|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2003-12-28 13:15:19
|
On Saturday 27 December 2003 17:02, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > Most of the > > syscall hairy bits should also help to get NetBSD and OpenBSD going too. > > I have ended up with a bit of an ifdef tangle in a few places but that > > might be best managed by simply forking a few of the source files > > (vg_kerneliface.h, vg_syscalls.c and similar). My patch is currently > > about 130k (as a unified diff against 2.1.0. > > Yes. ideally we should start with a directory structure and move the linux > specific files in a subdir, and fork them for other operating systems or > architectures. I agree with Dirk. Ports are of course a good thing, but we need structure. Can you make a proposal for how to adjust the directory structure so as to accommodate these x86 unixes as cleanly/modularly as possible? Then we can think about adding the FreeBSD stuff to the cvs. Solaris-x86 is another potential target, btw. Thanks, J |