You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(6) |
2
(3) |
3
(2) |
4
(1) |
5
(1) |
6
(6) |
7
(9) |
|
8
(8) |
9
(6) |
10
(13) |
11
(9) |
12
(12) |
13
(6) |
14
(1) |
|
15
(4) |
16
(8) |
17
(15) |
18
(7) |
19
(3) |
20
(11) |
21
(7) |
|
22
(26) |
23
(7) |
24
(4) |
25
(9) |
26
(10) |
27
(13) |
28
(6) |
|
29
(11) |
30
(6) |
31
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2010-08-10 19:37:19
|
Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Maynard Johnson <may...@us...> wrote: >> >> Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Maynard Johnson <may...@us...>wrote: >>> >>>> Currently, Valgrind has only partial support for new IBM POWER6 >>>> instructions (as defined in >>>> http://www.power.org/resources/reading/PowerISA_V2.05.pdf). The attached >>>> patch completes the 2.05 support. >>>> >>>> The results of running 'make regtest' on a POWER6 box are almost identical >>>> before and after applying this patch -- about 50 failing testcases. I have >>>> looked into many of those failing testcases and, so far, have been able to >>>> cut the number of failures to less than half that. I have a separate >>>> testsuite patch that I will submit separately (upon request, or I'll wait >>>> until this patch is accepted) that provides the improved testsuite results. >>>> >>>> Review comments are welcome. >>>> >>> >>> Which Valgrind version has the patch been developed against ? >>> >>> I have tried to apply the patch to the latest trunk version, but it doesn't >>> seem to apply cleanly: >>> >>> [ ... ] >>> patching file none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c >>> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] >>> Apply anyway? [n] >>> Skipping patch. >>> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file >>> none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c.rej >> >> The patch was made against an August 6 SVN snapshot. Sorry, I forgot to mention the rejection of the patch to none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c is actually expected. This happens because that file is a symbolic link to none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c, which is patched earlier. > > The only other comment I have on the patch is that the indentation > style of the VEX changes is different from the surrounding code: the > added code has been indented with tabs while the surrounding code is > not. hmmm . . . yeah, ugly. Let me re-swizzle and clean it up a bit. -Maynard > > Note: since the patch includes VEX changes, only Julian can apply it. > > Bart. |
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-08-10 16:31:25
|
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Maynard Johnson <may...@us...> wrote: > > Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Maynard Johnson <may...@us...>wrote: > > > >> Currently, Valgrind has only partial support for new IBM POWER6 > >> instructions (as defined in > >> http://www.power.org/resources/reading/PowerISA_V2.05.pdf). The attached > >> patch completes the 2.05 support. > >> > >> The results of running 'make regtest' on a POWER6 box are almost identical > >> before and after applying this patch -- about 50 failing testcases. I have > >> looked into many of those failing testcases and, so far, have been able to > >> cut the number of failures to less than half that. I have a separate > >> testsuite patch that I will submit separately (upon request, or I'll wait > >> until this patch is accepted) that provides the improved testsuite results. > >> > >> Review comments are welcome. > >> > > > > Which Valgrind version has the patch been developed against ? > > > > I have tried to apply the patch to the latest trunk version, but it doesn't > > seem to apply cleanly: > > > > [ ... ] > > patching file none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c > > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > > Apply anyway? [n] > > Skipping patch. > > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file > > none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c.rej > > The patch was made against an August 6 SVN snapshot. Sorry, I forgot to mention the rejection of the patch to none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c is actually expected. This happens because that file is a symbolic link to none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c, which is patched earlier. The only other comment I have on the patch is that the indentation style of the VEX changes is different from the surrounding code: the added code has been indented with tabs while the surrounding code is not. Note: since the patch includes VEX changes, only Julian can apply it. Bart. |
|
From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2010-08-10 15:59:47
|
Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Maynard Johnson <may...@us...>wrote: > >> Currently, Valgrind has only partial support for new IBM POWER6 >> instructions (as defined in >> http://www.power.org/resources/reading/PowerISA_V2.05.pdf). The attached >> patch completes the 2.05 support. >> >> The results of running 'make regtest' on a POWER6 box are almost identical >> before and after applying this patch -- about 50 failing testcases. I have >> looked into many of those failing testcases and, so far, have been able to >> cut the number of failures to less than half that. I have a separate >> testsuite patch that I will submit separately (upon request, or I'll wait >> until this patch is accepted) that provides the improved testsuite results. >> >> Review comments are welcome. >> > > Which Valgrind version has the patch been developed against ? > > I have tried to apply the patch to the latest trunk version, but it doesn't > seem to apply cleanly: > > [ ... ] > patching file none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file > none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c.rej The patch was made against an August 6 SVN snapshot. Sorry, I forgot to mention the rejection of the patch to none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c is actually expected. This happens because that file is a symbolic link to none/tests/ppc32/jm-insns.c, which is patched earlier. -Maynard > [ ... ] > > Bart. > |
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2010-08-10 13:38:15
|
This feature was introduced in 3.5 IIRC. Won't work in earlier versions.
