You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(152) |
Dec
(69) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(203) |
Dec
(182) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(307) |
Feb
(305) |
Mar
(430) |
Apr
(312) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(637) |
Sep
(336) |
Oct
(373) |
Nov
(441) |
Dec
(210) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(385) |
Feb
(480) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(544) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(625) |
Jul
(810) |
Aug
(838) |
Sep
(634) |
Oct
(521) |
Nov
(965) |
Dec
(543) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(494) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(546) |
Apr
(411) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(322) |
Jul
(256) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(345) |
Oct
(542) |
Nov
(308) |
Dec
(481) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(427) |
Feb
(326) |
Mar
(367) |
Apr
(255) |
May
(244) |
Jun
(204) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(231) |
Sep
(354) |
Oct
(374) |
Nov
(497) |
Dec
(362) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(482) |
Mar
(658) |
Apr
(422) |
May
(476) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(455) |
Aug
(267) |
Sep
(280) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(304) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(486) |
Feb
(470) |
Mar
(458) |
Apr
(423) |
May
(696) |
Jun
(461) |
Jul
(551) |
Aug
(575) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(157) |
Dec
(102) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(226) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(193) |
Aug
(238) |
Sep
(300) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(195) |
Mar
(315) |
Apr
(200) |
May
(267) |
Jun
(293) |
Jul
(353) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(278) |
Oct
(611) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(260) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(303) |
Feb
(391) |
Mar
(417) |
Apr
(441) |
May
(488) |
Jun
(655) |
Jul
(590) |
Aug
(610) |
Sep
(526) |
Oct
(478) |
Nov
(359) |
Dec
(372) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(391) |
Apr
(281) |
May
(299) |
Jun
(252) |
Jul
(311) |
Aug
(352) |
Sep
(481) |
Oct
(571) |
Nov
(222) |
Dec
(231) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(185) |
Feb
(329) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(399) |
Jul
(382) |
Aug
(500) |
Sep
(579) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(487) |
Dec
(256) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(338) |
Feb
(357) |
Mar
(330) |
Apr
(294) |
May
(191) |
Jun
(108) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(261) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(206) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(102) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(187) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(93) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(67) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(79) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
(5) |
3
(2) |
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
(1) |
|
8
(2) |
9
|
10
(3) |
11
(1) |
12
(7) |
13
|
14
(1) |
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
(1) |
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
(1) |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
(1) |
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2003-06-14 09:08:25
|
Alas, this is a bit subtle. pthread_once has always been broken and
is still broken. As of rev 1.127 it looks like this:
static pthread_mutex_t once_masterlock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
int __pthread_once ( pthread_once_t *once_control,
void (*init_routine) (void) )
{
int res;
ensure_valgrind("pthread_once");
res = __pthread_mutex_lock(&once_masterlock);
/* init routine called us again ? */
if (res != 0)
return 0;
if (*once_control == 0) {
*once_control = 1;
init_routine();
}
__pthread_mutex_unlock(&once_masterlock);
return 0;
}
Problem with this is "if (res != 0) return 0;". If the init_routine()
calls back here with the _same_ once_control, that's ok. But if it
calls with a different one, iow the init_routine is calling some other
init routine via pthread_once, then __pthread_once returns immediately
without running the new init routine.
An alternative formulation which has been suggested is
{
int res;
ensure_valgrind("pthread_once");
res = __pthread_mutex_lock(&once_masterlock);
if (*once_control == 0) {
*once_control = 1;
__pthread_mutex_unlock(&once_masterlock);
init_routine();
} else {
__pthread_mutex_unlock(&once_masterlock);
}
return 0;
}
This initially seems more promising. The global lock now protects just
the control variable. If init_routine calls back recursively with the
same once_control, the right thing happens (nothing). If it calls back
with some other once_control/init_routine pair, that is handled correctly
too. The problem is it fails to ensure the posix semantics that
2nd and subsequent callers with the same once_control are blocked
until the first caller returns.
The Linux manual pages are too vague and fail to mention this last constraint.
Go to http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/toc.htm and enter
pthread_once in the search box, to get the official POSIX definition.
Ideas? LinuxThreads seems to have a 3-state mechanism, where *once_control
can be 0, 1 or 2. 2 means completed. 0 means not started. 1 means the init
routine is still running, and so other callers have to block. It's all
complicated with stuff to do with handling fork() and cancellation points,
that I don't understand. Also I don't know whether or not LinuxThreads
uses one global lock, or one per thread.
J
On Friday 13 June 2003 13:24, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Update of /cvsroot/valgrind/valgrind/coregrind
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv8179
>
> Modified Files:
> vg_libpthread.c
> Log Message:
> don't bail out when pthread_once's init route calls itself recursively
>
>
> Index: vg_libpthread.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/valgrind/valgrind/coregrind/vg_libpthread.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.126
> retrieving revision 1.127
> diff -C2 -r1.126 -r1.127
> *** vg_libpthread.c 9 May 2003 23:40:34 -0000 1.126
> --- vg_libpthread.c 13 Jun 2003 12:24:41 -0000 1.127
> ***************
> *** 1501,1508 ****
> res = __pthread_mutex_lock(&once_masterlock);
>
> ! if (res != 0) {
> ! barf("pthread_once: Looks like your program's "
> ! "init routine calls back to pthread_once() ?!");
> ! }
>
> if (*once_control == 0) {
> --- 1501,1507 ----
> res = __pthread_mutex_lock(&once_masterlock);
>
> ! /* init routine called us again ? */
> ! if (res != 0)
> ! return 0;
>
> if (*once_control == 0) {
|