->r11_off,
ctxs->reg[11/*FP_REG*/] );
+ SUMMARISE_HOW(si->r7_how, si->r7_off,
+ ctxs->reg[7] );
+
if (ctxs->reg[14/*LR*/].tag == RR_Same
&& ctx->ra_reg == 14/*as we expect it always to be*/) {
/* Generate a trivial CfiExpr, which merely says "r14". First
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/storage.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/storage.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/storage.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -141,6 +141,9 @@
case CFIC_ARM_R11REL:
VG_(printf)("let cfa=oldR11+%d", si->cfa_off);
break;
+ case CFIC_ARM_R7REL:
+ VG_(printf)("let cfa=oldR7+%d", si->cfa_off);
+ break;
case CFIC_EXPR:
VG_(printf)("let cfa={");
ML_(ppCfiExpr)(exprs, si->cfa_off);
@@ -166,6 +169,8 @@
SHOW_HOW(si->r12_how, si->r12_off);
VG_(printf)(" R11=");
SHOW_HOW(si->r11_how, si->r11_off);
+ VG_(printf)(" R7=");
+ SHOW_HOW(si->r7_how, si->r7_off);
# elif defined(VGA_ppc32) || defined(VGA_ppc64)
# else
# error "Unknown arch"
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_libcassert.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_libcassert.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_libcassert.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -116,13 +116,14 @@
}
#elif defined(VGP_arm_linux)
# define GET_STARTREGS(srP) \
- { UInt block[5]; \
+ { UInt block[6]; \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"str r15, [%0, #+0];" \
"str r14, [%0, #+4];" \
"str r13, [%0, #+8];" \
"str r12, [%0, #+12];" \
"str r11, [%0, #+16];" \
+ "str r7, [%0, #+20];" \
: /* out */ \
: /* in */ "r"(&block[0]) \
: /* trash */ "memory" \
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@
(srP)->misc.ARM.r14 = block[2]; \
(srP)->misc.ARM.r12 = block[3]; \
(srP)->misc.ARM.r11 = block[4]; \
+ (srP)->misc.ARM.r7 = block[5]; \
}
#else
# error Unknown platform
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_machine.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_machine.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_machine.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@
= VG_(threads)[tid].arch.vex.guest_R12;
regs->misc.ARM.r11
= VG_(threads)[tid].arch.vex.guest_R11;
+ regs->misc.ARM.r7
+ = VG_(threads)[tid].arch.vex.guest_R7;
# else
# error "Unknown arch"
# endif
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_signals.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_signals.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_signals.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@
(srP)->misc.ARM.r14 = (uc)->uc_mcontext.arm_lr; \
(srP)->misc.ARM.r12 = (uc)->uc_mcontext.arm_ip; \
(srP)->misc.ARM.r11 = (uc)->uc_mcontext.arm_fp; \
+ (srP)->misc.ARM.r7 = (uc)->uc_mcontext.arm_r7; \
}
#elif defined(VGP_ppc32_aix5)
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_stacktrace.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_stacktrace.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_stacktrace.c 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -593,11 +593,12 @@
vg_assert(sizeof(Addr) == sizeof(void*));
D3UnwindRegs uregs;
- uregs.r15 = startRegs->r_pc;
+ uregs.r15 = startRegs->r_pc & 0xFFFFFFFE;
uregs.r14 = startRegs->misc.ARM.r14;
uregs.r13 = startRegs->r_sp;
uregs.r12 = startRegs->misc.ARM.r12;
uregs.r11 = startRegs->misc.ARM.r11;
+ uregs.r7 = startRegs->misc.ARM.r7;
Addr fp_min = uregs.r13;
/* Snaffle IPs from the client's stack into ips[0 .. max_n_ips-1],
@@ -612,7 +613,7 @@
fp_max -= sizeof(Addr);
if (debug)
- VG_(printf)("max_n_ips=%d fp_min=0x%lx fp_max_orig=0x%lx, "
+ VG_(printf)("\nmax_n_ips=%d fp_min=0x%lx fp_max_orig=0x%lx, "
"fp_max=0x%lx r15=0x%lx r13=0x%lx\n",