J
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> valgrind-3.3.1-Debian gives an error when frame level wildcards are used:
>
> {
> name
> Memcheck:Leak
> fun:malloc
> fun:__nss_lookup_function
> ...
> fun:getpwuid_r
> }
>
>
> ==23090== FATAL: in suppressions file
> '/home/kitware/Dashboards/DashboardScripts/CMakeValgrindSuppressions.supp':
> location should start with 'fun:' or 'obj:'
> ==23090== exiting now.
>
>
> Did the file format change?
|
|
From: Bill H. <bil...@ki...> - 2010-08-10 13:30:59
|
valgrind-3.3.1-Debian gives an error when frame level wildcards are used:
{
name
Memcheck:Leak
fun:malloc
fun:__nss_lookup_function
...
fun:getpwuid_r
}
==23090== FATAL: in suppressions file
'/home/kitware/Dashboards/DashboardScripts/CMakeValgrindSuppressions.supp':
location should start with 'fun:' or 'obj:'
==23090== exiting now.
Did the file format change?
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
bil...@ki...
http://www.kitware.com
518 881-4905 (Direct)
518 371-3971 x105
Fax (518) 371-4573
|
|
From: Alexander P. <gl...@go...> - 2010-08-10 08:13:49
|
Julian, Nicholas,
aren't these suppressions missing in the trunk after the merge?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, <sv...@va...> wrote:
> Author: sewardj
> Date: 2010-06-07 12:32:31 +0100 (Mon, 07 Jun 2010)
> New Revision: 11154
>
> Log:
> Initial suppression files for MacOSX 10.6.
>
>
> Added:
> branches/MACOSX106/darwin10-drd.supp
> branches/MACOSX106/darwin10.supp
>
>
> Added: branches/MACOSX106/darwin10-drd.supp
> ===================================================================
>
> Added: branches/MACOSX106/darwin10.supp
> ===================================================================
> --- branches/MACOSX106/darwin10.supp (rev 0)
> +++ branches/MACOSX106/darwin10.supp 2010-06-07 11:32:31 UTC (rev 11154)
> @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
> +
> +# Suppressions for Darwin 10.x / Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard
> +
> +##----------------------------------------------------------------------##
> +# Memcheck
> +##----------------------------------------------------------------------##
> +
> +{
> + mach_msg_trap-1
> + Memcheck:Param
> + mach_msg(msg.msgh_remote_port)
> + fun:mach_msg_trap
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + mach_msg_trap-2
> + Memcheck:Param
> + mach_msg(msg.msgh_remote_port)
> + fun:mach_msg_trap
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + mach_msg_trap-3
> + Memcheck:Param
> + mach_msg(msg.msgh_remote_port)
> + fun:mach_msg_trap
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + mach_msg_trap-4
> + Memcheck:Param
> + mach_msg(msg.msgh_remote_port)
> + fun:mach_msg_trap
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + mach_msg_trap-5
> + Memcheck:Param
> + mach_msg(msg.msgh_remote_port)
> + fun:mach_msg_trap
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-Cond-1
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:GetVariationInfoFromName
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-Cond-2
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:*PMMutex*Lock*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-Cond-3
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:sseCGSBlendXXXX8888
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-Cond-4
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:*CASettingsStorage*RefreshSettings*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreAudio*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreAudio*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-Cond-5
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:gle*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL*
> + obj:/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-Cond-6
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:pthread_rwlock_init$UNIX2003
> + fun:main
> +}
> +
> +# afaict this is legit. Might be caused by setenv("VAR=")
> +# where the value string is empty (not sure)
> +{
> + macos-Cond-7
> + Memcheck:Cond
> + fun:__setenv
> + fun:putenv*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-futimes-1
> + Memcheck:Param
> + futimes(tvp[1])
> + fun:futimes
> + obj:/usr/lib/libSystem*
> + obj:/usr/lib/libSystem*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + macos-vsyslog-hole
> + Memcheck:Param
> + socketcall.sendto(msg)
> + fun:sendto$NOCANCEL$UNIX2003
> + fun:vsyslog
> +}
> +
> +# Still-reachable memory.
