|
From: Mathieu M. <Mat...@cr...> - 2003-10-24 02:41:10
|
Hayati Ayg=FCn wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 >> I have found some post on the cygwin ML reporting that valgrind=20 >> could be built on cygwin. I just want to: >=20 >=20 > 1. would you forward this message? http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg00014.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg00000.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01258.html Ok now I might habe been a fool to believe this. Sorry about that, but=20 you can use valgrind without knowing the exact internal mechanism, right = ? >=20 >> - Make sure it's real >> - If so could someone point me out where are the patch(s) to apply= =20 >> to make it compile >=20 >=20 > 2. i can't believe this. i think there is support from the kernel=20 > through the proc system necessary. but i'm unsure on how it works. in a= n=20 > earlier version of valgrind it was on the way calling gdb. Hum, could someone else confirm on this. I thought valgrind could be=20 ported on *BSD too. Finally what is the main problem -if there is only one- that prevent=20 valgrind to be used under cygwin ? Thanks a lot mathieu |