|
From: Doug R. <df...@nl...> - 2003-12-27 17:54:00
|
On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 17:02, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Saturday 27 December 2003 15:40, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > Is there any interest here in merging support for FreeBSD? > > Absolutely yes. > > > Most of the > > syscall hairy bits should also help to get NetBSD and OpenBSD going too. > > I have ended up with a bit of an ifdef tangle in a few places but that > > might be best managed by simply forking a few of the source files > > (vg_kerneliface.h, vg_syscalls.c and similar). My patch is currently > > about 130k (as a unified diff against 2.1.0. > > Yes. ideally we should start with a directory structure and move the linux > specific files in a subdir, and fork them for other operating systems or > architectures. > > which files did you have to modify most? vg_syscalls and kerneliface, anything > else? Most of the really serious hacking was in vg_mylibc, vg_proxylwp, vg_signals, vg_syscalls and vg_kerneliface. Most of the rest of the changes are simple things (like working around the lack of ksa_restorer). |