|
From: Robert W. <rj...@du...> - 2003-12-27 00:12:17
|
> No, I meant that --trace-fds (rather than -v) should probably turn on > stack traces for all this stuff, since you're clearly interested in fds. I see. Actually, Steve's follow-up point was probably more valid, though: always print a backtrace when you print this error. |