|
From: D. B. <db...@en...> - 2004-08-05 13:22:13
|
ok, great. now where do i put this snippet - because it doesn't belong in the file mentioned in the earliest post... (or if it does - i don't see how). is there someone willing to 'modernize' this patch for the clueless user (me ;) thanks very much. Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Jeff Dike wrote: > >> It feels to me more like the valgrind thread runs a system call with no >> perceptible effect, and there's this new thread all of a sudden which >> runs >> happily in this address space because it can't tell that valgrind is >> there. > > > To summarise: you seem to be confident there won't be any problems, and > Tom's not so sure. I'm not sure either, but the > threads/signals/syscalls stuff is the part of Valgrind I understand the > least. I would say, just don't be shocked if you do this and weird > things start happening :) > > N |