|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2003-11-25 09:02:54
|
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Andriy Rysin wrote: > sorry, just found out that this patch breaks posix_memalign. It was ok > for that small example but when I tried valgrind on my bigger project it > seems like posix_memalign sets pointer to 0 and returns 22 (EINVAL), > while valgrind w/out this patch or just w/valgrind altogether code works > fine. > I did not have much time to investigate it more, I allocate about > 800*600*3/2 with align 16. > If more info needed I'll try to take a look when it breaks. That would help, thanks. N |