You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(6) |
2
(3) |
3
(2) |
4
(1) |
5
(1) |
6
(6) |
7
(9) |
|
8
(8) |
9
(6) |
10
(13) |
11
(9) |
12
(12) |
13
(6) |
14
(1) |
|
15
(4) |
16
(8) |
17
(15) |
18
(7) |
19
(3) |
20
(11) |
21
(7) |
|
22
(26) |
23
(7) |
24
(4) |
25
(9) |
26
(10) |
27
(13) |
28
(6) |
|
29
(11) |
30
(6) |
31
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-08-08 13:05:09
|
Hi Julian, I was looking into why my mac build 'make check' was failing, and after building configure with '--enable-only32bit' I came accross this failure. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I../../../coregrind -I../../../include -I../../../VEX/pub -DVGA_x86=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_x86_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -m32 -mmmx -msse -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT lzcnt32.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/lzcnt32.Tpo -c -o lzcnt32.o lzcnt32.c /var/tmp//cctKq6ZT.s:51:no such instruction: `lzcntl 0(%eax), %esi' /var/tmp//cctKq6ZT.s:93:no such instruction: `lzcntw 0(%eax), %si' make[5]: *** [lzcnt32.o] Error 1 rm insn_ssse3.c insn_sse3.c insn_fpu.c insn_sse.c insn_mmx.c insn_mmxext.c insn_sse2.c insn_basic.c insn_cmov.c make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 Here is the uname string: Darwin minimes-mac-mini.local 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15 16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 Rich -- Rich Coe rc...@wi... |
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-08-08 11:47:39
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-08-08 12:47:23 +0100 (Sun, 08 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 2005
Log:
Initial auditing of VFP on Thumb: the following checks/fixups:
- getIRegT vs A
- putIRegT vs A
- mk_skip_over_A32_if_cond_is_false vs T32
- any use of r15 as a memory base address must be 4-aligned
Modified:
branches/THUMB/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
Modified: branches/THUMB/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
===================================================================
--- branches/THUMB/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-08-08 10:41:53 UTC (rev 2004)
+++ branches/THUMB/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c 2010-08-08 11:47:23 UTC (rev 2005)
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
needs to happen even after we go uncond. (and for sure it doesn't
happen for VFP loads/stores right now).
+ VFP on thumb: check that we exclude all r13/r15 cases that we
+ should.
+
XXXX thumb to do: improve the ITSTATE-zeroing optimisation by
taking into account the number of insns guarded by an IT.
@@ -7943,15 +7946,15 @@
*/
if (BITS8(1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0) == (INSN(27,20) & BITS8(1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0))
&& INSN(11,8) == BITS4(1,0,1,1)) {
- UInt bP = (insn28 >> 24) & 1;
- UInt bU = (insn28 >> 23) & 1;
- UInt bW = (insn28 >> 21) & 1;
- UInt bL = (insn28 >> 20) & 1;
- UInt offset = (insn28 >> 0) & 0xFF;
- UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
- UInt dD = (INSN(22,22) << 4) | INSN(15,12);
- UInt nRegs = (offset - 1) / 2;
- UInt summary;
+ UInt bP = (insn28 >> 24) & 1;
+ UInt bU = (insn28 >> 23) & 1;
+ UInt bW = (insn28 >> 21) & 1;
+ UInt bL = (insn28 >> 20) & 1;