max_n_ips, fp_min, fp_max_orig, fp_max,
uregs.r15, uregs.r13);
@@ -652,11 +653,11 @@
if (VG_(use_CF_info)( &uregs, fp_min, fp_max )) {
if (sps) sps[i] = uregs.r13;
if (fps) fps[i] = 0;
- ips[i++] = uregs.r15 -1;
+ ips[i++] = (uregs.r15 & 0xFFFFFFFE) - 1;
if (debug)
VG_(printf)("USING CFI: r15: 0x%lx, r13: 0x%lx\n",
uregs.r15, uregs.r13);
- uregs.r15 = uregs.r15 - 1;
+ uregs.r15 = (uregs.r15 & 0xFFFFFFFE) - 1;
continue;
}
/* No luck. We have to give up. */
Modified: trunk/coregrind/pub_core_basics.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/pub_core_basics.h 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/pub_core_basics.h 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
UInt r14;
UInt r12;
UInt r11;
+ UInt r7;
} ARM;
} misc;
}
Modified: trunk/coregrind/pub_core_debuginfo.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/pub_core_debuginfo.h 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
+++ trunk/coregrind/pub_core_debuginfo.h 2010-09-23 22:05:59 UTC (rev 11377)
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
D3UnwindRegs;
#elif defined(VGA_arm)
typedef
- struct { Addr r15; Addr r14; Addr r13; Addr r12; Addr r11; }
+ struct { Addr r15; Addr r14; Addr r13; Addr r12; Addr r11; Addr r7; }
D3UnwindRegs;
#elif defined(VGA_ppc32) || defined(VGA_ppc64)
typedef
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-23 13:24:57
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-09-23 14:24:48 +0100 (Thu, 23 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 11376
Log:
DW_CFA_advance_loc{,1,2,4} fail to multiply the delta by
code_alignment_factor, thereby assuming it is 1. This happens to be
OK on amd64-linux and s390x-linux because it really is 1, but on
arm-linux it is 2, and hence the boundaries between code-unwind areas
are simply wrong after any of DW_CFA_advance_loc{,1,2,4} are
processed. This patch provides the obvious fix.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c 2010-09-23 11:02:48 UTC (rev 11375)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c 2010-09-23 13:24:48 UTC (rev 11376)
@@ -2852,6 +2852,7 @@
ctxs = &ctx->state[ctx->state_sp];
if (hi2 == DW_CFA_advance_loc) {
delta = (UInt)lo6;
+ delta *= ctx->code_a_f;
ctx->loc += delta;
if (di->ddump_frames)
VG_(printf)(" DW_CFA_advance_loc: %d to %08lx\n",
@@ -2909,6 +2910,7 @@
break;
case DW_CFA_advance_loc1:
delta = (UInt)read_UChar(&instr[i]); i+= sizeof(UChar);
+ delta *= ctx->code_a_f;
ctx->loc += delta;
if (di->ddump_frames)
VG_(printf)(" DW_CFA_advance_loc1: %d to %08lx\n",
@@ -2916,6 +2918,7 @@
break;
case DW_CFA_advance_loc2:
delta = (UInt)read_UShort(&instr[i]); i+= sizeof(UShort);
+ delta *= ctx->code_a_f;
ctx->loc += delta;
if (di->ddump_frames)
VG_(printf)(" DW_CFA_advance_loc2: %d to %08lx\n",
@@ -2923,6 +2926,7 @@
break;
case DW_CFA_advance_loc4:
delta = (UInt)read_UInt(&instr[i]); i+= sizeof(UInt);
+ delta *= ctx->code_a_f;
ctx->loc += delta;
if (di->ddump_frames)
VG_(printf)(" DW_CFA_advance_loc4: %d to %08lx\n",
@@ -3065,7 +3069,7 @@
ctxs->cfa_reg = reg;
/* ->cfa_off unchanged */
if (di->ddump_frames)
- VG_(printf)(" DW_CFA_def_cfa_reg: r%d\n", (Int)reg );
+ VG_(printf)(" DW_CFA_def_cfa_register: r%d\n", (Int)reg );
break;
case DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset:
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-23 11:02:57
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-09-23 12:02:48 +0100 (Thu, 23 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 11375
Log:
arm-linux: zero out the least significant bit of R15 that we
ptrace into the child, so as to be a legitimate instruction
address in both ARM and Thumb mode.
