|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2004-03-18 18:44:58
|
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 01:19, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > I only partly understand this thread, but reading it I'm thinking: this > all sounds very complicated for something that only(?) affects FC2... can > we avoid doing anything, or do something simple? It makes me > uncomfortable every time we have to build in some special handling for a > particular version of a library or whatever. Just an observation. No, it isn't library-specific. It's actually a new(ish) kernel interface, which libraries are starting to use. Ultimately it's cosmetic though; it's about showing the right function when we're showing the backtrace of a thread in a syscall. This patch works for me with --pointercheck=no. Unfortunately, just copying the linux-gate.so into the client address space isn't enough. J |