|
From: Doug R. <df...@nl...> - 2004-01-23 22:29:15
|
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 21:34, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 10:28, Doug Rabson wrote: > > Well if you are planning to drop this feature, it should tighten up the > > code generation for the low-overhead tools since you won't need the > > dec/test/branch at the beginning of each block, I guess. > > No, that code is there for thread context switching - the scheduler > switches to a new thread after N basic blocks (50000, I think). It's > use in --stop-after is secondary. I hadn't thought of that. Oh well - it seemed like a good idea at the time :-) |