|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2004-08-09 16:18:10
|
In message <20040809160451.GC28119@ugly.local>
Oswald Buddenhagen <os...@kd...> wrote:
> btw, ever thought about valgrinding valgrind (which valgrinds another
> valgrind :)? with a dynamic load address this shouldn't be a major
> problem any more. ok, for me, even the most trivial "valgrind valgrind"
> just segfaults, but i suppose this is easily fixable.
Oh we've though about it. We'd dearly love to be able to do it and
one day we might get there. It certainly isn't trivial however.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (th...@cy...)
Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
http://www.cyberscience.com/
|