|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2003-11-20 17:33:48
|
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 01:40, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > We've mentioned before the idea of dropping Valgrind's libpthread.so, and > just doing some low-level clone() interception... would that get around > any/all this NPTL/TLS nastiness? > > That option does have some other downsides, though, particularly it makes > it harder to tell tools when interesting pthread events (eg. mutex_lock) > occur. Yes it would solve the TLS problem, but you'd lose all the other benefits of having our own libpthread. I don't think its a good trade-off. J |