You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(11) |
2
(26) |
3
(15) |
4
(4) |
|
5
(2) |
6
(7) |
7
(6) |
8
(22) |
9
(15) |
10
(13) |
11
(8) |
|
12
(6) |
13
(4) |
14
(9) |
15
(5) |
16
(2) |
17
(7) |
18
(7) |
|
19
(8) |
20
(14) |
21
(7) |
22
(21) |
23
(12) |
24
(12) |
25
(6) |
|
26
(6) |
27
(12) |
28
(17) |
29
(8) |
30
(8) |
|
|
|
From: Scott P. <pa...@la...> - 2010-09-14 23:14:23
|
For a tool I'm writing, I'm finding that my instrumentation code needs
to pass a ton of arguments to some of my execution-time functions.
For example, given the statement
PUTI(64:8xF64)[t5,0] = t1
the target function needs access to base (64), nElems (8), elemTy
(F64), ix (t5), ix's run-time value ([dynamic]), bias (0), data (t1),
and data's run-time value ([dynamic]). The problem is that the number
of arguments is limited on certain platforms (6 on amd64, for
example). I suppose I can work around that limitation by passing half
the arguments to each of two helper functions, which can aggregate the
arguments then call my real function, but I'm wondering if there's a
cleaner way to pass bulk information from instrumentation code to
execution code.
It'd be great if my instrumentation code could pass a complete IRStmt
to an execution-time function and let that function extract both the
static arguments and dynamic values. However, I suspect that that's
not possible, right?
Any suggestions for an efficient way to pass all parts of an IRStmt
and all the associated execution-time values to an execution-time
function?
Thanks,
-- Scott
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-14 15:33:10
|
Author: bart Date: 2010-09-14 16:33:00 +0100 (Tue, 14 Sep 2010) New Revision: 11358 Log: PowerPC, Altivec: avoid using typedefs in combination with the vector keyword. Patch by Maynard Johnson (see also #247526). Modified: trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c Modified: trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c =================================================================== --- trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c 2010-09-14 10:53:57 UTC (rev 11357) +++ trunk/none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c 2010-09-14 15:33:00 UTC (rev 11358) @@ -170,10 +170,19 @@ #include "tests/malloc.h" // memalign16 /* Something of the same size as void*, so can be safely be coerced - to/from a pointer type. Also same size as the host's gp registers. */ + * to/from a pointer type. Also same size as the host's gp registers. + * According to the AltiVec section of the GCC manual, the syntax does + * not allow the use of a typedef name as a type specifier in conjunction + * with the vector keyword, so typedefs uint[32|64]_t are #undef'ed here + * and redefined using #define. + */ #ifndef __powerpc64__ +#undef uint32_t +#define uint32_t unsigned int typedef uint32_t HWord_t; #else +#undef uint64_t +#define uint64_t unsigned long typedef uint64_t HWord_t; #endif // #ifndef __powerpc64__ |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-09-14 10:54:08
|
Author: bart
Date: 2010-09-14 11:53:57 +0100 (Tue, 14 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 11357
Log:
Added configure test that checks whether the assembler supports the SSE4a instruction lzcnt.
Modified:
trunk/configure.in
trunk/none/tests/amd64/Makefile.am
trunk/none/tests/x86/Makefile.am
Modified: trunk/configure.in
===================================================================
--- trunk/configure.in 2010-09-13 17:44:51 UTC (rev 11356)
+++ trunk/configure.in 2010-09-14 10:53:57 UTC (rev 11357)
@@ -1410,6 +1410,24 @@
AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_SSSE3_TESTS, test x$ac_have_as_ssse3 = xyes)
+AC_MSG_CHECKING([if x86/amd64 assembler supports 'lzcnt'])
+
+AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [
+ do {
+ __asm__ __volatile__("lzcnt %rax,%rax");
+ } while (0)
+],
+[
+ ac_have_as_lzcnt=yes
+ AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
+], [
+ ac_have_as_lzcnt=no
+ AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
+])
+
+AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_LZCNT_TESTS], [test x$ac_have_as_lzcnt = xyes])