+ UInt offset = (insn28 >> 0) & 0xFF;
+ UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
+ UInt dD = (INSN(22,22) << 4) | INSN(15,12);
+ UInt nRegs = (offset - 1) / 2;
+ UInt summary = 0;
Int i;
/**/ if (bP == 0 && bU == 1 && bW == 0) {
@@ -7965,8 +7968,8 @@
}
else goto after_vfp_fldmx_fstmx;
- /* no writebacks to r15 allowed */
- if (rN == 15 && (summary == 2 || summary == 3))
+ /* no writebacks to r15 allowed. No use of r15 in thumb mode. */
+ if (rN == 15 && (summary == 2 || summary == 3 || isT))
goto after_vfp_fldmx_fstmx;
/* offset must be odd, and specify at least one register */
@@ -7981,14 +7984,18 @@
likely will generate an exception. So we have to take a side
exit at this point if the condition is false. */
if (condT != IRTemp_INVALID) {
- mk_skip_over_A32_if_cond_is_false( condT );
+ if (isT)
+ mk_skip_over_T32_if_cond_is_false( condT );
+ else
+ mk_skip_over_A32_if_cond_is_false( condT );
condT = IRTemp_INVALID;
}
/* Ok, now we're unconditional. Do the load or store. */
/* get the old Rn value */
IRTemp rnT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(rnT, getIRegA(rN));
+ assign(rnT, align4if(isT ? getIRegT(rN) : getIRegA(rN),
+ rN == 15));
/* make a new value for Rn, post-insn */
IRTemp rnTnew = IRTemp_INVALID;
@@ -8006,8 +8013,12 @@
/* update Rn if necessary -- in case 3, we're moving it down, so
update before any memory reference, in order to keep Memcheck
and V's stack-extending logic (on linux) happy */
- if (summary == 3)
- putIRegA(rN, mkexpr(rnTnew), IRTemp_INVALID, Ijk_Boring);
+ if (summary == 3) {
+ if (isT)
+ putIRegT(rN, mkexpr(rnTnew), IRTemp_INVALID);
+ else
+ putIRegA(rN, mkexpr(rnTnew), IRTemp_INVALID, Ijk_Boring);
+ }
/* generate the transfers */
for (i = 0; i < nRegs; i++) {
@@ -8022,8 +8033,12 @@
/* update Rn if necessary -- in case 2, we're moving it up, so
update after any memory reference, in order to keep Memcheck
and V's stack-extending logic (on linux) happy */
- if (summary == 2)
- putIRegA(rN, mkexpr(rnTnew), IRTemp_INVALID, Ijk_Boring);
+ if (summary == 2) {
+ if (isT)
+ putIRegT(rN, mkexpr(rnTnew), IRTemp_INVALID);
+ else
+ putIRegA(rN, mkexpr(rnTnew), IRTemp_INVALID, Ijk_Boring);
+ }
HChar* nm = bL==1 ? "ld" : "st";
switch (summary) {
@@ -8068,15 +8083,15 @@
*/
if (BITS8(1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0) == (INSN(27,20) & BITS8(1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0))
&& INSN(11,8) == BITS4(1,0,1,1)) {
- UInt bP = (insn28 >> 24) & 1;
- UInt bU = (insn28 >> 23) & 1;
- UInt bW = (insn28 >> 21) & 1;
- UInt bL = (insn28 >> 20) & 1;
- UInt offset = (insn28 >> 0) & 0xFF;
- UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
- UInt dD = (INSN(22,22) << 4) | INSN(15,12);
- UInt nRegs = offset / 2;
- UInt summary;
+ UInt bP = (insn28 >> 24) & 1;
+ UInt bU = (insn28 >> 23) & 1;
+ UInt bW = (insn28 >> 21) & 1;
+ UInt bL = (insn28 >> 20) & 1;
+ UInt offset = (insn28 >> 0) & 0xFF;
+ UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
+ UInt dD = (INSN(22,22) << 4) | INSN(15,12);
+ UInt nRegs = offset / 2;
+ UInt summary = 0;
Int i;
/**/ if (bP == 0 && bU == 1 && bW == 0) {
@@ -8090,8 +8105,8 @@
}
else goto after_vfp_fldmd_fstmd;
- /* no writebacks to r15 allowed */
- if (rN == 15 && (summary == 2 || summary == 3))
+ /* no writebacks to r15 allowed. No use of r15 in thumb mode. */