> +
> +# I chopped this one off at libSystem_initializer, there were more frames.
> +{
> + darwin-still-reachable-1
> + Memcheck:Leak
> + fun:calloc
> + fun:dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook
> + fun:_ZN4dyld19registerAddCallbackEPFvPK11mach_headerlE
> + fun:_dyld_register_func_for_add_image
> + fun:__keymgr_initializer
> + fun:libSystem_initializer
> +}
> +
> +# I chopped this one off at libSystem_initializer, there were more frames.
> +{
> + darwin-still-reachable-2
> + Memcheck:Leak
> + fun:malloc
> + fun:get_or_create_key_element
> + fun:_keymgr_get_and_lock_processwide_ptr_2
> + fun:dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook
> + fun:_ZN4dyld19registerAddCallbackEPFvPK11mach_headerlE
> + fun:_dyld_register_func_for_add_image
> + fun:__keymgr_initializer
> + fun:libSystem_initializer
> +}
> +
> +{
> + darwin-still-reachable-3
> + Memcheck:Leak
> + fun:malloc
> + fun:__smakebuf
> + fun:__swsetup
> + fun:__sfvwrite
> + fun:puts
> +}
> +
> +# Genuine leaks.
> +# See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188572 about this; it's
> +# unavoidable due to BSD setenv() semantics.
> +{
> + macos-__setenv-leak-see-our-bug-188572
> + Memcheck:Leak
> + fun:malloc_zone_malloc
> + fun:__setenv
> + fun:setenv$UNIX2003
> +}
> +{
> + macos-localeconv-leak
> + Memcheck:Leak
> + fun:malloc
> + fun:localeconv_l
> + fun:__vfprintf
> + fun:vsnprintf
> +}
> +
> +##----------------------------------------------------------------------##
> +# Helgrind
> +##----------------------------------------------------------------------##
> +
> +# These ones were necessary to give no errors on a tiny non-threaded
> +# program. I don't know if they're real problems or false positives (njn).
> +
> +# keymgr seems to deliberately do some bogus actions, and if they are bogus,
> +# it passes the error codes back to the caller.
> +{
> + __keymgr_initializer lock failed
> + Helgrind:PthAPIerror
> + fun:pthread_mutex_lock
> + fun:_dyld_register_func_for_*_image
> + fun:__keymgr_initializer
> + fun:libSystem_initializer
> +}
> +{
> + __keymgr_initializer unlock failed
> + Helgrind:PthAPIerror
> + fun:pthread_mutex_unlock
> + fun:_dyld_register_func_for_*_image
> + fun:__keymgr_initializer
> + fun:libSystem_initializer
> +}
> +{
> + __keymgr_initializer bogus unlock
> + Helgrind:UnlockBogus
> + fun:pthread_mutex_unlock
> + fun:_dyld_register_func_for_*_image
> + fun:__keymgr_initializer
> + fun:libSystem_initializer
> +}
> +
> +# These ones were necessary to give no errors on a tiny threaded program.
> +# I don't know if they're real problems or false positives (njn).
> +
> +#{
> +# helgrind-darwinlibc-nuke-everything-in-dyld
> +# Helgrind:Race
> +# obj:/usr/lib/dyld
> +#}
> +
> +{
> + helgrind-darwinlibc-nuke-everything-in-libSystem.B.dylib
> + Helgrind:Race
> + obj:/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
> +}
> +
> +# This would be better as "fun:\?\?\?" but string matching doesn't seem to
> +# allow escaping meta-chars.
> +#
> +# This is very bad .. not only will it hide races in any
> +# un-identified piece of code, the ??? also matches any 3-char
> +# function name.
> +{
> + helgrind-darwinlibc-nuke-everything-in-???-(unknown-code)
> + Helgrind:Race
> + fun:???
> +}
> +
> +{
> + helgrind-darwinlibc--mythread_wrapper-*thread*start*
> + Helgrind:Race
> + fun:mythread_wrapper
> + fun:*thread*start*
> +}
> +
> +{
> + helgrind-darwinlibc--pthread_create_WRK-pthread_create
> + Helgrind:Race
> + fun:pthread_create_WRK
> + fun:pthread_create
> +}
> +
> +
> +# Thread #9: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on
> +# mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
> +# at 0x18696: pthread_cond_wait* (hg_intercepts.c:655)
> +# by 0x2300B8: pthread_rwlock_wrlock$UNIX2003 (in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib)
> +# by 0x18F41: pthread_rwlock_wrlock* (hg_intercepts.c:1177)
> +#
> +# no idea what this is about
> +#
> +{
> + helgrind-darwin9--pthread-rwlock-kludgery
> + Helgrind:Misc
> + fun:pthread_cond_wait*
> + fun:pthread_rwlock_*lock*
> + fun:pthread_rwlock_*lock*
> +}
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Valgrind-developers mailing list
> Val...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
>
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Moscow
|
|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2010-08-10 08:05:50
|
Author: bart
Date: 2010-08-10 09:05:40 +0100 (Tue, 10 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 11255
Log:
Generalized a suppression pattern.
Modified:
trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp
Modified: trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp
===================================================================
--- trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp 2010-08-09 08:59:22 UTC (rev 11254)
+++ trunk/glibc-2.X-drd.supp 2010-08-10 08:05:40 UTC (rev 11255)
@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@
drd-libQtCore-deref-that-calls-QThreadData-destructor
drd:ConflictingAccess
fun:_ZN11QThreadDataD1Ev
- fun:_ZN11QThreadData5derefEv
obj:/usr/lib*/libQtCore.so.4.*
}
{
|
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-08-10 07:34:04
|
Nightly build on cellbuzz-native ( cellbuzz, ppc64, Fedora 7, native ) Started at 2010-08-10 02:33:52 EDT Ended at 2010-08-10 03:33:51 EDT Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... done Regression test results follow == 462 tests, 45 stderr failures, 12 stdout failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/deep_templates (stdout) memcheck/tests/leak-cases-full (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cases-summary (stderr) memcheck/tests/leak-cycle (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stdout) memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr) memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo1 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr) memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stdout) memcheck/tests/wrap8 (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-both (stderr) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stdout) callgrind/tests/simwork-branch (stderr) none/tests/empty-exe (stderr) none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr) none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout) none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-fp (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/jm-vmx (stdout) none/tests/ppc64/round (stdout) none/tests/shell_valid2 (stderr) none/tests/shell_valid3 (stderr) none/tests/shell_zerolength (stderr) helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/base (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/fp (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_bounds (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_dangle (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/hsg (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/justify (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_create (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_specific (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/strcpy (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/tricky (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned (stderr) exp-ptrcheck/tests/zero (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= |
|
From: Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...> - 2010-08-10 06:53:51
|
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Maynard Johnson <may...@us...>wrote: > Currently, Valgrind has only partial support for new IBM POWER6 > instructions (as defined in > http://www.power.org/resources/reading/PowerISA_V2.05.pdf). The attached > patch completes the 2.05 support. > > The results of running 'make regtest' on a POWER6 box are almost identical > before and after applying this patch -- about 50 failing testcases. I have > looked into many of those failing testcases and, so far, have been able to > cut the number of failures to less than half that. I have a separate > testsuite patch that I will submit separately (upon request, or I'll wait > until this patch is accepted) that provides the improved testsuite results. > > Review comments are welcome. > Which Valgrind version has the patch been developed against ? I have tried to apply the patch to the latest trunk version, but it doesn't seem to apply cleanly: [ ... ] patching file none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file none/tests/ppc64/jm-insns.c.rej [ ... ] Bart. |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-08-10 05:41:48
|
Nightly build on ppc32 ( Linux 2.6.27.45-0.1-default ppc )
Started at 2010-08-09 23:26:01 CDT
Ended at 2010-08-10 00:41:34 CDT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 459 tests, 39 stderr failures, 6 stdout failures, 2 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/badjump (stderr)
memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/capget (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/stack_changes (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/timerfd-syscall (stdout)
memcheck/tests/linux-syscalls-2007 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/origin5-bz2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
massif/tests/deep-D (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/linux/mremap (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-fp (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/jm-vmx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/round (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stdout)
none/tests/ppc32/test_fx (stderr)
none/tests/ppc32/test_gx (stdout)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/base (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/fp (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/globalerr (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hackedbz2 (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_bounds (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_dangle (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/hsg (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/justify (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/preen_invars (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_create (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_specific (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/strcpy (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/tricky (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned (stderr)
exp-ptrcheck/tests/zero (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-darwin
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-darwin 2010-08-10 00:04:19.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,61 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-ppc
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-ppc 2010-08-10 00:04:19.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
- at 0x........: (within libpthread-?.?.so)
- by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2(within libpthread-?.?.so)
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff-linux-x86
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp-linux-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:19.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -3,84 +3,11 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:20)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 0.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:24)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:51)
-
-Thread 1:
-The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:28)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-rwlock 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:57)
-
-Thread 1:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 2.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-Thread 3:
-Probably a race condition: condition variable 0x........ has been signaled but the associated mutex 0x........ is not locked by the signalling thread.
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_signal (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: rescue_me (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:32)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-cond 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:56)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
-
-The impossible happened: mutex 0x........ is locked simultaneously by two threads (recursion count 1, owners 2 and 1) !
-Thread 2:
-Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 2, owner 1.
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: grab_the_lock (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:42)
- by 0x........: vgDrd_thread_wrapper (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:53)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:?)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/bad_percentify.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- bad_percentify.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ bad_percentify.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,33 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:88)
- by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:93)
- by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
- Actual: unknown
-
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: strlen (h_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: VG_print_translation_stats (bad_percentify.c:98)
- by 0x........: main (bad_percentify.c:107)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 3 back from here
- Actual: unknown
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/base.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- base.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ base.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
about to do 14 [0]
about to do 14 [-1]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:14)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 80 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 40 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (arith_include2.c:22)
@@ -13,22 +16,22 @@
about to do 18 [0]
about to do 18 [-1]
about to do 20 [0]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:20)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
about to do 20 [-1]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:20)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
about to do 22 [0]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:22)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
about to do 22 [-1]
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (base.c:22)
Address 0x........ is not derived from any known block
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/base.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- base.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ base.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
about to do 14 [0]
about to do 14 [-1]
Invalid read of size 4
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- ccc.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ ccc.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
@@ -21,21 +24,21 @@
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:10)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:22)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:23)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:11)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:23)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:24)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:12)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:24)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:22)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc.stderr.diff-glibc27-x86
=================================================
--- ccc.stderr.exp-glibc27-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ ccc.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
@@ -35,7 +38,7 @@
by 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:12)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:25)
+ at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:22)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/ccc.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- ccc.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ ccc.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:39:58.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (ccc.cpp:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/fp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- fp.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ fp.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (fp.c:13)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/globalerr.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- globalerr.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ globalerr.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 2
- at 0x........: main (globalerr.c:12)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: global array "a" in object with soname "NONE"
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid read of size 2
- at 0x........: main (globalerr.c:12)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: global array "b" in object with soname "NONE"
- Actual: unknown
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hackedbz2.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- hackedbz2.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ hackedbz2.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,16 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: vex_strlen (hackedbz2.c:1006)
- by 0x........: add_to_myprintf_buf (hackedbz2.c:1284)
- by 0x........: vex_printf (hackedbz2.c:1155)
- by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (hackedbz2.c:4039)
- by 0x........: handle_compress (hackedbz2.c:4761)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (hackedbz2.c:4831)
- by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (hackedbz2.c:5638)
- by 0x........: main (hackedbz2.c:6484)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: global array "myprintf_buf" in object with soname "NONE"
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_bounds.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hp_bounds.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ hp_bounds.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (hp_bounds.c:9)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hp_dangle.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hp_dangle.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ hp_dangle.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (hp_dangle.c:17)
Address 0x........ is 20 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/hsg.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hsg.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ hsg.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:39.000000000 -0500
@@ -32,70 +32,6 @@
<error>
<unique>0x........</unique>
<tid>...</tid>
- <kind>SorG</kind>
- <what>Invalid read of size 2</what>
- <stack>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>addup_wrongly</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>main</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- </stack>
- <auxwhat>Address 0x........ expected vs actual:</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Expected: global array "ga" in object with soname "NONE"</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Actual: unknown</auxwhat>
-</error>
-
-<error>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
- <tid>...</tid>
- <kind>SorG</kind>
- <what>Invalid read of size 2</what>
- <stack>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>addup_wrongly</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>do_other_stuff</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>main</fn>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>hsg.c</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
- </stack>
- <auxwhat>Address 0x........ expected vs actual:</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Expected: stack array "la" in frame 1 back from here</auxwhat>
- <auxwhat>Actual: unknown</auxwhat>
-</error>
-
-<error>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
- <tid>...</tid>
<kind>Heap</kind>
<what>Invalid read of size 1</what>
<stack>
@@ -209,14 +145,6 @@
<pair>
<count>...</count>
<unique>0x........</unique>
- </pair>
- <pair>
- <count>...</count>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
- </pair>
- <pair>
- <count>...</count>
- <unique>0x........</unique>
</pair>
<pair>
<count>...</count>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/justify.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- justify.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ justify.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:43.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (justify.c:20)
Address 0x........ is 5000 bytes after the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- partial_bad.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_bad.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
@@ -83,9 +86,9 @@
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial.c:7)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:43)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 7 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial.c:8)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_bad.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- partial_bad.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_bad.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- partial_good.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_good.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:21)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
- at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
-
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:22)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
@@ -28,13 +24,6 @@
by 0x........: main (partial.c:9)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:25)
- Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 7 alloc'd
- at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:10)
-
-Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:34)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
@@ -42,13 +31,6 @@
by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:35)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
- at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
-
-Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:36)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
@@ -69,12 +51,12 @@
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
-Invalid read of size 4
- at 0x........: main (partial.c:41)
+Invalid read of size 8
+ at 0x........: main (partial.c:42)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 3 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 7 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (partial.c:6)
+ by 0x........: main (partial.c:7)
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (partial.c:44)
@@ -91,4 +73,4 @@
by 0x........: main (partial.c:10)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 13 errors from 13 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/partial_good.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- partial_good.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_good.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (partial.c:22)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/preen_invars.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- preen_invars.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ preen_invars.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:40:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
-Invalid read of size 1
- at 0x........: main (preen_invars.c:22)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: unknown
- Actual: global array "im_a_global_arr" in object with soname "preen_invars_so"
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_create.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_create.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_create.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid write of size 4
at 0x........: pthread_key_create (in /...libpthread...)
by 0x........: main (pth_create.c:17)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/pth_specific.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_specific.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ pth_specific.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (pth_specific.c:19)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- realloc.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ realloc.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,43 +1,46 @@
-Invalid read of size 8
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:20)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:17)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:17)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:28)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:25)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:29)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 200 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:25)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:38)
- Address 0x........ is 8 bytes before the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 800 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:33)
-Invalid read of size 8
+Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:39)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
- legitimate range, a block of size 800 alloc'd
+ legitimate range, a block of size 400 alloc'd
at 0x........: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (realloc.c:33)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/realloc.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- realloc.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ realloc.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (realloc.c:20)
Address 0x........ is 4 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr.stderr.diff-glibc27-x86
=================================================
--- stackerr.stderr.exp-glibc27-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ stackerr.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,27 +1,6 @@
-Invalid write of size 4
- at 0x........: foo (stackerr.c:27)
- by 0x........: bar (stackerr.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:41)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in frame 2 back from here
- Actual: stack array "beforea" in frame 2 back from here
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid write of size 4
- at 0x........: main (stackerr.c:44)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in this frame
- Actual: stack array "beforea" in this frame
-
-Invalid write of size 1
- at 0x........: _IO_default_xsputn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:49)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 4 back from here
- Actual: stack array "beforebuf" in frame 4 back from here
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/stackerr.stderr.diff-glibc28-amd64
=================================================
--- stackerr.stderr.exp-glibc28-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ stackerr.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,27 +1,6 @@
-Invalid write of size 8
- at 0x........: foo (stackerr.c:27)
- by 0x........: bar (stackerr.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:41)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in frame 2 back from here
- Actual: unknown
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
-Invalid write of size 8
- at 0x........: main (stackerr.c:44)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "a" in this frame
- Actual: unknown
-
-Invalid write of size 1
- at 0x........: _IO_default_xsputn (in /...libc...)