+
+
# Check for TLS support in the compiler and linker
if test "x${cross_compiling}" = "xno"; then
# Native compilation: check whether running a program using TLS succeeds.
Modified: trunk/none/tests/amd64/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/amd64/Makefile.am 2010-09-13 17:44:51 UTC (rev 11356)
+++ trunk/none/tests/amd64/Makefile.am 2010-09-14 10:53:57 UTC (rev 11357)
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@
bug127521-64 bug132813-amd64 bug132918 \
clc \
$(INSN_TESTS) \
- lzcnt64 \
rcl-amd64 \
redundantRexW \
smc1 \
@@ -69,6 +68,9 @@
if BUILD_SSSE3_TESTS
check_PROGRAMS += ssse3_misaligned
endif
+if BUILD_LZCNT_TESTS
+ check_PROGRAMS += lzcnt64
+endif
# DDD: these need to be made to work on Darwin like the x86/ ones were.
if ! VGCONF_OS_IS_DARWIN
Modified: trunk/none/tests/x86/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- trunk/none/tests/x86/Makefile.am 2010-09-13 17:44:51 UTC (rev 11356)
+++ trunk/none/tests/x86/Makefile.am 2010-09-14 10:53:57 UTC (rev 11357)
@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@
jcxz \
lahf \
looper \
- lzcnt32 \
movx \
pushpopseg \
sbbmisc \
@@ -95,6 +94,9 @@
if BUILD_SSSE3_TESTS
check_PROGRAMS += ssse3_misaligned
endif
+if BUILD_LZCNT_TESTS
+ check_PROGRAMS += lzcnt32
+endif
AM_CFLAGS += @FLAG_M32@ $(FLAG_MMMX) $(FLAG_MSSE)
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-09-14 08:10:44
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-09-14 02:34:11 EDT Ended at 2010-09-14 04:10:26 EDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 471 tests, 42 stderr failures, 11 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/base (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/fp (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_bounds (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_dangle (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hsg (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/justify (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_create (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_specific (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/strcpy (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/tricky (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/zero (stderr) |
|
From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2010-09-14 07:04:32
|
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Philippe Waroquiers <phi...@sk...> wrote: > While implementing a patch to fix quadratic memory usage in m_mallocfree.c > (see http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250101) > I encountered some questions related to the high memory usage by memcheck: > > First question: memcheck client redzone: > ----------------------------------------- > Memcheck sets a client redzone (16 bytes IIRC). This is significant for small allocations. > What is the purpose of this memcheck client redzone ? > (as reading or writing before or after a malloc-ed block will be trapped by the rest > of memcheck machinery). If you overrun by a very small amount, you'll get a warning. If you overrun by a slightly larger amount, you may well end up accessing another heap block, which won't cause a warning. Having a 16 byte redzone means that more of these small overruns will be caught. > Second question: why multiple arenas ? > ---------------------------------------- > What is the reason to "split" the allocation between client arena and the other (non client) arenas ? > When using only one non-client arena, the memory usage by valgrind of a big process > decreased of 8%. > > Has this split "functional" advantages ? > Or performance advantages for some cases ? I think the different arenas have different superblock sizes. Maybe it's not a good idea, though. Nick |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-09-14 04:50:18
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-09-13 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-09-13 23:50:06 CDT
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... failed
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_ppc32=1 -DVGO_linux=1 -DVGP_ppc32_linux=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -Winline -Wall -O -g -mregnames -maltivec -m32 -DHAS_ALTIVEC -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT jm_insns-jm-insns.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/jm_insns-jm-insns.Tpo -c -o jm_insns-jm-insns.o `test -f 'jm-insns.c' || echo './'`jm-insns.c
jm-insns.c: In function 'register_vfarg':
jm-insns.c:4429: error: 'vector' undeclared (first use in this function)
jm-insns.c:4429: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
jm-insns.c:4429: error: for each function it appears in.)
jm-insns.c:4429: error: expected ';' before 'uint32_t'
jm-insns.c:4432: error: 'vfargI' undeclared (first use in this function)
jm-insns.c:4432: error: expected ')' before 'uint32_t'
jm-insns.c:4432: error: expected ';' before '{' token
make[5]: *** [jm_insns-jm-insns.o] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32'
make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32'
make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests'
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new'
make: *** [check] Error 2
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... failed
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_ppc32=1 -DVGO_linux=1 -DVGP_ppc32_linux=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -Winline -Wall -O -g -mregnames -maltivec -m32 -DHAS_ALTIVEC -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT jm_insns-jm-insns.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/jm_insns-jm-insns.Tpo -c -o jm_insns-jm-insns.o `test -f 'jm-insns.c' || echo './'`jm-insns.c
jm-insns.c: In function 'register_vfarg':
jm-insns.c:4429: error: 'vector' undeclared (first use in this function)
jm-insns.c:4429: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
jm-insns.c:4429: error: for each function it appears in.)