+ if (rN == 15 && (summary == 2 || summary == 3 || isT))
goto after_vfp_fldmd_fstmd;
/* offset must be even, and specify at least one register */
@@ -8116,7 +8131,8 @@
/* get the old Rn value */
IRTemp rnT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(rnT, isT ? getIRegT(rN) : getIRegA(rN));
+ assign(rnT, align4if(isT ? getIRegT(rN) : getIRegA(rN),
+ rN == 15));
/* make a new value for Rn, post-insn */
IRTemp rnTnew = IRTemp_INVALID;
@@ -8200,8 +8216,11 @@
DIP("fmstat%s\n", nCC(conq));
} else {
/* Otherwise, merely transfer FPSCR to r0 .. r14. */
- putIRegA(rD, IRExpr_Get(OFFB_FPSCR, Ity_I32),
- condT, Ijk_Boring);
+ IRExpr* e = IRExpr_Get(OFFB_FPSCR, Ity_I32);
+ if (isT)
+ putIRegT(rD, e, condT);
+ else
+ putIRegA(rD, e, condT, Ijk_Boring);
DIP("fmrx%s r%u, fpscr\n", nCC(conq), rD);
}
goto decode_success_vfp;
@@ -8215,7 +8234,8 @@
UInt rD = INSN(15,12);
UInt reg = INSN(19,16);
if (reg == BITS4(0,0,0,1)) {
- putMiscReg32(OFFB_FPSCR, getIRegA(rD), condT);
+ putMiscReg32(OFFB_FPSCR,
+ isT ? getIRegT(rD) : getIRegA(rD), condT);
DIP("fmxr%s fpscr, r%u\n", nCC(conq), rD);
goto decode_success_vfp;
}
@@ -8270,8 +8290,8 @@
// VMOV rD[x], rT
if (0x0E000B10 == (insn28 & 0x0F900F1F)) {
- UInt rD = (INSN(7,7) << 4) | INSN(19,16);
- UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
+ UInt rD = (INSN(7,7) << 4) | INSN(19,16);
+ UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
UInt opc = (INSN(22,21) << 2) | INSN(6,5);
UInt index;
if (rT == 15) {
@@ -8279,20 +8299,33 @@
} else {
if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,0,0)) == BITS4(1,0,0,0)) {
index = opc & 7;
- putDRegI(rD, triop(Iop_SetElem8x8, getDRegI(rD), mkU8(index),
- unop(Iop_32to8, getIRegA(rT))), condT);
+ putDRegI(rD, triop(Iop_SetElem8x8,
+ getDRegI(rD),
+ mkU8(index),
+ unop(Iop_32to8,
+ isT ? getIRegT(rT) : getIRegA(rT))),
+ condT);
DIP("vmov%s.8 d%u[%u], r%u\n", nCC(conq), rD, index, rT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
- } else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,0,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,1)) {
+ }
+ else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,0,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,1)) {
index = (opc >> 1) & 3;
- putDRegI(rD, triop(Iop_SetElem16x4, getDRegI(rD), mkU8(index),
- unop(Iop_32to16, getIRegA(rT))), condT);
+ putDRegI(rD, triop(Iop_SetElem16x4,
+ getDRegI(rD),
+ mkU8(index),
+ unop(Iop_32to16,
+ isT ? getIRegT(rT) : getIRegA(rT))),
+ condT);
DIP("vmov%s.16 d%u[%u], r%u\n", nCC(conq), rD, index, rT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
- } else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,1,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,0)) {
+ }
+ else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,1,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,0)) {
index = (opc >> 2) & 1;
- putDRegI(rD, triop(Iop_SetElem32x2, getDRegI(rD), mkU8(index),
- getIRegA(rT)), condT);
+ putDRegI(rD, triop(Iop_SetElem32x2,
+ getDRegI(rD),
+ mkU8(index),
+ isT ? getIRegT(rT) : getIRegA(rT)),
+ condT);
DIP("vmov%s.32 d%u[%u], r%u\n", nCC(conq), rD, index, rT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
} else {
@@ -8303,9 +8336,9 @@
// VMOV rT, rD[x]
if (0x0E100B10 == (insn28 & 0x0F100F1F)) {
- UInt rN = (INSN(7,7) << 4) | INSN(19,16);
- UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
- UInt U = INSN(23,23);
+ UInt rN = (INSN(7,7) << 4) | INSN(19,16);
+ UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
+ UInt U = INSN(23,23);
UInt opc = (INSN(22,21) << 2) | INSN(6,5);
UInt index;
if (rT == 15) {
@@ -8313,28 +8346,39 @@
} else {
if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,0,0)) == BITS4(1,0,0,0)) {
index = opc & 7;
- putIRegA(rT, unop(U ? Iop_8Uto32 : Iop_8Sto32,
- binop(Iop_GetElem8x8,
- getDRegI(rN),
- mkU8(index))),
- condT, Ijk_Boring);
+ IRExpr* e = unop(U ? Iop_8Uto32 : Iop_8Sto32,
+ binop(Iop_GetElem8x8,
+ getDRegI(rN),
+ mkU8(index)));
+ if (isT)
+ putIRegT(rT, e, condT);
+ else
+ putIRegA(rT, e, condT, Ijk_Boring);
DIP("vmov%s.%c8 r%u, d%u[%u]\n", nCC(conq), U ? 'u' : 's',
rT, rN, index);
goto decode_success_vfp;
- } else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,0,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,1)) {
+ }
+ else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,0,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,1)) {
index = (opc >> 1) & 3;
- putIRegA(rT, unop(U ? Iop_16Uto32 : Iop_16Sto32,
- binop(Iop_GetElem16x4,
- getDRegI(rN),
- mkU8(index))),
- condT, Ijk_Boring);
+ IRExpr* e = unop(U ? Iop_16Uto32 : Iop_16Sto32,
+ binop(Iop_GetElem16x4,
+ getDRegI(rN),
+ mkU8(index)));
+ if (isT)
+ putIRegT(rT, e, condT);
+ else
+ putIRegA(rT, e, condT, Ijk_Boring);
DIP("vmov%s.%c16 r%u, d%u[%u]\n", nCC(conq), U ? 'u' : 's',
rT, rN, index);
goto decode_success_vfp;
- } else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,1,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,0) && U == 0) {
+ }
+ else if ((opc & BITS4(1,0,1,1)) == BITS4(0,0,0,0) && U == 0) {
index = (opc >> 2) & 1;
- putIRegA(rT, binop(Iop_GetElem32x2, getDRegI(rN), mkU8(index)),
- condT, Ijk_Boring);
+ IRExpr* e = binop(Iop_GetElem32x2, getDRegI(rN), mkU8(index));
+ if (isT)
+ putIRegT(rT, e, condT);
+ else
+ putIRegA(rT, e, condT, Ijk_Boring);
DIP("vmov%s.32 r%u, d%u[%u]\n", nCC(conq), rT, rN, index);
goto decode_success_vfp;
} else {
@@ -8347,9 +8391,9 @@
// FCONSTS sD, #imm
if (BITS8(1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1) == (INSN(27,20) & BITS8(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,1))
&& BITS4(0,0,0,0) == INSN(7,4) && INSN(11,8) == BITS4(1,0,1,0)) {
- UInt rD = (INSN(15,12) << 1) | INSN(22,22);
+ UInt rD = (INSN(15,12) << 1) | INSN(22,22);
UInt imm8 = (INSN(19,16) << 4) | INSN(3,0);
- UInt b = (imm8 >> 6) & 1;
+ UInt b = (imm8 >> 6) & 1;
UInt imm;
imm = (BITS8((imm8 >> 7) & 1,(~b) & 1,b,b,b,b,b,(imm8 >> 5) & 1) << 8)
| ((imm8 & 0x1f) << 3);
@@ -8363,9 +8407,9 @@
// FCONSTD dD, #imm
if (BITS8(1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1) == (INSN(27,20) & BITS8(1,1,1,1,1,0,1,1))
&& BITS4(0,0,0,0) == INSN(7,4) && INSN(11,8) == BITS4(1,0,1,1)) {
- UInt rD = INSN(15,12) | (INSN(22,22) << 4);
+ UInt rD = INSN(15,12) | (INSN(22,22) << 4);
UInt imm8 = (INSN(19,16) << 4) | INSN(3,0);
- UInt b = (imm8 >> 6) & 1;
+ UInt b = (imm8 >> 6) & 1;
ULong imm;
imm = (BITS8((imm8 >> 7) & 1,(~b) & 1,b,b,b,b,b,b) << 8)
| BITS8(b,b,0,0,0,0,0,0) | (imm8 & 0x3f);
@@ -8380,27 +8424,27 @@
// VDUP qD, rT
if (BITS8(1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0) == (INSN(27,20) & BITS8(1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1))
&& BITS4(1,0,1,1) == INSN(11,8) && INSN(6,6) == 0 && INSN(4,4) == 1) {