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: ...
- by 0x........: main (stackerr.c:49)
- Address 0x........ expected vs actual:
- Expected: stack array "buf" in frame 4 back from here
- Actual: unknown
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/strcpy.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- strcpy.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ strcpy.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/supp.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ supp.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:21.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Syscall param write(buf) is non-contiguous
at 0x........: write (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: main (supp.c:16)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/tricky.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tricky.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ tricky.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- unaligned.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ unaligned.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:33)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
@@ -8,6 +11,14 @@
by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:37)
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 6 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: ...
+ by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
+
+Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:39)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
legitimate range, a block of size 6 alloc'd
@@ -15,5 +26,13 @@
by 0x........: ...
by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:43)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
+ legitimate range, a block of size 6 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: ...
+ by 0x........: main (unaligned.c:8)
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/unaligned.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- unaligned.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ unaligned.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (unaligned.c:33)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes before the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/exp-ptrcheck/tests/zero.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- zero.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:02.000000000 -0500
+++ zero.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:41:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+WARNING: exp-ptrcheck on ppc32/ppc64/arm platforms: stack and global array
+WARNING: checking is not currently supported. Only heap checking is
+WARNING: supported. Disabling s/g checks (like --enable-sg-checks=no).
Invalid read of size 1
at 0x........: main (zero.c:10)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after the accessing pointer's
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:01.000000000 -0500
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:29:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
Possible data race during write of size 4 at 0x........ by thread #x
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
@@ -28,8 +26,6 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc06_two_races_xml.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:30:24.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,11 +45,17 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>do_clone</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
- <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5</fn>
+ <fn>pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>createthread.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -121,6 +127,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -175,6 +184,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -229,6 +241,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
@@ -283,6 +298,9 @@
<ip>0x........</ip>
<obj>...</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
+ <dir>...</dir>
+ <file>pthread_create.c</file>
+ <line>...</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x........</ip>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc23-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc23-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:30:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -31,14 +31,13 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -46,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,20 +75,21 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-amd64
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 2010-08-10 00:04:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:30:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc25-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-x86 2010-08-10 00:04:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:30:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -37,14 +37,7 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
+---------------------
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
@@ -52,6 +45,20 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ Lock was previously acquired
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+
+Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
Thread #x was created
@@ -68,7 +75,7 @@
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -81,13 +88,8 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Thread #x deallocated location 0x........ containing a locked lock
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:01.000000000 -0500
+++ tc23_bogus_condwait.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:31:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,29 +5,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with un-held mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:72)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex of type pthread_rwlock_t*
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:75)
-
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait called with mutex held by a different thread
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Process terminating with default action of signal 7 (SIGBUS)
+ Invalid address alignment at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt (pthread_mutex_unlock.c:64)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (pthread_cond_wait.c:108)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:69)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:61)
-Thread #x: pthread_cond_{timed}wait: cond is associated with a different mutex
- at 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc23_bogus_condwait.c:78)
+Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
+ ...
+ ...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/deep-D.post.diff
=================================================
--- deep-D.post.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ deep-D.post.out 2010-08-10 00:25:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
8 3,264 3,264 3,200 64 0
9 3,672 3,672 3,600 72 0
98.04% (3,600B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
-
+->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
+ ->98.04% (3,600B) 0x........: (below main)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:10.000000000 -0500
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2010-08-10 00:26:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,18 @@
4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
+| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
+| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+|
+->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
+ ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/badjump.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- badjump.stderr.exp 2010-08-10 00:04:08.000000000 -0500
+++ badjump.stderr.out 2010-08-10 00:19:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
at 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /...libc...)
by 0x........: (below main)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, ...
