|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2004-01-03 23:52:25
|
In message <3FF...@ey...>
Eyal Lebedinsky <ey...@ey...> wrote:
> Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> > I also need the --time-stamp patch which I mentioned on
> > the list a few times in the past, but it somehow was
> > never accepted (what do I have to get it in?). I really
> > need it for analysing reports in a client/server environment.
> > I am attaching this patch against cvs.
>
> Patch now really attached...
This feature was also requested in bug 70587 and I've just posted a
patch there to add it. It's a bit different from yours because it is
desigmed for the CVS head so can use libc's localtime instead of
having to reimplement it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (th...@cy...)
Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
http://www.cyberscience.com/
|