Re: [Valgrind-users] 2.6 kernel support

[Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...>]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Looks like valgrind 2.1.0 and cvs are missing the syscalls
> #define __NR_epoll_create       254
> #define __NR_epoll_ctl          255
> #define __NR_epoll_wait         256
>
> I see that there's a patch for valgrind-2.0.0 to add epoll support
> at http://www.fefe.de/diffs/
> Perhaps you could try 2.0.0 with that patch.
>
> It'd be nice if the epoll support made it into cvs sometime...

I thought it wasn't as simple as adding the entries to vg_syscalls.c, that
it might sort-of work, but really deeper changes were needed... but that
might be wrong.  Anyone else know more?

N