[truncated message content] |
|
From: Rich C. <rc...@wi...> - 2010-08-10 04:17:16
|
Nightly build on macbook ( Darwin 9.8.0 i386 ) Started at 2010-08-09 23:05:00 CDT Ended at 2010-08-09 23:17:08 CDT Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... failed Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo Making check in . make addressable atomic_incs badaddrvalue badfree badjump badjump2 badloop badpoll badrw brk2 buflen_check calloc-overflow clientperm custom_alloc custom-overlap deep_templates describe-block doublefree error_counts errs1 exitprog execve execve2 erringfds file_locking fprw fwrite inits inline leak-0 leak-cases leak-cycle leak-pool leak-tree linux-syslog-syscall linux-syscalls-2007 long_namespace_xml long-supps mallinfo malloc_free_fill malloc_usable malloc1 malloc2 malloc3 manuel1 manuel2 manuel3 match-overrun memalign_test memalign2 memcmptest mempool mmaptest mismatches new_override metadata nanoleak_supp nanoleak2 new_nothrow noisy_child null_socket origin1-yes origin2-not-quite origin3-no origin4-many origin5-bz2 origin6-fp overlap partiallydefinedeq partial_load pdb-realloc pdb-realloc2 pipe pointer-trace post-syscall realloc1 realloc2 realloc3 sh-mem sh-mem-random sigaltstack signal2 sigprocmask sigkill strchr str_tester supp_unknown supp1 supp2 suppfree trivialleak un it_libcbase unit_oset varinfo1 varinfo2 varinfo3 varinfo4 varinfo5 varinfo5so.so varinfo6 vcpu_fbench vcpu_fnfns xml1 wrap1 wrap2 wrap3 wrap4 wrap5 wrap6 wrap7 wrap7so.so wrap8 writev gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../coregrind -I../../include -I../../VEX/pub -DVGA_amd64=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_amd64_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -arch x86_64 -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT addressable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/addressable.Tpo -c -o addressable.o addressable.c mv -f .deps/addressable.Tpo .deps/addressable.Po gcc -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -arch x86_64 -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -o addressable addressable.o gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../coregrind -I../../include -I../../VEX/pub -DVGA_amd64=1 -DVGO_darwin=1 -DVGP_amd64_darwin=1 -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g -arch x86_64 -mdynamic-no-pic -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-stack-protector -MT atomic_incs-atomic_incs.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/atomic_incs-atomic_incs.Tpo -c -o atomic_incs-atomic_incs.o `test -f 'atomic_incs.c' || echo './'`atomic_incs.c atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_8bit': atomic_incs.c:37: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_16bit': atomic_incs.c:101: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_32bit': atomic_incs.c:164: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' atomic_incs.c: In function 'atomic_add_64bit': atomic_incs.c:219: error: PIC register 'rbx' clobbered in 'asm' make[5]: *** [atomic_incs-atomic_incs.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 Congratulations, all tests passed! |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-08-10 02:55:00
|
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) Started at 2010-08-10 03:05:12 BST Ended at 2010-08-10 03:54:38 BST Results unchanged from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 546 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) |
|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2010-08-10 02:38:14
|
Nightly build on mg ( x86_64, Fedora 9 ) Started at 2010-08-10 03:10:04 BST Ended at 2010-08-10 03:37:53 BST Results differ from 24 hours ago Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 553 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) ================================================= == Results from 24 hours ago == ================================================= Checking out valgrind source tree ... done Configuring valgrind ... done Building valgrind ... done Running regression tests ... failed Regression test results follow == 553 tests, 3 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) none/tests/amd64/fxtract (stdout) none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) helgrind/tests/pth_spinlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr) ================================================= == Difference between 24 hours ago and now == ================================================= *** old.short Tue Aug 10 03:23:47 2010 --- new.short Tue Aug 10 03:37:53 2010 *************** *** 8,10 **** ! == 553 tests, 3 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) --- 8,10 ---- ! == 553 tests, 2 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 post failures == none/tests/amd64/bug132918 (stdout) *************** *** 12,14 **** none/tests/x86/fxtract (stdout) - helgrind/tests/pth_spinlock (stderr) helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) --- 12,13 ---- |