Modified:
trunk/coregrind/m_debugger.c
Modified: trunk/coregrind/m_debugger.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/coregrind/m_debugger.c 2010-09-23 01:26:06 UTC (rev 11374)
+++ trunk/coregrind/m_debugger.c 2010-09-23 11:02:48 UTC (rev 11375)
@@ -223,7 +223,10 @@
uregs.ARM_ip = vex->guest_R12;
uregs.ARM_sp = vex->guest_R13;
uregs.ARM_lr = vex->guest_R14;
- uregs.ARM_pc = vex->guest_R15T;
+ // Remove the T bit from the bottom of R15T. It will get shipped
+ // over in CPSR.T instead, since LibVEX_GuestARM_get_cpsr copies
+ // it from R15T[0].
+ uregs.ARM_pc = vex->guest_R15T & 0xFFFFFFFE;
uregs.ARM_cpsr = LibVEX_GuestARM_get_cpsr(vex);
return VG_(ptrace)(VKI_PTRACE_SETREGS, pid, NULL, &uregs);
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-23 11:01:23
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-09-23 12:01:15 +0100 (Thu, 23 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 2041
Log:
LibVEX_GuestARM_get_cpsr: set CPSR.Q, .GE, .T and .M
in the resulting value. Fixes #251362.
Modified:
trunk/priv/guest_arm_helpers.c
Modified: trunk/priv/guest_arm_helpers.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/priv/guest_arm_helpers.c 2010-09-22 22:26:40 UTC (rev 2040)
+++ trunk/priv/guest_arm_helpers.c 2010-09-23 11:01:15 UTC (rev 2041)
@@ -478,14 +478,39 @@
/* VISIBLE TO LIBVEX CLIENT */
UInt LibVEX_GuestARM_get_cpsr ( /*IN*/VexGuestARMState* vex_state )
{
- UInt nzcv;
- nzcv = armg_calculate_flags_nzcv(
- vex_state->guest_CC_OP,
- vex_state->guest_CC_DEP1,
- vex_state->guest_CC_DEP2,
- vex_state->guest_CC_NDEP
- );
- return nzcv;
+ UInt cpsr = 0;
+ // NZCV
+ cpsr |= armg_calculate_flags_nzcv(
+ vex_state->guest_CC_OP,
+ vex_state->guest_CC_DEP1,
+ vex_state->guest_CC_DEP2,
+ vex_state->guest_CC_NDEP
+ );
+ vassert(0 == (cpsr & 0x0FFFFFFF));
+ // Q
+ if (vex_state->guest_QFLAG32 > 0)
+ cpsr |= (1 << 27);
+ // GE
+ if (vex_state->guest_GEFLAG0 > 0)
+ cpsr |= (1 << 16);
+ if (vex_state->guest_GEFLAG1 > 0)
+ cpsr |= (1 << 17);
+ if (vex_state->guest_GEFLAG2 > 0)
+ cpsr |= (1 << 18);
+ if (vex_state->guest_GEFLAG3 > 0)
+ cpsr |= (1 << 19);
+ // M
+ cpsr |= (1 << 4); // 0b10000 means user-mode
+ // J,T J (bit 24) is zero by initialisation above
+ // T we copy from R15T[0]
+ if (vex_state->guest_R15T & 1)
+ cpsr |= (1 << 5);
+ // ITSTATE we punt on for the time being. Could compute it
+ // if needed though.
+ // E, endianness, 0 (littleendian) from initialisation above
+ // A,I,F disable some async exceptions. Not sure about these.
+ // Leave as zero for the time being.