jm-insns.c:4429: error: expected ';' before 'uint32_t'
jm-insns.c:4432: error: 'vfargI' undeclared (first use in this function)
jm-insns.c:4432: error: expected ')' before 'uint32_t'
jm-insns.c:4432: error: expected ';' before '{' token
make[5]: *** [jm_insns-jm-insns.o] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none/tests/ppc32'
make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none/tests/ppc32'
make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none/tests'
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old'
make: *** [check] Error 2
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short Mon Sep 13 23:38:03 2010
--- new.short Mon Sep 13 23:50:06 2010
***************
*** 16,26 ****
make[5]: *** [jm_insns-jm-insns.o] Error 1
! make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none/tests/ppc32'
make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2
! make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none/tests/ppc32'
make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
! make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none/tests'
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
! make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old/none'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
! make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-old'
make: *** [check] Error 2
--- 16,26 ----
make[5]: *** [jm_insns-jm-insns.o] Error 1
! make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32'
make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2
! make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/ppc32'
make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
! make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests'
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
! make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new/none'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
! make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/src/vg/nightly/valgrind-new'
make: *** [check] Error 2
Congratulations, all tests passed!
|
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-09-14 04:14:14
|
Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 9.8.0 i386 ) Started at 2010-09-13 23:05:00 CDT Ended at 2010-09-13 23:14:05 CDT Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... failed Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o int int.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT jcxz.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/jcxz.Tpo -c -o jcxz.o jcxz.c mv -f .deps/jcxz.Tpo .deps/jcxz.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o jcxz jcxz.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lahf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lahf.Tpo -c -o lahf.o lahf.c mv -f .deps/lahf.Tpo .deps/lahf.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o lahf lahf.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT looper.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/looper.Tpo -c -o looper.o looper.c mv -f .deps/looper.Tpo .deps/looper.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o looper looper.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lzcnt32.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lzcnt32.Tpo -c -o lzcnt32.o lzcnt32.c /var/tmp//cc6mAxPR.s:51:no such instruction: `lzcntl 0(%eax), %esi' /var/tmp//cc6mAxPR.s:93:no such instruction: `lzcntw 0(%eax), %si' make[5]: *** [lzcnt32.o] Error 1 rm insn_ssse3.c insn_sse3.c insn_fpu.c insn_sse.c insn_mmx.c insn_mmxext.c insn_sse2.c insn_basic.c insn_cmov.c make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... failed Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o int int.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT jcxz.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/jcxz.Tpo -c -o jcxz.o jcxz.c mv -f .deps/jcxz.Tpo .deps/jcxz.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o jcxz jcxz.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lahf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lahf.Tpo -c -o lahf.o lahf.c mv -f .deps/lahf.Tpo .deps/lahf.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o lahf lahf.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT looper.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/looper.Tpo -c -o looper.o looper.c mv -f .deps/looper.Tpo .deps/looper.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o looper looper.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lzcnt32.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lzcnt32.Tpo -c -o lzcnt32.o lzcnt32.c /var/tmp//cc0i3p7f.s:51:no such instruction: `lzcntl 0(%eax), %esi' /var/tmp//cc0i3p7f.s:93:no such instruction: `lzcntw 0(%eax), %si' make[5]: *** [lzcnt32.o] Error 1 rm insn_ssse3.c insn_sse3.c insn_fpu.c insn_sse.c insn_mmx.c insn_mmxext.c insn_sse2.c insn_basic.c insn_cmov.c make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Mon Sep 13 23:09:35 2010 --- new.short Mon Sep 13 23:14:05 2010 *************** *** 17,20 **** gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lzcnt32.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lzcnt32.Tpo -c -o lzcnt32.o lzcnt32.c ! /var/tmp//cc0i3p7f.s:51:no such instruction: `lzcntl 0(%eax), %esi' ! /var/tmp//cc0i3p7f.s:93:no such instruction: `lzcntw 0(%eax), %si' make[5]: *** [lzcnt32.o] Error 1 --- 17,20 ---- gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lzcnt32.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lzcnt32.Tpo -c -o lzcnt32.o lzcnt32.c ! /var/tmp//cc6mAxPR.s:51:no such instruction: `lzcntl 0(%eax), %esi' ! /var/tmp//cc6mAxPR.s:93:no such instruction: `lzcntw 0(%eax), %si' make[5]: *** [lzcnt32.o] Error 1 Congratulations, all tests passed! |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-09-14 02:52:43
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-09-14 03:05:05 BST Ended at 2010-09-14 03:52:25 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 549 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-09-14 02:38:37
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-09-14 03:10:07 BST Ended at 2010-09-14 03:38:12 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 556 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |