From: Florian K. <fl...@ei...> - 2025-10-03 16:29:17
|
Hi Mark, thanks for taking the time. On 02.10.25 22:53, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > That looks nice (I do have a wording nitpick, but feel free to ignore > if you feel no-print is more clear than html). Agreed. > I wouldn't integrate the make dist with the post-regtest-checks > though. It wouldn't have caught the issue because it only generates > the tar ball. make distcheck would have caught it, but I think that > make distcheck should be a separate step/check (it does multiple > builds and takes a long time even with BUILD_DOCS=none). True enough. I am going to check this in with your suggested changes. Florian |