- UInt rD = (INSN(7,7) << 4) | INSN(19,16);
- UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
- UInt Q = INSN(21,21);
+ UInt rD = (INSN(7,7) << 4) | INSN(19,16);
+ UInt rT = INSN(15,12);
+ UInt Q = INSN(21,21);
UInt size = (INSN(22,22) << 1) | INSN(5,5);
if (rT == 15 || size == 3i || (Q && (rD & 1))) {
/* fall through */
} else {
+ IRExpr* e = isT ? getIRegT(rT) : getIRegA(rT);
if (Q) {
rD >>= 1;
switch (size) {
case 0:
- putQReg(rD, unop(Iop_Dup32x4, getIRegA(rT)), condT);
+ putQReg(rD, unop(Iop_Dup32x4, e), condT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
case 1:
- putQReg(rD, unop(Iop_Dup16x8,
- unop(Iop_32to16, getIRegA(rT))),
- condT);
+ putQReg(rD, unop(Iop_Dup16x8, unop(Iop_32to16, e)),
+ condT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
case 2:
- putQReg(rD, unop(Iop_Dup8x16, unop(Iop_32to8, getIRegA(rT))),
- condT);
+ putQReg(rD, unop(Iop_Dup8x16, unop(Iop_32to8, e)),
+ condT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
default:
vassert(0);
@@ -8408,16 +8452,15 @@
} else {
switch (size) {
case 0:
- putDRegI(rD, unop(Iop_Dup32x2, getIRegA(rT)), condT);
+ putDRegI(rD, unop(Iop_Dup32x2, e), condT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
case 1:
- putDRegI(rD, unop(Iop_Dup16x4,
- unop(Iop_32to16, getIRegA(rT))),
- condT);
+ putDRegI(rD, unop(Iop_Dup16x4, unop(Iop_32to16, e)),
+ condT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
case 2:
- putDRegI(rD, unop(Iop_Dup8x8, unop(Iop_32to8, getIRegA(rT))),
- condT);
+ putDRegI(rD, unop(Iop_Dup8x8, unop(Iop_32to8, e)),
+ condT);
goto decode_success_vfp;
default:
vassert(0);
@@ -8736,16 +8779,16 @@
*/
if (BITS8(1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0) == (INSN(27,20) & BITS8(1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0))
&& INSN(11,8) == BITS4(1,0,1,0)) {
- UInt bP = (insn28 >> 24) & 1;
- UInt bU = (insn28 >> 23) & 1;
- UInt bW = (insn28 >> 21) & 1;
- UInt bL = (insn28 >> 20) & 1;
- UInt bD = (insn28 >> 22) & 1;
- UInt offset = (insn28 >> 0) & 0xFF;
- UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
- UInt fD = (INSN(15,12) << 1) | bD;
- UInt nRegs = offset;
- UInt summary;
+ UInt bP = (insn28 >> 24) & 1;
+ UInt bU = (insn28 >> 23) & 1;
+ UInt bW = (insn28 >> 21) & 1;
+ UInt bL = (insn28 >> 20) & 1;
+ UInt bD = (insn28 >> 22) & 1;
+ UInt offset = (insn28 >> 0) & 0xFF;
+ UInt rN = INSN(19,16);
+ UInt fD = (INSN(15,12) << 1) | bD;
+ UInt nRegs = offset;
+ UInt summary = 0;
Int i;
/**/ if (bP == 0 && bU == 1 && bW == 0) {
@@ -8759,8 +8802,8 @@
}
else goto after_vfp_fldms_fstms;
- /* no writebacks to r15 allowed */
- if (rN == 15 && (summary == 2 || summary == 3))
+ /* no writebacks to r15 allowed. No use of r15 in thumb mode. */
+ if (rN == 15 && (summary == 2 || summary == 3 || isT))
goto after_vfp_fldms_fstms;
/* offset must specify at least one register */
@@ -8785,7 +8828,8 @@
/* get the old Rn value */
IRTemp rnT = newTemp(Ity_I32);
- assign(rnT, isT ? getIRegT(rN) : getIRegA(rN));
+ assign(rnT, align4if(isT ? getIRegT(rN) : getIRegA(rN),
+ rN == 15));
/* make a new value for Rn, post-insn */
IRTemp rnTnew = IRTemp_INVALID;
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-08-08 10:42:02
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2010-08-08 11:41:53 +0100 (Sun, 08 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 2004
Log:
* Enable VFP for Thumb.
* Add new Thumb instructions: SXTB short form, LDRSB short form,
ADC/SBB reg,reg,const, {S,U}XTH, MLS, SMULBB, {S,U}XTA{B,H}.
Modified:
branches/THUMB/priv/guest_arm_toIR.c
[... diff too large to include ...]
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-08-08 06:37:25
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-08-08 02:33:36 EDT Ended at 2010-08-08 02:37:18 EDT Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo Checking out valgrind source tree ... svn co svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk -r {2010-08-08T02:33:36} valgrind-new Job ID = 5112.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory Configuring valgrind ... cd valgrind-new && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/home/bart/software/valgrind/nightly/valgrind-new/Inst Job ID = 5113.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory Building valgrind ... cd valgrind-new && make -j 2 && make -j 2 check && make install Job ID = 5114.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory Running regression tests ... cd valgrind-new && make regtest Job ID = 5115.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo Checking out valgrind source tree ... svn co svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk -r {2010-08-07T02:33:36} valgrind-old Job ID = 5108.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory Configuring valgrind ... cd valgrind-old && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/home/bart/software/valgrind/nightly/valgrind-old/Inst Job ID = 5109.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory Building valgrind ... cd valgrind-old && make -j 2 && make -j 2 check && make install Job ID = 5110.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory Running regression tests ... cd valgrind-old && make regtest Job ID = 5111.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Sun Aug 8 02:36:36 2010 --- new.short Sun Aug 8 02:37:18 2010 *************** *** 8,20 **** ! Checking out valgrind source tree ... svn co svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk -r {2010-08-07T02:33:36} valgrind-old ! Job ID = 5108.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ! Configuring valgrind ... cd valgrind-old && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/home/bart/software/valgrind/nightly/valgrind-old/Inst ! Job ID = 5109.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ! Building valgrind ... cd valgrind-old && make -j 2 && make -j 2 check && make install ! Job ID = 5110.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ! Running regression tests ... cd valgrind-old && make regtest ! Job ID = 5111.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory --- 8,20 ---- ! Checking out valgrind source tree ... svn co svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk -r {2010-08-08T02:33:36} valgrind-new ! Job ID = 5112.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ! Configuring valgrind ... cd valgrind-new && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/home/bart/software/valgrind/nightly/valgrind-new/Inst ! Job ID = 5113.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ! Building valgrind ... cd valgrind-new && make -j 2 && make -j 2 check && make install ! Job ID = 5114.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory ! Running regression tests ... cd valgrind-new && make regtest ! Job ID = 5115.cell-user.cell.buzz cat: cmd-output.txt: No such file or directory |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-08-08 05:41:31
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-08-07 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-08-08 00:41:18 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 459 tests, 39 stderr failures, 6 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stdout)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-vmx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/base (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/fp (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_bounds (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_dangle (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hsg (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/justify (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_create (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_specific (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/strcpy (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/tricky (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/zero (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-08-08 00:03:58.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-08-08 00:03:58.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:58.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- bad_percentify.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ bad_percentify.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,33 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:88)
- by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:93)
- by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
- Actual: unknown
-
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:98)
- by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
- Actual: unknown
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/base.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- base.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ base.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
about to do 14 [0]
about to do 14 [-1]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:14)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 80 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 40 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (arith_include2.c:22)
@@ -13,22 +16,22 @@
about to do 18 [0]
about to do 18 [-1]
about to do 20 [0]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:20)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
about to do 20 [-1]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:20)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
about to do 22 [0]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:22)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
about to do 22 [-1]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:22)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/base.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- base.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ base.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
about to do 14 [0]
about to do 14 [-1]
Invalid read of size 4
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- ccc.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ ccc.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
@@ -21,21 +24,21 @@
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:10)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:22)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:23)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:11)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:23)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:24)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:12)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:24)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:22)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc.stderr.diff-glibc27-x86
=================================================
--- ccc.stderr.exp-glibc27-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ ccc.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
@@ -35,7 +38,7 @@
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:12)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:25)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:22)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- ccc.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ ccc.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fp.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ fp.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (fp.c:13)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/globalerr.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- globalerr.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ globalerr.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:39:50.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 2
- at 0x........: main (globalerr.c:12)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: global array "a" in object with soname "NONE"
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid read of size 2
- at 0x........: main (globalerr.c:12)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: global array "b" in object with soname "NONE"
- Actual: unknown
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hackedbz2.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- hackedbz2.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ hackedbz2.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,16 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: vex_strlen (hackedbz2.c:1006)
- by 0x........: add_to_myprintf_buf (hackedbz2.c:1284)
- by 0x........: vex_printf (hackedbz2.c:1155)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (hackedbz2.c:4039)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (hackedbz2.c:4761)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (hackedbz2.c:4831)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (hackedbz2.c:5638)
- by 0x........: main (hackedbz2.c:6484)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: global array "myprintf_buf" in object with soname "NONE"
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_bounds.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hp_bounds.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ hp_bounds.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (hp_bounds.c:9)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_dangle.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hp_dangle.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ hp_dangle.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (hp_dangle.c:17)
Address 0x........ is 20 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hsg.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hsg.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ hsg.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,70 +32,6 @@
<error>
<unique>0x........</unique>
<tid>...</tid>
- <kind>SorG</kind>
- <what>Invalid read of size 2</what>
- <stack>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>addup_wrongly</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>main</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- </stack>
- <auxwhat>Address 0x........ expected vs actual:</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Expected: global array "ga" in object with soname "NONE"</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Actual: unknown</auxwhat>
-</error>
-
-<error>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
- <tid>...</tid>
- <kind>SorG</kind>
- <what>Invalid read of size 2</what>
- <stack>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>addup_wrongly</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_other_stuff</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>main</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- </stack>
- <auxwhat>Address 0x........ expected vs actual:</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Expected: stack array "la" in frame 1 back from here</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Actual: unknown</auxwhat>
-</error>
-
-<error>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
- <tid>...</tid>
<kind>Heap</kind>
<what>Invalid read of size 1</what>
<stack>
@@ -209,14 +145,6 @@
<pair>
<count>...</count>
<unique>0x........</unique>
- </pair>
- <pair>
- <count>...</count>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
- </pair>
- <pair>
- <count>...</count>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
</pair>
<pair>
<count>...</count>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/justify.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- justify.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ justify.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (justify.c:20)
Address 0x........ is 5000 bytes after the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- partial_bad.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_bad.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
@@ -83,9 +86,9 @@
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial.c:7)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:43)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 7 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial.c:8)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- partial_bad.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_bad.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- partial_good.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_good.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:21)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
- at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
-
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:22)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
@@ -28,13 +24,6 @@
by 0x........: main (partial.c:9)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:25)
- Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 7 alloc'd
- at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:10)
-
-Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:34)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
@@ -42,13 +31,6 @@
by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:35)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
- at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
-
-Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:36)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
@@ -69,12 +51,12 @@
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
-Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:41)
+Invalid read of size 8
+ at 0x........: main (partial.c:42)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 7 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
+ by 0x........: main (partial.c:7)
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (partial.c:44)
@@ -91,4 +73,4 @@
by 0x........: main (partial.c:10)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 13 errors from 13 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- partial_good.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_good.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:22)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/preen_invars.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- preen_invars.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ preen_invars.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:39.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: main (preen_invars.c:22)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: unknown
- Actual: global array "im_a_global_arr" in object with soname "preen_invars_so"
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_create.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_create.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_create.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid write of size 4
at 0x........: pthread_key_create (in /...libpthread...)
by 0x........: main (pth_create.c:17)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_specific.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_specific.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_specific.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:49.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (pth_specific.c:19)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- realloc.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ realloc.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,43 +1,46 @@
-Invalid read of size 8
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:20)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:17)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:17)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:28)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:25)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:29)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:25)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:38)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 800 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:33)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:39)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 800 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:33)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- realloc.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ realloc.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr.stderr.diff-glibc27-x86
=================================================
--- stackerr.stderr.exp-glibc27-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ stackerr.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,27 +1,6 @@
-Invalid write of size 4
- at 0x........: foo (stackerr.c:27)
- by 0x........: bar (stackerr.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:41)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in frame 2 back from here
- Actual: stack array "beforea" in frame 2 back from here
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid write of size 4
- at 0x........: main (stackerr.c:44)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in this frame
- Actual: stack array "beforea" in this frame
-
-Invalid write of size 1
- at 0x........: _IO_default_xsputn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:49)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 4 back from here
- Actual: stack array "beforebuf" in frame 4 back from here
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- stackerr.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ stackerr.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:40:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,27 +1,6 @@
-Invalid write of size 8
- at 0x........: foo (stackerr.c:27)
- by 0x........: bar (stackerr.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:41)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in frame 2 back from here
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid write of size 8
- at 0x........: main (stackerr.c:44)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in this frame
- Actual: unknown
-
-Invalid write of size 1
- at 0x........: _IO_default_xsputn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:49)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 4 back from here
- Actual: unknown
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/strcpy.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- strcpy.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ strcpy.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:41:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ supp.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:41:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Syscall param write(buf) is non-contiguous
at 0x........: write (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: main (supp.c:16)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/tricky.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tricky.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ tricky.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:41:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- unaligned.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ unaligned.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:41:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:33)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
@@ -8,6 +11,14 @@
by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:37)
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 6 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: ...
