|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-06-23 13:20:44
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Chris January wrote: > I am trying to find a way to match function calls up with returns. > > [snip] > > I don't want the trampoline code instrumented so I decided to manually > insert a non-instrumneted copy (compiled from Ucode) in the translation > table. Unfortunately this requires the use of some internal functions > and is generally messy. > > Can anyone help me out here and suggest a better way to do what I'm > doing? A better way for matching call/ret pairs, or a better way for the trampoline bit? If the latter, can you give more detail about your current approach -- the description you've given is too vague to be much use. Can you insert UCode before a RET that calls your trampoline code? N |