|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-08-03 12:56:21
|
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, pkr wrote: >> That looks like a header bug, which you're likely to get no matter which >> gcc version you use. I'm no expert on header bugs, unfortunately. > > The same gcc compiles 2.0.0 which is what I was trying to use in the > first place and landed into reloc error. That's because 2.1.2 uses the header which is broken on FC1, whereas 2.0.0 doesn't. The gcc version is irrelevant. To summarise: - it shouldn't matter which gcc you use - using 2.1.2 should fix the bug you encountered with 2.0.0 - but you'll have to fix your broken header as Tom suggested to compile 2.1.2 HTH N |