+ by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
+
+Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:39)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 6 alloc'd
@@ -15,5 +26,13 @@
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:43)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 6 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: ...
+ by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- unaligned.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:42.000000000 -0500
+++ unaligned.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:41:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:33)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/zero.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- zero.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ zero.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:41:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (zero.c:10)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:40.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:29:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:41.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:30:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:40.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:30:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-08 00:03:40.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:30:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-08 00:03:40.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:30:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:40.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:31:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:49.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-08-08 00:25:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:49.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-08-08 00:25:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-08-08 00:03:48.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-08-08 00:18:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, ...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-08-08 04:17:40
|
Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 9.8.0 i386 ) Started at 2010-08-07 23:05:01 CDT Ended at 2010-08-07 23:17:29 CDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... failed Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo Making check in . make addressable atomic_incs badaddrvalue badfree badjump badjump2 badloop badpoll badrw brk2 buflen_check calloc-overflow clientperm custom_alloc custom-overlap deep_templates describe-block doublefree error_counts errs1 exitprog execve execve2 erringfds file_locking fprw fwrite inits inline leak-0 leak-cases leak-cycle leak-pool leak-tree linux-syslog-syscall linux-syscalls-2007 long_namespace_xml long-supps mallinfo malloc_free_fill malloc_usable malloc1 malloc2 malloc3 manuel1 manuel2 manuel3 match-overrun memalign_test memalign2 memcmptest mempool mmaptest mismatches new_override metadata nanoleak_supp nanoleak2 new_nothrow noisy_child null_socket origin1-yes origin2-not-quite origin3-no origin4-many origin5-bz2 origin6-fp overlap partiallydefinedeq partial_load pdb-realloc pdb-realloc2 pipe pointer-trace post-syscall realloc1 realloc2 realloc3 sh-mem sh-mem-random sigaltstack signal2 sigprocmask sigkill strchr str_tester supp_unknown supp1 supp2 suppfree trivialleak un it_libcbase unit_oset varinfo1 varinfo2 varinfo3 varinfo4 varinfo5 varinfo5so.so varinfo6 vcpu_fbench vcpu_fnfns xml1 wrap1 wrap2 wrap3 wrap4 wrap5 wrap6 wrap7 wrap7so.so wrap8 writev gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../coregrind -I../../include -I../../VEX/pub -DVGA_amd64=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_amd64_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -arch x86_64 -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT addressable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/addressable.Tpo -c -o addressable.o addressable.c mv -f .deps/addressable.Tpo .deps/addressable.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -arch x86_64 -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o addressable addressable.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../coregrind -I../../include -I../../VEX/pub -DVGA_amd64=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_amd64_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -arch x86_64 -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT atomic_incs-atomic_incs.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/atomic_incs-atomic_incs.Tpo -c -o atomic_incs-atomic_incs.o `test -f 'atomic_incs.c' || echo './'`atomic_incs.c atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_8bit': atomic_incs.c:37: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_16bit': atomic_incs.c:101: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_32bit': atomic_incs.c:164: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_64bit': atomic_incs.c:219: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' make[5]: *** [atomic_incs-atomic_incs.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 Congratulations, all tests passed! |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-08-08 02:52:41
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-08-08 03:05:04 BST Ended at 2010-08-08 03:52:19 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 546 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-08-08 02:37:17
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-08-08 03:10:04 BST Ended at 2010-08-08 03:37:02 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 553 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |