Re: [Valgrind-developers] Rearranging the tree

[Jeremy F. <je...@go...>]

On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 00:35, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Why not go with a directory structure that looks like the one
> in for example glibc? 

Because I can never work out how glibc actually builds itself, and I
don't want the directory tree to get too deep.

> Of course, in glibc all these dirs are located in sysdeps/
> I think the "common" suffix and prefix make it too messy.
> And why not "unix-common" instead of "common-unix"? i386-linux
> vs linux-i386?

Well, autoconf seems to use the form CPU-OS; common-unix means "any cpu,
unixish OS".

	J