|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2004-02-29 01:34:48
|
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Julian Seward wrote: > > I think all the other problems could be handled by allowing multiple > > expected outputs, as Julian suggested. I'll look into changing the > > script. The only question is if you have multiple acceptable outputs, if > > none of them match, which do you use to form the .diff file? I figure > > it can give a .diff for every acceptable output, eg. .diff, .diff2, > > .diff3... > > I'd vote for that, viz, one .diff file for each acceptable output. Done. N |