+ return cpsr;
}
/* VISIBLE TO LIBVEX CLIENT */
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-09-23 08:01:16
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-09-23 02:28:14 EDT Ended at 2010-09-23 04:00:57 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 449 tests, 13 stderr failures, 10 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) |
|
From: Cristian O. <one...@gm...> - 2010-09-23 07:48:10
|
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote: > On 23/09/10 08:19, Cristian Oneţ wrote: > >> Could this be said in a more valgrind user understandable language? If >> I understand correctly it is a bug in valgrind? Should I file >> bugreport? Or is there anyother way I could help to get this fixed? > > Yes, please file a bug report. Done at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 Regards, Cristian |
|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2010-09-23 07:31:56
|
On 23/09/10 08:19, Cristian Oneţ wrote: > Could this be said in a more valgrind user understandable language? If > I understand correctly it is a bug in valgrind? Should I file > bugreport? Or is there anyother way I could help to get this fixed? Yes, please file a bug report. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |
|
From: Cristian O. <one...@gm...> - 2010-09-23 07:19:35
|
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:32 AM, John Reiser <jr...@bi...> wrote: > On 09/22/2010, Cristian Oneţ wrote: >> vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xF3 0xF 0xB8 0x4 0x11 0x48 > > The first five bytes are: popcnt (%rcx,%rdx,1),%eax > > On 09/20/2010, Julian Seward wrote: >> cat /proc/cpuinfo on the cpu emulated since r2011 says >> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca mov >> pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm >> constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf >> pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm >> sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept >> vpid > > Note that 'popcnt' is in the list [so is 'aes'.] However, there is > no case for 0x0F 0xB8 in file VEX/priv/guest_x86_toIR.c. Oops. > [It doesn't help that there is an "extra" 0xF3 prefix.] > Could this be said in a more valgrind user understandable language? If I understand correctly it is a bug in valgrind? Should I file bugreport? Or is there anyother way I could help to get this fixed? Thanks! Regards, Cristian Oneţ |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-09-23 05:40:00
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-09-22 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-09-23 00:39:45 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 443 tests, 18 stderr failures, 5 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-09-23 00:03:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-09-23 00:03:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-09-23 00:03:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:01.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:29:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:30:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-09-23 00:03:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:30:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-09-23 00:03:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:30:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-09-23 00:03:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:30:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:31:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:10.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-09-23 00:25:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:10.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-09-23 00:26:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:09.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:19:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump2.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump2.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:19:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-syscalls-2007.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:20:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 281
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
HEAP SUMMARY:
in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/capget.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- capget.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ capget.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:20:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
capget result:
-effective 0
-permitted 0
+effective 0x........
+permitted 0x........
inheritable 0
HEAP SUMMARY:
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- stack_changes.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:07.000000000 -0500
+++ stack_changes.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:20:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+WARNING: unhandled syscall: 249
+You may be able to write your own handler.
+Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
+Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
+it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:21:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2269)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: fallbackSort (origin5-bz2.c:2275)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3116)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-09-23 00:03:09.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:21:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -38,7 +39,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -48,7 +50,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2855)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2859)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
@@ -78,7 +83,8 @@
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Use of uninitialised value of size 4
- at 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2964)
+ by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
by 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4753)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2.stderr.diff-glibc27-ppc64
=================================================
--- origin5-bz2.stderr.exp-glibc27-ppc64 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ origin5-bz2.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:21:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
@@ -9,25 +9,25 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: handle_compress (origin5-bz2.c:4686)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (origin5-bz2.c:4822)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2820)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2823)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2854)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2858)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
at 0x........: mainSort (origin5-bz2.c:2963)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (origin5-bz2.c:3105)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (origin5-bz2.c:4034)
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (origin5-bz2.c:5630)
by 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6484)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
- at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6481)
+ at 0x........: main (origin5-bz2.c:6479)
-Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+Use of uninitialised value of size 4
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:23:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:24:12.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2010-09-23 00:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:24:12.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:26:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
+grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
+grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/linux/mremap.stderr.diff-glibc27
=================================================
--- mremap.stderr.exp-glibc27 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ mremap.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:26:59.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
-mremap(grow, fixed): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(shrink, fixed): Invalid argument
+shrink, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(shrink, maymove): Invalid argument
+shrink, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, fixed): Invalid argument
grow, nomove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
+mremap(grow, maymove): Invalid argument
grow, maymove: p=0x........ np=0x........: shrink moved?!
-mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Cannot allocate memory
+mremap(grow, nomove, constrained): Invalid argument
+mremap(grow, maymove, constrained): Invalid argument
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:27:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,23 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: test_fsqrt (jm-insns.c:1979)
+ by 0x........: test_float_one_arg (jm-insns.c:5731)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- jm-fp.stdout.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ jm-fp.stdout.out 2010-09-23 00:27:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -794,570 +794,4 @@
fnabs 0010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
fnabs 00100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs 3fe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs 3fe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fnabs 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fnabs bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fnabs bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fnabs 0000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fnabs 7ff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- fnabs 7ff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs fff7ffffffffffff => fff7ffffffffffff
- fnabs 7ff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
- fnabs fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fsqrt 0010000000000001 => 2000000000000000
- fsqrt 00100094e0000359 => 2000004a6f52dd4a
- fsqrt 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe6a09e667f3bcd
- fsqrt 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe6a107aacb50df
- fsqrt 8010000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 80100094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe0000000000001 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt bfe00094e0000359 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fsqrt 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- fsqrt fff0000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffffffffff
- fsqrt fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffffffffff
- fsqrt 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- fsqrt fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
-PPC floating point arith insns
- with one arg with flags update:
- frsp. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000000
- frsp. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000000
- frsp. 8010000000000001 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 80100094e0000359 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000000
- frsp. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000000
- frsp. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- frsp. 8000000000000000 => 8000000000000000
- frsp. 7ff0000000000000 => 7ff0000000000000
- frsp. fff0000000000000 => fff0000000000000
- frsp. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 7fffffffe0000000
- frsp. fff7ffffffffffff => ffffffffe0000000
- frsp. 7ff8000000000000 => 7ff8000000000000
- frsp. fff8000000000000 => fff8000000000000
-
- fctiw. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000001
- fctiw. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. bfe0000000000001 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. bfe00094e0000359 => 00000000ffffffff
- fctiw. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiw. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiw. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiw. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fctiwz. 0010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 00100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 3fe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8010000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 80100094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe0000000000001 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. bfe00094e0000359 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 8000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
- fctiwz. 7ff0000000000000 => 000000007fffffff
- fctiwz. fff0000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff7ffffffffffff => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. 7ff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
- fctiwz. fff8000000000000 => 0000000080000000
-
- fmr. 0010000000000001 => 0010000000000001
- fmr. 00100094e0000359 => 00100094e0000359
- fmr. 3fe0000000000001 => 3fe0000000000001
- fmr. 3fe00094e0000359 => 3fe00094e0000359
- fmr. 8010000000000001 => 8010000000000001
- fmr. 80100094e0000359 => 80100094e0000359
- fmr. bfe0000000000001 => bfe0000000000001
- fmr. bfe00094e0000359 => bfe00094e0000359
- fmr. 0000000000000000 => 0000000000000000
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:27:39.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,19 @@
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 784(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: main (power5+_round.c:124)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/power5+_round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- power5+_round.stdout.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ power5+_round.stdout.out 2010-09-23 00:27:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-frin inf inf 0 PASS
-frin 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frin 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frin 0 0 0 PASS
-frin -0 -0 0 PASS
-frin -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frin -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frin -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frin nan nan 0 PASS
-frin 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frin 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frin -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frin -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frin 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frin -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-friz inf inf 0 PASS
-friz 1.9 1 0 PASS
-friz 1.1 1 0 PASS
-friz 0 0 0 PASS
-friz -0 -0 0 PASS
-friz -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-friz -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-friz -inf -inf 0 PASS
-friz nan nan 0 PASS
-friz 0.9 0 0 PASS
-friz 0.1 0 0 PASS
-friz -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-friz -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-friz 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-friz -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frip inf inf 0 PASS
-frip 1.9 2 0 PASS
-frip 1.1 2 0 PASS
-frip 0 0 0 PASS
-frip -0 -0 0 PASS
-frip -1.1 -1 0 PASS
-frip -1.9 -1 0 PASS
-frip -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frip nan nan 0 PASS
-frip 0.9 1 0 PASS
-frip 0.1 1 0 PASS
-frip -0.1 -0 0 PASS
-frip -0.9 -0 0 PASS
-frip 1e-40 1 0 PASS
-frip -1e-40 -0 0 PASS
-frim inf inf 0 PASS
-frim 1.9 1 0 PASS
-frim 1.1 1 0 PASS
-frim 0 0 0 PASS
-frim -0 -0 0 PASS
-frim -1.1 -2 0 PASS
-frim -1.9 -2 0 PASS
-frim -inf -inf 0 PASS
-frim nan nan 0 PASS
-frim 0.9 0 0 PASS
-frim 0.1 0 0 PASS
-frim -0.1 -1 0 PASS
-frim -0.9 -1 0 PASS
-frim 1e-40 0 0 PASS
-frim -1e-40 -1 0 PASS
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- round.stderr.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stderr.out 2010-09-23 00:27:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,22 @@
+disInstr(ppc): declined to decode a GeneralPurpose-Optional insn.
+disInstr(ppc): unhandled instruction: 0x........
+ primary 63(0x........), secondary 44(0x........)
+valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x.........
+Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
+did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
+1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
+ location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
+ warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
+2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
+ i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
+ you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
+Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
+probably kill your program.
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
+ Illegal opcode at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: check_double_guarded_arithmetic_op (round.c:1116)
+ by 0x........: test_float_arithmetic_ops (round.c:1185)
+ by 0x........: main (round.c:1206)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32/round.stdout.diff
=================================================
--- round.stdout.exp 2010-09-23 00:03:15.000000000 -0500
+++ round.stdout.out 2010-09-23 00:27:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -2259,77 +2259,4 @@
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000dp+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000000ep+0
-inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000011p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(-0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , 0x1.0000000000001p-1) = 0x1.a000000000012p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1p+0 , 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000001p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000002p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000002p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000003p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000003p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000004p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000005p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000005p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000006p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000006p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000007p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000007p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000008p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000008p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000009p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.0000000000009p+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ap+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ap+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000bp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000bp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000cp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000cp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000ep+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000dp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000000fp+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000ep+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a00000000001p+0
--inf:PASSED:fnmsub(0x1.000000000000fp+0, 0x1.2p+0 , -0x1.0000000000001p-1) = -0x1.a000000000011p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-near:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0abfp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e2p+0
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0bp-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907aep-1
-zero:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed827p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049fp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3cp+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0938p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7484p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7dp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9ep+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.c39p-1 ) = 0x1.e0d526020fb6cp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9p-1 ) = 0x1.c48c6001f0acp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.4852p+0 ) = 0x1.21e9ed813e2e3p+0
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.e984p-1 ) = 0x1.f4a1b09bbf0b1p-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9a1p-1 ) = 0x1.ca34879b907afp-1
-+inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.76b2p+0 ) = 0x1.35b6781aed828p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a44p-1 ) = 0x1.cfdcaf353049ep-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.a822p+0 ) = 0x1.498302b49cd6dp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.05a2p+0 ) = 0x1.02cd13b44f3bfp+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.9504p-1 ) = 0x1.c76073cec0937p-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.dca2p+0 ) = 0x1.5d4f8d4e4c2b2p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.02c8p+0 ) = 0x1.016309cde7483p+0
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.b9p-1 ) = 0x1.db2cfe686fe7cp-1
--inf:PASSED:fsqrt(0x1.1d02p+0 ) = 0x1.0e1d62e78ed9dp+0
--inf:PASSED:...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-09-23 02:53:16
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-09-23 03:05:11 BST Ended at 2010-09-23 03:52:52 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 549 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-09-23 02:40:06
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-09-23 03:10:06 BST Ended at 2010-09-23 03:39:48 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 556 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-23 01:26:17
|
Author: sewardj Date: 2010-09-23 02:26:06 +0100 (Thu, 23 Sep 2010) New Revision: 11374 Log: Add VFP test cases, as per bug 244493 comment 1. Minorly cleaned up version of a patch by (Dmitry Zhurikhin, zh...@is...) Added: trunk/none/tests/arm/vfp.c trunk/none/tests/arm/vfp.stderr.exp trunk/none/tests/arm/vfp.stdout.exp trunk/none/tests/arm/vfp.vgtest Modified: trunk/none/tests/arm/Makefile.am [... diff too large to include ...] |