|
From: Paul F. <pj...@wa...> - 2025-11-17 07:05:58
|
> On 17 Nov 2025, at 05:35, Philippe Waroquiers via valgrind-testresults <val...@li...> wrote: > > valgrind revision: valgrind-3.27.0.GIT-fafb6efd4b-20251116 > C compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) > GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7 > Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.27-44.base.el7_9.1 > C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17 > uname -mrs: Linux 3.10.0-1160.105.1.el7.ppc64 ppc64 > Vendor version: CentOS Linux 7 (AltArch) > > Nightly build on gcc110 ( \S, ppc64 ) > Started at 2025-11-17 03:00:09 UTC > Ended at 2025-11-17 04:35:31 UTC > Results differ from 24 hours ago > > Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done > Configuring valgrind ... done > Building valgrind ... done > Running regression tests ... failed > > Regression test results follow > > == 774 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == > memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) > none/tests/fdleak_ipv4 (stderr) Tonight I’ll see if I can reproduce and understand the fdleak_ipv4 failure A+ Paul |