|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2004-02-05 10:31:15
|
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 02:21, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > > - In POST(epoll_wait), I check if the result is > 0 before doing the > > > SYSCALL_TRACK, and the size argument relies on the result, rather than > > > arg3. > > > > The check is redundant - POST(x) is never called if the syscall didn't > > succeed. > > It can succeed and still return 0; if it does, we don't want to to call > post_mem_write because nothing has been written (and the size arg would be > 0). Ah, OK. J |