|
From: Doug R. <df...@nl...> - 2004-02-05 18:46:50
|
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 18:27, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 07:13, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > On Thursday 05 February 2004 14:21, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > > > > > coregrind/arch/x86 > > > coregrind/arch/x86-freebsd > > > coregrind/arch/x86-linux > > > > IMHO yes, plus the linux-common subdirectory which Jeremy suggested. I was > > waiting for further feedback on the FreeBSD port (as suggested by J) to not > > mess up the CVS repository again when importing it. > > > > if we could finally agree then I can arrange the tree as necessary on the > > server so that we don't loose the commit history. > > Well, I need to give the patch another going over. Then should I send > it to you so you can commit it with all the renames, etc? > > If you do move things around on the server, does that mean we can ever > get back to an older version (ie, with the old layout)? The only way of doing that in CVS is to copy the rcs files to the new locations (renaming any tags, e.g. by prepending 'old') and then using 'cvs rm' to remove the old locations. Subversion is a lot better at this kind of thing - I'm using subversion locally to track my FreeBSD stuff and periodically merge from valgrind cvs. |