disInstr: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0xF 0x2E 0x5 (was: Re: [Valgrind-users] Memcheck: mc_translate.c:1108 (memcheck_instrument): Assertion `u_in->size == 4 || u_in->size == 16' failed.)

[<jhr...@t-...>]

Dear Nicholas,

you wrote:

> > when running one of my regression tests built with ICC 7.1 under the
newly
> > released valgrind I see the following assertion failure:
> >
> > Memcheck: mc_translate.c:1108 (memcheck_instrument): Assertion
`u_in->size
> > == 4 || u_in->size == 16' failed.
>
> It's a bug, change the line to this:
>
>    sk_assert(u_in->size == 4 || u_in->size == 8 || u_in->size == 16);

Done. This fixed the original problem. Now it seems I'm again stuck with a
missing instruction:

----------
==1989== Memcheck, a.k.a. Valgrind, a memory error detector for x86-linux.
==1989== Copyright (C) 2002-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward.
==1989== Using valgrind-20031012, a program supervision framework for
x86-linux.
==1989== Copyright (C) 2000-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward.
==1989== Estimated CPU clock rate is 1716 MHz
==1989== For more details, rerun with: -v
==1989==
test_vector
double, unbounded_array
v1 = v2 = [3](1,2,3)
v1.assign_temporary (v2) = [3](1,2,3)
v1.swap (v2) = [3](1,2,3) [3](1,2,3)
- v1 = [3](-1,-2,-3)
conj (v1) = [3](1,2,3)
v1 + v2 = [3](2,4,6)
v1 - v2 = [3](0,0,0)
element_prod (v1, v2) = [3](1,4,9)
1. * v1 = [3](1,2,3)
N * v1 = [3](3,6,9)
v1 * 1. = [3](1,2,3)
v1 * N = [3](3,6,9)
v2 += v1 = [3](2,4,6)
v2 -= v1 = [3](1,2,3)
v1 *= 1. = [3](1,2,3)
v1 *= N = [3](3,6,9)
sum (v1) = 6
norm_1 (v1) = 6
disInstr: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0xF 0x2E 0x5
==1989== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
==1989==    at 0x8050AB0: (within
/usr/local/lib/boost_dev/boost/libs/numeric/ublas/test1/bin/test1/intel-linu
x/release/runtime-link-dynamic/test1)
==1989==
==1989== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
==1989==    at 0x0: ???
==1989==    Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or free'd
----------

Thanks very much for your help,
Joerg