Re: [Valgrind-users] mysterious error in running valgrind

[Tom H. <th...@cy...>]

In message <874...@rg...>
          rg...@sd... (Rob Ristroph) wrote:

> ulimit -n gave 256 in one case and 1024 in another.  I have fixed my
> problem -- you cannot believe how relieved this makes me, as valgrind
> is very important to solving some persistent problems I'm having.  You
> have my complete appreciation and thanks.
> 
> I haven't tried it with the CVS HEAD or even any of the other versions
> yet.

You should find that it works with the CVS head as that version now
automatically adjusts the limit at startup, and will cope with a lower
limit even if it can't adjust it.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (th...@cy...)
Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
http://www.cyberscience.com/