Re: [Valgrind-users] 2.1.0 Syscall error reporting

[Jeremy F. <je...@go...>]

On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 16:12, Robert Walsh wrote:
> > No, I meant that --trace-fds (rather than -v) should probably turn on
> > stack traces for all this stuff, since you're clearly interested in fds.
> 
> I see.  Actually, Steve's follow-up point was probably more valid,
> though: always print a backtrace when you print this error.

It can get pretty noisy.  There's quite a few programs which do lots of
indiscriminate closing of fds.

	J